Individual differences |
Methods | Statistics | Clinical | Educational | Industrial | Professional items | World psychology |
Biological: Behavioural genetics · Evolutionary psychology · Neuroanatomy · Neurochemistry · Neuroendocrinology · Neuroscience · Psychoneuroimmunology · Physiological Psychology · Psychopharmacology (Index, Outline)
In biology, histones are highly alkaline proteins found in eukaryotic cell nuclei that package and order the DNA into structural units called nucleosomes. They are the chief protein components of chromatin, acting as spools around which DNA winds, and play a role in gene regulation. Without histones, the unwound DNA in chromosomes would be very long (a length to width ratio of more than 10 million to one in human DNA). For example, each human cell has about 1.8 meters of DNA, but wound on the histones it has about 90 micrometers (0.09 mm) of chromatin, which, when duplicated and condensed during mitosis, result in about 120 micrometers of chromosomes.
Two of each of the core histones assemble to form one octameric nucleosome core particle, and 147 base pairs of DNA wrap around this core particle 1.65 times in a left-handed super-helical turn. The linker histone H1 binds the nucleosome and the entry and exit sites of the DNA, thus locking the DNA into place and allowing the formation of higher order structure. The most basic such formation is the 10 nm fiber or beads on a string conformation. This involves the wrapping of DNA around nucleosomes with approximately 50 base pairs of DNA separating each pair of nucleosomes (also referred to as linker DNA). The assembled histones and DNA is called chromatin. Higher-order structures include the 30 nm fiber (forming an irregular zigzag) and 100 nm fiber, these being the structures found in normal cells. During mitosis and meiosis, the condensed chromosomes are assembled through interactions between nucleosomes and other regulatory proteins.
The following is a list of human histone proteins:
|H1F||H1F0, H1FNT, H1FOO, H1FX|
|H1H1||HIST1H1A, HIST1H1B, HIST1H1C, HIST1H1D, HIST1H1E, HIST1H1T|
|H2AF||H2AFB1, H2AFB2, H2AFB3, H2AFJ, H2AFV, H2AFX, H2AFY, H2AFY2, H2AFZ|
|H2A1||HIST1H2AA, HIST1H2AB, HIST1H2AC, HIST1H2AD, HIST1H2AE, HIST1H2AG, HIST1H2AI, HIST1H2AJ, HIST1H2AK, HIST1H2AL, HIST1H2AM|
|H2BF||H2BFM, H2BFS, H2BFWT|
|H2B1||HIST1H2BA, HIST1H2BB, HIST1H2BC, HIST1H2BD, HIST1H2BE, HIST1H2BF, HIST1H2BG, HIST1H2BH, HIST1H2BI, HIST1H2BJ, HIST1H2BK, HIST1H2BL, HIST1H2BM, HIST1H2BN, HIST1H2BO|
|H3A1||HIST1H3A, HIST1H3B, HIST1H3C, HIST1H3D, HIST1H3E, HIST1H3F, HIST1H3G, HIST1H3H, HIST1H3I, HIST1H3J|
|H41||HIST1H4A, HIST1H4B, HIST1H4C, HIST1H4D, HIST1H4E, HIST1H4F, HIST1H4G, HIST1H4H, HIST1H4I, HIST1H4J, HIST1H4K, HIST1H4L|
The nucleosome core is formed of two H2A-H2B dimers and a H3-H4 tetramer, forming two nearly symmetrical halves by tertiary structure (C2 symmetry; one macromolecule is the mirror image of the other). The H2A-H2B dimers and H3-H4 tetramer also show pseudodyad symmetry. The 4 'core' histones (H2A, H2B, H3 and H4) are relatively similar in structure and are highly conserved through evolution, all featuring a 'helix turn helix turn helix' motif (which allows the easy dimerisation). They also share the feature of long 'tails' on one end of the amino acid structure - this being the location of post-translational modification (see below).
It has been proposed that histone proteins are evolutionarily related to the helical part of the extended AAA+ ATPase domain, the C-domain, and to the N-terminal substrate recognition domain of Clp/Hsp100 proteins. Despite the differences in their topology, these three folds share a homologous helix-strand-helix (HSH) motif.
