Psychology Wiki
Register
(cat)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{ClinPsy}}
 
{{ClinPsy}}
  +
{{PsyPerspective}}
'''Diagnosis''' (from the [[Greek language|Greek]] words ''dia'' = by and ''gnosis'' = knowledge) is the process of identifying a [[disease]] by its [[sign (medicine)|signs]], [[symptom]]s and results of various diagnostic procedures. The conclusion reached through that process is also called a diagnosis.
 
   
  +
'''Diagnosis''' is the identification of the nature of anything, either by [[process of elimination]] or other analytical methods. Diagnosis is used in many different disciplines, with slightly different implementations on the application of logic and experience to determine the cause and effect relationships. Below are given as examples and tools used to identify the causes of [[symptoms]] and [[disorders]], both [[physical disorders|physical]] and [[mental disorders]].
The term "diagnostic criteria" designates the combination of symptoms which allows the doctor to ascertain the diagnosis of the respective disease.
 
   
  +
Typically, someone with abnormal ''symptoms'' will consult a [[physician]], who will then obtain a history of their present illness and examine them for ''signs'' of disease. The physician will formulate a hypothesis of likely diagnoses and in many cases will obtain further testing to confirm or clarify the diagnosis before proceeding to render [[therapy|treatment]].
 
  +
==In education==
 
* [[Educational diagnosis]]
   
  +
==In medicine==
Forms of testing commonly performed are [[urine test]]s, [[Human feces|stool]] samples, [[saliva]] samples, [[blood test]]s, [[medical imaging]], [[electrocardiogram]], [[urinalysis]], [[Hydrogen Breath Test|hydrogen breath test]] and, occasionally, [[biopsy]].
 
  +
*[[Autopsy]]
  +
*[[Clinical judgement (not diagnosis)]]
 
*[[Diagnosis related groups]]
  +
*[[Differential diagnosis]]
  +
*[[Dual diagnosis]]
  +
*[[Medical diagnosis]]
  +
*[[Psychodiagnosis]]
  +
*[[Retrospective diagnosis]]
   
  +
==Methods used to contribute to a diagnosis==
The list of most likely and possible diagnoses based on available information is called a ''[[differential diagnosis]]''; the final diagnosis is only arrived at after other diseases on this list have been eliminated through further investigations or consultations.
 
  +
*[[General health questionaire]]
  +
*[[Geriatric assessment]]
  +
*[[Intake interview]]
  +
*[[Neuropsychological assessment]]
  +
*[[Pain measurement]]
  +
*[[Patient history]]
  +
*[[Psychological assessment]]
  +
*[[Psychiatric assessment]]
  +
*[[Screening]]
  +
*[[Symptom checklists]]
   
==History==
 
   
  +
==Logic==
The history of medical diagnosis began in earnest from the enlightened days of [[Hippocrates]] in [[ancient Greece]] but is far from perfect despite the enormous bounty of information made available by medical research including the [[sequencing]] of the [[human genome]]. The practice of [[diagnosis]] continues to be dominated by theories set down in the early [[1900s]].
 
  +
*[[Zebra (medical)]]
  +
*[[Sutton's law]]
  +
*[[Occam's razor]]
  +
*[[Hickam's dictum]]
   
===Ancient Greece===
+
==See also==
  +
*[[Bayesian probability]]
 
 
*[[Clinical psychology: Types of problem]]
Over two thousand years ago, Hippocrates recorded the association between disease and heredity. In similar fashion, [[Pythagoras]] noted the association between [[metabolism]] and [[heredity]] (allergy to Fava beans). The medical community, however, has only recently acknowledged the importance of [[genetics]] and its relevance to mainstream [[medicine]].
 
