Psychology Wiki

Freud's seduction theory

34,203pages on
this wiki
Add New Page
Talk0 Share

Assessment | Biopsychology | Comparative | Cognitive | Developmental | Language | Individual differences | Personality | Philosophy | Social |
Methods | Statistics | Clinical | Educational | Industrial | Professional items | World psychology |

Clinical: Approaches · Group therapy · Techniques · Types of problem · Areas of specialism · Taxonomies · Therapeutic issues · Modes of delivery · Model translation project · Personal experiences ·

Sigmund freud um 1905

Sigmund Freud, founder of Psychoanalysis.

Freud's seduction theory was a hypothesis posited in the mid-1890s by Sigmund Freud that he believed provided the solution to the problem of the origins of hysteria and obsessional neurosis. According to the theory, a repressed memory of an early childhood sexual abuse or molestation experience was the essential precondition for hysterical or obsessional symptoms, with the addition of an active sexual experience up to the age of eight for the latter.[1]

In the traditional account of development of seduction theory, Freud initially thought that his patients were relating more or less factual stories of sexual mistreatment, and that the sexual abuse was responsible for many of his patients' neuroses and other mental health problems.[2] Within a few years Freud abandoned his theory, concluding that the memories of sexual abuse were in fact imaginary fantasies.[3]

An alternative account that has come to the fore in recent Freud scholarship emphasizes that the theory as posited by Freud was that hysteria and obsessional neurosis result from unconscious memories of sexual abuse in infancy.[4] In the three seduction theory papers published in 1896, Freud stated that with all his current patients he had been able to uncover such abuse, mostly below the age of four.[5] These papers indicate that the patients did not relate stories of having been sexually abused in early childhood; rather, Freud used the analytic interpretation of symptoms and patients' associations, and the exerting of pressure on the patient, in an attempt to induce the "reproduction" of the deeply repressed memories he posited.[6] Though he reported he had succeeded in achieving this aim, he also acknowledged that the patients generally remained unconvinced that what they had experienced indicated that they had actually been sexually abused in infancy.[7] Freud's reports of the seduction theory episode went through a series of changes over the years, culminating in the traditional story based on his last account, in New Introductory Lectures on Psychoanalysis.[8]

Freud’s seduction theoryEdit

On the evening of April 21, 1896, Sigmund Freud presented a paper before his colleagues at the Society for Psychiatry and Neurology in Vienna, entitled "The Aetiology of Hysteria". Using a sample of 18 patients—male and female—from his practice, he concluded that all of them had been the victims of sexual assaults by various caretakers. The cause of the patient’s distress lay in a trauma inflicted by an actor in the childs’ social environment. The source of internal psychic pain lay in an act inflicted upon the child from outside.[9] This led to his well known ‘seduction theory’.

The medical journals of that time did not report Freud's lecture. In the Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, published weekly in Vienna, on May 14, 1896, three papers were reported from the April 21 meeting (p. 420). Two of the papers were reported in the usual manner. Invariably, the practice was to give the title of a paper, a brief summary of its contents, and an account of the ensuing discussion. But in the citation of the last paper, there was a break with tradition. The report reads as follows: Docent Sigm. Freud: Über die Aetiologie der Hysterie. (Sigmund Freud, lecturer: On the Aetiology of Hysteria.) There was no summary and no discussion.[10] Freud published it a few weeks later in the Wiener klinische Rundschau.[11]

On the other hand, Freud had no trouble publishing three papers on the subject in a matter of months. Doubt has been cast on the notion that the occurrence of child sexual abuse was not acknowledged by most of Freud's colleagues. It has been pointed out that they were skeptical about Freud's claims of one hundred percent confirmation of his theory, and would have been aware of criticisms that his suggestive clinical procedures were liable to produce findings of doubtful validity.[12]