Using an electron paramagnetic resonance spin-labeling technique, British researchers measured the distances between the spools around which eukaryotic cells wind their DNA. They determined the spacings range from 59 to 70 Å.
In all, histones make five types of interactions with DNA:
- Helix-dipoles from alpha-helices in H2B, H3, and H4 cause a net positive charge to accumulate at the point of interaction with negatively charged phosphate groups on DNA
- Hydrogen bonds between the DNA backbone and the amide group on the main chain of histone proteins
- Nonpolar interactions between the histone and deoxyribose sugars on DNA
- Salt bridges and hydrogen bonds between side chains of basic amino acids (especially lysine and arginine) and phosphate oxygens on DNA
- Non-specific minor groove insertions of the H3 and H2B N-terminal tails into two minor grooves each on the DNA molecule
The highly basic nature of histones, aside from facilitating DNA-histone interactions, contributes to their water solubility.
Histones are subject to post translational modification by enzymes primarily on their N-terminal tails, but also in their globular domains. Such modifications include methylation, citrullination, acetylation, phosphorylation, SUMOylation, ubiquitination, and ADP-ribosylation. This affects their function of gene regulation (see functions).
In general, genes that are active have less bound histone, while inactive genes are highly associated with histones during interphase. It also appears that the structure of histones has been evolutionarily conserved, as any deleterious mutations would be severely maladaptive. All histones have a highly positively charged N-terminus with many lysine and arginine residues.
Histones were discovered in 1884 by Albrecht Kossel. The word "histone" dates from the late 19th century and is from the German "Histon", of uncertain origin: perhaps from Greek histanai or from histos. Until the early 1990s, histones were dismissed by most as inert packing material for eukaryotic nuclear DNA, based in part on the "ball and stick" models of Mark Ptashne and others who believed that transcription was activated by protein-DNA and protein-protein interactions on largely naked DNA templates, as is the case in bacteria. During the 1980s, work by Michael Grunstein demonstrated that eukaryotic histones repress gene transcription, and that the function of transcriptional activators is to overcome this repression. It is now known that histones play both positive and negative roles in gene expression, forming the basis of the histone code.
Conservation across species Edit
Histones are found in the nuclei of eukaryotic cells, and in certain Archaea, namely Euryarchaea, but not in bacteria. The unicellular algae known as dinoflagellates are the only eukaryotes that are known to completely lack histones.
Archaeal histones may well resemble the evolutionary precursors to eukaryotic histones. Histone proteins are among the most highly conserved proteins in eukaryotes, emphasizing their important role in the biology of the nucleus.:939 In contrast mature sperm cells largely use protamines to package their genomic DNA, most likely because this allows them to achieve an even higher packaging ratio.
Core histones are highly conserved proteins; that is, there are very few differences among the amino acid sequences of the histone proteins of different species. Linker histone usually has more than one form within a species and is also less conserved than the core histones.
There are some variant forms in some of the major classes. They share amino acid sequence homology and core structural similarity to a specific class of major histones but also have their own feature that is distinct from the major histones. These minor histones usually carry out specific functions of the chromatin metabolism. For example, histone H3-like CenpA is a histone associated with only the centromere region of the chromosome. Histone H2A variant H2A.Z is associated with the promoters of actively transcribed genes and also involved in the prevention of the spread of silent heterochromatin. Furthermore, H2A.Z has roles in chromatin for genome stability. Another H2A variant H2A.X binds to the DNA with double-strand breaks and marks the region undergoing DNA repair. Histone H3.3 is associated with the body of actively transcribed genes.
Compacting DNA strands Edit
Histones act as spools around which DNA winds. This enables the compaction necessary to fit the large genomes of eukaryotes inside cell nuclei: the compacted molecule is 40,000 times shorter than an unpacked molecule.
