Assessment | Biopsychology | Comparative | Cognitive | Developmental | Language | Individual differences | Personality | Philosophy | Social |
Methods | Statistics | Clinical | Educational | Industrial | Professional items | World psychology |

Psychology: Debates · Journals · Psychologists

The format of the peer review report follows the Criteria for peer review approval on the Psychology Wiki

• Date:

• Reviewer:

• Affiliation:

• Name of article reviewed:[[]]

• Recommended outcome of the review: Passed/Requires further work/Recommended for deletion.

Is the article appropriate for inculsion in the Psychology WikiEdit

Does the article provide a clear statement of the current position of knowledge in the areaEdit

Does it make clear, or link to clear accounts, of any technical definitions, the theoretical background, the methodologies employed, information on prominent workers or research groups in the area, etc.Edit

Does it contain and use the main references in the areaEdit

Does it reflect, or link to accurate accounts of, the diverse views, interpretations etc within the fieldEdit

Recommendations for further development of the article or linking materialEdit