Wikia

Psychology Wiki

Family therapy

Talk0
34,140pages on
this wiki

Assessment | Biopsychology | Comparative | Cognitive | Developmental | Language | Individual differences | Personality | Philosophy | Social |
Methods | Statistics | Clinical | Educational | Industrial | Professional items | World psychology |

Clinical: Approaches · Group therapy · Techniques · Types of problem · Areas of specialism · Taxonomies · Therapeutic issues · Modes of delivery · Model translation project · Personal experiences ·


Family therapy
Brain animated color nevit

Approaches
Notable therapists
Misc

Family therapy, also referred to as couple and family therapy and family systems therapy, and earlier generally referred to as marriage therapy, is a branch of psychotherapy that works with families and couples in intimate relationships to nurture change and development. It tends to view these in terms of the systems of interaction between family members. It emphasizes family relationships as an important factor in psychological health. As such, family problems have been seen to arise as an emergent property of systemic interactions, rather than to be blamed on individual members.

What the different schools of family therapy have in common is a belief that, regardless of the origin of the problem, and regardless of whether the clients consider it an "individual" or "family" issue, involving families in solutions is often beneficial. This involvement of families is commonly accomplished by their direct participation in the therapy session. The skills of the family therapist thus include the ability to influence conversations in a way that catalyzes the strengths, wisdom, and support of the wider system.

In the field's early years, many clinicians defined the family in a narrow, traditional manner usually including parents and children. As the field has evolved, the concept of the family is more commonly defined in terms of strongly supportive, long-term roles and relationships between people who may or may not be related by blood.

Family therapy has been used effectively in the full range of human dilemmas; there is no category of relationship or psychological problem that has not been addressed with this approach.

History and theoretical frameworksEdit

Main article: History of family therapy

Formal interventions with families to help individuals and families experiencing various kinds of problems have been a part of many cultures, probably throughout history. These interventions have sometimes involved formal procedures or rituals, and often included the extended family as well as non-kin members of the community (see for example Ho'oponopono). Following the emergence of specialization in various societies, these interventions were often conducted by particular members of a community – for example, a chief, priest, physician, and so on - usually as an ancillary function.[1]

Family therapy as a distinct professional practice within Western cultures can be argued to have had its origins in the social work movements of the 19th century in England and the United States.[1] As a branch of psychotherapy, its roots can be traced somewhat later to the early 20th century with the emergence of the child guidance movement and marriage counseling.[2] The formal development of family therapy dates to the 1940s and early 1950s with the founding in 1942 of the American Association of Marriage Counselors (the precursor of the AAMFT), and through the work of various independent clinicians and groups - in England (John Bowlby at the Tavistock Clinic), the US (John Elderkin Bell, Nathan Ackerman, Christian Midelfort, Theodore Lidz, Lyman Wynne, Murray Bowen, Carl Whitaker, Virginia Satir), and Hungary (D.L.P. Liebermann) - who began seeing family members together for observation or therapy sessions.[1][3] There was initially a strong influence from psychoanalysis (most of the early founders of the field had psychoanalytic backgrounds) and social psychiatry, and later from learning theory and behavior therapy - and significantly, these clinicians began to articulate various theories about the nature and functioning of the family as an entity that was more than a mere aggregation of individuals.[2]

The movement received an important boost in the mid-1950s through the work of anthropologist Gregory Bateson and colleagues – Jay Haley, Donald D. Jackson, John Weakland, William Fry, and later, Virginia Satir, Paul Watzlawick and others – at Palo Alto in the United States, who introduced ideas from cybernetics and general systems theory into social psychology and psychotherapy, focusing in particular on the role of communication (see Bateson Project). This approach eschewed the traditional focus on individual psychology and historical factors – that involve so-called linear causation and content – and emphasized instead feedback and homeostatic mechanisms and “rules” in here-and-now interactions – so-called circular causation and process – that were thought to maintain or exacerbate problems, whatever the original cause(s).[4][5] (See also systems psychology and systemic therapy.) This group was also influenced significantly by the work of US psychiatrist, hypnotherapist, and brief therapist, Milton H. Erickson - especially his innovative use of strategies for change, such as paradoxical directives (see also Reverse psychology). The members of the Bateson Project (like the founders of a number of other schools of family therapy, including Carl Whitaker, Murray Bowen, and Ivan Böszörményi-Nagy) had a particular interest in the possible psychosocial causes and treatment of schizophrenia, especially in terms of the putative "meaning" and "function" of signs and symptoms within the family system. The research of psychiatrists and psychoanalysts Lyman Wynne and Theodore Lidz on communication deviance and roles (e.g., pseudo-mutuality, pseudo-hostility, schism and skew) in families of schizophrenics also became influential with systems-communications-oriented theorists and therapists.[2][6] A related theme, applying to dysfunction and psychopathology more generally, was that of the "identified patient" or "presenting problem" as a manifestation of or surrogate for the family's, or even society's, problems. (See also double bind; family nexus.)