Chromatin regulation Edit
Histones undergo posttranslational modifications that alter their interaction with DNA and nuclear proteins. The H3 and H4 histones have long tails protruding from the nucleosome, which can be covalently modified at several places. Modifications of the tail include methylation, acetylation, phosphorylation, ubiquitination, SUMOylation, citrullination, and ADP-ribosylation. The core of the histones H2A, H2B, and H3 can also be modified. Combinations of modifications are thought to constitute a code, the so-called "histone code". Histone modifications act in diverse biological processes such as gene regulation, DNA repair, chromosome condensation (mitosis) and spermatogenesis (meiosis).
The common nomenclature of histone modifications is:
- The name of the histone (e.g., H3)
- The single-letter amino acid abbreviation (e.g., K for Lysine) and the amino acid position in the protein
- The type of modification (Me: methyl, P: phosphate, Ac: acetyl, Ub: ubiquitin)
- The number of modifications (only Me is known to occur in more than one copy per residue. 1, 2 or 3 is mono-, di- or tri-mthylation)
So H3K4me1 denotes the monomethylation of the 4th residue (a lysine) from the start (i.e., the N-terminal) of the H3 protein.
Examples of histone modifications in transcription regulation include:
| Type of|
Functions of histone modificationsEdit
A huge catalogue of histone modifications have been described, but a functional understanding of most is still lacking. Collectively, it is thought that histone modifications may underlie a histone code, whereby combinations of histone modifications have specific meanings. However, most functional data concerns individual prominent histone modifications that are biochemically amenable to detailed study.
Chemistry of histone modificationsEdit
- Lysine methylation
The addition of one, two or three methyl groups to lysine has little effect on the chemistry of the histone; methylation leaves the charge of the lysine intact and adds a minimal number of atoms so steric interactions are mostly unaffected. However, proteins containing Tudor, chromo or PHD domains, amongst others, can recognise lysine methylation with exquisite sensitivity and differentiate mono, di and tri-methyl lysine, to the extent that, for some lysines (e.g.: H4K20) mono, di and tri-mthylation appear to have different meanings. Because of this, lysine methylation tends to be a very informative mark and dominates the known histone modification functions.
- Arginine methylation
What was said above of the chemistry of lysine methylation also applies to arginine methylation, and some protein domains—e.g., Tudor domains—can be specific for methyl arginine instead of methyl lysine. Arginine is known to be mono- or di-methylated, and methylation can be symmetric or asymmetric, potentially with different meanings.
- Lysine acetylation
Addition of an acetyl group has a major chemical effect on lysine as it neutralises the positive charge. This reduces electrostatic attraction between the histone and the negatively charged DNA backbone, loosening the chromatin structure; highly acetylated histones form more accessible chromatin and tend to be associated with active transcription. Lysine acetylation appears to be less precise in meaning than methylation, in that histone acetyltransferases tend to act on more than one lysine; presumably this reflects the need to alter multiple lysines to have a significant effect on chromatin structure.
- Serine/Threonine/Tyrosine phosphorylation
Addition of a negatively charge phosphate group can lead to major changes in protein structure, leading to the well-characterised role of phosphorylation in controlling protein function. It is not clear what structural implications histone phosphorylation has, but histone phosphorylation has clear functions as a post-translational modification, and binding domains such as BRCT have been characterised.
Functions in transcriptionEdit
Most well-studied histone modifications are involved in control of transcription.
Actively transcribed genesEdit
Two histone modifications are particularly associated with active transcription:
H3K4 trimethylation is performed by the COMPASS complex. Despite the conservation of this complex and histone modification from yeast to mammals, it is not entirely clear what role this modification plays. However, it is an excellent mark of active promoters and the level of this histone modification at a gene’s promoter is broadly correlated with transcriptional activity of the gene. The formation of this mark is tied to transcription in a rather convoluted manner: early in transcription of a gene, RNA polymerase II undergoes a switch from initiating’ to ‘elongating’, marked by a change in the phosphorylation states of the RNA polymerase II C terminal domain (CTD). The same enzyme that phosphorylates the CTD also phosphorylates the Rad6 complex, which in turn adds a ubiquitin mark to H2B K123 (K120 in mammals). H2BK123Ub occurs throughout transcribed regions, but this mark is required for COMPASS to trimethylate H3K4 at promoters.
