Assessment |
Biopsychology |
Comparative |
Cognitive |
Developmental |
Language |
Individual differences |
Personality |
Philosophy |
Social |

Methods |
Statistics |
Clinical |
Educational |
Industrial |
Professional items |
World psychology |

**Statistics:**
Scientific method ·
Research methods ·
Experimental design ·
Undergraduate statistics courses ·
Statistical tests ·
Game theory ·
Decision theory

In statistics, the **phi coefficient** *φ* or *r*_{φ} is a measure of association for two binary variables. This measure is similar to the Pearson correlation coefficient in its interpretation. In fact, a Pearson correlation coefficient estimated for two binary variables will return the phi coefficient.^{[1]} The Phi coefficient is also related to the chi-square statistic for a 2×2 contingency table (see Pearson's_chi-square_test)^{[2]}

where *n* is the total number of observations. Two binary variables are considered positively associated if most of the data falls along the diagonal cells. In contrast, two binary variables are considered negatively associated if most of the data falls off the diagonal. If we have a 2×2 table for two random variables *x* and *y*

y = 1 | y = 0 | total | |

x = 1 | |||

x = 0 | |||

total |

where *n*_{11}, *n*_{10}, *n*_{01}, *n*_{00}, are non-negative "cell cell counts" that sum to *n*, the total number of observations. The phi coefficient that describes the association of *x* and *y* is

## Maximum values Edit

Although computationally the Pearson correlation coefficient reduces to the phi coefficient in the 2×2 case, the interpretation of a Pearson correlation coefficient and phi coefficient must be taken cautiously. The Pearson correlation coefficient ranges from −1 to +1, where ±1 indicates perfect agreement or disagreement, and 0 indicates no relationship. The phi coefficient has a maximum value that is determined by the distribution of the two variables. If both have a 50/50 split, the range of phi will range from −1 to +1. See Davenport El-Sanhury (1991) ^{[3]} for a thorough discussion.

## See alsoEdit

## ReferencesEdit

- ↑ Guilford, J. (1936). Psychometric Methods. New York: McGraw–Hill Book Company, Inc.
- ↑ Everitt B.S. (2002)
*The Cambridge Dictionary of Statistics*, CUP. ISBN 0-521-81099-x - ↑ Davenport, E., & El-Sanhury, N. (1991). Phi/Phimax: Review and Synthesis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 51, 821–828.