By the mid-1960s, a number of distinct schools of family therapy had emerged. From those groups that were most strongly influenced by cybernetics and systems theory, there came MRI Brief Therapy, and slightly later, strategic therapy, Salvador Minuchin's Structural Family Therapy and the Milan systems model. Partly in reaction to some aspects of these systemic models, came the experiential approaches of Virginia Satir and Carl Whitaker, which downplayed theoretical constructs, and emphasized subjective experience and unexpressed feelings (including the subconscious), authentic communication, spontaneity, creativity, total therapist engagement, and often included the extended family. Concurrently and somewhat independently, there emerged the various intergenerational therapies of Murray Bowen, Ivan Böszörményi-Nagy, James Framo, and Norman Paul, which present different theories about the intergenerational transmission of health and dysfunction, but which all deal usually with at least three generations of a family (in person or conceptually), either directly in therapy sessions, or via "homework", "journeys home", etc. Psychodynamic family therapy - which, more than any other school of family therapy, deals directly with individual psychology and the unconscious in the context of current relationships - continued to develop through a number of groups that were influenced by the ideas and methods of Nathan Ackerman, and also by the British School of Object Relations and John Bowlby’s work on attachment. Multiple-family group therapy, a precursor of psychoeducational family intervention, emerged, in part, as a pragmatic alternative form of intervention - especially as an adjunct to the treatment of serious mental disorders with a significant biological basis, such as schizophrenia - and represented something of a conceptual challenge to some of the "systemic" (and thus potentially "family-blaming") paradigms of pathogenesis that were implicit in many of the dominant models of family therapy. The late-1960s and early-1970s saw the development of network therapy (which bears some resemblance to traditional practices such as Ho'oponopono) by Ross Speck and Carolyn Attneave, and the emergence of behavioral marital therapy (renamed behavioral couples therapy in the 1990s; see also relationship counseling) and behavioral family therapy as models in their own right.[2]

By the late-1970s, the weight of clinical experience - especially in relation to the treatment of serious mental disorders - had led to some revision of a number of the original models and a moderation of some of the earlier stridency and theoretical purism. There were the beginnings of a general softening of the strict demarcations between schools, with moves toward rapprochement, integration, and eclecticism – although there was, nevertheless, some hardening of positions within some schools. These trends were reflected in and influenced by lively debates within the field and critiques from various sources, including feminism and post-modernism, that reflected in part the cultural and political tenor of the times, and which foreshadowed the emergence (in the 1980s and 1990s) of the various "post-systems" constructivist and social constructionist approaches. While there was still debate within the field about whether, or to what degree, the systemic-constructivist and medical-biological paradigms were necessarily antithetical to each other (see also Anti-psychiatry; Biopsychosocial model), there was a growing willingness and tendency on the part of family therapists to work in multi-modal clinical partnerships with other members of the helping and medical professions.[2][6][7]

From the mid-1980s to the present, the field has been marked by a diversity of approaches that partly reflect the original schools, but which also draw on other theories and methods from individual psychotherapy and elsewhere – these approaches and sources include: brief therapy, structural therapy, constructivist approaches (e.g., Milan systems, post-Milan/collaborative/conversational, reflective), solution-focused therapy, narrative therapy, a range of cognitive and behavioral approaches, psychodynamic and object relations approaches, attachment and Emotionally Focused Therapy, intergenerational approaches, network therapy, and multisystemic therapy (MST).[8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] Multicultural, intercultural, and integrative approaches are being developed.[16][17][18][19][20][21] Many practitioners claim to be "eclectic," using techniques from several areas, depending upon their own inclinations and/or the needs of the client(s), and there is a growing movement toward a single “generic” family therapy that seeks to incorporate the best of the accumulated knowledge in the field and which can be adapted to many different contexts;[22] however, there are still a significant number of therapists who adhere more or less strictly to a particular, or limited number of, approach(es).[23]

Ideas and methods from family therapy have been influential in psychotherapy generally: a survey of over 2,500 US therapists in 2006 revealed that of the 10 most influential therapists of the previous quarter-century, three were prominent family therapists and that the marital and family systems model was the second most utilized model after cognitive behavioral therapy.[24]

AssessmentEdit

Main article: Assessment in family therapy

TechniquesEdit

Family therapy uses a range of counseling and other techniques including:


