Psychology Wiki
Register
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{ClinPsy}}
 
{{ClinPsy}}
   
The '''Oedipus conflict''' or '''[[complex_(psychology)|complex]]''' is a concept developed by [[Sigmund Freud]] to explain the origin of certain [[neurosis|neuroses]] in childhood. It is defined as a child's unconscious desire for the exclusive love of the parent of the opposite sex. This desire includes jealousy toward the parent of the same sex and the unconscious wish for that parent's death. Freud used the term to describe the unconscious feelings of children of both sexes toward their parents. However, later researchers used the term [[Electra complex]] for the the same phenomena in girls. (In Greek myth, [[Electra]], daughter of [[Agamemnon]], helped plan the murder of her mother). Freud and his ideas were a primary inspiration for [[Carl Jung]], who further described the concept and coined the term "complex".
+
The '''Oedipus conflict''' or '''[[complex_(psychology)|complex]]''' is a concept developed by [[Sigmund Freud]] to explain the origin of certain [[neurosis|neuroses]] in childhood. It is defined as a child's unconscious desire for the exclusive love of the parent of the opposite sex. This desire includes jealousy toward the parent of the same sex and the unconscious wish for that parent's death. Freud used the term to describe the unconscious feelings of children of both sexes toward their parents. However, later researchers used the term [[Electra complex]] for the the same phenomena in girls. (In Greek myth, Electra, daughter of Agamemnon, helped plan the murder of her mother). Freud and his ideas were a primary inspiration for [[Carl Jung]], who further described the concept and coined the term "complex".
   
The idea is based on the [[Greek mythology|Greek]] [[myth]] of [[Oedipus]], who kills his father [[Laius]] and marries his mother [[Jocasta]]. The Oedipus conflict, or Oedipus complex, was described as a state of psychosexual development and awareness first occurring around the age of 5 and a half years (a period known as the [[phallic stage]] in Freudian theory).
+
The idea is based on the Greek myth of Oedipus, who kills his father Laius and marries his mother Jocasta. The Oedipus conflict, or Oedipus complex, was described as a state of psychosexual development and awareness first occurring around the age of 5 and a half years (a period known as the [[phallic stage]] in Freudian theory).
   
 
== Theory of the Oedipus complex ==
 
== Theory of the Oedipus complex ==
   
Relying on material from his self-analysis and on [[anthropology|anthropological]] studies of [[totemism]], Freud developed the Oedipus complex as an explanation of the formation of the [[superego]]. The traditional paradigm in a (male) child's [[psychology|psychological]] coming-into-being is to first select the mother as the object of [[libido|libidinal]] investment. This however is expected to arouse the father's anger, and the infant surmises that the most probable outcome of this would be [[castration anxiety|castration]]. Although Freud devoted most of his early literature to the Oedipus complex in males, by 1931 he was arguing that females do experience an Oedipus complex, and that in the case of females, incestuous desires are initially homosexual desires towards the mothers. It is clear that in Freud's view, at least as we can tell from his later writings, the Oedipus complex was a far more complicated process in female than in male development. Freud used the term "Oedipus complex" for both males and females, and did not like the way rivals had coined the term "Electra Complex" for the process in girls.
+
Relying on material from his self-analysis and on [[anthropology|anthropological]] studies of [[totemism]], Freud developed the Oedipus complex as an explanation of the formation of the [[superego]]. The traditional paradigm in a (male) child's psychological coming-into-being is to first select the mother as the object of [[libido|libidinal]] investment. This however is expected to arouse the father's anger, and the infant surmises that the most probable outcome of this would be [[castration anxiety|castration]]. Although Freud devoted most of his early literature to the Oedipus complex in males, by 1931 he was arguing that females do experience an Oedipus complex, and that in the case of females, incestuous desires are initially homosexual desires towards the mothers. It is clear that in Freud's view, at least as we can tell from his later writings, the Oedipus complex was a far more complicated process in female than in male development. Freud used the term "Oedipus complex" for both males and females, and did not like the way rivals had coined the term "Electra Complex" for the process in girls.
   
 
The infant internalizes the rules pronounced by his father. This is how the [[super-ego]] comes into being. The father now becomes the figure of identification, as the child wants to keep his [[phallus]], but resigns from his attempts to take the mother, shifting his libidinal attention to new objects of desire.
 
