Psychology Wiki
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 11: Line 11:
 
*[[Guanxi]]
 
*[[Guanxi]]
 
*[[Ganqing]].
 
*[[Ganqing]].
  +
*[[Impression management]]
 
*[[Reputation]]
 
*[[Reputation]]
   

Revision as of 11:04, 8 October 2012

Assessment | Biopsychology | Comparative | Cognitive | Developmental | Language | Individual differences | Personality | Philosophy | Social |
Methods | Statistics | Clinical | Educational | Industrial | Professional items | World psychology |

Social psychology: Altruism · Attribution · Attitudes · Conformity · Discrimination · Groups · Interpersonal relations · Obedience · Prejudice · Norms · Perception · Index · Outline


Face refers to two separate but related concepts in Chinese social relations. One is mianzi (面子). The other is lianzi (臉子).

Lian is the confidence of society in a person's moral character, while mianzi represents social perceptions of a person's prestige. For a person to maintain face is important with Chinese social relations because face translates into power and influence. A loss of lian would result in a loss of trust within a social network, while a loss of mianzi would likely result in a loss of authority. To illustrate the difference, gossiping about someone stealing from a cash register would cause a loss of lian but not mianzi. Repeatedly interrupting one's boss as he is trying to speak may cause a loss of mianzi but not lian.

When trying to avoid conflict, Chinese in general will avoid causing another person to lose mianzi by bringing up embarrassing facts in public. Conversely, when challenging authority and another person's standing within a community, Chinese will often attempt to cause a loss of lian or mianzi. A very public example of this occurred during the Tiananmen protests of 1989 when Wu'er Kaixi scolded Premier Li Peng for being late to a meeting with the demonstrators, resulting in Li's loss of mianzi because he was seen as either tardy or insincere about the meeting.

For more information about Face, please read Ho, David Yau-Fai (1976), "On the Concept of Face," American Journal of Sociology, 81 (4), 867-84.[1]

See also

This page uses Creative Commons Licensed content from Wikipedia (view authors).