Psychology Wiki
Advertisement

I have some difficulties with the latest additions. As this is a professional site we have to be particulalry careful about the quality of references used. I dont think the Skeptical Inquirer is an appropriate source. Can you improve on the referencing. How do we know Elizabeth has been involved in hundreds of cases? The contribution is welcome but needs tightening to professional standards. What criticism has been voiced in the psychological literature about her work? Dr Joe Kiff 17:42, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Advertisement