The number of sessions depends on the situation, but the average is 5-20 sessions. A family therapist usually meets several members of the family at the same time. This has the advantage of making differences between the ways family members perceive mutual relations as well as interaction patterns in the session apparent both for the therapist and the family. These patterns frequently mirror habitual interaction patterns at home, even though the therapist is now incorporated into the family system. Therapy interventions usually focus on relationship patterns rather than on analyzing impulses of the unconscious mind or early childhood trauma of individuals as a Freudian therapist would do - although some schools of family therapy, for example psychodynamic and intergenerational, do consider such individual and historical factors (thus embracing both linear and circular causation) and they may use instruments such as the genogram to help to elucidate the patterns of relationship across generations.

The distinctive feature of family therapy is its perspective and analytical framework rather than the number of people present at a therapy session. Specifically, family therapists are relational therapists: They are generally more interested in what goes on between individuals rather than within one or more individuals, although some family therapists—in particular those who identify as psychodynamic, object relations, intergenerational, EFT, or experiential family therapists—tend to be as interested in individuals as in the systems those individuals and their relationships constitute. Depending on the conflicts at issue and the progress of therapy to date, a therapist may focus on analyzing specific previous instances of conflict, as by reviewing a past incident and suggesting alternative ways family members might have responded to one another during it, or instead proceed directly to addressing the sources of conflict at a more abstract level, as by pointing out patterns of interaction that the family might have not noticed.

Family therapists tend to be more interested in the maintenance and/or solving of problems rather than in trying to identify a single cause. Some families may perceive cause-effect analyses as attempts to allocate blame to one or more individuals, with the effect that for many families a focus on causation is of little or no clinical utility. It is important to note that a circular way of problem evaluation is used as opposed to a linear route. Using this method, families can be helped by finding patterns of behaviour, what the causes are, and what can be done to better their situation.[25]

TheoriesEdit

The basic theory of classical systemic family therapy was derived mainly from systems theory and cybernetics. As the field evolved, it was then influenced by behavioral therapy and cognitive psychotherapy, although most of the founders of the field had psychoanalytic backgrounds.[26] More recent developments have come from feminist, postmodernist, narrative, psychodynamic and attachment theories.[27][28][29][30][31][32]

Important schools of family therapy include structural family therapy, strategic family therapy, a range of cognitive and behavioral approaches, constructivist (eg, Milan systems, post-systems/collaborative/conversational, reflective), solution-focused therapy, psychodynamic, object relations, intergenerational (Bowen systems theory, Contextual therapy), Emotionally Focused Therapy, experiential therapy, and narrative therapy. Multicultural, intercultural, and integrative approaches are being developed.[33][34][35][36][37] Most practitioners claim to be "eclectic," using techniques from several areas, depending upon their own inclinations and/or the needs of the client(s).[38]

Summary of theories and techniquesEdit

(references:[39][40][41][42])

