No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
It comprises 33 items, although researchers have sought to use shortened versions such as the 10-item version used by [http://www.springerlink.com/content/g5771006303277ww/fulltext.pdf Thompson and Phua] <ref> Thompson, E. R. & Phua, F. T. T. 2005. [http://www.springerlink.com/content/g5771006303277ww/fulltext.pdf Reliability among senior managers of the Marlowe-Crowne short-form social desirability scale], Journal of Business and Psychology, 19(4): 541-554.</ref>. <br /> |
It comprises 33 items, although researchers have sought to use shortened versions such as the 10-item version used by [http://www.springerlink.com/content/g5771006303277ww/fulltext.pdf Thompson and Phua] <ref> Thompson, E. R. & Phua, F. T. T. 2005. [http://www.springerlink.com/content/g5771006303277ww/fulltext.pdf Reliability among senior managers of the Marlowe-Crowne short-form social desirability scale], Journal of Business and Psychology, 19(4): 541-554.</ref>. <br /> |
||
| + | |||
| + | ==See also== |
||
| + | *[[Social desirability bias]] |
||
==References== |
==References== |
||
Latest revision as of 08:20, 8 September 2013
Assessment |
Biopsychology |
Comparative |
Cognitive |
Developmental |
Language |
Individual differences |
Personality |
Philosophy |
Social |
Methods |
Statistics |
Clinical |
Educational |
Industrial |
Professional items |
World psychology |
Social Processes: Methodology · Types of test
the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale is one of the most commonly used measures of social desirability is [1].
It comprises 33 items, although researchers have sought to use shortened versions such as the 10-item version used by Thompson and Phua [2].
See also
References
- ↑ Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24, 349-354
- ↑ Thompson, E. R. & Phua, F. T. T. 2005. Reliability among senior managers of the Marlowe-Crowne short-form social desirability scale, Journal of Business and Psychology, 19(4): 541-554.