Wikia

Psychology Wiki

Changes: Ontologies

Edit

Back to page

m (Removing link to empty page 20th century using popups)
(Update WP)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{PhilPsy}}
 
{{PhilPsy}}
In [[philosophy]], '''ontology''' (from the [[Greek language|Greek]] {{polytonic|ὄν}}, genitive {{polytonic|ὄντος}}: ''being'' (part. of {{polytonic|εἶναι}}: ''to be'') and [[-logy|-λογία]]: ''writing about'', ''study of'') is the most fundamental branch of [[metaphysics]]. It studies [[being]] or [[existence]] as well as the [[category of being|basic categories]] thereof—trying to find out what [[entity|entities]] and what [[type theory|types of entities]] exist. Ontology has strong implications for the conceptions of [[reality]].
+
In philosophy, '''ontology''' (from the Greek {{polytonic|ὄν}}, genitive {{polytonic|ὄντος}}: ''of being'' (part. of {{polytonic|εἶναι}}: ''to be'') and [[-logy|-λογία]]: ''science'', ''study'', ''theory'') is the study of [[being]] or [[existence]]. It seeks to describe or posit the [[category of being|basic categories]] and relationships of being or existence to define [[entity|entities]] and [[type theory|types of entities]] within its framework. Ontology can be said to study conceptions of [[reality]].
   
Some philosophers, notably of the [[Plato]]nic school, contend that all nouns refer to entities. Other philosophers contend that some nouns do not name entities but provide a kind of shorthand way of referring to a collection (of either objects or events). In this latter view, ''[[mind]]'', instead of referring to an entity, refers to a collection of ''mental events'' experienced by a person; ''[[society]]'' refers to a collection of persons with some shared characteristics, and ''[[geometry]]'' refers to a collection of a specific kind of intellectual activity. Any ontology must give an account of which words refer to entities, which do not, why, and what categories result. When one applies this process to nouns such as ''[[electron]]s'', ''[[energy]]'', ''[[contract]]'', ''[[happiness]]'', ''[[time]]'', ''[[truth]]'', ''[[causality]]'', and ''[[god]]'', ontology becomes fundamental to many branches of philosophy.
+
Some philosophers, notably of the [[Plato]]nic school, contend that all nouns refer to entities. Other philosophers contend that some nouns do not name entities but provide a kind of shorthand way of referring to a collection (of either objects or events). In this latter view, ''[[mind]]'', instead of referring to an entity, refers to a collection of ''mental events'' experienced by a person; ''[[society]]'' refers to a collection of persons with some shared characteristics, and ''[[geometry]]'' refers to a collection of a specific kind of intellectual activity. Any ontology must give an account of which words refer to entities, which do not, why, and what categories result. When one applies this process to nouns such as ''electrons'', ''energy'', ''contract'', ''[[happiness]]'', ''time'', ''truth'', ''causality'', and ''God'', ontology becomes fundamental to many branches of philosophy.
   
 
== Some basic questions ==
 
== Some basic questions ==
   
Ontology has one basic question: "What are the fundamental categories of being?" Different [[philosophers]] make different lists of such fundamental categories of being.
+
Ontology has one basic question: "What actually exists?" Different philosophers provide different answers to this question.
   
This highlights one of the problems of the philosophical approach—it relies on continued investigation of categories, and has no clear way to stop asking. In [[theology]], [[library and information science|library science]] and [[artificial intelligence]], in contrast, one typically adopts a relatively stable [[foundation ontology]]. This avoids some problems with the philosophical approach which has a larger base of [[cosmology]] and probably also [[morals]] and aesthetic examples or stories, each of which can set foundational priorities. In [[theology]] this base derives from a [[religion]] and its (relatively) stable doctrines.
+
One common approach is to divide the extant entities into groups called "categories". However, these lists of categories are also quite different from one another. It is in this latter sense that ontology is applied to such fields as theology, [[information science|information science]] and [[artificial intelligence]].
   
