Methods | Statistics | Clinical | Educational | Industrial | Professional items | World psychology |
Self psychology is a school of psychoanalytic theory and therapy created by Heinz Kohut and developed in the United States at the Chicago Institute for Psychoanalysis. Self psychology explains psychopathology as being the result of disrupted or unmet developmental needs. Essential to understanding Self psychology are the concepts of empathy, self-object, mirroring, idealising, alter ego/twinship and the tripolar self. Though self psychology also recognizes certain drives, conflicts and complexes present in Freudian psychodynamic theory, these are understood within a different framework.
Kohut started out with an idealizing image of Freud and his theories, but with self-psychology, he ended up going back to the roots of psychology, viewing therapy as a "talking cure" rather than an analytical process. After almost a century of conflicting, but working, theories of the mind, Kohut argued that what made therapy work, was more about the patient, than the analytical theories. To make therapy work, one needed to address the patient's self.
Kohut's concept of self, and "defects" in it, is the core variable of self-psychology, where for instance superego/ego/id and oedipal conflicts could be considered to be the core of Freudian theory. The self is thought to be an adaptable structure, with a static core, defined in early life.
Psychopathology is observed with regard to how the self adapts and reacts to other objects. For the therapist, the patient's self is also examined with regard to how to approach the patient.
Kohut maintained that parents' failures to empathize with their children and the responses of their children to these failures were 'at the root of almost all psychopathology' . Correspondingly, he emphasized the use of empathy as a tool in therapy.
Kohut describes human empathy as a therapeutic skill. When a patient acts in a certain way, "put yourself in his/her shoes" - and find out how it feels for the patient to act in this manner.
Using the skill of empathy, the therapist is able to reach conclusions sooner (with less dialogue and interpretation), and there is also a stronger bond between patient and therapist, making the patient feel more fundamentally understood. The implicit bond of empathy itself has a curing effect, according to Kohut.
The conceptual introduction of empathy was not intended to be a "discovery." Empathic moments in psychology existed long before Kohut. Instead, Kohut posited that empathy in psychology should be acknowledged as a powerful therapeutic tool, extending beyond "hunches" and vague "assumptions," and enabling empathy to be described, taught, and used more actively.
Selfobjects are external objects that function as part of the "self machinery." In other words, they are persons, objects or activities that "complete" the self, and which are necessary for normal functioning. Observing the patient's selfobject connections is a fundamental part of self-psychology. For instance, a person's particular habits, choice of education and work, taste in life partners, may fill a selfobject-function for that particular individual.
Selfobjects are addressed throughout Kohut's theory, and include everything from the transference phenomenon in therapy, relatives, and items (for instance Linus van Pelt's security blanket). If psychopathology is explained as an "incomplete" or "defect" self, then the self-objects can be described as a self-prescribed "cure".
As described by Kohut, the selfobject-function (ie. what the selfobject does for the self) is taken for granted and seems to take place in a "blindzone." The function thus usually does not become "visible" until the relation with the selfobject is somehow broken.
When a relationship is established with a new selfobject, the relationship connection can "lock in place" quite powerfully, and the pull of the connection may affect both self and selfobject. Powerful transference, for instance, is an example of this phenomenon.
When a selfobject is needed, but not accessible, this will create a potential problem for the self, referred to as a "frustration." This is solved, optimally, by imagining the object's presence, thus creating a "surrogate" selfobject until the selfobject is available.
If the frustration is solved too eagerly, this means that the imagined presence may not develop it's "surrogate" function. On the other hand, if the frustration response is suboptimal, the "surrogate" image may become too important.
Suboptimal frustrations and maladaptations following them, may be compared to, for instance, Freud's trauma concept, the concept could also be considered reminiscent of problem solution in the oedipal phase. However, the scope of optimal frustration describes shaping of every "nook and cranny" of the self, rather than a few dramatic conflicts.
The need to establish a mutual selfobject connection with an object of idealization.
Alter ego/Twinship needsEdit
Alter ego/Twinship needs concern the need to feel alikeness to other human beings . This need relaxes as development continues allowing a greater degree of difference from others to be accepted .
The Tripolar SelfEdit
The tripolar self is not associated with bipolar disorder, but is the sum of the three "poles" of the body:
- "grandiose-exhibitionistic needs"
- "the need for an omnipotent idealized figure"
- "alter-ego needs"
The tripolar self forms as a result of the needs of an individual binding with the interactions of other significant persons within the life of that individual.
References & BibliographyEdit
- Bacal, H., & Newman, K. (1990). Theories of object relations: Bridges to self psychology. N.Y.: Columbia University Press.
- Galatzer Levy, R.M., & Cohler, B.J. (1993). The essential other: A developmental psychology of the self. N.Y.: Basic Books.
- Goldberg, A. (Ed). Progress in self psychology. (Series of edited books). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
- Goldberg, A. (1978). The psychology of the self: A casebook. New York, NY: International Universities Press.
- Goldberg, A. (1995). The problem of perversion: The view from self psychology. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
- Goldberg, A. (1999). Being of two minds: The vertical split in psychoanalysis and psychotherapy. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
- Kohut, H. (1966). Forms and transformations of narcissism. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 14, 243-272.
- Kohut, H. (1968). The psychoanalytic treatment of narcissistic personality disorders. The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 23, 86-113.
- Kohut, H. (1971). The analysis of the self. New York: International Universities Press.
- Kohut, H. (1972). Thoughts on narcissism and narcissistic rage. Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 27, 360-400.
- Kohut, H. (1977). The restoration of the self. New York: International Universities Press.
- Kohut, H. (1978). The disorders of the self and their treatment: An outline. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 59, 413-425.
- Kohut, H. (1984). How does psychoanalysis cure? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Lichtenberg, J.D. (1989). Psychoanalysis and motivation. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
- Wolf, E.S. (1988). Treating the self: Elements of clinical self psychology. New York: Guildford Press.
- Self Psychology Page, published by David Wolf
- The International Council for Psychoanalytic Self Psychology website
|This page uses Creative Commons Licensed content from Wikipedia (view authors).|