Wikia

Psychology Wiki

Hypergamy

Talk0
34,141pages on
this wiki
Revision as of 12:16, January 10, 2010 by Dr Joe Kiff (Talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Assessment | Biopsychology | Comparative | Cognitive | Developmental | Language | Individual differences | Personality | Philosophy | Social |
Methods | Statistics | Clinical | Educational | Industrial | Professional items | World psychology |

Social psychology: Altruism · Attribution · Attitudes · Conformity · Discrimination · Groups · Interpersonal relations · Obedience · Prejudice · Norms · Perception · Index · Outline


Close Relationships
KarenWhimseyValentineMain

Affinity
Asexuality
Attachment
Bisexuality
Bride price
Brideservice
Bonding
Boyfriend
Cohabitation
Courtship
Dowry
Divorce
Friendship
Family
Girlfriend
Ground rules
Homosexuality
Incest
Jealousy
Love
Marriage
Monogamy
Open marriage
Paedophilia
Partner
Pederasty
Platonic love
Polyamory
Polyandry
Polygamy
Polygynandry
Polygyny
Prostitution
Sexuality
Separation
Swinging
Violence
Widowhood
Zoophilia

Hypergamy (colloquially referred to as marrying up) is the act or practice of seeking a spouse of equal or higher socio-economic status, or caste status than oneself.[1]

The term is often used more specifically in reference to a widespread tendency amongst human cultures for females to seek or be encouraged to pursue male suitors that are comparatively older, wealthier or otherwise more privileged than themselves.[2] Hypergamic behaviours can be explained in terms of genetic economic necessity, in which societies with high levels of gender inequality are more likely to have women who "marry-up" for the benefit of their children, and more likely to have men who "marry-down" to ensure that their mates have a higher incentive to remain faithful.[3]

The word "hypogamy"[4] typically refers to instances of the opposite occurring: marrying a person of lower social class or status.

Society Edit

In contemporary society, human females continue to exhibit strong mate-selective preferences for spouses who are at least equal to them in terms of attained educational level, job status, social standing, and capital accumulation. In comparison males tend to place higher emphasis on the value of physical attractiveness in a woman alone.[5][6]

In an anthology about money and relationships by many prominent female writers, the authors expressed that the role money plays in determining how women select long-term male partners is often considered a taboo subject.[7]

Dynamics Edit

In any population, low status males face relatively greater difficulties in finding long-term relationships due to hypergamic pressures. A contributing reason is that low status females often still aspire to obtain mates with greater social standing than themselves.[How to reference and link to summary or text]

Hypergamy can also create difficulty for women with high social status in finding long-term relationships. Very high status women may have to choose from a relatively small pool of men, that being, men who are still 'above' themselves in measures of perceived social status. As an individual woman increases in relative social status, there are proportionally less men in a population, in a relative sense, who remain above her status-wise - shrinking the long-term partner pool.

The practice is also observed among gay couples.[8]

VarianceEdit

One study found no statistical difference in the number of women or men "marrying-up" in a sample of 1109 first-time married couples in the United States.[9]

See alsoEdit


ReferencesEdit

  1. http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/hypergamy
  2. http://depts.washington.edu/crfam/WorkingPapers/CRF%202004-01_Rose.pdf
  3. Gilles Saint-Paul (May 2008), Genes, Legitimacy and Hypergamy: Another Look at the Economics of Marriage, CEPR Discussion Paper No. DP6828, University of Toulouse I - GREMAQ-IDEI; Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR), http://idei.fr/doc/wp/2008/genes.pdf 
  4. not to be confused with the botanical term hypogamous.
  5. Buss, D.M.; Barnes, M. (1986), "Preferences in human mate selection", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50 (3): 559–570, doi:10.1037/0022-3514.50.3.559, http://www.landofangels.de/py1/buss-barnes-1986.pdf 
  6. Bereczkei, T.; Voros, S.; Gal, A.; Bernath, L. (1997), "Resources, attractiveness, family commitment; reproductive decisions in human mate choice", Ethology 103 (8): 681–699, http://www.popline.org/docs/1239/131493.html 
  7. includeonly>Sachs, Andrea. "The Truth About Women, Money and Relationships", Time Magazine, Jan. 07, 2009. Retrieved on 2009-07-24.
  8. Cruising to Familyland: Gay Hypergamy and Rainbow Kinship
  9. Dalmia & Sicilian (Volume 14, Number 4 / November, 2008). Kids Cause Specialization: Evidence for Becker’s Household Division of Labor Hypothesis.
This page uses Creative Commons Licensed content from Wikipedia (view authors).

Around Wikia's network

Random Wiki