No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| (7 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
There are a number of factors leading to this development |
There are a number of factors leading to this development |
||
| − | * The philosophies of [[evidence |
+ | * The philosophies of [[evidence-based practice]] and |
| − | + | Practice-based evidence both favour the production of clinical outcome data in order to facilitate clinical decision making. |
|
*The development if a number of convenient instruments has meant that clinicans with an interest in exploring the outcome of their work have easy, and sometimes free, access to the appropriate tools |
*The development if a number of convenient instruments has meant that clinicans with an interest in exploring the outcome of their work have easy, and sometimes free, access to the appropriate tools |
||
*Purchasers of psychological treatments, whether individuals, or organizations are increasingly calling for data demonstrating treatment efffectiveness. |
*Purchasers of psychological treatments, whether individuals, or organizations are increasingly calling for data demonstrating treatment efffectiveness. |
||
*Clinical managers increasingly call for such data in order to monitor the services provided |
*Clinical managers increasingly call for such data in order to monitor the services provided |
||
| + | {{TOCright}} |
||
==Instruments suitable for the routine assessment of clinical outcome== |
==Instruments suitable for the routine assessment of clinical outcome== |
||
| Line 25: | Line 26: | ||
===Papers=== |
===Papers=== |
||
| + | *Slade, M., Thornicroft, G. and Glover, G. (1999) The feasibility of routine outcome measures in mental health. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 34, 243-249 |
||
| − | Sperlinger, D. (2002). Outcome assessment in routine clinical practice in psychosocial services. Measuring Outcomes in Routine Clinical Practice, I. Leicester: British Psychological Society (Division of Clinical Psychology). |
+ | *Sperlinger, D. (2002). Outcome assessment in routine clinical practice in psychosocial services. Measuring Outcomes in Routine Clinical Practice, I. Leicester: British Psychological Society (Division of Clinical Psychology).[http://www.psige.org/psige-pdfs/BPS%20Measuring%20Outcomes%20in%20Routine%20Clinical%20Practice%20Paper%201.pdf Full text] |
| + | |||
==Additional material== |
==Additional material== |
||
===Books=== |
===Books=== |
||
Latest revision as of 01:03, 26 March 2008
Assessment |
Biopsychology |
Comparative |
Cognitive |
Developmental |
Language |
Individual differences |
Personality |
Philosophy |
Social |
Methods |
Statistics |
Clinical |
Educational |
Industrial |
Professional items |
World psychology |
Clinical: Approaches · Group therapy · Techniques · Types of problem · Areas of specialism · Taxonomies · Therapeutic issues · Modes of delivery · Model translation project · Personal experiences ·
Routine outcome assessment or Routine Outcome Measurement (ROM) is increasingly being adopted as part of everyday clinical practice.
There are a number of factors leading to this development
- The philosophies of evidence-based practice and
Practice-based evidence both favour the production of clinical outcome data in order to facilitate clinical decision making.
- The development if a number of convenient instruments has meant that clinicans with an interest in exploring the outcome of their work have easy, and sometimes free, access to the appropriate tools
- Purchasers of psychological treatments, whether individuals, or organizations are increasingly calling for data demonstrating treatment efffectiveness.
- Clinical managers increasingly call for such data in order to monitor the services provided
Instruments suitable for the routine assessment of clinical outcome
See also
References & Bibliography
Key texts
Books
Papers
- Slade, M., Thornicroft, G. and Glover, G. (1999) The feasibility of routine outcome measures in mental health. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 34, 243-249
- Sperlinger, D. (2002). Outcome assessment in routine clinical practice in psychosocial services. Measuring Outcomes in Routine Clinical Practice, I. Leicester: British Psychological Society (Division of Clinical Psychology).Full text