Theoretical Model Theorists Summary Techniques
Adlerian Family Therapy Alfred Adler Also known as "Individual Psychology". Sees the person as a whole. Ideas include compensation for feelings of inferiority leading to striving for significance toward a fictional final goal with a private logic. Birth order and mistaken goals are explored to examine mistaken motivations of children and adults in the family constellation. Psychoanalysis, Typical Day, Reorienting, Re-educating
Attachment Theory John Bowlby, Mary Ainsworth Individuals are shaped by their experiences with caregivers in the first three years of life. Used as a foundation for Object Relations Theory. The Strange Situation experiment with infants involves a systematic process of leaving a child alone in a room in order to assess the quality of their parental bond. Psychoanalysis, Play Therapy
Bowenian Family Systems Murray Bowen, Betty Carter, Philip Guerin, Michael Kerr, Thomas Fogarty, Monica McGoldrick, Edwin Friedman, Daniel Papero Also known as “Intergenerational Family Therapy” (although there are also other schools of intergenerational family therapy). Family members are driven to achieve a balance of internal and external differentiation, causing anxiety, triangulation, and emotional cutoff. Families are affected by nuclear family emotional processes, sibling positions and multigenerational transmission patterns resulting in an undifferentiated family ego mass. Detriangulation, Nonanxious Presence, Genograms, Coaching
Cognitive Behavioral Family Therapy John Gottman, Albert Ellis, Albert Bandura Problems are the result of operant conditioning that reinforces negative behaviors within the family’s interpersonal social exchanges that extinguish desired behavior and promote incentives toward unwanted behaviors. This can lead to irrational beliefs and a faulty family schema. Therapeutic Contracts, Modeling, Systematic Desensitization, Shaping, Charting, Examining Irrational Beliefs
Collaborative Language Systems Harry Goolishian, Harlene Anderson, Tom Andersen, Lynn Hoffman, Peggy Penn Individuals form meanings about their experiences within the context of social relationship on a personal and organizational level. Collaborative therapists help families reorganize and dis-solve their perceived problems through a transparent dialogue about inner thoughts with a “not-knowing” stance intended to illicit new meaning through conversation. Collaborative therapy is an approach that avoids a particular theoretical perspective in favor of a client-centered philosophical process. Dialogical Conversation, Not Knowing, Curiosity, Being Public, Reflecting Teams
Communications Approaches Virginia Satir, John Banmen, Jane Gerber, Maria Gomori All people are born into a primary survival triad between themselves and their parents where they adopt survival stances to protect their self-worth from threats communicated by words and behaviors of their family members. Experiential therapists are interested in altering the overt and covert messages between family members that affect their body, mind and feelings in order to promote congruence and to validate each person’s inherent self-worth. Equality, Modeling Communication, Family Life Chronology, Family Sculpting, Metaphors, Family Reconstruction
Contextual Therapy Ivan Böszörményi-Nagy Families are built upon an unconscious network of implicit loyalties between parents and children that can be damaged when these “relational ethics” of fairness, trust, entitlement, mutuality and merit are breached. Rebalancing, Family Negotiations, Validation, Filial Debt Repayment
Emotion-Focused Therapy Sue Johnson, Les Greenberg Couples and families can develop rigid patterns of interaction based on powerful emotional experiences that hinder emotional engagement and trust. Treatment aims to enhance empathic capabilities of family members by exploring deep-seated habits and modifying emotional cues. Reflecting, Validation, Heightening, Reframing, Restructuring
Experiential Family Therapy Carl Whitaker, David Kieth, Laura Roberto, Walter Kempler, John Warkentin, Thomas Malone, August Napier Stemming from Gestalt foundations, change and growth occurs through an existential encounter with a therapist who is intentionally “real” and authentic with clients without pretense, often in a playful and sometimes absurd way as a means to foster flexibility in the family and promote individuation. Battling, Constructive Anxiety, Redefining Symptoms, Affective Confrontation, Co-Therapy, Humor
Feminist Family Therapy Sandra Bern, Complications from social and political disparity between genders are identified as underlying causes of conflict within a family system. Therapists are encouraged to be aware of these influences in order to avoid perpetuating hidden oppression, biases and cultural stereotypes and to model an egalitarian perspective of healthy family relationships. Demystifying, Modeling, Equality, Personal Accountability
Milan Systemic Family Therapy Luigi Boscolo, Gianfranco Cecchin, Mara Selvini Palazzoli, Giuliana Prata A practical attempt by the “Milan Group” to establish therapeutic techniques based on Gregory Bateson’s cybernetics that disrupts unseen systemic patterns of control and games between family members by challenging erroneous family beliefs and reworking the family’s linguistic assumptions. Hypothesizing, Circular Questioning, Neutrality, Counterparadox
Medical Family Therapy[42] Goerge Engel, Susan McDaniel, Jeri Hepworth & William Doherty Families facing the challenges of major illness experience a unique set of biological, psychological and social difficulties that require a specialized skills of a therapist who understands the complexities of the medical system, as well as the full spectrum of mental health theories and techniques. Grief Work, Family Meetings, Consultations, Collaborative Approaches
MRI Brief Therapy Gregory Bateson, Milton Erickson, Heinz von Foerster Established by the Mental Research Institute (MRI) as a synthesis of ideas from multiple theorists in order to interrupt misguided attempts by families to create first and second order change by persisting with “more of the same,” mixed signals from unclear metacommunication and paradoxical double-bind messages. Reframing, Prescribing the Symptom, Relabeling, Restraining (Going Slow), Bellac Ploy
Narrative Therapy Michael White, David Epston People use stories to make sense of their experience and to establish their identity as a social and political constructs based on local knowledge. Narrative therapists avoid marginalizing their clients by positioning themselves as a co-editor of their reality with the idea that “the person is not the problem, but the problem is the problem.” Deconstruction, Externalizing Problems, Mapping, Asking Permission
Object Relations Therapy Hazan & Shaver, David Scharff & Jill Scharff, James Framo, Individuals choose relationships that attempt to heal insecure attachments from childhood. Negative patterns established by their parents (object) are projected onto their partners. Detriangulation, Co-Therapy, Psychoanalysis, Holding Environment
Psychoanalytic Family Therapy Nathan Ackerman By applying the strategies of Freudian psychoanalysis to the family system therapists can gain insight into the interlocking psychopathologies of the family members and seek to improve complementarity Psychoanalysis, Authenticity, Joining, Confrontation
Solution Focused Therapy Kim Insoo Berg, Steve de Shazer, William O'Hanlon, Michelle Weiner-Davis, Paul Watzlawick The inevitable onset of constant change leads to negative interpretations of the past and language that shapes the meaning of an individual’s situation, diminishing their hope and causing them to overlook their own strengths and resources. Future Focus, Beginner’s Mind, Miracle Question, Goal Setting, Scaling
Strategic Therapy Jay Haley, Cloe Madanes Symptoms of dysfunction are purposeful in maintaining homeostasis in the family hierarchy as it transitions through various stages in the family life cycle. Directives, Paradoxical Injunctions, Positioning, Metaphoric Tasks, Restraining (Going Slow)
Structural family therapy Salvador Minuchin, Harry Aponte, Charles Fishman, Braulio Montalvo Family problems arise from maladaptive boundaries and subsystems that are created within the overall family system of rules and rituals that governs their interactions. Joining, Family Mapping, Hypothesizing, Reenactments, Reframing, Unbalancing