Freud's seduction theory emphasizes the causative impact of nurture: the shaping of the mind by experience. This theory held that hysteria and obsessional neurosis are caused by repressed memories of infantile sexual abuse.[13] Infantile sexual abuse, the root of all neurosis, is premature introduction of sexuality into the experience of the child. Trauma creates affects and thoughts that simply cannot be integrated. The adult who had a normal, non traumatic childhood is able to contain and assimilate sexual feelings into a continuous sense of self. Freud proposed that adults who experienced sexual abuse as a child suffer from unconscious memories and feelings incompatible with the central mass of thoughts and feelings that constitute his or her experience. Psychic disorders are a direct consequence of experiences that cannot be assimilated.[14] Unconscious memories of infantile sexual abuse was a necessary condition for the development of certain disorders, hysteria in particular. But another condition had to be met: There had to be an unconscious memory of the abuse.[15]

Freud’s reported evidence for the seduction theoryEdit

Freud had a lot of data as evidence for the seduction theory, but rather than presenting the actual data on which he based his conclusions (his clinical cases and what he had learned from them) or the methods he used to acquire the data (his psychoanalytic technique), he instead addressed only the evidence that the data he reportedly acquired were accurate (that he had discovered genuine abuse). He thought that the community could not yet handle the clinical case stories about sexual abuse. He did not want to present these stories before the seduction theory had become more accepted.[16] Freud made several arguments to support the position that the memories he had uncovered were genuine. One of them was, according to Freud, that the patients were not simply remembering the events as they would normally forgotten material; rather they were essentially reliving the events, with all the accompanying painful sensory experiences.[17]

On two occasions Freud wrote that he would be presenting the clinical evidence for his claims,[18] but he never did so,[19] which some critics have contended means that they have had to be taken largely on trust.[20] Freud's clinical methodology at the time, involving the symbolic interpretation of symptoms, the use of suggestion and the exerting of pressure to induce his patients to "reproduce" the deeply repressed memories he posited,[21] has led several Freud scholars and historians of psychology to cast doubt on the validity of his findings, whether of actual infantile abuse, or, as he later decided, unconscious fantasies.[22]

Abandonment of ‘seduction theory’Edit

The neutrality of this section is disputed.

Freud did not publish the reasons that led to his abandoning the seduction theory in 1897–1898. For these we have to turn to a letter he wrote to his confidant Wilhelm Fliess dated 21 September 1897. First, he referred to his inability to “bring a single analysis to a real conclusion” and "the absence of complete successes" on which he had counted. Second, he wrote of his “surprise that in all cases, the father, not excluding my own, had to be accused of being perverse" if he were to be able to maintain the theory; and the "realization of the unexpected frequency of hysteria… whereas surely such widespread perversions against children are not very probable." Third, Freud referred to indications that, he argued, the unconscious is unable to distinguish fact from fiction. In the unconscious there is no sign of reality, so one cannot differentiate between the truth and the fiction invested with feeling. Fourth, Freud wrote of his belief that in deep-reaching psychosis, unconscious memories do break through to the conscious, "so the secret of childhood experiences is not disclosed even in the most confused delirium."[23] (In the same letter Freud wrote that his loss of faith in his theory would remain known only to himself and Fliess,[24] and in fact he did not make known his abandonment of the theory publicly until 1906.[25])

In his article 'On the History of the Psycho-Analytic Movement' (1914) Freud wrote: "If hysterical subjects trace back their symptoms to traumas that are ficticious, then the new fact which emerges is precisely that they create such scenes in phantasy and this psychical reality requires to be taken into account alongside practical reality" [26]

The collapse of the seduction theory led in 1897 to the emergence of Freud's new theory of infantile sexuality. The impulses, fantasies and conflicts that Freud claimed to have uncovered beneath the neurotic symptoms of his patients derived not from external contamination, he now believed, but from the mind of the child itself.