 
Further examples of ontological questions include:
 
Further examples of ontological questions include:
# What is [[existence]]?
+
* What is [[existence]]?
# What are [[physical object]]s?
+
* Is existence a property?
# What are the essential, as opposed to merely accidental, attributes of a given object?
+
* Why does anything exist rather than nothing?
# What constitutes the ''[[Identity (philosophy)|identity]]'' of an object?
+
* What constitutes the ''[[Identity (philosophy)|identity]]'' of an object?
# Can one give an account of [[the existence of physical objects|what it means to say that a physical object exists]]?
+
* What is a [[physical object]]?
# What are an object's [[properties]] or relations and how are they related to the object itself?
+
* What features are the essential, as opposed to merely accidental, attributes of a given object?
# Is existence a property?
+
* Can one give an account of [[the existence of physical objects|what it means to say that a physical object exists]]?
# When does an object go ''out'' of existence, as opposed to merely ''[[change|changing]]''?
+
* What are an object's [[properties]] or relations and how are they related to the object itself?
# Why does something exist rather than nothing?
+
* When does an object go ''out'' of existence, as opposed to merely ''[[change|changing]]''?
   
 
== Concepts ==
 
== Concepts ==
Line 26: Line 26:
   
 
* [[Universal_(metaphysics)|Universals]]
 
* [[Universal_(metaphysics)|Universals]]
* [[Substance]]
+
* [[Substance theory|Substance]]
   
 
== Early history of ontology ==
 
== Early history of ontology ==
   
The concept of ontology is generally thought to have originated in early [[Greece]] and occupied [[Plato]] and [[Aristotle]]. Since the word is of Greek origin its current meaning and application are certainly sourced from Greek culture. Aristotle described ontology as "the science of being ''qua'' being". The word '' 'qua' '' means 'in the capacity of'. According to this theory, then, ontology is the science of being inasmuch as it is being, or the study of ''beings'' insofar as they exist. Take anything you can find in the world, and look at it, not as a puppy or a slice of pizza or a folding chair or a president, but just as something that ''is''. More precisely, ontology concerns determining what ''[[category of being|categories of being]]'' are fundamental and asks whether, and in what sense, the items in those categories can be said to "be".
+
The concept of ontology is generally thought to have originated in early Greece] and occupied [[Plato]] and [[Aristotle]]. While the etymology is Greek, the oldest extant record of the word itself is the Latin form ''ontologia'', which appeared in 1606, in the work ''Ogdoas Scholastica'' by Jacob Lorhard (''Lorhardus'') and in 1613 in the ''Lexicon philosophicum'' by Rudolf Göckel (''Goclenius'').
  +
The first occurrence in English of "ontology" as recorded by the OED appears in Bailey’s dictionary of 1721, which defines ontology as ‘an Account of being in the Abstract’. However its appearance in a dictionary indicates it was in use already at that time. It is likely the word was first used in its latin form by philosophers based on the latin roots, which themselves are based on the Greek.
   
Prior to Greek philosophy these questions were debated in ancient India by many philosophers and thinkers. The names of a few of these have come down to us today. The most notable secular philosophers are Raja (King) [[Janaka]] and Rajamuni (Royal Sage) Kapila. Kapila's Samkhya philosophy asked and answers many ontological questions posed by the Greek philosophers. The most distinguishing fact concerning Kapila's ontology is that it is entirely secular in nature.
+
Students of Aristotle first used the word 'metaphysica' (literally "after the physical") to
  +
refer to the work their teacher described as "the science of being ''qua'' being". The word '' 'qua' '' means 'in the capacity of'. According to this theory, then, ontology is the science of being inasmuch as it is being, or the study of ''beings'' insofar as they exist. Take anything you can find in the world, and look at it, not as a puppy or a slice of pizza or a folding chair or a president, but just as something that ''is''. More precisely, ontology concerns determining what ''[[category of being|categories of being]]'' are fundamental and asks whether, and in what sense, the items in those categories can be said to "be".
  +
  +
Ontological questions have also been raised and debated by thinkers in the ancient civilizations of India and China, in some cases perhaps predating the Greek thinkers who have become associated with the concept.
   