TechniquesEdit

Family therapy uses a range of counseling and other techniques including:

The number of sessions depends on the situation, but the average is 5-20 sessions. A family therapist usually meets several members of the family at the same time. This has the advantage of making differences between the ways family members perceive mutual relations as well as interaction patterns in the session apparent both for the therapist and the family. These patterns frequently mirror habitual interaction patterns at home, even though the therapist is now incorporated into the family system. Therapy interventions usually focus on relationship patterns rather than on analyzing impulses of the unconscious mind or early childhood trauma of individuals as a Freudian therapist would do - although some schools of family therapy, for example psychodynamic and intergenerational, do consider such individual and historical factors (thus embracing both linear and circular causation) and they may use instruments such as the genogram to help to elucidate the patterns of relationship across generations.

The distinctive feature of family therapy is its perspective and analytical framework rather than the number of people present at a therapy session. Specifically, family therapists are relational therapists: They are generally more interested in what goes on between individuals rather than within one or more individuals, although some family therapists—in particular those who identify as psychodynamic, object relations, intergenerational, EFT, or experiential family therapists—tend to be as interested in individuals as in the systems those individuals and their relationships constitute. Depending on the conflicts at issue and the progress of therapy to date, a therapist may focus on analyzing specific previous instances of conflict, as by reviewing a past incident and suggesting alternative ways family members might have responded to one another during it, or instead proceed directly to addressing the sources of conflict at a more abstract level, as by pointing out patterns of interaction that the family might have not noticed.

Family therapists tend to be more interested in the maintenance and/or solving of problems rather than in trying to identify a single cause. Some families may perceive cause-effect analyses as attempts to allocate blame to one or more individuals, with the effect that for many families a focus on causation is of little or no clinical utility. It is important to note that a circular way of problem evaluation is used as opposed to a linear route. Using this method, families can be helped by finding patterns of behaviour, what the causes are, and what can be done to better their situation.[43]

A novel development in the field of couples therapy in particular, has involved the introduction of insights gained from affective neuroscience and psychopharmacology into clinical practice.[44] There has been interest in use of the so-called love hormoneoxytocin – during therapy sessions, although this is still largely experimental and somewhat controversial.[45][46]

Evidence baseEdit

Family therapy has an evolving evidence base. A summary of current evidence is available via the UK's Association of Family Therapy. [1]

According to a 2004 French government study conducted by INSERM, Family and couple's therapy was the second most effective therapy after Cognitive behavioral therapy.[47] The study used meta-analysis of over a hundred secondary studies to find some level of effectiveness that was either "proven" or "presumed" to exist. Of the treatments studied, family therapy was presumed or proven effective at treating schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, anorexia and alcohol dependency.[47]


Licensing and degreesEdit

Family therapy practitioners come from a range of professional backgrounds, and some are specifically qualified or licensed/registered in family therapy (licensing is not required in some jurisdictions and requirements vary from place to place). In the United Kingdom and the United States, family therapists are usually psychologists, nurses, psychotherapists, social workers, or counselors who have done further training in family therapy, either a diploma or an M.Sc.; however, in the US there is a specific degree and license as a Marriage and Family therapist.

Prior to 1999 in California, counselors who specialized in this area were called Marriage, Family and Child Counselors. Today, they are known as Marriage and Family Therapists (MFT), and work variously in private practice, in clinical settings such as hospitals, institutions, or counseling organizations.

