Psychology Wiki

Converse accident

34,201pages on
this wiki
Add New Page
Add New Page Talk0

Assessment | Biopsychology | Comparative | Cognitive | Developmental | Language | Individual differences | Personality | Philosophy | Social |
Methods | Statistics | Clinical | Educational | Industrial | Professional items | World psychology |

Philosophy Index: Aesthetics · Epistemology · Ethics · Logic · Metaphysics · Consciousness · Philosophy of Language · Philosophy of Mind · Philosophy of Science · Social and Political philosophy · Philosophies · Philosophers · List of lists

The logical fallacy of converse accident (also called reverse accident, destroying the exception or a dicto secundum quid ad dictum simpliciter) is a deductive fallacy that can occur in a statistical syllogism when an exception to a generalization is wrongly called for.

For example:

If we allow people with glaucoma to use medical marijuana
then everyone should be allowed to use marijuana.

People who suffer from glaucoma are an exception to the general rule that does not overlap with everyone else.

The inductive version of this fallacy is called hasty generalization. See faulty generalization.

The opposing kind of dicto simpliciter is accident.

See alsoEdit

References & BibliographyEdit

Key textsEdit



Additional materialEdit



External linksEdit

This page uses Creative Commons Licensed content from Wikipedia (view authors).

Also on Fandom

Random Wiki