Quasiperfect equilibrium
this wiki
Ad blocker interference detected!
Wikia is a freetouse site that makes money from advertising. We have a modified experience for viewers using ad blockers
Wikia is not accessible if you’ve made further modifications. Remove the custom ad blocker rule(s) and the page will load as expected.
Assessment 
Biopsychology 
Comparative 
Cognitive 
Developmental 
Language 
Individual differences 
Personality 
Philosophy 
Social 
Methods 
Statistics 
Clinical 
Educational 
Industrial 
Professional items 
World psychology 
Statistics: Scientific method · Research methods · Experimental design · Undergraduate statistics courses · Statistical tests · Game theory · Decision theory

Quasiperfect equilibrium is a refinement of Nash Equilibrium for extensive form games due to Eric van Damme. Informally, a player playing by a strategy from a quasiperfect equilibrium takes observed as well as potential future mistakes of his opponents into account but assumes that he himself will not make a mistake in the future, even if he observes that he has done so in the past. Quasiperfect equilibrium is a further refinement of sequential equilibrium. It is itself refined by normal form proper equilibrium.
Mertens' voting game Edit
It has been argued by JeanFrançois Mertens that quasiperfect equilibrium is superior to Reinhard Selten's notion of extensiveform trembling hand perfect equilibrium as a quasiperfect equilibrium is guaranteed to describe admissible behavior. In contrast, for a certain twoplayer voting game no extensiveform trembling hand perfect equilibrium describes admissible behavior for both players.
The voting game suggested by Mertens may be described as follows: Two players must elect one of them to perform an effortless task. The task may be performed either correctly or incorrectly. If it is performed correctly, both players receive a payoff of 1, otherwise both players receive a payoff of 0. The election is by a secret vote. If both players vote for the same player, that player gets to perform the task. If each player votes for himself, the player to perform the task is chosen at random but is not told that he was elected this way. Finally, if the players vote for each other, the task is performed by somebody else, with no possibility of it being performed incorrectly.
In the unique quasiperfect equilibrium for the game, each player votes for himself. This is also the unique admissible behavior. But in any extensiveform trembling hand perfect equilibrium, at least one of the players believes that he is at least as likely as the other player to perform the task incorrectly and hence votes for the other player.
The example illustrates that being a limit of equilibria of perturbed games, an extensiveform trembling hand perfect equilibrium implicitly assumes an agreement between the players about the relative magnitudes of future trembles. It also illustrates that such an assumption may be unwarranted and undesirable.
References Edit
Eric van Damme. "A relationship between perfect equilibria in extensive form games and proper equilibria in normal form games." International Journal of Game Theory 13:113, 1984.
JeanFrançois Mertens. "Two examples of strategic equilibrium." Games and Economic Behavior, 8:378388, 1995.
This page uses Creative Commons Licensed content from Wikipedia (view authors). 