A master's degree is required to work as an MFT in some American states. Most commonly, MFTs will first earn a M.S. or M.A. degree in psychology, family studies, or social work and then spend two to three years completing a program in specific areas of psychology relevant to marriage and family therapy. After graduation, prospective MFTs work as interns under the supervision of a licensed professional and are referred to as an MFTi.[48]

Requirements vary, but in most states about 3000 hours of supervised work as an intern are needed to sit for a licensing exam. MFTs must be licensed by the state to practice. Only after completing their education and internship and passing the state licensing exam can they call themselves MFTs and work unsupervised.

License restrictions can vary considerably from state to state. In Ohio, for example, Marriage and Family Therapists are not allowed to diagnose and treat mental and emotional disorders, practice independently, or bill insurance.

There have been concerns raised within the profession about the fact that specialist training in couples therapy – as distinct from family therapy in general - is not required to gain a license as an MFT or membership of the main professional body, the AAMFT.[49]

Values and ethics in family therapyEdit

Since issues of interpersonal conflict, values, and ethics are often more pronounced in relationship therapy than in individual therapy, there has been debate within the profession about the different values that are implicit in the various theoretical models of therapy and the role of the therapist’s own values in the therapeutic process, and how prospective clients should best go about finding a therapist whose values and objectives are most consistent with their own.[50][51][52] Specific issues that have emerged have included an increasing questioning of the longstanding notion of therapeutic neutrality[53],[54][55] a concern with questions of justice and self-determination,[56] connectedness and independence,[57] "functioning" versus "authenticity",[58] and questions about the degree of the therapist’s "pro-marriage/family" versus "pro-individual" commitment.[59]

Founders and key influences Edit

Some key developers of family therapy are:

JournalsEdit

Category:Family therapy journals include:

Professional organizationsEdit

See alsoEdit

ReferencesEdit

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 Broderick, C.B. & Schrader, S.S. (1991). The History of Professional Marriage and Family Therapy. In A. S. Gurman & D. P. Kniskern (Eds.), Handbook of Family Therapy. Vol. 2. NY: Brunner/Mazel
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 Sholevar, G.P. (2003). Family Theory and Therapy. In Sholevar, G.P. & Schwoeri, L.D. Textbook of Family and Couples Therapy: Clinical Applications. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing Inc.
  3. Silverman, M. & Silverman, M. Psychiatry Inside the Family Circle. Saturday Evening Post, 46-51. 28 July 1962.
  4. Guttman, H.A. (1991). Systems Theory, Cybernetics, and Epistemology. In A. S. Gurman & D. P. Kniskern (Eds.), Handbook of Family Therapy. Vol. 2. NY: Brunner/Mazel
  5. Becvar, D.S., & Becvar, R.J. (2008). Family therapy: A systemic integration. 7th ed. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
  6. 6.0 6.1 Barker, P. (2007). Basic family therapy; 5th edition. Wiley-Blackwell.
  7. Nichols, M.P. & Schwartz, R.C. (2006). Family therapy: concepts and methods. 7th ed. Boston: Pearson/Allyn & Bacon.
  8. Sprenkle D.H., Bischof G.P. (1994). Contemporary family therapy in the United States. Journal of Family Therapy 16 (1): 5–23.
  9. Dattilio, F.R. (Ed.) (1998). Case Studies in Couple and Family Therapy: Systemic and Cognitive Perspectives. Guildford Press: New York.
  10. Gurman A.S., Fraenkel P. (2002). The history of couple therapy: a millennial review. Family Process 41 (2): 199–260.
  11. Couple therapy Harvard Mental Health Letter 03/01/2007.
  12. Attachment and Family Systems. Family Process. Special Issue: Fall 2002 41(3)
  13. Denborough, D. (2001). Family Therapy: Exploring the Field's Past, Present and Possible Futures. Adelaide, South Australia: Dulwich Centre Publications.
  14. Crago, H. (2006). Couple, Family and Group Work: First Steps in Interpersonal Intervention. Maidenhead, Berkshire; New York: Open University Press.
  15. Van Buren, J. Multisystemic therapy. Encyclopedia of Mental Disorders. retrieved 29 October 2009
  16. McGoldrick, M. (Ed.) (1998). Re-Visioning Family Therapy: Race, Culture, and Gender in Clinical Practice. Guilford Press: New York.
  17. Dean R.G. (2001). The Myth of Cross-Cultural Competence. Families in Society: the Journal of Contemporary Human Services 82 (6): 623–30.
  18. Krause, I-B. (2002). Culture and System in Family Therapy. London; New York: Karnac.
  19. Ng, K.S. (2003). Global Perspectives in Family Therapy: Development, Practice, and Trends. New York: Brunner-Routledge.
  20. McGoldrick, M., Giordano, J. & Garcia-Preto, N. (2005). Ethnicity & Family Therapy, 3rd Ed.: Guilford Press.
  21. Nichols, M.P. & Schwartz, R.C. (2006). Recent Developments in Family Therapy: Integrative Models; in Family therapy: concepts and methods. 7th ed. Boston: Pearson/Allyn & Bacon.
  22. Lebow, J. (2005). Handbook of clinical family therapy. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.
  23. Booth T.J., Cottone R.R. (2000). Measurement, Classification, and Prediction of Paradigm Adherence of Marriage and Family Therapists. American Journal of Family Therapy 28 (4): 329–346.
  24. The Top 10: The Most Influential Therapists of the Past Quarter-Century. Psychotherapy Networker.: 2007, March/April (retrieved 7 October 2010)
  25. Gale, Barbara (December 2007). Family therapy. Bereavement Care 26 (3): 58-59.
  26. Dattilio, F.R. (Ed.) (1998). Case Studies in Couple and Family Therapy: Systemic and Cognitive Perspectives. Guildford Press: New York.
  27. Sprenkle, D.H., & Bischof, G.P. (1994). Contemporary family therapy in the United States. Journal of Family Therapy, 16(1): 5-23(19)
  28. Gurman, A.S. & Fraenkel, P. (2002). The history of couple therapy: a millennial review. Family Process, 41(2): 199-260(62)
  29. Couple therapy Harvard Mental Health Letter 03/01/2007.
  30. Attachment and Family Systems. Family Process. Special Issue: Fall 2002 41(3)
  31. Sholevar, G.P. & Schwoeri, L.D. (2003). Textbook of Family and Couples Therapy: Clinical Applications. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing Inc.
  32. Denborough, D. (2001). Family Therapy: Exploring the Field's Past, Present and Possible Futures. Adelaide, South Australia: Dulwich Centre Publications.
  33. McGoldrick, M. (Ed.) (1998). Re-Visioning Family Therapy: Race, Culture, and Gender in Clinical Practice.Guilford Press: New York.
  34. Dean, R.G. (2001). The Myth of Cross-Cultural Competence. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Human Services. 82(6): 623-30.
  35. Ng, K.S. (2003). Global Perspectives in Family Therapy: Development, Practice, and Trends. New York: Brunner-Routledge.
  36. McGoldrick, M., Giordano, J. & Garcia-Preto, N. (2005). Ethnicity & Family Therapy, 3rd Ed.: Guilford Press.
  37. Nichols, M.P. & Schwartz, R.C. (2006). Recent Developments in Family Therapy: Integrative Models; in Family therapy: concepts and methods. 7th ed. Boston: Pearson/Allyn & Bacon.
  38. Booth, T.J. & Cottone, R.R. (2000). Measurement, Classification, and Prediction of Paradigm Adherence of Marriage and Family Therapists. American Journal of Family Therapy. 28(4): 329-346.
  39. Gehart, D. R., & Tuttle, A. R. (2003). Theory-based treatment planning for marriage and family therapists: Integrating theory and practice. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole/Thomson.
  40. Goldenberg, I., & Goldenberg, H. (2008). Family therapy: An overview. Belmont, CA: Thomson Brooks/Cole.
  41. Gurman, A. S. (2008). Clinical handbook of couple therapy. New York: Guilford Press.
  42. 42.0 42.1 Sexton, T. L., Weeks, G. R., & Robbins, M. S. (2003). Handbook of family therapy: The science and practice of working with families and couples. New York: Brunner-Routledge.
  43. Gale, Barbara (December 2007). Family therapy. Bereavement Care 26 (3): 58-59.
  44. Atkinson, B., Atkinson, L., Kutz, P., et al. (2005). Rewiring Neural States in Couples Therapy: Advances from Affective Neuroscience.Journal of Systemic Therapies. 24 (3): 3-16.
  45. Resnikoff, R. (2002). Couples Therapy and Psychopharmacology. Psychiatric Times. 19 (7).
  46. Smith, D. Clashing couples to get a spray of love. Sydney Morning Herald May 26, 2007.
  47. 47.0 47.1 National Institute for health and medical research (2004), Psychotherapy: Three approaches evaluated, PMID 21348158 
  48. Therapy Center:Credentials. Psychology Today. URL accessed on 2008-08-13.
  49. Doherty W (2002). Bad Couples Therapy and How to Avoid It: Getting past the myth of therapist neutrality. Psychotherapy Networker 26 (Nov-Dec): 26–33.
  50. Doherty W, Boss P (1981). "Values and ethics in family therapy" Kniskern DP, Gurman AS Handbook of family therapy, New York: Brunner/Mazel.
  51. Dueck A (1991). "Metaphors, models, paradigms and stories in family therapy" Vande Kemp H Family therapy: Christian perspectives, 175–207, Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Book House.
  52. Wall J, Needham T, Browning DS, James S (Apr 1999). The Ethics of Relationality: The Moral Views of Therapists Engaged in Marital and Family Therapy. Family Relations 48 (2): 139–49.
  53. Grosser GH, Paul NL (Oct 1964). Ethical issues in family group therapy. Am J Orthopsychiatry 34: 875–84.
  54. Hare-Mustin RT (Jun 1978). A feminist approach to family therapy. Fam Process 17 (2): 181–94.
  55. Gottlieb, M.C. (1995). Developing Your Ethical Position in Family Therapy: Special Issues. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association (103rd, New York, NY, August 11-15, 1995).
  56. Melito, R. (2003). Values in the role of the family therapist: Self determination and justice. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy. 29(1):3-11.
  57. Fowers BJ, Richardson FC (1996). Individualism, Family Ideology and Family Therapy. Theory & Psychology 6 (1): 121–51.
  58. Schwartz RB, Nichols MP (2006). Family therapy: concepts and methods, 7th, Boston: Pearson/Allyn and Bacon.
  59. USA Today 6/21/2005 Hearts divide over marital therapy.