 
== Subject, relationship, object ==
 
== Subject, relationship, object ==
Line 38: Line 38:
 
"What exists", "What is", "What am I", "What is describing this to me", all exemplify questions about being, and highlight the most basic problems in ontology: finding a subject, a relationship, and an object to talk about. During the [[the Age of Enlightenment|Enlightenment]] the view of [[René Descartes]] that "[[cogito ergo sum]]" ("I think therefore I am") had generally prevailed, although Descartes himself did not believe the question worthy of any deep investigation. However, Descartes was very religious in his [[philosophy]], and indeed argued that "[[cogito ergo sum]]" proved the existence of [[God]]. Later theorists would note the existence of the "[[Cartesian Other]]" — asking "who is reading that sentence about thinking and being?" — and generally concluded that it must be [[God]].
 
"What exists", "What is", "What am I", "What is describing this to me", all exemplify questions about being, and highlight the most basic problems in ontology: finding a subject, a relationship, and an object to talk about. During the [[the Age of Enlightenment|Enlightenment]] the view of [[René Descartes]] that "[[cogito ergo sum]]" ("I think therefore I am") had generally prevailed, although Descartes himself did not believe the question worthy of any deep investigation. However, Descartes was very religious in his [[philosophy]], and indeed argued that "[[cogito ergo sum]]" proved the existence of [[God]]. Later theorists would note the existence of the "[[Cartesian Other]]" — asking "who is reading that sentence about thinking and being?" — and generally concluded that it must be [[God]].
   
This answer, however, became increasingly unsatisfactory in the 20th century as the [[philosophy of mathematics]] and the [[philosophy of science]] and even [[particle physics]] explored some of the most fundamental barriers to knowledge about being. Sociological theorists, most notably George Herbert Mead and Erving Goffman, saw the Cartesian Other as a "Generalized Other," the imaginary audience that individuals use when thinking about the self. The Cartesian Other was also used by Freud, who saw the [[Ego, superego, and id|superego]] as an abstract regulatory force.
+
This answer, however, became increasingly unsatisfactory in the [[20th century]] as the [[philosophy of mathematics]] and the [[philosophy of science]] and even [[particle physics]] explored some of the most fundamental barriers to knowledge about being. Sociological theorists, most notably George Herbert Mead and Erving Goffman, saw the Cartesian Other as a "Generalized Other," the imaginary audience that individuals use when thinking about the self. The Cartesian Other was also used by Freud, who saw the [[Ego, superego, and id|superego]] as an abstract regulatory force.
   
 
== Body and environment ==
 
== Body and environment ==
   
Schools of [[metaphysical subjectivism|subjectivism]], [[metaphysical objectivism|objectivism]] and [[relativism]] existed at various times in the 20th century, and the [[postmodernism|postmodernists]] and [[embodied philosophy|body philosophers]] tried to reframe all these questions in terms of bodies taking some specific [[philosophy of action|action]] in an environment. This relied to a great degree on insights derived from scientific research into animals taking instinctive action in natural and artificial settings — as studied by [[biology]], [[ecology]], and [[cognitive science]].
+
Schools of [[metaphysical subjectivism|subjectivism]], [[metaphysical objectivism|objectivism]] and [[relativism]] existed at various times in the 20th century, and the [[postmodernism|postmodernists]] and [[embodied philosophy|body philosophers]] tried to reframe all these questions in terms of bodies taking some specific [[philosophy of action|action]] in an environment. This relied to a great degree on insights derived from scientific research into animals taking instinctive action in natural and artificial settings — as studied by biology, ecology, and [[cognitive science]].
   
The processes by which bodies related to environments became of great concern, and the idea of [[being]] itself became difficult to really define. What did people mean when they said "A is B", "A must be B", "A was B"...? Some linguists advocated dropping the verb "to be" from the English language, leaving "[[E-Prime|E Prime]]", supposedly less prone to bad abstractions. Others, mostly philosophers, tried to dig into the word and its usage. [[Martin Heidegger | Heidegger]] attempted to distinguish ''being'' and ''existence''.
+
The processes by which bodies related to environments became of great concern, and the idea of [[being]] itself became difficult to really define. What did people mean when they said "A is B", "A must be B", "A was B"...? Some linguists advocated dropping the verb "to be" from the English language, leaving "Prime", supposedly less prone to bad abstractions. Others, mostly philosophers, tried to dig into the word and its usage. [[Martin Heidegger | Heidegger]] attempted to distinguish ''being'' and ''existence''.
   