The infant internalizes the rules pronounced by his father. This is how the [[super-ego]] comes into being. The father now becomes the figure of identification, as the child wants to keep his [[phallus]], but resigns from his attempts to take the mother, shifting his libidinal attention to new objects of desire.

Revision as of 10:19, 15 December 2006

Assessment | Biopsychology | Comparative | Cognitive | Developmental | Language | Individual differences | Personality | Philosophy | Social |
Methods | Statistics | Clinical | Educational | Industrial | Professional items | World psychology |

Clinical: Approaches · Group therapy · Techniques · Types of problem · Areas of specialism · Taxonomies · Therapeutic issues · Modes of delivery · Model translation project · Personal experiences ·


The Oedipus conflict or complex is a concept developed by Sigmund Freud to explain the origin of certain neuroses in childhood. It is defined as a child's unconscious desire for the exclusive love of the parent of the opposite sex. This desire includes jealousy toward the parent of the same sex and the unconscious wish for that parent's death. Freud used the term to describe the unconscious feelings of children of both sexes toward their parents. However, later researchers used the term Electra complex for the the same phenomena in girls. (In Greek myth, Electra, daughter of Agamemnon, helped plan the murder of her mother). Freud and his ideas were a primary inspiration for Carl Jung, who further described the concept and coined the term "complex".

The idea is based on the Greek myth of Oedipus, who kills his father Laius and marries his mother Jocasta. The Oedipus conflict, or Oedipus complex, was described as a state of psychosexual development and awareness first occurring around the age of 5 and a half years (a period known as the phallic stage in Freudian theory).

Theory of the Oedipus complex

Relying on material from his self-analysis and on anthropological studies of totemism, Freud developed the Oedipus complex as an explanation of the formation of the superego. The traditional paradigm in a (male) child's psychological coming-into-being is to first select the mother as the object of libidinal investment. This however is expected to arouse the father's anger, and the infant surmises that the most probable outcome of this would be castration. Although Freud devoted most of his early literature to the Oedipus complex in males, by 1931 he was arguing that females do experience an Oedipus complex, and that in the case of females, incestuous desires are initially homosexual desires towards the mothers. It is clear that in Freud's view, at least as we can tell from his later writings, the Oedipus complex was a far more complicated process in female than in male development. Freud used the term "Oedipus complex" for both males and females, and did not like the way rivals had coined the term "Electra Complex" for the process in girls.

The infant internalizes the rules pronounced by his father. This is how the super-ego comes into being. The father now becomes the figure of identification, as the child wants to keep his phallus, but resigns from his attempts to take the mother, shifting his libidinal attention to new objects of desire.

Little Hans: a case study by Freud

Little Hans was a young boy who was the subject of an early but extensive study of castration anxiety and the Oedipus complex by Freud. Hans' neurosis took the shape of a crippling phobia of horses (Hippophobia). Freud wrote a summary of his treatment of Little Hans, in 1909, in a paper entitled "Analysis of a Phobia in a Five-year-old Boy". This was one of just a few case studies that Freud published.

Due to a fear focused on horses, which he was afraid would bite him, Hans is said to have become fearful of going out into the street. Freud saw Hans only once in his office during the consultation, and carried out most of the work by gathering information from Hans' father (one of his colleagues) and providing ideas to the father for what to say and do to improve the situation, which was referred to in the case study as "nonsense". The information gathered from the father included reports of Hans' dreams, his behaviors, and his answers to questions. Freud had recently written a book about the development of sexuality, and he believed that what he learned from Hans' situation backed up his theory.

Hans' fear and anxiety were thought to be the result of several factors, including the birth of a little sister, his desire to replace his father as his mother's mate, conflicts over masturbation, and other issues. Freud saw this anxiety as rooted in an incomplete repression of sexual feelings and other defense mechanisms the boy was using to combat the impulses involved in his sexual development. Hans' behavior and emotional state did improve when he was provided with information by his father, and the two became closer.