- Trimethylation of H3 lysine 36 (H3K36Me3) in the body of active genes
H3K36 trimethylation is deposited by the methyltransferase Set2. This protein associates with elongating RNA polymerase II, and H3K36Me3 is indicative of actively transcribed genes. H3K36Me3 is recognised by the Rpd3 histone deacetylase complex, which removes acetyl modifications from surrounding histones, increasing chromatin compaction and repressing spurious transcription. Increased chromatin compaction prevents transcription factors from accessing DNA, and reduces the likelihood of new transcription events being initiated within the body of the gene. This process therefore helps ensure that transcription is not interrupted.
Three histone modifications are particularly associated with repressed genes:
- Trimethylation of H3 lysine 27 (H3K27Me3)
This histone modification is depositied by the polycomb complex PRC2. It is a clear marker of gene repression, and is likely bound by other proteins to exert a repressive function. Another polycomb complex, PRC1, can bind H3K27Me3 and adds the histone modification H2AK119Ub which aids chromatin compaction. Based on this data it appears that PRC1 is recruited through the action of PRC2, however, recent studies show that PRC1 is recruited to the same sites in the absence of PRC2.
- Di and tri-methylation of H3 lysine 9 (H3K9Me2/3)
H3K9Me2/3 is a well-characterised marker for heterochromatin, and is therefore strongly associated with gene repression. The formation of heterochromatin has been best studied in the yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe, where it is initiated by recruitment of the RNA-induced transcriptional silencing complex to double stranded RNAs produced from centromeric repeats. RITS recruits the Clr4 histone methyltransferase which deposits H3K9Me2/3. H3K9Me2/3 serves as a binding site for the recruitment of Swi6 (heterochromatin protein 1 or HP1, another classic heterochromatin marker) which in turn recruits further repressive activities including histone modifiers such as histone deacetylases and histone methyltransferases.
- Trimethylation of H4 lysine 20 (H4K20Me3)
This modification is tightly associated with heterochromatin, although its functional importance remains unclear. This mark is placed by the Suv4-20h methyltransferase, which is at least in part recruited by heterochromatin protein 1.
Analysis of histone modifications in embryonic stem cells (and other stem cells) revealed many gene promoters carrying both H3K4Me3 and H3K27Me3, in other words these promoters display both activating and repressing marks simultaneously. This peculiar combination of modifications marks genes that are poised for transcription; they are not required in stem cells, but are rapidly required after differentiation into some lineages. Once the cell starts to differentiate, these bivalent promoters are resolved to either active or repressive states depending on the chosen lineage.
- Phosphorylation of Histone H2AX at Serine 139
Phosphorylated H2AX (also known as gamma H2AX) is a marker for DNA double strand breaks, and forms part of the response to DNA damage. H2AX is phosphorylated early after detection of DNA double strand break, and forms a domain extending many kilobases either side of the damage. Gamma H2AX acts as a binding site for the protein MDC1, which in turn recruits key DNA repair proteins (this complex topic is well reviewed in) and as such, gamma H2AX forms a vital part of the machinary that ensures genome stability.
- Acetylation of H3 lysine 56 (H3K56Ac)
H3K56Acx is required for genome stability. H3K56 is acetylated by the p300/Rtt109 complex., but is rapidly deacetylated around sites of DNA damage. H3K56 acetylation is also required to stabilise stalled replication forks, preventing dangerous replication fork collapses. H3K56 is acetylated by p300/Rtt109. Although in general mammals make far greater use of histone modifications than microorganisms, a major role of H3K56Ac in DNA replication exists only in fungi, and this has become a target for antibiotic development.
See also Edit
- Histone-Modifying Enzymes
- Histone deacetylases
- PRMT4 pathway
- Gene silencing
- Histone methyltransferase
- Histone acetyltransferase
- ↑ Youngson, Robert M. (2006). Collins Dictionary of Human Biology, Glasgow: HarperCollins.
