(Created page with 'thumb|200px|[[Chicago Police Department officers arrest a man]] thumb|200px|[[Lucy Parsons after her arrest…') |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Image:Man being arrested.jpg|thumb|200px|[[Chicago Police Department]] officers arrest a man]] |
[[Image:Man being arrested.jpg|thumb|200px|[[Chicago Police Department]] officers arrest a man]] |
||
| − | [[File:Lucy.Parsons.1915.arrest.jpg|thumb|200px| |
+ | [[File:Lucy.Parsons.1915.arrest.jpg|thumb|200px|Lucy Parsons after her arrest for rioting during an unemployment protest at Hull House in Chicago, Illinois. 1915]] |
| − | An '''arrest''' is the act of depriving a person of his or her [[liberty]] usually in relation to the [[investigation]] and prevention of [[crime]]. The term is |
+ | An '''arrest''' is the act of depriving a person of his or her [[liberty]] usually in relation to the [[investigation]] and prevention of [[crime]]. The term is Anglo-Norman in origin and is related to the French word ''arrêt'', meaning "stop". |
==Procedure== |
==Procedure== |
||
| Line 135: | Line 135: | ||
[[Category:Criminal law]] |
[[Category:Criminal law]] |
||
| − | [[Category:Law enforcement |
+ | [[Category:Law enforcement]] |
| − | [[Category: |
+ | [[Category:Legal psychology]] |
{{Criminal procedure}} |
{{Criminal procedure}} |
||
Latest revision as of 08:32, 5 January 2010
Chicago Police Department officers arrest a man
Lucy Parsons after her arrest for rioting during an unemployment protest at Hull House in Chicago, Illinois. 1915
An arrest is the act of depriving a person of his or her liberty usually in relation to the investigation and prevention of crime. The term is Anglo-Norman in origin and is related to the French word arrêt, meaning "stop".
Procedure
United States
For serious crimes, the police typically handcuff the suspect (only if it is in a public place) and bring him/her to a police station or a jail where he/she will be incarcerated pending a judicial bail determination or an arraignment. In other instances, the police may issue a notice to appear, specifying where and when a suspect is to appear for his arraignment.
England
In English law, whether a person has been arrested does not depend on the legal authority of the person enforcing the arrest, rather it depends upon whether he has been deprived of his liberty to go where he pleases.[1] Whether an arrest is lawful depends on whether the police officer or civilian exercising the arrest is acting within the scope of her or his powers.
Upon arrest a person must ordinarily be taken to a police station as soon as is practicable,[2] but may be released on bail.
Powers of Arrest
United Kingdom
Any police officer has the following powers to effect arrest without warrant:
| Provision | Extent of Power |
|---|---|
| Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984, section 24, as amended by SOCPA[3] | Power to arrest
|
| Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984, Schedule 2 | Various specific powers of arrest |
| Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994, Part X | Cross-border powers of arrest |
| Common law | To prevent a Breach of the peace |
Code G to the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 deals with powers of arrest under section 24. The wide power under section 24 of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 may only be used if it is necessary to:
- ascertain the person's name or address;
- to prevent the person
- causing physical injury to himself or any other person,
- suffering physical injury,
- causing loss of or damage to property,
- committing an offence against public decency, or
- causing an unlawful obstruction to the highway;
- to protect a child or other vulnerable person from the person;
- to allow prompt and effective investigation;[4][5] or
- to prevent the disappearance of the person.[6]
Police officers also have powers to arrest under warrant. Civilians have restricted powers of arrest without warrant in relation to very serious offences[7] and to prevent a breach of the peace.
Warnings on arrest
United States
- See also: Miranda warning
The reading of the Miranda warning or similar "caution" to an arrestee advising him or her of rights is not legally required upon arrest. A legal caution is required only when a person has been taken into custody and is interrogated. Legal cautions are mandated in the US, most Commonwealth and other common law jurisdictions, and countries where the right to legal counsel, the right to silence, and the right against self-incrimination have been clearly established.