== Being ==
+
== Being and non-being ==
  +
{{section-stub}}
   
[[Existentialism]] regards ''[[being]]'' as a fundamental central concept. It is anything that can be said to 'be' ''in various senses of the word 'be'.'' The [[verb]] [[to be]] has many different meanings and can therefore be rather [[ambiguity|ambiguous]]. Because "to be" has so many different meanings, there are, accordingly, many different [[ways of being]].
+
[[Existentialism]] regards ''[[being]]'' as a fundamental central concept. It is anything that can be said to 'be' ''in various senses of the word 'be'.'' The verb to be has many different meanings and can therefore be rather ambiguous. Because "to be" has so many different meanings, there are, accordingly, many different [[ways of being]].
  +
  +
== Becoming ==
  +
{{section-stub}}
  +
  +
The first formal development of this notion within philosophy began with the [[pre-Socratic]] [[Heraclitus]], where he posited ''agon'' ("strife of opposites") as the ontological basis of all reality in terms of this endless transformative conflict, which was later contrasted and dominated by the [[Parmenides|Parmenidean]], or [[Platonic]], notion of Being, until more recent philosophers began a reversion of this trend.
  +
  +
Notably and the first to make such an advocation since Heraclitus was the nineteenth century German philosopher [[Friedrich Nietzsche]], who used the expression "the innocence of becoming", a fundamental element of his philosophical thought grounded in the "will to power as ''pathos''", as a means to describe the aesthetic qualities of existence, which pervades his thinking, including but not limited to ideas such as his "Dionysian world", "eternal recurrence", "amor fati", and "decadence". It was with this a-teleological view that he attempted to disgregate all views pertaining to the human condition, where "thingness" is ultimately characterized as a mere "hypothesis" in Nietzsche's phrase, and such a view, pertaining to the "inequality" of all "things", carries deep implications for ethics and the nature of knowledge.
   
 
== Social science ==
 
== Social science ==
   
Social scientists adopt one of four main ontological approaches: [[realism]] (the idea that facts are out there just waiting to be discovered), [[empiricism]] (the idea that we can observe the world and evaluate those observations in relation to facts), [[positivism]] (which focuses on the observations themselves, attentive more to claims about facts than to facts themselves), and [[post-modernism]] (which holds that facts are fluid and elusive, so that we should focus ''only'' on our observational claims).
+
Social scientists adopt one of four main ontological approaches: [[realism]] (the idea that facts are out there just waiting to be discovered), [[empiricism]] (the idea that we can observe the world and evaluate those observations in relation to facts), [[positivism]] (which focuses on the observations themselves, attentive more to claims about facts than to facts themselves), and [[postmodernism]] (which holds that facts are fluid and elusive, so that we should focus ''only'' on our observational claims).
   
 
== Prominent ontologists ==
 
== Prominent ontologists ==
Line 58: Line 58:
 
* [[Aquinas]]
 
* [[Aquinas]]
 
* [[Aristotle]]
 
* [[Aristotle]]
* [[Martin Heidegger|Heidegger, Martin]]
+
* [[Gilles Deleuze]]
  +
* [[Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel]]
  +
* [[Martin Heidegger]]
 
* [[Heraclitus]]
 
* [[Heraclitus]]
* [[Edmund Husserl|Husserl, Edmund]]
+
* [[Edmund Husserl]]
* [[Roman Ingarden|Ingarden, Roman]]
+
* [[Roman Ingarden]]
 
* [[Immanuel Kant]]
 
* [[Immanuel Kant]]
* [[Gottfried Leibniz|Leibniz, Gottfried]]
+
* [[Gottfried Leibniz]]
  +
* [[Friedrich Nietzsche]]
 
* [[Parmenides]]
 
* [[Parmenides]]
 
* [[Plato]]
 