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 Cox, Michael; Nelson, David R.; Lehninger, Albert L (2005). Lehninger Principles of Biochemistry, San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.
- ↑ Redon C, Pilch D, Rogakou E, Sedelnikova O, Newrock K, Bonner W (April 2002). Histone H2A variants H2AX and H2AZ. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 12 (2): 162–9.
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 Bhasin M, Reinherz EL, Reche PA (2006). Recognition and classification of histones using support vector machine. J. Comput. Biol. 13 (1): 102–12.
- ↑ 5.0 5.1 (1988) Basic Genetics, Jones and Bartlett Publishers.
- ↑ 6.0 6.1 Luger K, Mäder AW, Richmond RK, Sargent DF, Richmond TJ (September 1997). Crystal structure of the nucleosome core particle at 2.8 A resolution. Nature 389 (6648): 251–60. PDB 1AOI
- ↑ Farkas, Daniel (1996). DNA simplified: the hitchhiker's guide to DNA, Washington, D.C: AACC Press.
- ↑ Alva V, Ammelburg M, Lupas AN (March 2007). On the origin of the histone fold. BMC Struct Biol 7: 17.
- ↑ Ward R, Bowman A, El-Mkami H, Owen-Hughes T, Norman DG (February 2009). Long distance PELDOR measurements on the histone core particle. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131 (4): 1348–9.
- ↑ Kayne PS, Kim UJ, Han M, Mullen JR, Yoshizaki F, Grunstein M (October 1988). Extremely conserved histone H4 N terminus is dispensable for growth but essential for repressing the silent mating loci in yeast. Cell 55 (1): 27–39.
- ↑ Crane-Robinson C, Dancy SE, Bradbury EM, Garel A, Kovacs AM, Champagne M, Daune M (August 1976). Structural studies of chicken erythrocyte histone H5. Eur. J. Biochem. 67 (2): 379–88.
- ↑ Aviles FJ, Chapman GE, Kneale GG, Crane-Robinson C, Bradbury EM (August 1978). The conformation of histone H5. Isolation and characterisation of the globular segment. Eur. J. Biochem. 88 (2): 363–71.
- ↑ Peter J. Rizzo (2003). Those amazing dinoflagellate chromosomes. Cell Research 13 (4): 215–217..
- ↑ Clarke HJ (1992). Nuclear and chromatin composition of mammalian gametes and early embryos. Biochem. Cell Biol. 70 (10–11): 856–66.
- ↑ Guillemette B, Bataille AR, Gévry N, Adam M, Blanchette M, Robert F, Gaudreau L (December 2005). Variant Histone H2A.Z Is Globally Localized to the Promoters of Inactive Yeast Genes and Regulates Nucleosome Positioning. PLoS Biol. 3 (12): e384.
- ↑ Billon P, Côté J (October 2011). Precise deposition of histone H2A.Z in chromatin for genome expression and maintenance. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1819 (3-4): 290–302.
- ↑ 17.0 17.1 Paull TT, Rogakou EP, Yamazaki V, Kirchgessner CU, Gellert M, Bonner WM (2000). A critical role for histone H2AX in recruitment of repair factors to nuclear foci after DNA damage. Curr. Biol. 10 (15): 886–95.
- ↑ Ahmad K, Henikoff S (June 2002). The histone variant H3.3 marks active chromatin by replication-independent nucleosome assembly. Mol. Cell 9 (6): 1191–200.
- ↑ Strahl BD, Allis CD (Jan 2000). The language of covalent histone modifications. Nature 403 (6765): 41–5.
- ↑ Jenuwein T, Allis CD (Aug 2001). Translating the histone code. Science 293 (5532): 1074–80.
- ↑ Ning Song, Jie Liu, Shucai An, Tomoya Nishino, Yoshitaka Hishikawa and Takehiko Koji (2011). Immunohistochemical Analysis of Histone H3 Modifications in Germ Cells during Mouse Spermatogenesis. Acta Histochemica et Cytochemica 44 (4): 183–90.
- ↑ Benevolenskaya EV (August 2007). Histone H3K4 demethylases are essential in development and differentiation. Biochem. Cell Biol. 85 (4): 435–43.
