Fandom

Psychology Wiki

Cognitive hypothesis testing

34,203pages on
this wiki
Add New Page
Talk0 Share

Assessment | Biopsychology | Comparative | Cognitive | Developmental | Language | Individual differences | Personality | Philosophy | Social |
Methods | Statistics | Clinical | Educational | Industrial | Professional items | World psychology |

Cognitive Psychology: Attention · Decision making · Learning · Judgement · Memory · Motivation · Perception · Reasoning · Thinking  - Cognitive processes Cognition - Outline Index


Cognitive hypothesis testing is the development and testing of logical rules in the analysis of situations until a reliable set of operations have been developed.


See alsoEdit

ReferencesEdit

  • Adsit, D. J. (1989). The effects of alternative hypotheses on cognitive hypothesis testing: Dissertation Abstracts International.
  • Alexander, J. M., Johnson, K. E., & Schreiber, J. B. (2002). Knowledge is not everything: Analysis of children's performance on a haptic comparison task: Journal of Experimental Child Psychology Vol 82(4) Aug 2002, 341-366.
  • Ames, H. G. I. (1995). Influence of counselor information gathering on information processing during a psychodiagnostic hypothesis testing task. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences.
  • An, A., & Cercone, N. (2001). Rule quality measures for rule induction systems: Description and evaluation: Computational Intelligence Vol 17(3) Aug 2001, 409-424.
  • Anderson, B. H. (1989). An examination of factors affecting auditors' hypothesis testing strategies: Dissertation Abstracts International.
  • Anderson, J. R., & Betz, J. (2001). A hybrid model of categorization: Psychonomic Bulletin & Review Vol 8(4) Dec 2001, 629-647.
  • Anserello, C. (1981). The relationship between children's locus of control orientation and response to blank trials in two verbal feedback combinations: Dissertation Abstracts International.
  • Ast, M. E. (1996). Preschool children's conceptualization of safety and moral rules. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering.
  • Awang, M. B. (1985). Rule usage in solving formal operational problems among Malay and Euro-American college students: An evaluation of the rule-assessment tests: Dissertation Abstracts International.
  • Babcock, R. L., & Laguna, K. D. (1996). An examination of the adult age-related differences on the Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices: A structural equations approach: Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition Vol 3(3) Sep 1996, 187-200.
  • Bailet, L. L., & Lyon, G. R. (1985). Deficient linguistic rule application in a learning disabled speller: A case study: Journal of Learning Disabilities Vol 18(3) Mar 1985, 162-165.
  • Baker, L. M. (2000). How scientific experiments are designed: Problem solving in a knowledge-rich, error-rich environment. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering.
  • Bardenhagen, F. J., & Bowden, S. C. (1995). Does knowledge of the response rule determine human performance on an animal test of amnesia? : Neuropsychology Vol 9(4) Oct 1995, 573-579.
  • Baron, J., Beattie, J., & Hershey, J. C. (1988). Heuristics and biases in diagnostic reasoning: II. Congruence, information, and certainty: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes Vol 42(1) Aug 1988, 88-110.
  • Barrett, H. C. (2004). Descent versus design in Shuar children's reasoning about animals: Journal of Cognition and Culture Vol 4(1) 2004, 25-50.
  • Barrouillet, P., & Lecas, J.-F. (1998). How can mental models theory account for content effects in conditional reasoning? A developmental perspective: Cognition Vol 67(3) Jul 1998, 209-253.
  • Bassok, M., & Trope, Y. (1983). People's strategies for testing hypotheses about another's personality: Confirmatory or diagnostic? : Social Cognition Vol 2(3) 1983-1984, 199-216.
  • Beattie, J., & Baron, J. (1988). Confirmation and matching biases in hypothesis testing: The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology Vol 40A(2) May 1988, 269-297.
  • Bender, T. A. (1982). Cooperative rule-learning: A metacognitive interpretation: Dissertation Abstracts International.
  • Bender, T. A. (1985). Paired versus individual learning in testing hypotheses: Journal of General Psychology Vol 112(1) Jan 1985, 59-64.
  • Bennett, R. E., & Rock, D. A. (1995). Generalizability, validity, and examinee perceptions of a computer-delivered Formulating-Hypotheses test: Journal of Educational Measurement Vol 32(1) Spr 1995, 19-36.
