Wikia

Psychology Wiki

Changes: Transhistoricity

Edit

Back to page

(Created page with "{{SocPsy}} {{PsyPerspective}} '''Transhistoricity''' is the quality of holding throughout human history, not merely within the frame of reference of a particular form of [[societ...")
 
 
Line 3: Line 3:
 
'''Transhistoricity''' is the quality of holding throughout human history, not merely within the frame of reference of a particular form of [[society]] at a particular stage of historical development. An entity or concept that has transhistoricity is said to be '''transhistorical'''.
 
'''Transhistoricity''' is the quality of holding throughout human history, not merely within the frame of reference of a particular form of [[society]] at a particular stage of historical development. An entity or concept that has transhistoricity is said to be '''transhistorical'''.
   
Certain theories of history, (e.g. that of [[Historicism#Hegelian_historicism|Hegel]]), treat human history as divided into distinct [[historical period|epoch]]s with their own internal [[logic]]s - [[historical materialism]] is the most famous case of such a theory. States of affairs which hold within one epoch may be completely absent, or carry opposite implications in another, according to these theories.
+
Certain theories of history, (e.g. that of [[Historicism#Hegelian_historicism|Hegel]]), treat human history as divided into distinct historical periods or epochs with their own internal [[logic]]s - [[historical materialism]] is the most famous case of such a theory. States of affairs which hold within one epoch may be completely absent, or carry opposite implications in another, according to these theories.
   
 
==In the abstract==
 
==In the abstract==
Transhistoricity may be seen as the necessary [[antithesis]] to the idea that [[meanings]] are bounded by their historical context. It is the temporal equivalent of the spatial concept of [[Universality (philosophy)|universality]].
+
Transhistoricity may be seen as the necessary antithesis to the idea that [[meanings]] are bounded by their historical context. It is the temporal equivalent of the spatial concept of [[Universality (philosophy)|universality]].
   
 
==In sociopolitical theory==
 
==In sociopolitical theory==

Latest revision as of 19:50, October 5, 2011

Assessment | Biopsychology | Comparative | Cognitive | Developmental | Language | Individual differences | Personality | Philosophy | Social |
Methods | Statistics | Clinical | Educational | Industrial | Professional items | World psychology |

Social psychology: Altruism · Attribution · Attitudes · Conformity · Discrimination · Groups · Interpersonal relations · Obedience · Prejudice · Norms · Perception · Index · Outline


This article needs rewriting to enhance its relevance to psychologists..
Please help to improve this page yourself if you can..


Transhistoricity is the quality of holding throughout human history, not merely within the frame of reference of a particular form of society at a particular stage of historical development. An entity or concept that has transhistoricity is said to be transhistorical.

Certain theories of history, (e.g. that of Hegel), treat human history as divided into distinct historical periods or epochs with their own internal logics - historical materialism is the most famous case of such a theory. States of affairs which hold within one epoch may be completely absent, or carry opposite implications in another, according to these theories.

In the abstractEdit

Transhistoricity may be seen as the necessary antithesis to the idea that meanings are bounded by their historical context. It is the temporal equivalent of the spatial concept of universality.

In sociopolitical theoryEdit

Questions of what might and might not be transhistorical phenomena are typically the concern of historians and sociologists identifying with the historicist traditions of Hegelian or Marxian thought, but matter additionally in the debates around Kuhn's notion of paradigm shift and similar discussions.

Others look for transhistorical continuities to inform what's basic to the human condition. For example, Simonton (1976),[1] finds some regularities in the types of ideas that gain ascendancy following certain types of historical events, in a data series spanning 2,500 years.

In more recent years, research in the vicinity of evolutionary psychology has proceeded on the basis that some observed transcultural regularities in human behaviour are also transhistoric, accounted for by their being fixed in the genetic legacy common to all Homo sapiens.


References Edit

  1. Simonton, D. K. (1976g). 'The sociopolitical context of philosophical beliefs: A transhistorical causal analysis'. Social Forces, 54, pp:513-523.


This page uses Creative Commons Licensed content from Wikipedia (view authors).

Around Wikia's network

Random Wiki