There were some serious negative consequences of this shift. The most obvious negative consequence was that a limited interpretation of Freud's theory of infantile sexuality would cause some therapists and others to deny reported sexual abuse as fantasy; a situation that has given rise to much criticism (e.g. The Freudian Coverup by social worker Florence Rush). However, without the rejection of the seduction theory concepts such as the unconscious, repressions, the repetition compulsion, transference and resistance, and the unfolding psychosexual stages of childhood would never have been added to human knowledge.[27]

An alternative view involves the recognition that the notion of unconscious mental processes was commonplace before Freud started writing on the subject.[28] Moreover, the skepticism of almost all non-Freudian psychiatrists and psychologists towards Freud's psychosexual stages of childhood is that it is not consistent with much of current informed opinion.[29]

See alsoEdit


  1. Masson (ed.) (1985), p. 187; Jones, E. (1953). Sigmund Freud: Life and Work. Volume 1. London: Hogarth Press, p. 289; Clark, R. W. (1980). Freud: The Man and the Cause. Jonathan Cape, p. 156.
  2. Jahoda, M. (1977). Freud and the Dilemmas of Psychology. London: Hogarth Press, p. 28; Clark (1980), p. 156; Gay, P. (1988). Freud: A Life for Our Time, Norton, pp. 92-94.
  3. Jahoda (1977), p. 28; Gay (1988), p. 96.
  4. Masson (ed.) (1985), pp. 141, 144; Garcia, E. E. (1987). Freud's Seduction Theory. The Psychological Study of the Child, Vol. 42. Yale University Press, pp. 443-468; Schimek, J. G. (1987). Fact and Fantasy in the Seduction Theory: a Historical Review. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, xxxv: 937-65; Israëls, H. and Schatzman, M. (1993). The Seduction Theory. History of Psychiatry, iv: 23-59; McCullough, M.L. (2001). Freud's seduction theory and its rehabilitation: A saga of one mistake after another. Review of General Psychology, vol. 5, no. 1: 3-22.
  5. Masson (1984), pp. 276, 281; Garcia (1987); Schimek (1987); Israëls & Schatzman (1993); Salyard, A. (1994), On Not Knowing What You Know: Object-coercive Doubting and Freud's Announcement of the Seduction Theory, Psychoanalytic Review, 81(4), pp. 659-676.
  6. Schimek (1987); Smith, D. L. (1991). Hidden Conversations: An Introduction to Communicative Psychoanalysis, Routledge, pp. 9-10; Toews, J.E. (1991). Historicizing Psychoanalysis: Freud in His Time and for Our Time, Journal of Modern History, vol. 63 (pp. 504-545), p. 510, n.12; McNally, R.J. (2003), Remembering Trauma, Harvard University Press, pp. 159-169.
  7. Masson (1984), p. 273; Paul, R. A. (1985). Freud and the Seduction Theory: A Critical Examination of Masson's "The Assault on "Truth", Journal of Psychoanalytic Anthropology, vol. 8, pp. 161-187; Garcia (1987); Schimek, (1987); Eissler, (2001), pp. 114-116.
  8. Schimek, (1987); Israëls & Schatzman (1993); Salyard, A. (1994); Esterson, A. (2001).
  9. Gay, P. (1988). Freud: a life for our time. New York: W. W. Norton
  10. Masson (1984), p. 6.
  11. Masson (1984), p. 11.
  12. Robinson, P. (1993). Freud and his Critics. University of California Press, p. 114-115; Borch-Jacobsen (1996), Neurotica: Freud and the Seduction Theory, October, 76, Spring 1996, MIT, pp. 15-43; Esterson, A. (2002).
  13. Masson (ed) 1985, pp. 141, 144; Schimek (1987); Smith (1991), pp. 7-8.
  14. Mitchell, S.A., & Black, M.J. (1995). Freud and Beyond: a history of modern psychoanalytic thought. Basic Books, New York
  15. Freud, S.E. 3, 1896a, pp. 151-152; 1896b, p. 166, 1896c, p. 211.
  16. Masson, J. M. (1984). The assault on truth, Freud’s suppression of the seduction theory, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York
  17. Gleaves, D.H., Hernandez, E. (1999). Recent reformulations of Freud’s development and abandonment of his seduction theory. History of psychology, 2 (4), 324-354.
  18. Esterson, A. (2001).
  19. Robinson, P. (1993), p. 107; Esterson (2001).
  20. Smith, (1991), pp. 11-14; Triplett, H. (2005). The Misnomer of Freud's "Seduction Theory", Journal of the History of Ideas, 2005, University of Pennsylvania Press.
  21. Schimek (1987); Eissler (2001), pp. 114-116.
  22. Cioffi (1998[1974]), pp. 199-204; Schimek (1987); Salyard (1994); Esterson (1998); Eissler (2001), pp. 107-117; Allen, B. P. (1997). Personality Theories: Development, Growth and Diversity, Boston: Allyn & Bacon, pp. 43-45; Hergenhahn, B.R. (1997), An Introduction to the History of Psychology, Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks.Cole, pp. 484-485; McNally, R.J. (2003), Remembering Trauma, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 159-169.
  23. Masson (ed.) (1985), pp. 264-266; Masson (1984), pp. 108-110; Israëls and Schatzman, (1993).
  24. Masson (ed.) (1985), p. 265; Masson (1984), p. 109.
  25. Israëls and Schatzman (1993); Esterson, A. (2001).
  26. Freud, S.(1914).'On the History of the Psycho-Analytic Movement' Standard edition, XIV, 7-66.(p17-18)
  27. Joyce, P.A. (1995). Psychoanalytic theory, child sexual abuse and clinical social work. Clinical social work journal, 23 (2), 199-214
  28. Ellenberger, H. F. (1970), The Discovery of the Unconscious: The History and Evolution of Dynamic Psychiatry, New York: Basic Books; Altschule, M.D. (1977), Origins of Concepts in Human Behavior, New York: Wiley, p. 199.
  29. Alan A. Stone (1995), "Where Will Psychoanalysis Survive?", American Academy of Psychoanalysis.; "Freud is Widely Taught at Universities, except in the psychology department", New York Times, 25 November 2007.

