Wikia

Psychology Wiki

Changes: Construct (philosophy of science)

Edit

Back to page

(New page: {{PhilPsy}} In philosophy of science, a 'construct' is an ''ideal object'' (i.e., one whose existence depends on a subject's mind), as opposed to "real objects" (i.e., those whose exis...)
 
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{PhilPsy}}
 
{{PhilPsy}}
In [[philosophy of science]], a 'construct' is an ''ideal object'' (i.e., one whose existence depends on a subject's mind), as opposed to "real objects" (i.e., those whose existence is non dependent on a subject's mind).<ref>Bunge, M. 1974. ''Treatise on Basic Philosophy, Vol. I Semantics I: Sense and Reference''. Dordrecth-Boston: Reidel Publishing Co.</ref> Hence, [[concepts]] (such as those designated by the sign '3' or the word 'liberty'), [[hypotheses]] (such as that designated by the sentence "[[Evolutionary theory]] refers to individuals and populations"), [[theories]] (e.g., evolutionary theory), [[classifications]] (e.g., biological [[taxonomy]]) and other conceptual items are constructs, while [[biologists]], [[foxes]], philosophers, rocks, computers, and pencils, among many other, are not constructs but real objects (or real things).
+
In [[philosophy of science]], a 'construct' is an ''ideal object'' (i.e., one whose existence depends on a subject's mind), as opposed to "real objects" (i.e., those whose existence is non dependent on a subject's mind).<ref>Bunge, M. 1974. ''Treatise on Basic Philosophy, Vol. I Semantics I: Sense and Reference''. Dordrecth-Boston: Reidel Publishing Co.</ref> Hence, [[concepts]] (such as those designated by the sign '3' or the word 'liberty'), [[hypotheses]] (such as that designated by the sentence "[[Evolutionary theory]] refers to individuals and populations"), [[theories]] (e.g., evolutionary theory), [[classifications]] (e.g., biological [[taxonomy]]) and other conceptual items are constructs, while biologists, foxes, philosophers, rocks, computers, and pencils, among many other, are not constructs but real objects (or real things).
   
 
== References ==
 
== References ==
Line 8: Line 8:
 
[[Category:Philosophy of science]]
 
[[Category:Philosophy of science]]
   
  +
<!--
 
[[es:Constructo (epistemología)]]
 
[[es:Constructo (epistemología)]]
  +
-->
   
 
{{enWP|Construct (philosophy of science)}}
 
{{enWP|Construct (philosophy of science)}}

Latest revision as of 12:09, November 8, 2008

Assessment | Biopsychology | Comparative | Cognitive | Developmental | Language | Individual differences | Personality | Philosophy | Social |
Methods | Statistics | Clinical | Educational | Industrial | Professional items | World psychology |

Philosophy Index: Aesthetics · Epistemology · Ethics · Logic · Metaphysics · Consciousness · Philosophy of Language · Philosophy of Mind · Philosophy of Science · Social and Political philosophy · Philosophies · Philosophers · List of lists


In philosophy of science, a 'construct' is an ideal object (i.e., one whose existence depends on a subject's mind), as opposed to "real objects" (i.e., those whose existence is non dependent on a subject's mind).[1] Hence, concepts (such as those designated by the sign '3' or the word 'liberty'), hypotheses (such as that designated by the sentence "Evolutionary theory refers to individuals and populations"), theories (e.g., evolutionary theory), classifications (e.g., biological taxonomy) and other conceptual items are constructs, while biologists, foxes, philosophers, rocks, computers, and pencils, among many other, are not constructs but real objects (or real things).

References Edit

  1. Bunge, M. 1974. Treatise on Basic Philosophy, Vol. I Semantics I: Sense and Reference. Dordrecth-Boston: Reidel Publishing Co.


This page uses Creative Commons Licensed content from Wikipedia (view authors).

Around Wikia's network

Random Wiki