  • Benson, N. J. (2000). Analysis of specific deficits: Evidence of transfer in disabled and normal readers following oral-motor awareness training: Journal of Educational Psychology Vol 92(4) Dec 2000, 646-658.
  • Benson, N. J., Lovett, M. W., & Kroeber, C. L. (1997). Training and transfer-of-learning effects in disabled and normal readers: Evidence of specific deficits: Journal of Experimental Child Psychology Vol 64(3) Mar 1997, 343-366.
  • Bentall, R. P., & Young, H. F. (1996). Sensible hypothesis testing in deluded, depressed and normal subjects: British Journal of Psychiatry Vol 168(3) Mar 1996, 372-375.
  • Bentz, B. G., Williamson, D. A., & Smith, C. F. (1999). The prediction of negative events associated with anxiety and dietary restraint: A test of the content specificity hypothesis: Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment Vol 21(2) Jun 1999, 97-108.
  • Bereiter, C. (1991). Commentary: Human Development Vol 34(5) Sep-Oct 1991, 294-298.
  • Bergan, J. R., Towstopiat, O., Cancelli, A. A., & Karp, C. (1982). Replacement and component rules in hierarchically ordered mathematics rule learning tasks: Journal of Educational Psychology Vol 74(1) Feb 1982, 39-50.
  • Bernt, F. M. (1986). The effects of perceptual differentiation and conceptual organization upon children's hypothesis-testing behavior: Dissertation Abstracts International.
  • Billig, M. (1994). Representing Words and Thoughts: PsycCRITIQUES Vol 39 (2), Feb, 1994.
  • Birnbaum, M. H. (1999). Testing critical properties of decision making on the Internet: Psychological Science Vol 10(5) Sep 1999, 399-407.
  • Biro, S., & Russell, J. (2001). The execution of arbitrary procedures by children with autism: Development and Psychopathology Vol 13(1) Mar 2001, 97-110.
  • Bisantz, A. M., & Kirlik, A. (2000). Adaptivity and rule verification tasks: An empirical investigation: International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics Vol 4(1) 2000, 1-18.
  • Bischof, W. F. (2000). Learning to recognize objects: Spatial Vision Vol 13(2-3) 2000, 297-304.
  • Bischof, W. F. (2004). Visual Learning: An Overview: Swiss Journal of Psychology/Schweizerische Zeitschrift fur Psychologie/Revue Suisse de Psychologie Vol 63(3) Sep 2004, 151-164.
  • Blustein, D. L., & Strohmer, D. C. (1987). Vocational hypothesis testing in career decision-making: Journal of Vocational Behavior Vol 31(1) Aug 1987, 45-62.
  • Boger, B. C. (1987). Teaching expository text comprehension to learning disabled adolescents by modeling a hypothesis testing strategy: Dissertation Abstracts International.
  • Bonini, N., Arcuri, L., & Legrenzi, P. (1992). The role of linguistic formulation and the presence of risk in hypothesis-testing strategies: Giornale Italiano di Psicologia Vol 19(1) Feb 1992, 61-80.
  • Bonini, N., & Gonzalez, M. (2005). Inconsistent Probability Estimates of a Hypothesis: The Role of Contrasting Support: Experimental Psychology Vol 52(1) 2005, 55-66.
  • Bonner, C. J. (1983). Effects of sequence-relationship and analytic explanation of positive and negative examples on learning a set of rules: Dissertation Abstracts International.
  • Boreham, N. C. (1985). Transfer of training in the generation of diagnostic hypotheses: The effect of lowering fidelity of simulation: British Journal of Educational Psychology Vol 55(3) Nov 1985, 213-223.
  • Borowsky, R., Owen, W. J., & Fonos, N. (1999). Reading speech and hearing print: Constraining models of visual word recognition by exploring connections with speech perception: Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale Vol 53(4) Dec 1999, 294-305.
  • Bourne, L. E., Jr., Healy, A. F., Kole, J. A., & Graham, S. M. (2006). Strategy shifts in classification skill acquisition: Does memory retrieval dominate rule use? : Memory & Cognition Vol 34(4) Jun 2006, 903-913.
  • Brake, G. L. (1999). Calibration of probability judgments: Effects of number of focal hypotheses and predictability of the environment. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering.
  • Brenner, L. A., & Koehler, D. J. (1999). Subjective probability of disjunctive hypotheses: Local-weight models for decomposition of evidential support: Cognitive Psychology Vol 38(1) Feb 1999, 16-47.
  • Briars, D. J. (1985). Individual differences in rule discovery: An exploratory study of the inductive reasoning game Eleusis: Dissertation Abstracts International.