- ↑ 23.0 23.1 23.2 23.3 23.4 23.5 23.6 23.7 Barski A, Cuddapah S, Cui K, Roh TY, Schones DE, Wang Z, Wei G, Chepelev I, Zhao K (May 2007). High-resolution profiling of histone methylations in the human genome. Cell 129 (4): 823–37.
- ↑ 24.0 24.1 24.2 Steger DJ, Lefterova MI, Ying L, Stonestrom AJ, Schupp M, Zhuo D, Vakoc AL, Kim JE, Chen J, Lazar MA, Blobel GA, Vakoc CR (April 2008). DOT1L/KMT4 Recruitment and H3K79 Methylation Are Ubiquitously Coupled with Gene Transcription in Mammalian Cells. Mol. Cell. Biol. 28 (8): 2825–39.
- ↑ 25.0 25.1 25.2 Rosenfeld JA, Wang Z, Schones DE, Zhao K, DeSalle R, Zhang MQ (2009). Determination of enriched histone modifications in non-genic portions of the human genome. BMC Genomics 10: 143.
- ↑ 26.0 26.1 26.2 Koch CM, Andrews RM, Flicek P, Dillon SC, Karaöz U, Clelland GK, Wilcox S, Beare DM, Fowler JC, Couttet P, James KD, Lefebvre GC, Bruce AW, Dovey OM, Ellis PD, Dhami P, Langford CF, Weng Z, Birney E, Carter NP, Vetrie D, Dunham I (June 2007). The landscape of histone modifications across 1% of the human genome in five human cell lines. Genome Res. 17 (6): 691–707.
- ↑ Krogan NJ, Dover J, Wood A, Schneider J, Heidt J, Boateng MA et al. (2003). The Paf1 complex is required for histone H3 methylation by COMPASS and Dot1p: linking transcriptional elongation to histone methylation.. Mol Cell 11 (3): 721–9.
- ↑ Ng HH, Robert F, Young RA, Struhl K (2003). Targeted recruitment of Set1 histone methylase by elongating Pol II provides a localized mark and memory of recent transcriptional activity.. Mol Cell 11 (3): 709–19.
- ↑ Bernstein BE, Kamal M, Lindblad-Toh K, Bekiranov S, Bailey DK, Huebert DJ et al. (2005). Genomic maps and comparative analysis of histone modifications in human and mouse.. Cell 120 (2): 169–81.
- ↑ (Mar 2002). COMPASS, a histone H3 (Lysine 4) methyltransferase required for telomeric silencing of gene expression.. J Biol Chem 277 (13): 10753–5.
- ↑ (Dec 2001). The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Set1 complex includes an Ash2 homologue and methylates histone 3 lysine 4.. EMBO J 20 (24): 7137–48.
- ↑ (Jan 2002). A trithorax-group complex purified from Saccharomyces cerevisiae is required for methylation of histone H3.. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99 (1): 90–4.
- ↑ Wood A, Schneider J, Dover J, Johnston M, Shilatifard A (2005). The Bur1/Bur2 complex is required for histone H2B monoubiquitination by Rad6/Bre1 and histone methylation by COMPASS.. Mol Cell 20 (4): 589–99.
- ↑ Sarcevic B, Mawson A, Baker RT, Sutherland RL (2002). Regulation of the ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme hHR6A by CDK-mediated phosphorylation.. EMBO J 21 (8): 2009–18.
- ↑ Robzyk K, Recht J, Osley MA (2000). Rad6-dependent ubiquitination of histone H2B in yeast.. Science 287 (5452): 501–4.
- ↑ Sun ZW, Allis CD (2002). Ubiquitination of histone H2B regulates H3 methylation and gene silencing in yeast.. Nature 418 (6893): 104–8.
- ↑ Dover J, Schneider J, Tawiah-Boateng MA, Wood A, Dean K, Johnston M et al. (2002). Methylation of histone H3 by COMPASS requires ubiquitination of histone H2B by Rad6.. J Biol Chem 277 (32): 28368–71.
