Wikia

Psychology Wiki

Changes: Thatcher effect

Edit

Back to page

(Overview)
m (Reverted edits by 68.184.212.95 (talk | block) to last version by Dr Joe Kiff)
 
Line 4: Line 4:
   
 
==Overview==
 
==Overview==
The effect is illustrated by two originally identical photos,<ref>http://www.faculty.ucr.edu/~rosenblu/VSinvertedspeech.html</ref> which are inverted. The second picture is obviously altered so that the eyes and mouth are vertically flipped, though the changes are not immediately obvious until the image is viewed in normal orientation.
+
The effect is illustrated by two originally identical photos,<ref>http://www.faculty.ucr.edu/~rosenblu/VSinvertedspeech.html</ref> which are inverted. The second picture is obviously altered so that the eyes and mouth are vertically flipped, though the changes are not immediately obvious until the image is viewed in normal orientation.
   
This is thought to be due to specific psychological processes involved in [[face perception]] which are tuned especially to upright faces. Faces seem unique despite the fact that they are getting high. It has been hypothesised that we develop specific processes to differentiate between faces that rely as much on the configuration (the structural relationship between individual features on the face) as the details of individual face features, such as the [[Human eye|eyes]], [[human nose|nose]] and [[mouth]]. When a face is upside down, the configural processing cannot take place, and so minor differences are more difficult to detect.
+
This is thought to be due to specific psychological processes involved in [[face perception]] which are tuned especially to upright faces. Faces seem unique despite the fact that they are very similar. It has been hypothesised that we develop specific processes to differentiate between faces that rely as much on the configuration (the structural relationship between individual features on the face) as the details of individual face features, such as the [[Human eye|eye]]s, [[human nose|nose]] and [[mouth]]. When a face is upside down, the configural processing cannot take place, and so minor differences are more difficult to detect.
   
This effect is not present in people who have some forms of [[prosopagnosia]], a disorder where face processing is impaired, usually acquired after brain injury or illness. This suggests that their specific brain injury may damage the process that analyses facial structures.
+
This effect is not present in people who have some forms of [[prosopagnosia]], a disorder where face processing is impaired, usually acquired after brain injury or illness. This suggests that their specific brain injury may damage the process that analyses facial structures.
   
[[Rhesus monkeys]] also show the Thatcher effect (Adachi, et al., 2009), raising the possibility that some brain mechanisms involved in processing faces may have evolved in a common ancestor 30+ million years ago. drugs
+
[[Rhesus monkeys]] also show the Thatcher effect (Adachi, et al., 2009), raising the possibility that some brain mechanisms involved in processing faces may have evolved in a common ancestor 30+ million years ago.
   
 
==See also==
 
==See also==

Latest revision as of 00:36, March 20, 2012

Assessment | Biopsychology | Comparative | Cognitive | Developmental | Language | Individual differences | Personality | Philosophy | Social |
Methods | Statistics | Clinical | Educational | Industrial | Professional items | World psychology |

Cognitive Psychology: Attention · Decision making · Learning · Judgement · Memory · Motivation · Perception · Reasoning · Thinking  - Cognitive processes Cognition - Outline Index


File:Iain MTeffect.jpg
The Thatcher Effect

The Thatcher effect or Thatcher illusion is a phenomenon where it becomes difficult to detect local feature changes in an upside down face, despite identical changes being obvious in an upright face. It is named after British former Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher on whose photograph the effect has been most famously demonstrated. This was originally created by Peter Thompson, (Thompson, 1980).

OverviewEdit

The effect is illustrated by two originally identical photos,[1] which are inverted. The second picture is obviously altered so that the eyes and mouth are vertically flipped, though the changes are not immediately obvious until the image is viewed in normal orientation.

This is thought to be due to specific psychological processes involved in face perception which are tuned especially to upright faces. Faces seem unique despite the fact that they are very similar. It has been hypothesised that we develop specific processes to differentiate between faces that rely as much on the configuration (the structural relationship between individual features on the face) as the details of individual face features, such as the eyes, nose and mouth. When a face is upside down, the configural processing cannot take place, and so minor differences are more difficult to detect.

This effect is not present in people who have some forms of prosopagnosia, a disorder where face processing is impaired, usually acquired after brain injury or illness. This suggests that their specific brain injury may damage the process that analyses facial structures.

Rhesus monkeys also show the Thatcher effect (Adachi, et al., 2009), raising the possibility that some brain mechanisms involved in processing faces may have evolved in a common ancestor 30+ million years ago.

See alsoEdit

ReferencesEdit

Original articleEdit

Further investigationsEdit

Recognition timesEdit

  • Carbon, C. C., & Leder, H. (2005). When feature information comes first! Early processing of inverted faces. Perception, 34(9), 1117-1134.
  • Sjoberg, W., & Windes, J. D. (1992). Recognition times for rotated normal and 'Thatcher' faces. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 75(3, Pt 2), 1176-1178.
  • Stuerzel, F., & Spillmann, L. (2000). Thatcher illusion: dependence on angle of rotation. Perception, 29(8), 937-942.

Developmental aspectsEdit

  • Lewis, M. B. (2003). Thatcher's children: Development and the Thatcher illusion. Perception, 32(12), 1415-1421.
  • Rouse, H., Donnelly, N., Hadwin, J. A., & Brown, T. (2004). Do children with autism perceive second-order relational features? The case of the Thatcher illusion. J Child Psychol Psychiatry, 45(7), 1246-1257.

ProsopagnosiaEdit

  • Carbon, C. C., Grüter, T., Weber, J. E., & Lueschow, A. (2007). Faces as objects of non-expertise: Processing of Thatcherised faces in congenital prosopagnosia. Perception, 36(11), 1635-1645.

EEGEdit

  • Carbon, C. C., Schweinberger, S. R., Kaufmann, J. M., & Leder, H. (2005). The Thatcher Illusion seen by the brain: An event-related brain potentials study. Cognitive Brain Research, 24(3), 544-555.

Evidence from nonhuman speciesEdit

  • Adachi, I., Chou, D.P., Hampton, R.R., Thatcher Effect in Monkeys Demonstrates Conservation of Face Perception across Primates, Current Biology (2009), doi:10.1016/j.cub.2009.05.067.

External links Edit


This page uses Creative Commons Licensed content from Wikipedia (view authors).

Around Wikia's network

Random Wiki