  +
*[[Comorbidity]]
 
  +
*[[Diagnosis (artificial intelligence)]]
===The Oslerian ideal===
 
 
*[[International Classification of Diseases]]
 
  +
*[[Labelling]]
The ideals of [[William Osler]] who innovated the practice of medicine in the early 1900s were based on the principles of the diagnosis and treatment of [[disease]]. According to Osler, the functions of a [[physician]] were to be able to identify disease and its manifestations, understand its mechanisms, how it may be prevented and how it may be cured. For his medical students he believed that the best textbook was the patient himself – analysis of morbid [[anatomy]] and [[pathology]] were the keys. The Oslerian ideal continues today, as the basis of the Doctor’s strategy is, "What disease does this patient have and what is the best way for treatment?" The emphasis is on the classification of the disease in order to use the remedies available for its effects to be reversed or ameliorated. The human being in question is representative of a class of people with this type of disease whereas the biological individuality of this person is not given any great weight.
 
  +
*[[Measurement]]
 
  +
*[[Misdiagnois]
===Garrod's view===
 
  +
*[[Organizational diagnostics]]
 
  +
*[[Other approaches to defining what we do]]
The successor to William Osler as Regius Professor at Oxford was [[Archibald Garrod]]. Garrod echoed the observations of his Greek counterparts of two millennia ago, ''...our chemical individualities are due to our chemical merits as well as our chemical shortcomings; and it is more nearly true to say that the factors which confer upon us our predispositions to and immunities from various mishaps which are spoken of as diseases, are inherent in our very chemical structure; and even in the molecular groupings which confer upon us our individualities, and which went into the making of the [[chromosomes]] from which we sprang.'' Considering that the time that he formulated these ideas were the early 1900's, and the knowledge of [[DNA]] encoding [[genes]] that in turn encoded [[proteins]] responsible for bodily structure and functions not being discovered until some fifty years later it took some time before medicine could fully appreciate the fundamental importance of his concept of diagnosis.
 
  +
*[[Prognosis]]
 
  +
*[[Research diagnostic criteria]]
===Present-day Oslerian practice===
 
  +
*[[Severity (disorders)]]
 
  +
*[[Working towards a new classification in clinical psychology]]
Whereas Osler laid the founding principles by which medicine should be practiced, Garrod placed these principles in a greater context of a [[chemical]] individuality that is inherited and is subject to the mechanisms of [[evolutionary]] selection. The Oslerian ideal of medical practice continues to dominate medical philosophy today. The patient is a collective of [[symptoms]] to be characterised and analysed [[algorithmically]] in order to draw a diagnosis and subsequently produce a strategy of treatment. Medicine is about problems based solutions. In keeping with this philosophy, today's pathology reports provide a momentary snapshot of the patient's [[biochemical]] profile, highlighting the end result of the disease process.
 
  +
{{disambig}}
 
===Influence of DNA technology===
 
 
Garrod's conception of [[biological]] individuality was confirmed with the advent of the sequencing of the human genome. Finally the subtle relationship between inheritance, individuality and environment became apparent via the variations detected in DNA. In each patient's DNA lies a script for how their bodies will change and become ill as well as how they will handle the assaults of the environment from the beginning of their life to its end. It is hoped that by knowing a patient's genes that the biological strengths and weaknesses in respect to these assaults will be revealed and disease processes can be predicted before they have the opportunity to manifest. Although knowledge in this area is far from complete, there are already medical interventions based on this. More importantly, the physician, forewarned with this knowledge can guide the patient towards appropriate lifestyle changes to anticipate and mitigate disease processes.
 
 
==Hypothesis testing==
 
 
History taking is a fluid process that adapts to the information as it is presented. Almost invariably the patient presents with a complaint. Even the unconscious patient presents with the implicit complaint of being unconscious. This presenting complaint leads to the formation of [[hypothesis|hypotheses]]. Rather than consider the myriad of diseases that could afflict the patient, the physician narrows down the possibilities to those conditions likely to account for the presenting complaint. The history taking then proceeds to test these hypotheses, often narrowing down the diagnosis within a few questions. Sometimes the initial hypotheses are ruled out and the physician must then move on to look at other hypotheses or multiple ones. [[Occam's razor]] is then invoked to attempt to simplify the number of provisional diagnoses and it is only with some reluctance that a physician will make several provisional diagnoses to explain the symptoms elicited.
 
 
The physician then moves on to the physical examination. However, the hypothesis testing does not end at this point. Signs may confirm the provisional diagnosis or cause the physician to consider the question further and even lead to more questioning. An unexpected finding on examination may cause the physician to reconsider the initial diagnosis.
 
