Psychology Wiki
Register
Advertisement

Assessment | Biopsychology | Comparative | Cognitive | Developmental | Language | Individual differences | Personality | Philosophy | Social |
Methods | Statistics | Clinical | Educational | Industrial | Professional items | World psychology |

Biological: Behavioural genetics · Evolutionary psychology · Neuroanatomy · Neurochemistry · Neuroendocrinology · Neuroscience · Psychoneuroimmunology · Physiological Psychology · Psychopharmacology (Index, Outline)


File:Default-network-graph-maturation.jpeg

Graphs of the dynamic development of correlations between brain networks. (A) In children the regions are largely local and are organized by their physical location; the frontal regions are highlighted in light blue. (B) In adults the networks become highly correlated despite their physical distance; the default network is highlighted in light red.[1]

In neuroscience, the default mode network is a network of brain regions that are active when the individual is not focused on the outside world and the brain is at wakeful rest. Also called the default network, default state network, or task-negative network (TNN), it is characterized by coherent neuronal oscillations at a rate lower than 0.1 Hz (one every ten seconds). During goal-oriented activity, the DMN is deactivated and another network, the task-positive network (TPN) is activated. The default network may correspond to task-independent introspection, or self-referential thought, while the TPN corresponds to action, and that perhaps the TNN and TPN may be "considered elements of a single default network with anti-correlated components".[2]

Anatomy[]

The default mode network is an interconnected and anatomically defined[3][citation needed] brain system that preferentially activates when individuals engage in internal tasks such as daydreaming, envisioning the future, retrieving memories, and gauging others' perspectives.[4] It is negatively correlated with brain systems that focus on external visual signals. Its subsystems include part of the medial temporal lobe for memory, part of the medial prefrontal cortex for theory of mind, and the posterior cingulate cortex for integration,[4] along with the adjacent ventral precuneus [5] and the medial, lateral and inferior parietal cortex. In the infant brain, there is limited evidence of the default network, but default network connectivity is more consistent in children aged 9–12 years, suggesting that the default network undergoes developmental change.[2]

Function[]

In humans, the default mode network has been hypothesized to generate spontaneous thoughts during mind-wandering and may relate to creativity.[4] Alternatively, default mode activity may represent underlying physiological processes going on in the brain that are unrelated to any particular thought or thoughts.[6] It has been hypothesized to be relevant to disorders including Alzheimer's disease, autism, and schizophrenia.[4] In particular, reduced default network activity has been associated with autism,[7] overactivity with schizophrenia,[8] and the default network is preferentially attacked by the buildup of beta-amyloid in Alzheimer's disease.[9] Lower connectivity was found across the default network in people who have experienced long term trauma, such as childhood abuse. Among people experiencing posttraumatic stress disorder, lower activation was found in the posterior cingulate gyrus compared to controls (Dr. Ruth Lanius, Brain Mapping conference, London, November 2010). The posterior cingulate gyrus discerns emotional and self-relevant information; this interacts with the anterior cingulate gyrus, which integrates emotional information with cognition; and the medial prefrontal cortex, which allows for self-reflection and the regulation of emotion and arousal. This appears to correlate with the experience of people who have experienced long-term trauma and describe feeling 'dead inside' or have a fragmented sense of self or enter dissociative states.[citation needed] Children who have been traumatised often lack an inner world of imagination and show little symbolic play, this too is likely to be due to interruptions across the default network.[citation needed] Meditation practice may be associated with increased default mode network connectivity.[10] Impaired control of entering and leaving the default network state is correlated with old age.[11]

The idea of a "default network" is not universally accepted.[12] In 2007 the concept of the default mode was criticized as not being useful for understanding brain function, on the grounds that a simpler hypothesis is that a resting brain actually does more processing than a brain doing certain "demanding" tasks, and that there is no special significance to the intrinsic activity of the resting brain.[13]

History[]

Hans Berger, the inventor of the electroencephalogram was the first to propose the idea that the brain is constantly busy. In a series of papers published in 1929 he showed that the electrical oscillations detected by his device do not cease even when the subject is at rest. However his ideas were not taken seriously and a general perception formed among neurologists that only when a focused activity is performed does the brain (or a part of the brain) become active.[14]

Later, experiments by neurologist Marcus E. Raichle's lab at Washington University School of Medicine and other groups showed that the brain's energy consumption is increased by less than 5% of its baseline energy consumption while performing a focused mental task. These experiments showed that the brain is constantly active with a high level of activity even when the person is not engaged in focused mental work. Research thereafter focused on finding the regions responsible for this constant background activity level.[14]

Raichle coined the term "default mode" in 2001 to describe resting state brain function;[15] the concept rapidly became a central theme in neuroscience.[6] The brain has other Low Frequency Resting State Networks (LFRSNs), such as visual and auditory networks.[2]


See also[]


References[]

  1. (2009). Functional Brain Networks Develop from a 'Local to Distributed' Organization. PLoS Computational Biology 5 (5): e1000381.
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 (2009). Default-mode brain dysfunction in mental disorders: A systematic review. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 33 (3): 279–96.
  3. Crimi et al. "Structurally constrained effective brain connectivity" Neuroimage 289 (1), 2021 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118288
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 (2008). The Brain's Default Network: Anatomy, Function, and Relevance to Disease. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1124: 1–38.
  5. Zhang S, Li CS (February 2012). Functional connectivity mapping of the human precuneus by resting state fMRI. NeuroImage 59 (4): 3548–3562.
  6. 6.0 6.1 (2007). A default mode of brain function: A brief history of an evolving idea. NeuroImage 37 (4): 1083–90.
  7. (2006). Failing to deactivate: resting functional abnormalities in autism.. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103: 8275–8280.
  8. (2009). Hyperactivity and hyperconnectivity of the default network in schizophrenia and in first-degree relatives of persons with schizophrenia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106 (4): 1279–84.
  9. includeonly>Kolata G. "Insights give hope for new attack on Alzheimer's", New York Times, 2010-12-13. Retrieved on 2010-12-14.
  10. (2011). Increased default mode network connectivity associated with meditation. Neuroscience Letters 487 (3): 358–62.
  11. includeonly>Lehrer J. "Daydream achiever", Boston Globe, 2008-08-31. Retrieved on 2009-01-23.
  12. (2008). The maturing architecture of the brain's default network. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105 (10): 4028–32.
  13. (2007). On the fundamental role of anatomy in functional imaging: Reply to commentaries on 'In praise of tedious anatomy'. NeuroImage 37 (4): 1073–82.
  14. 14.0 14.1 Raichle, Marcus (March 2010). The Brain's Dark Energy. Scientific American: 44-49.
  15. (2001). Inaugural Article: A default mode of brain function. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 98 (2): 676–82.

External links[]

This page uses Creative Commons Licensed content from Wikipedia (view authors).
Advertisement