* [[Plato]]
* [[W. V. Quine|Quine, W. V.]]
+
* [[W. V. Quine]]
 
* [[Gilbert Ryle]]
 
* [[Gilbert Ryle]]
* [[Jean-Paul Sartre|Sartre, Jean-Paul]]
+
* [[Jean-Paul Sartre]]
* [[Spinoza]]
+
* [[Baruch Spinoza]]
* [[Charles Taylor (philosopher)|Taylor, Charles]]
+
* [[Charles Taylor (philosopher)|Charles Taylor]]
* [[Ludwig Wittgenstein|Wittgenstein, Ludwig]]
+
* [[Ludwig Wittgenstein]]
   
 
==See also==
 
==See also==
Line 79: Line 79:
 
* [[Foundation ontology]]
 
* [[Foundation ontology]]
 
* [[Mereology]]
 
* [[Mereology]]
* [[Meta-modeling]]
+
* [[Meta-modeling|Metamodeling]] -- a [[Meta-model|metamodel]] is a simplified form of ontology
 
* [[Metaphysics]]
 
* [[Metaphysics]]
 
* [[Modal logic]]
 
* [[Modal logic]]
Line 92: Line 92:
 
* [[Taxonomy]]
 
* [[Taxonomy]]
 
* [[Theology]]
 
* [[Theology]]
  +
* [[Perfection]] ("Ontological and theological perfection")
  +
* [[Formal Ontology]]
   
 
== External links ==
 
== External links ==
   
* [http://www.formalontology.it/being-qua-being.htm Aristotle's definition of a science of Being qua Being: ancient and modern interpretations]
 
* [http://ontology.buffalo.edu/smith Barry Smith's Ontology Page]
 
* [http://ontology.buffalo.edu Buffalo Ontology Site]
 
* [http://www.eece.memphis.edu/cas/publications.htm Building a Sensor Ontology: A Practical Approach Leveraging ISO and OGC Models]
 
* [http://www.droit.univ-paris5.fr/HTMLpages/enseignants/staff/delforge/recherche/publications/WsEKAW2000.pdf Designing medical law ontology from technical texts and core ontology]
 
* [http://ncor.us National Center for Ontological Research]
 
* [http://ncbo.us National Center for Biomedical Ontology]
 
 
* [http://www.formalontology.it Ontology. A resource guide for philosophers]
 
* [http://www.formalontology.it Ontology. A resource guide for philosophers]
* [[Clay Shirky]]: [http://www.shirky.com/writings/ontology_overrated.html Ontology is Overrated]
 
* [http://www.landcglobal.com/pages/whitepapers.php White papers by L&C, a medicinal domain-oriented ontology provider]
 
 
   
 
{{Philosophy (navigation)}}
 
{{Philosophy (navigation)}}
Line 113: Line 105:
   
 
[[af:Ontologie]]
 
[[af:Ontologie]]
  +
[[ar:أنتولوجيا]]
  +
[[zh-min-nan:Pún-thé-lūn]]
 
[[bg:Онтология]]
 
[[bg:Онтология]]
 
[[cs:Ontologie]]
 
[[cs:Ontologie]]
Line 120: Line 114:
 
[[es:Ontología]]
 
[[es:Ontología]]
 
[[eo:Ontologio]]
 
[[eo:Ontologio]]
  +
[[eu:Ontologia]]
  +
[[fa:هستی‌شناسی]]
 
[[fr:Ontologie (philosophie)]]
 
[[fr:Ontologie (philosophie)]]
 
[[io:Ontologio]]
 
[[io:Ontologio]]
  +
[[ia:Ontologia]]
 
[[it:Ontologia]]
 
[[it:Ontologia]]
 
[[he:תורת ההוויה]]
 
[[he:תורת ההוויה]]
Line 131: Line 128:
 
[[pl:Ontologia]]
 
[[pl:Ontologia]]
 
[[pt:Ontologia]]
 
[[pt:Ontologia]]
  +
[[ro:Ontologie]]
 
[[ru:Онтология]]
 
[[ru:Онтология]]
 
[[sk:Ontológia]]
 