Further readingEdit

  • Cioffi, F. (1998 [1973]. Was Freud a liar? Freud and the Question of Pseudoscience. Chicago: Open Court, pp. 199–204.
  • Kurt R. Eissler, Freud and the seduction theory: A brief love affair, New York: International Universities Press, 2001
  • Robert Fliess, Symbol, Dream and Psychosis: Volume III Psychoanalytic Series, 1973
  • Esterson, A. (1998). Jeffrey Masson and Freud’s seduction theory: a new fable based on old myths. History of the Human Sciences, 11 (1), pp. 1–21.
  • Esterson, A. (2001). The mythologizing of psychoanalytic history: deception and self deception in Freud’s accounts of the seduction theory episode. History of Psychiatry, Vol. 12 (3), pp. 329-352.
  • Esterson, A. (2002). The myth of Freud’s ostracism by the medical community in 1896-1905: Jeffrey Masson’s assault on truth. History of Psychology, 5 (2), pp. 115-134.
  • Freud, S. (1896a). Heredity and the aetiology of the neuroses. Standard Edition Vol. 3, 143-156.
  • Freud, S. (1896b). Further remarks on the neuro-psychoses of defence. Standard Edition Vol. 3, 162-185.
  • Freud, S. (1896c). The aetiology of hysteria. Standard Edition, Vol. 3, 191-221.
  • Israëls, H. and Schatzman, M. (1993) The Seduction Theory. History of Psychiatry, iv: 23-59.
  • Masson, J. M. (1984). The Assault on Truth: Freud's Suppression of the Seduction Theory. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
  • Masson, J. M. (editor) (1985). The Complete Letters of Sigmund Freud to Wilhelm Fliess 1887-1904. ed. and trans. J. M. Masson. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Schimek, J. G. (1987). Fact and Fantasy in the Seduction Theory: a Historical Review. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, xxxv: 937-65.

External links Edit

This page uses Creative Commons Licensed content from Wikipedia (view authors).

Ad blocker interference detected!

Wikia is a free-to-use site that makes money from advertising. We have a modified experience for viewers using ad blockers

Wikia is not accessible if you’ve made further modifications. Remove the custom ad blocker rule(s) and the page will load as expected.

Also on Fandom

Random Wiki