No edit summary |
m (Automatically delinking centuries and decades using popups) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
In the United States this refers to the practice of courts, while not ordering [[involuntary commitment]], of requiring those it has found to be mentally ill to take medication or to comply with other restrictions. The courts will often specify that if the orders are not complied with, the person under court order will be subject to involuntary commitment. |
In the United States this refers to the practice of courts, while not ordering [[involuntary commitment]], of requiring those it has found to be mentally ill to take medication or to comply with other restrictions. The courts will often specify that if the orders are not complied with, the person under court order will be subject to involuntary commitment. |
||
| − | In the last decade of the |
+ | In the last decade of the 20th century and the first of the 21st, there were "outpatient commitment" laws passed in a number of states in the [[United States]] and jurisdictions in [[Canada]], in response to a small number of violent acts committed by people who had been diagnosed with [[mental illness]], or the existing "outpatient commitment" laws were expanded. These laws were opposed by the [[anti-psychiatry]] and [[Psychiatric survivors movement|mad liberation]] movements, often on the basis that the ordered drugs had (or were alleged to have) serious or unpleasant side-effects. |
Other countries and states have different laws with some requiring court hearings and others requiring that treating psychiatrists comply with a set of requirements before compulsory treatment is instituted. When a court process is not required there is usually a form of appeal to the courts or appeal to or scrutiny by tribunals set up for that purpose. Community treatment laws have generally followed the worldwide trend of [[psychiatric hospital|community treatment]]. See [[mental health law]] for details of countries which do not have laws that regulate compulsory treatment. |
Other countries and states have different laws with some requiring court hearings and others requiring that treating psychiatrists comply with a set of requirements before compulsory treatment is instituted. When a court process is not required there is usually a form of appeal to the courts or appeal to or scrutiny by tribunals set up for that purpose. Community treatment laws have generally followed the worldwide trend of [[psychiatric hospital|community treatment]]. See [[mental health law]] for details of countries which do not have laws that regulate compulsory treatment. |
||
Revision as of 22:51, 25 August 2006
Assessment |
Biopsychology |
Comparative |
Cognitive |
Developmental |
Language |
Individual differences |
Personality |
Philosophy |
Social |
Methods |
Statistics |
Clinical |
Educational |
Industrial |
Professional items |
World psychology |
Clinical: Approaches · Group therapy · Techniques · Types of problem · Areas of specialism · Taxonomies · Therapeutic issues · Modes of delivery · Model translation project · Personal experiences ·
Outpatient commitment refers to mental health law which allows the compulsory, community-based treatment of individuals with mental illness.
In the United States this refers to the practice of courts, while not ordering involuntary commitment, of requiring those it has found to be mentally ill to take medication or to comply with other restrictions. The courts will often specify that if the orders are not complied with, the person under court order will be subject to involuntary commitment.
In the last decade of the 20th century and the first of the 21st, there were "outpatient commitment" laws passed in a number of states in the United States and jurisdictions in Canada, in response to a small number of violent acts committed by people who had been diagnosed with mental illness, or the existing "outpatient commitment" laws were expanded. These laws were opposed by the anti-psychiatry and mad liberation movements, often on the basis that the ordered drugs had (or were alleged to have) serious or unpleasant side-effects.
Other countries and states have different laws with some requiring court hearings and others requiring that treating psychiatrists comply with a set of requirements before compulsory treatment is instituted. When a court process is not required there is usually a form of appeal to the courts or appeal to or scrutiny by tribunals set up for that purpose. Community treatment laws have generally followed the worldwide trend of community treatment. See mental health law for details of countries which do not have laws that regulate compulsory treatment.
See also
- E. Fuller Torrey
- International Center for the Study of Psychiatry and Psychology
- Involuntary treatment
- Kendra's Law
- Laura's Law
- MindFreedom International
- Treatment Advocacy Center
External links
- Psychlaws.org - 'A Guide to Laura’s Law: California's New Law for Assisted Outpatient Treatment', The California Treatment Advocacy Coalition and The Treatment Advocacy Center (January, 2003)
- Keys to Commitment (A Guide for Family Members) by Robert J. Kaplan, J.D.
- State-by-state chart of U.S. commitment laws
- MindFreedom.org - 'Bill for More Forced Psychiatry Passed by California Legislature, Goes to Governor', California Network of Mental Health Clients (September 3 2002)
| This page uses Creative Commons Licensed content from Wikipedia (view authors). |