It should be noted that Hans himself was unable to find on his own any connection at all between the fear of horses and the desire to get rid of his father. George Serban, in a more modern commentary, says

This assumption was suggested to him by his father. Furthermore, Freud himself admitted that 'Hans had to be told many things that he could not say himself'; that 'he had to be presented with thoughts which he had so far shown no signs of possessing'; and that 'his attention had to be turned in the direction from which his father was expecting something to come.' (Serban 1982)

Critiques of the Oedipus Complex

Popular culture often portrays Freud as overfocused on sexual influences, and his theory of the Oedipus Complex is often considered untenable. However, there have always been a great deal of critiques of the Oedipus complex by psychoanalysts and among philosophers who acquainted themselves with the work of Freud.

Alfred Adler contended with Freud's belief over the dominance of the sex drive and whether ego drives were libidinal; he also attacked Freud's ideas over repression. Adler believed that the repression theory should be replaced with the concept of ego-defensive tendencies - compared to the neurotic state derived from inferiority feelings and overcompensation of the masculine protest, Oedipal complexes were to him insignificant. Although Freud believed that the Oedipus complex takes place around the age of five, Melanie Klein believed it took place far earlier, possibly in the first two years of a child's life. There have also been criticisms from anthropologists such as Malinowski or Westermarck. Research such as that of Malinowski in the Trobriand Islands is often cited as a challenge to Freud's conviction that the Oedipus complex is a universal phenomenon.

Philosophy and the Oedipus Complex

Philosophers Michel Foucault and Gilles Deleuze, along with radical psychoanalyst Félix Guattari, have used their work to show how internalized power structures are a function of the world order we live in, bent on disciplining the subject. Discipline is meant by Foucault in both its senses, arguing that the science of man has created its own object, relying on Friedrich Nietzsche's concept of the will to power. According to this theory the Oedipus Complex can only arise historically under certain conditions.

Deleuze and Guattari in Anti-Oedipus apply this to the dissemination of Freud's Oedipus Complex, which they call "Oedipalization". They believe that the capitalist system and psychoanalysis as its tool rely on making people believe in a father, who is more powerful than them and has a phallus, which will always be unobtainable for them. Their idea is that the family structure is the smallest unit of this subjection because now power does not come from a central force like God or a monarch, but is spread over small power units which keep people in submission. Therefore they assume a system of pure immanence without an outside. They believe psychoanalysis is intent on producing neuroses while the capitalist system is really inherently schizophrenic. They propose an escape through anoedipal structures, relying on psychoanalyst Melanie Klein's concept of partial objects and proposing non-centered schizophrenia as a tendency to strive for, displacing psychoanalysis for schizoanalysis.

French theorist and psychoanalyst Jacques Lacan revised the Oedipus complex in line with his structuralist attempt to combine psychoanalysis and linguistics. Lacan claimed that the position of the father could never be held by the infant. On the one hand the infant must identify with the father, in order to participate in sexual relations. However the infant could also never become the father as this would imply sexual relations with the mother. Through the dictates on the one hand to be the father and on the other not to, the father is elevated to an ideal. He is no longer a real material father, but a function of a father. Lacan terms this the "Name-of-the-Father". The same goes for the mother — Lacan no longer talks of a real mother, but simply of desire, which is a desire to return to the undifferentiated state of being together with the mother, before the interference through the Name-of-the-Father.

This desire necessarily lacks something, i.e. it is a desire of lack. The father and accordingly the phallus (not a real penis, but a representation of mastery) can never be reached, thus he is above or outside the language system and cannot be spoken about. All language relies on this absence of the phallus from the system of signification. According to this theory, without a phallus outside of language, nothing in language would make sense or could be differentiated. Thus Lacan remodels the linguistic theory of Swiss linguist Ferdinand de Saussure. It is this idea that forms the basis of much contemporary thought, especially poststructuralism. Nothing can be thought that is outside of language, but the phallus is there and therefore structures the whole system of thought accordingly. Oedipus could also be thought of the theme of the story.

References

  • Serban, George. The Tyranny of Magical Thinking. E. P. Dutton Inc., New York 1982. ISBN 052524140X

See also


da:Ødipuskompleks de:Ödipuskomplex et:Oidipuse kompleks es:Complejo de Edipo fr:Complexe d'Œdipe he:תסביך אדיפוס nl:Oedipuscomplex no:Ødipuskomplekset pt:Complexo de Édipo ro:Complexul Oedip fi:Oidipuskompleksi sv:Oidipuskomplex zh:恋母情结

This page uses Creative Commons Licensed content from Wikipedia (view authors).