- ↑ Strahl BD, Grant PA, Briggs SD, Sun ZW, Bone JR, Caldwell JA et al. (2002). Set2 is a nucleosomal histone H3-selective methyltransferase that mediates transcriptional repression.. Mol Cell Biol 22 (5): 1298–306.
- ↑ Li J, Moazed D, Gygi SP (2002). Association of the histone methyltransferase Set2 with RNA polymerase II plays a role in transcription elongation.. J Biol Chem 277 (51): 49383–8.
- ↑ Carrozza MJ, Li B, Florens L, Suganuma T, Swanson SK, Lee KK et al. (2005). Histone H3 methylation by Set2 directs deacetylation of coding regions by Rpd3S to suppress spurious intragenic transcription.. Cell 123 (4): 581–92.
- ↑ Keogh MC, Kurdistani SK, Morris SA, Ahn SH, Podolny V, Collins SR et al. (2005). Cotranscriptional set2 methylation of histone H3 lysine 36 recruits a repressive Rpd3 complex.. Cell 123 (4): 593–605.
- ↑ Joshi AA, Struhl K (2005). Eaf3 chromodomain interaction with methylated H3-K36 links histone deacetylation to Pol II elongation.. Mol Cell 20 (6): 971–8.
- ↑ Kuzmichev A, Nishioka K, Erdjument-Bromage H, Tempst P, Reinberg D (2002). Histone methyltransferase activity associated with a human multiprotein complex containing the Enhancer of Zeste protein.. Genes Dev 16 (22): 2893–905.
- ↑ 44.0 44.1 Cao R, Wang L, Wang H, Xia L, Erdjument-Bromage H, Tempst P et al. (2002). Role of histone H3 lysine 27 methylation in Polycomb-group silencing.. Science 298 (5595): 1039–43.
- ↑ de Napoles M, Mermoud JE, Wakao R, Tang YA, Endoh M, Appanah R et al. (2004). Polycomb group proteins Ring1A/B link ubiquitylation of histone H2A to heritable gene silencing and X inactivation.. Dev Cell 7 (5): 663–76.
- ↑ Wang H, Wang L, Erdjument-Bromage H, Vidal M, Tempst P, Jones RS et al. (2004). Role of histone H2A ubiquitination in Polycomb silencing.. Nature 431 (7010): 873–8.
- ↑ Tavares L, Dimitrova E, Oxley D, Webster J, Poot R, Demmers J et al. (2012). RYBP-PRC1 Complexes Mediate H2A Ubiquitylation at Polycomb Target Sites Independently of PRC2 and H3K27me3.. Cell 148 (4): 664–78.
- ↑ Gao Z, Zhang J, Bonasio R, Strino F, Sawai A, Parisi F et al. (2012). PCGF Homologs, CBX Proteins, and RYBP Define Functionally Distinct PRC1 Family Complexes.. Mol Cell 45 (3): 344–56.
- ↑ Verdel A, Jia S, Gerber S, Sugiyama T, Gygi S, Grewal SI et al. (2004). RNAi-mediated targeting of heterochromatin by the RITS complex.. Science 303 (5658): 672–6.
- ↑ Rea S, Eisenhaber F, O'Carroll D, Strahl BD, Sun ZW, Schmid M et al. (2000). Regulation of chromatin structure by site-specific histone H3 methyltransferases.. Nature 406 (6796): 593–9.
- ↑ Bannister AJ, Zegerman P, Partridge JF, Miska EA, Thomas JO, Allshire RC et al. (2001). Selective recognition of methylated lysine 9 on histone H3 by the HP1 chromo domain.. Nature 410 (6824): 120–4.
- ↑ Lachner M, O'Carroll D, Rea S, Mechtler K, Jenuwein T (2001). Methylation of histone H3 lysine 9 creates a binding site for HP1 proteins.. Nature 410 (6824): 116–20.
- ↑ 53.0 53.1 Schotta G, Lachner M, Sarma K, Ebert A, Sengupta R, Reuter G et al. (2004). A silencing pathway to induce H3-K9 and H4-K20 methylation at constitutive heterochromatin.. Genes Dev 18 (11): 1251–62.
