Ad blocker interference detected!
Wikia is a free-to-use site that makes money from advertising. We have a modified experience for viewers using ad blockers
Wikia is not accessible if you’ve made further modifications. Remove the custom ad blocker rule(s) and the page will load as expected.
Individual differences |
Methods | Statistics | Clinical | Educational | Industrial | Professional items | World psychology |
In statistics, the Neyman-Pearson lemma states that when performing a hypothesis test between two point hypotheses H0: θ = θ0 and H1: θ = θ1, then the likelihood-ratio test which rejects H0 in favour of H1 when
It is named for Jerzy Neyman and Egon Pearson.
In practice, the likelihood ratio is often used directly to construct tests — see Likelihood-ratio test. However it can also be used to suggest particular test-statistics that might be of interest or to suggest simplified tests — for this one considers algebraic manipulation of the ratio to see if there are key statistics in it is related to the size of the ratio (i.e. whether a large statistic corresponds to a small ratio or to a large one).
Define the rejection region of the null hypothesis for the NP test as
Any other test will have a different rejection region that we define as . Furthermore define the function of region, and parameter
where this is the probability of the data falling in region R, given parameter .
For both tests to have significance level , it must be true that
However it is useful to break these down into integrals over distinct regions, given by
Setting and equating the above two expression, yields that
Comparing the powers of the two tests, which are and , one can see that
Now by the definition of ,
Hence the inequality holds.
Let be a random sample from the distribution where the mean is known, and suppose that we wish to test for against . The likelihood for this set of normally distributed data is
We can compute the likelihood ratio to find the key statistic in this test and its effect on the test's outcome:
This ratio only depends on the data through . Therefore, by the Neyman-Pearson lemma, the most powerful test of this type of hypothesis for this data will depend only on . Also, by inspection, we can see that if , then is an increasing function of . So we should reject if is sufficiently large. The rejection threshold depends on the size of the test.
- Jerzy Neyman, Egon Pearson (1933). On the Problem of the Most Efficient Tests of Statistical Hypotheses. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical or Physical Character 231: 289–337.
- cnx.org: Neyman-Pearson criterion
|This page uses Creative Commons Licensed content from Wikipedia (view authors).|