 
At this point the physician usually has at least a [[differential diagnosis]] and probably a provisional diagnosis if not a firm diagnosis. Further tests are then requested, in part to confirm or disprove the diagnosis but also to document the status at that time and before treatment is started. Consultations with other physicians and specialists in the field may be sought.
 
 
Treatment itself may indicate a need for review of the diagnosis if there is a failure to respond to treatments that would normally work.
 
 
Despite all of these complexities, most consultations are relatively brief, partly because many diseases are common and [[pattern recognition]] allows the physician to recognize the diagnosis early, but also because the decision trees of most hypothesis testing are relatively short.
 
 
== See also ==
 
 
* [[Diagnosis of exclusion]]
 
* [[Diagnosis-related group]]
 
* [[International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems]]
 
* [[Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders]]
 
* [[Nosology]]
 
* [[Nursing diagnosis]]
 
   
 
[[Category:Medical terms]]
 
[[Category:Medical terms]]
[[Category:Nosology]]
 
[[Category:Clinical psychology]]
 
 
[[Category:Diagnosis]]
 
[[Category:Diagnosis]]
  +
 
<!--
 
<!--
  +
[[als:Diagnostik]]
  +
[[ar:تشخيص]]
  +
[[bg:Диагноза]]
  +
[[da:Diagnose]]
 
[[de:Diagnose]]
 
[[de:Diagnose]]
[[als:Diagnostik]]
+
[[et:Diagnoos]]
 
[[es:Diagnóstico]]
 
[[es:Diagnóstico]]
  +
[[eo:Diagnozo]]
 
[[eu:Diagnostiko]]
 
[[eu:Diagnostiko]]
[[fr:Diagnostic]]
+
[[fr:Diagnostic (médecine)]]
  +
[[hi:निदान]]
 
[[id:Diagnosis]]
 
[[it:Diagnosi]]
 
[[it:Diagnosi]]
  +
[[he:אבחנה]]
  +
[[ms:Diagnosis]]
 
[[nl:Diagnose]]
 
[[nl:Diagnose]]
[[nn:diagnose]]
+
[[ja:診断]]
 
[[no:Diagnose]]
 
[[no:Diagnose]]
  +
[[nn:Diagnose]]
 
[[pl:Diagnoza (medycyna)]]
 
[[pl:Diagnoza (medycyna)]]
[[pt:Diagnóstico]]
+
[[pt:Diagnóstico (medicina)]]
  +
[[ro:Diagnostic medical]]
  +
[[ru:Диагноз]]
 
[[simple:Diagnosis]]
 
[[simple:Diagnosis]]
 
[[sk:Diagnóza]]
 
[[sk:Diagnóza]]
  +
[[sr:Дијагностика]]
--->
 
  +
[[sh:Dijagnoza]]
  +
[[fi:Lääketieteellinen diagnoosi]]
  +
[[sv:Medicinsk diagnostik]]
  +
[[ta:அறுதியிடல்]]
  +
[[ur:تشخیص]]
  +
[[zh:诊断]]
 
-->
 
{{enWP|Diagnosis}}
 
{{enWP|Diagnosis}}

Revision as of 00:00, 3 February 2009

Assessment | Biopsychology | Comparative | Cognitive | Developmental | Language | Individual differences | Personality | Philosophy | Social |
Methods | Statistics | Clinical | Educational | Industrial | Professional items | World psychology |

Clinical: Approaches · Group therapy · Techniques · Types of problem · Areas of specialism · Taxonomies · Therapeutic issues · Modes of delivery · Model translation project · Personal experiences ·


This article needs rewriting to enhance its relevance to psychologists..
Please help to improve this page yourself if you can..


Diagnosis is the identification of the nature of anything, either by process of elimination or other analytical methods. Diagnosis is used in many different disciplines, with slightly different implementations on the application of logic and experience to determine the cause and effect relationships. Below are given as examples and tools used to identify the causes of symptoms and disorders, both physical and mental disorders.


In education

In medicine

Methods used to contribute to a diagnosis


Logic

See also

This page uses Creative Commons Licensed content from Wikipedia (view authors).