- ↑ Kourmouli N, Jeppesen P, Mahadevhaiah S, Burgoyne P, Wu R, Gilbert DM et al. (2004). Heterochromatin and tri-methylated lysine 20 of histone H4 in animals.. J Cell Sci 117 (Pt 12): 2491–501.
- ↑ Bernstein BE, Mikkelsen TS, Xie X, Kamal M, Huebert DJ, Cuff J et al. (2006). A bivalent chromatin structure marks key developmental genes in embryonic stem cells.. Cell 125 (2): 315–26.
- ↑ 56.0 56.1 Rogakou EP, Pilch DR, Orr AH, Ivanova VS, Bonner WM (1998). DNA double-stranded breaks induce histone H2AX phosphorylation on serine 139.. J Biol Chem 273 (10): 5858–68.
- ↑ Celeste A, Petersen S, Romanienko PJ, Fernandez-Capetillo O, Chen HT, Sedelnikova OA et al. (2002). Genomic instability in mice lacking histone H2AX.. Science 296 (5569): 922–7.
- ↑ Shroff R, Arbel-Eden A, Pilch D, Ira G, Bonner WM, Petrini JH et al. (2004). Distribution and dynamics of chromatin modification induced by a defined DNA double-strand break.. Curr Biol 14 (19): 1703–11.
- ↑ Rogakou EP, Boon C, Redon C, Bonner WM (1999). Megabase chromatin domains involved in DNA double-strand breaks in vivo.. J Cell Biol 146 (5): 905–16.
- ↑ Stewart GS, Wang B, Bignell CR, Taylor AM, Elledge SJ (2003). MDC1 is a mediator of the mammalian DNA damage checkpoint.. Nature 421 (6926): 961–6.
- ↑ Bekker-Jensen S, Mailand N (2010). Assembly and function of DNA double-strand break repair foci in mammalian cells.. DNA Repair (Amst) 9 (12): 1219–28.
- ↑ Ozdemir A, Spicuglia S, Lasonder E, Vermeulen M, Campsteijn C, Stunnenberg HG et al. (2005). Characterization of lysine 56 of histone H3 as an acetylation site in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.. J Biol Chem 280 (28): 25949–52.
- ↑ Masumoto H, Hawke D, Kobayashi R, Verreault A (2005). A role for cell-cycle-regulated histone H3 lysine 56 acetylation in the DNA damage response.. Nature 436 (7048): 294–8.
- ↑ 64.0 64.1 Driscoll R, Hudson A, Jackson SP (2007). Yeast Rtt109 promotes genome stability by acetylating histone H3 on lysine 56.. Science 315 (5812): 649–52.
- ↑ 65.0 65.1 Han J, Zhou H, Horazdovsky B, Zhang K, Xu RM, Zhang Z (2007). Rtt109 acetylates histone H3 lysine 56 and functions in DNA replication.. Science 315 (5812): 653–5.
- ↑ 66.0 66.1 Das C, Lucia MS, Hansen KC, Tyler JK (2009). CBP/p300-mediated acetylation of histone H3 on lysine 56.. Nature 459 (7243): 113–7.
- ↑ Han J, Zhou H, Li Z, Xu RM, Zhang Z (2007). Acetylation of lysine 56 of histone H3 catalyzed by RTT109 and regulated by ASF1 is required for replisome integrity.. J Biol Chem 282 (39): 28587–96.
- ↑ Wurtele H, Kaiser GS, Bacal J, St-Hilaire E, Lee EH, Tsao S et al. (2012). Histone H3 lysine 56 acetylation and the response to DNA replication fork damage.. Mol Cell Biol 32 (1): 154–72.
- ↑ Wurtele H, Tsao S, Lépine G, Mullick A, Tremblay J, Drogaris P et al. (2010). Modulation of histone H3 lysine 56 acetylation as an antifungal therapeutic strategy.. Nat Med 16 (7): 774–80.
|This page uses Creative Commons Licensed content from Wikipedia (view authors).|