=Further readingEdit

Key textsEdit

BooksEdit

  • Barker P (1987) Basic Family Therapy Blackwell: Oxford
  • McGoldrick, M. & Hardy, K.V. (2009) Re-visioning family therapy:Race culture and gender in clinical practice. Guildford Press

PapersEdit

  • Gurman, A. and Lebow, J. “Couple and Family Therapy.” In Sadock, H. & Sadock, R. Kaplan and Sadock's Comprehensive Textbook of Psychiatry VIII. New York: Williams & Wilkins.
  • Knobloch-Fedders, L.M.; Pinsof, W.M.; and Mann, B.J. (2004). “The Formation of the Therapeutic Alliance in Couple Therapy.” Family Process, 43, 425-442.
  • Lebow, J and Newcomb-Rekart, K.(2004). “Research Assessing Couple and Family Therapies for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder.” In D. Catherall. Handbook of Stress, Trauma, and the Family . (pp 261-79). New York: Taylor & Francis.
  • Lebow, J. (2004).“Guidelines for Conducting Couple and Family Therapy.” In G. Koocker, J.C. Norcross, & S.S. Hill (eds.) Psychologists Desk Reference (2 nd edition.) New York: Oxford Press.
  • Lebow, J.(2004). “Family Psychology in the First Decade of the 21 st Century.” Family Psychologist , 20, Winter, 1 & 9-10.
  • Lebow, J.(2004). “Transcending the barriers between science and practice in family psychology,” The Family Psychologist, 12, p.1 & 12-13.
  • Lebow, J.(2004). “Spirituality and Family Therapy.” Family Psychologist, 12, Summer, pp.1 & 33.
  • Lebow, J.(2004). “The Treatment of Children in Families.” Family Psychologist , 12, Spring, pp 1 & 10.
  • Lebow, J.L. (ed.) (2005). Handbook of Clinical Family Therapy . John Wiley & Sons
  • Lebow, J.(2005). “Family Therapy in High Conflict Divorce.” In Lebow, J. (ed.) Handbook of Clinical Family Therapy. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Lebow, J.(2005). “Family Therapy in the 21 st Century.” In Lebow, J.(ed.) Handbook of Clinical Family Therapy. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Pinsof, W. and Lebow, J.L.(2005). (Eds.) Family Psychology: The Art of the Science. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Pinsof, W. & Lebow, J.(2005). “A Scientific Paradigm for Family Psychology.” In Pinsof, W. & Lebow, (eds.) Family Psychology: The Art of the Science. New York: Oxford University Press.

Additional materialEdit

BooksEdit

  • The Dictionary of family psychology and family therapy / S. Richard Sauber ... [et al.]. 2nd ed. c1993. Newbury Park, Calif. : Sage Publications ISBN 0803953321 (hbk) ISBN 080395333X (pbk.)

PapersEdit


External linksEdit

Title of ebook: Family Therapy - A Medical Dictionary, Bibliography, and Annotated Research Guide to Internet References.ISBN: 0497004615.Publisher: ICON Health Publications

This page uses Creative Commons Licensed content from Wikipedia (view authors).

Around Wikia's network

Random Wiki