[[sk:Ontológia]]
  +
[[sl:Ontologija]]
  +
[[sr:Онтологија]]
 
[[fi:Ontologia]]
 
[[fi:Ontologia]]
 
[[sv:Ontologi]]
 
[[sv:Ontologi]]
 
[[tr:Ontoloji]]
 
[[tr:Ontoloji]]
 
[[zh:本体论]]
 
[[zh:本体论]]
  +
 
{{enWP|Ontology}}
 
{{enWP|Ontology}}

Revision as of 14:31, August 31, 2006

Assessment | Biopsychology | Comparative | Cognitive | Developmental | Language | Individual differences | Personality | Philosophy | Social |
Methods | Statistics | Clinical | Educational | Industrial | Professional items | World psychology |

Philosophy Index: Aesthetics · Epistemology · Ethics · Logic · Metaphysics · Consciousness · Philosophy of Language · Philosophy of Mind · Philosophy of Science · Social and Political philosophy · Philosophies · Philosophers · List of lists


In philosophy, ontology (from the Greek ὄν, genitive ὄντος: of being (part. of εἶναι: to be) and -λογία: science, study, theory) is the study of being or existence. It seeks to describe or posit the basic categories and relationships of being or existence to define entities and types of entities within its framework. Ontology can be said to study conceptions of reality.

Some philosophers, notably of the Platonic school, contend that all nouns refer to entities. Other philosophers contend that some nouns do not name entities but provide a kind of shorthand way of referring to a collection (of either objects or events). In this latter view, mind, instead of referring to an entity, refers to a collection of mental events experienced by a person; society refers to a collection of persons with some shared characteristics, and geometry refers to a collection of a specific kind of intellectual activity. Any ontology must give an account of which words refer to entities, which do not, why, and what categories result. When one applies this process to nouns such as electrons, energy, contract, happiness, time, truth, causality, and God, ontology becomes fundamental to many branches of philosophy.

Some basic questions

Ontology has one basic question: "What actually exists?" Different philosophers provide different answers to this question.

One common approach is to divide the extant entities into groups called "categories". However, these lists of categories are also quite different from one another. It is in this latter sense that ontology is applied to such fields as theology, information science and artificial intelligence.

Further examples of ontological questions include:

  • What is existence?
  • Is existence a property?
  • Why does anything exist rather than nothing?
  • What constitutes the identity of an object?
  • What is a physical object?
  • What features are the essential, as opposed to merely accidental, attributes of a given object?
  • Can one give an account of what it means to say that a physical object exists?
  • What are an object's properties or relations and how are they related to the object itself?
  • When does an object go out of existence, as opposed to merely changing?

Concepts

Quintessential ontological concepts include:

Early history of ontology

The concept of ontology is generally thought to have originated in early Greece] and occupied Plato and Aristotle. While the etymology is Greek, the oldest extant record of the word itself is the Latin form ontologia, which appeared in 1606, in the work Ogdoas Scholastica by Jacob Lorhard (Lorhardus) and in 1613 in the Lexicon philosophicum by Rudolf Göckel (Goclenius). The first occurrence in English of "ontology" as recorded by the OED appears in Bailey’s dictionary of 1721, which defines ontology as ‘an Account of being in the Abstract’. However its appearance in a dictionary indicates it was in use already at that time. It is likely the word was first used in its latin form by philosophers based on the latin roots, which themselves are based on the Greek.

Students of Aristotle first used the word 'metaphysica' (literally "after the physical") to refer to the work their teacher described as "the science of being qua being". The word 'qua' means 'in the capacity of'. According to this theory, then, ontology is the science of being inasmuch as it is being, or the study of beings insofar as they exist. Take anything you can find in the world, and look at it, not as a puppy or a slice of pizza or a folding chair or a president, but just as something that is. More precisely, ontology concerns determining what categories of being are fundamental and asks whether, and in what sense, the items in those categories can be said to "be".

Ontological questions have also been raised and debated by thinkers in the ancient civilizations of India and China, in some cases perhaps predating the Greek thinkers who have become associated with the concept.