United Kingdom
- See also: Right to silence in England and Wales
In the United Kingdom a person must be told that he is under arrest,[8] and "told in simple, non-technical language that he could understand, the essential legal and factual grounds for his arrest".[9] A person must be 'cautioned' when being arrested unless this is impractical due to the behaviour of the arrestee i.e. violence or drunkenness. The caution required in England and Wales states,
You do not have to say anything, but it may harm your defence if you do not mention when questioned something which you may later rely on in court. Anything you do say may be given in evidence.[10]
Deviation from this accepted form is permitted provided that the same information is conveyed.
Search on arrest
United Kingdom
Otherwise than in relation to terrorist suspects, a police constable has the following powers where he arrests a person outside a police station:[11]
| Search person | Search property | Seize property | |
|---|---|---|---|
| including a right to require a suspect to remove an outer coat, jacket or gloves (but nothing else) and to search the arrested person's mouth | any premises in which the person arrested was when arrested or immediately before | ||
| Danger | if the constable has reasonable grounds for believing that the arrested person may have articles that can present a danger to himself or others | if the constable has reasonable grounds for believing that the person searched might use the property to cause physical injury to himself or to any other person | |
| Escape | to the extent that is reasonably required if the constable has reasonable grounds for believing that the person to be searched may have concealed on him anything which he might use to assist him to escape from lawful custody | other than an item subject to legal privilege, if he has reasonable grounds for believing that he might use it to assist him to escape from lawful custody | |
| Evidence | to the extent that is reasonably required if the constable has reasonable grounds for believing that the person to be searched may have concealed on him anything which might be evidence relating to an offence | if the constable has reasonable grounds for believing that there is evidence relating to the offence for which the person has been arrested | other than an item subject to legal privilege, if he has reasonable grounds for believing that it is evidence of an offence or has been obtained in consequence of the commission of an offence |
Non-criminal arrests
United States
Breach of a court order can be civil contempt of court, and a warrant may issue for the person's arrest. Some court orders contain authority for a police officer to make an arrest without further order.
If a legislature lacks a quorum, many jurisdictions allow the members present the power to order a call of the house, which orders the arrest of the members who are not present. A member arrested is brought to the body's chamber to achieve a quorum. The member "arrested" does not face prosecution, but may be required to pay a fine to the legislative body.
Ordinarily only human beings can be arrested, but recent and somewhat controversial changes to criminal codes have allowed for the arrest not only of the usual "contraband, evidence, fruits, and instrumentalities" of crime, but also of inanimate objects such as money, automobiles, houses, and other personal property under asset forfeiture.
Following arrest
While an arrest will not necessarily lead to a criminal conviction, it may nonetheless have serious ramifications such as absence from work, social stigma, and in some cases, the legal obligation to disclose an incidence of arrest when the person applies for a job, a loan or a professional license. These collateral consequences are more severe in the United States than in the UK, where arrests without conviction are not usually considered significant and are not even recorded in a standard criminal record check. In the US, a person who was not found guilty after an arrest can remove his arrest record through an expungement or Finding of Factual Innocence. A legal action is sometimes filed against the government for wrongful arrest.
See also
- Citizen's arrest
- House arrest
- Arrestable offence (obsolete term in UK law)
- Law enforcement agency
- Nightwalker Statute
- Resisting arrest
- Arbitrary arrest and detention
- False arrest
References
- ↑ Lewis v Chief Constable of the South Wales Constabulary [1991] 1 All ER 206.
- ↑ Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984, section 30.
- ↑ OPSI Police powers etc.. Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005. URL accessed on 2009-04-18.
- ↑ R (on the application of C) v Chief Constable of A [2006] EWHC 2352 (Admin).
- ↑ Spencer, J.R. (2007). Arrest for Questioning. Cambridge Law Journal 66 (2): 282–284.
- ↑ Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984, section 24.
- ↑ Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984, section 24A.
- ↑ Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984, section 28.
- ↑ Taylor v Chief Constable of Thames Valley Police 2004 EWCA Civ 858.
- ↑ Code C to the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984, para. 10.5.
- ↑ Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984, section 32.
Template:Criminal procedure
| This page uses Creative Commons Licensed content from Wikipedia (view authors). |