No edit summary |
(tidied) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | {{ |
+ | {{CompPsy}} |
| − | {{Template:Animal liberation movement}} |
||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | These countries have ruled that [[chimpanzee]]s, [[bonobo]]s, [[gorilla]]s, and [[orangutans]] are [[Cognition|cognitively]] so similar to humans that using them as test subjects is unethical. Announcing the UK’s ban in 1986, the British |
||
| ⚫ | These countries have ruled that [[chimpanzee]]s, [[bonobo]]s, [[gorilla]]s, and [[orangutans]] are [[Cognition|cognitively]] so similar to humans that using them as test subjects is unethical. Announcing the UK’s ban in 1986, the British Home Secretary said: "[T]his is a matter of morality. The cognitive and behavioural characteristics and qualities of these animals mean it is unethical to treat them as expendable for research."<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.spiked-online.com/Articles/000000005549.htm|title=The great ape debate|author=Helene Guldberg|publisher=Spiked online|date=March 29, 2001}}</ref> Britain continues to use other [[primate]]s in laboratories, such as [[macaque]]s and [[marmoset]]s. |
||
| ⚫ | The British newspaper, ''The Independent'', has argued that the "demand for a comprehensive ban by the |
||
| ⚫ | The British newspaper, ''The Independent'', has argued that the "demand for a comprehensive ban by the European Union on experiments involving great apes is surely unanswerable"<ref>{{cite news|publisher=The Independent|date=March 28, 2001|url=http://www.independent.co.uk//eceRedirect?articleId=249787&pubId=55|title= Ban all experiments on the higher primates}}</ref> |
||
| ⚫ | The United States is the world's largest user of chimpanzees for |
||
| + | |||
| ⚫ | The United States is the world's largest user of chimpanzees for biomedical research with approximately 1,300 individuals currently in U.S. labs. A Washington-state group called Ban Ape Research (BAR) is campaigning to enact an ordinance in Seattle that would prohibit non-human great-ape experiments in that city, which would be the first jurisdiction in the U.S. to take this step. |
||
==References== |
==References== |
||
Revision as of 13:31, 17 February 2007
Assessment |
Biopsychology |
Comparative |
Cognitive |
Developmental |
Language |
Individual differences |
Personality |
Philosophy |
Social |
Methods |
Statistics |
Clinical |
Educational |
Industrial |
Professional items |
World psychology |
Animals · Animal ethology · Comparative psychology · Animal models · Outline · Index
A Great Ape research ban, or severe restrictions on the use of non-human great apes in research, is currently in place in the Netherlands, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, Sweden, Germany and Japan, and has been proposed in Austria.
These countries have ruled that chimpanzees, bonobos, gorillas, and orangutans are cognitively so similar to humans that using them as test subjects is unethical. Announcing the UK’s ban in 1986, the British Home Secretary said: "[T]his is a matter of morality. The cognitive and behavioural characteristics and qualities of these animals mean it is unethical to treat them as expendable for research."[1] Britain continues to use other primates in laboratories, such as macaques and marmosets.
The British newspaper, The Independent, has argued that the "demand for a comprehensive ban by the European Union on experiments involving great apes is surely unanswerable"[2]
The United States is the world's largest user of chimpanzees for biomedical research with approximately 1,300 individuals currently in U.S. labs. A Washington-state group called Ban Ape Research (BAR) is campaigning to enact an ordinance in Seattle that would prohibit non-human great-ape experiments in that city, which would be the first jurisdiction in the U.S. to take this step.
References
- ↑ includeonly>Helene Guldberg. "The great ape debate", Spiked online, March 29, 2001.
- ↑ includeonly>"Ban all experiments on the higher primates", The Independent, March 28, 2001.
See also
External links
| This page uses Creative Commons Licensed content from Wikipedia (view authors). |