Ad blocker interference detected!
Wikia is a free-to-use site that makes money from advertising. We have a modified experience for viewers using ad blockers
Wikia is not accessible if you’ve made further modifications. Remove the custom ad blocker rule(s) and the page will load as expected.
Individual differences |
Methods | Statistics | Clinical | Educational | Industrial | Professional items | World psychology |
In linguistics, formal semantics seeks to understand linguistic meaning by constructing precise mathematical models of the principles that speakers use to define relations between expressions in a natural language and the world which supports meaningful discourse.
Linguists rarely employed formal semantics until Richard Montague showed how English (or any natural language) could be treated like a formal language. His contribution to linguistic semantics, which is now known as Montague grammar, was the basis for further developments, like the categorial grammar of Bar-Hillel and colleagues, and the more recent type-logical semantics (or grammar) based on Lambek calculus.
Another line of inquiry, using linear logic, is Glue semantics, which is based on the idea of "interpretation as deduction", closely related to the "parsing as deduction" paradigm of categorial grammar.
Cognitive semantics emerged and developed as a reaction against formal semantics.
See also Edit
- ↑ (2003) The handbook of linguistics, Wiley-Blackwell., chapter 15: An Introduction to Formal semantics.
- ↑ For a very readable and succinct overview of how formal semantics found its way into linguistics, please refer to The formal approach to meaning: Formal semantics and its recent developments by Barbara Abbott. In: Journal of Foreign Languages (Shanghai), 119:1 (January 1999), 2–20.
- ↑ Michael Moortgat (1988). Categorial investigations: logical and linguistic aspects of the Lambek calculus, Walter de Gruyter. URL accessed 5 April 2011.
- ↑ Harry Bunt (2008). Computing Meaning, Springer.
- ↑ Margaret King (1992). "Epilogue: on the relation between computational linguistics and formal semantics" Michael Rosner Computational Linguistics and Formal Semantics, 283, Cambridge University Press.
Further reading Edit
- Max Cresswell (2006). "Formal semantics" Michael Devitt, Richard Hanley The Blackwell guide to the philosophy of language, Wiley-Blackwell. An very accessible overview of the main ideas in the field.
- John I. Saeed (2008). Semantics, 3rd, Wiley-Blackwell. Chapter 10, Formal semantics, contains the best chapter-level coverage of the main technical directions
- (2010) Handbook of Logic and Language, 2nd, Elsevier. The most comprehensive reference in the area.
- Emmon W. Bach (1989). Informal lectures on formal semantics, SUNY Press. One of the first textbooks. Accessible to undergraduates.
- Ronnie Cann (1993). Formal semantics: an introduction, Cambridge University Press.
- (1998) Semantics in generative grammar, Wiley-Blackwell.
- (2000) Meaning and grammar: an introduction to semantics, 2nd, MIT Press.
- Sean A. Fulop (2004). On the Logic and Learning of Language, Trafford Publishing.
- based on: Template:Cite thesis
- Glyn V. Morrill (1994). Type logical grammar: categorial logic of signs, Springer.
- Reinhard Muskens Type-logical Semantics to appear in the Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy Online.
- Bob Carpenter (1998). Type-logical semantics, MIT Press.
- Johan van Benthem (1995). Language in action: categories, lambdas, and dynamic logic, MIT Press.
- Barbara H. Partee: Reflections of a formal semanticist as of Feb 2005. Ample historical information. (an extended version of the introductory essay in Barbara H. Partee: Compositionality in Formal Semantics: Selected Papers of Barbara Partee. Blackwell Publishers, Oxford, 2004.)
|This page uses Creative Commons Licensed content from Wikipedia (view authors).|