Subject, relationship, object

"What exists", "What is", "What am I", "What is describing this to me", all exemplify questions about being, and highlight the most basic problems in ontology: finding a subject, a relationship, and an object to talk about. During the Enlightenment the view of René Descartes that "cogito ergo sum" ("I think therefore I am") had generally prevailed, although Descartes himself did not believe the question worthy of any deep investigation. However, Descartes was very religious in his philosophy, and indeed argued that "cogito ergo sum" proved the existence of God. Later theorists would note the existence of the "Cartesian Other" — asking "who is reading that sentence about thinking and being?" — and generally concluded that it must be God.

This answer, however, became increasingly unsatisfactory in the 20th century as the philosophy of mathematics and the philosophy of science and even particle physics explored some of the most fundamental barriers to knowledge about being. Sociological theorists, most notably George Herbert Mead and Erving Goffman, saw the Cartesian Other as a "Generalized Other," the imaginary audience that individuals use when thinking about the self. The Cartesian Other was also used by Freud, who saw the superego as an abstract regulatory force.

Body and environment

Schools of subjectivism, objectivism and relativism existed at various times in the 20th century, and the postmodernists and body philosophers tried to reframe all these questions in terms of bodies taking some specific action in an environment. This relied to a great degree on insights derived from scientific research into animals taking instinctive action in natural and artificial settings — as studied by biology, ecology, and cognitive science.

The processes by which bodies related to environments became of great concern, and the idea of being itself became difficult to really define. What did people mean when they said "A is B", "A must be B", "A was B"...? Some linguists advocated dropping the verb "to be" from the English language, leaving "Prime", supposedly less prone to bad abstractions. Others, mostly philosophers, tried to dig into the word and its usage. Heidegger attempted to distinguish being and existence.

Being and non-being

Existentialism regards being as a fundamental central concept. It is anything that can be said to 'be' in various senses of the word 'be'. The verb to be has many different meanings and can therefore be rather ambiguous. Because "to be" has so many different meanings, there are, accordingly, many different ways of being.

Becoming

The first formal development of this notion within philosophy began with the pre-Socratic Heraclitus, where he posited agon ("strife of opposites") as the ontological basis of all reality in terms of this endless transformative conflict, which was later contrasted and dominated by the Parmenidean, or Platonic, notion of Being, until more recent philosophers began a reversion of this trend.

Notably and the first to make such an advocation since Heraclitus was the nineteenth century German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche, who used the expression "the innocence of becoming", a fundamental element of his philosophical thought grounded in the "will to power as pathos", as a means to describe the aesthetic qualities of existence, which pervades his thinking, including but not limited to ideas such as his "Dionysian world", "eternal recurrence", "amor fati", and "decadence". It was with this a-teleological view that he attempted to disgregate all views pertaining to the human condition, where "thingness" is ultimately characterized as a mere "hypothesis" in Nietzsche's phrase, and such a view, pertaining to the "inequality" of all "things", carries deep implications for ethics and the nature of knowledge.

Social science

Social scientists adopt one of four main ontological approaches: realism (the idea that facts are out there just waiting to be discovered), empiricism (the idea that we can observe the world and evaluate those observations in relation to facts), positivism (which focuses on the observations themselves, attentive more to claims about facts than to facts themselves), and postmodernism (which holds that facts are fluid and elusive, so that we should focus only on our observational claims).

Prominent ontologists

See also

External links


af:Ontologie

ar:أنتولوجيا zh-min-nan:Pún-thé-lūn bg:Онтология cs:Ontologie da:Ontologi (filosofi) de:Ontologie et:Ontoloogia es:Ontología eo:Ontologio eu:Ontologia fa:هستی‌شناسی fr:Ontologie (philosophie) io:Ontologio ia:Ontologiahe:תורת ההוויה la:Ontologia lt:Ontologija nl:Ontologie (filosofie)no:Ontologipt:Ontologia ro:Ontologie ru:Онтология sk:Ontológia sl:Ontologija sr:Онтологија fi:Ontologia sv:Ontologizh:本体论

This page uses Creative Commons Licensed content from Wikipedia (view authors).

Around Wikia's network

Random Wiki