Wikia

Psychology Wiki

Structure-activity relationship

Talk0
34,143pages on
this wiki

Assessment | Biopsychology | Comparative | Cognitive | Developmental | Language | Individual differences | Personality | Philosophy | Social |
Methods | Statistics | Clinical | Educational | Industrial | Professional items | World psychology |

Biological: Behavioural genetics · Evolutionary psychology · Neuroanatomy · Neurochemistry · Neuroendocrinology · Neuroscience · Psychoneuroimmunology · Physiological Psychology · Psychopharmacology (Index, Outline)


This article is in need of attention from a psychologist/academic expert on the subject.
Please help recruit one, or improve this page yourself if you are qualified.
This banner appears on articles that are weak and whose contents should be approached with academic caution
.

Structure-activity relationship { SAR } is the traditional Practices of medicinal chemistry which try to modify the effect or the potency {ie. Activity} of Bioactive chemical compound by modifying its chemical structure. traditional medicinal chemists were using the chemical techniques of synthesis to insert new chemical groups into the biomedical compound and test the modifications in its biological Effect .

That enabled them to determine the responsible chemical groups for evoking the biological effect in the organism . Later this method has been developed into trial to build mathematical relationships between the Chemical structure and the biological activity , that is what is know as Qsar .

SAR and SAR paradoxEdit

The basic assumption for all molecule based hypotheses is that similar molecules have similar activities. This principle is also called Structure-Activity Relationship (SAR). The underlying problem is therefore how to define a small difference on a molecular level, since each kind of activity, e.g. reaction ability, biotransformation ability, solubility, target activity, and so on, might depend on another difference. A good example was given in the bioisosterism review of Patanie/LaVoie.[1]

From the computer science standpoint, the no-free-lunch theorem proves that no general algorithm can exist to define e.g. a small difference for always getting the best hypothesis.

In general, one is more interested in finding strong trends. Created hypotheses usually rely on a finite number of chemical data. Thus, the induction principle should be respected to avoid overfitted hypotheses and deriving overfitted and useless interpretations on structural/molecular data.

The SAR paradox refers to the fact that it is not the case that all similar molecules have similar activities.

ReferencesEdit

  1. G. A. Patani, E. J. LaVoie, Bioisosterism: A Rational Approach in Drug Design. Chem. Rev., 1996, 96, 3147-3176. DOI:10.1021/cr950066q

Around Wikia's network

Random Wiki