  • Brodbeck, F. C., & Greitemeyer, T. (2000). Effects of individual versus mixed individual and group experience in rule induction on group member learning and group performance: Journal of Experimental Social Psychology Vol 36(6) Nov 2000, 621-648.
  • Brooks, p. J., Hanauer, J. B., & Frye, D. (2001). Training 3-year-olds in rule-based causal reasoning: British Journal of Developmental Psychology Vol 19(4) Nov 2001, 573-595.
  • Brooks, R. (1983). Towards a theory of the comprehension of computer programs: International Journal of Man-Machine Studies Vol 18(6) Jun 1983, 543-554.
  • Brown, D. M. (1984). The effects of self-monitoring upon the use of a focusing strategy during hypotheses sampling in kindergarten children: Dissertation Abstracts International.
  • Bruce, A. J., & Cox, M. O. (1983). Metamemory and structure: Spelling: Educational Research Quarterly Vol 8(2) 1983, 38-43.
  • Brunas-Wagstaff, J., Bergquist, A., Morgan, K., & Wagstaff, G. F. (1996). Impulsivity, interference on perceptual tasks and hypothesis testing: Personality and Individual Differences Vol 20(4) Apr 1996, 471-482.
  • Bryant, P. E. (1982). The role of conflict and of agreement between intellectual strategies in children's ideas about measurement: British Journal of Psychology Vol 73(2) May 1982, 243-251.
  • Bryceland, J. A. (1995). Rule-governed behavior: Effects of internal versus external instructions on sequential ordering behavior. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences.
  • Buonomano, D. V. (2005). A Learning Rule for the Emergence of Stable Dynamics and Timing in Recurrent Networks: Journal of Neurophysiology Vol 94(4) Oct 2005, 2275-2283.
  • Burgess, P. W., & Shallice, T. (1996). Bizarre responses, rule detection and frontal lobe lesions: Cortex Vol 32(2) Jun 1996, 241-259.
  • Byrne, R. M. J., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1990). Remembering conclusions we have inferred: What biases reveal. Oxford, England: North-Holland.
  • Byrne, R. M. J., Segura, S., Culhane, R., Tasso, A., & Berrocal, P. (2000). The temporality effect in counterfactual thinking about what might have been: Memory & Cognition Vol 28(2) Mar 2000, 264-281.
  • Byrne, R. M. J., & Tasso, A. (1999). Deductive reasoning with factual, possible, and counterfactual conditionals: Memory & Cognition Vol 27(4) Jul 1999, 726-740.
  • Cahill, C., Al-Eithan, M., & Frith, C. D. (1993). Conscious and unconscious rule-induction: A neuropsychological case study: Consciousness and Cognition: An International Journal Vol 2(3) Sep 1993, 210-224.
  • Cantor, J. H., & Spiker, C. C. (1982). The effect of the temporal locus of the introtact probe on the hypothesis-testing strategies of kindergarten children: Journal of Experimental Child Psychology Vol 34(3) Dec 1982, 510-525.
  • Cantor, J. H., & Spiker, C. C. (1984). Evidence for long-term planning in children's hypothesis testing: Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society Vol 22(6) Nov 1984, 493-496.
  • Capaldi, E. J., & Miller, R. M. (2003). Serial learning vs. reward schedules: What is learned? : Learning and Motivation Vol 34(2) May 2003, 127-147.
  • Carlisle, E., & Shafir, E. (2005). Questioning the cheater-detection hypothesis: New studies with the selection task: Thinking & Reasoning Vol 11(2) May 2005, 97-122.
  • Carlson, R. A., & Schneider, W. (1989). Acquisition context and the use of causal rules: Memory & Cognition Vol 17(3) May 1989, 240-248.
  • Carpenter, G. A., Grossberg, S., & Rosen, D. B. (1991). ART 2-A: An adaptive resonance algorithm for rapid category learning and recognition: Neural Networks Vol 4(4) 1991, 493-504.
  • Carretero, M. (1982). Formal thought: New findings about an old theme: Revista de Psicologia General y Aplicada Vol 37(2) 1982, 247-260.
  • Case, S. M. (1983). The development and evaluation of a new instrument to assess medical problem solving: Dissertation Abstracts International.
  • Caskey, B. J. (1986). The relationship between subset size and hypothesis selection during children's discrimination learning: Dissertation Abstracts International.
  • Catania, A. C., Matthews, B. A., & Shimoff, E. H. (1990). Properties of rule-governed behaviour and their implications. Hillsdale, NJ, England: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  • Catania, A. C., Shimoff, E., & Matthews, B. A. (1989). An experimental analysis of rule-governed behavior. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
  • Cauzinille-Marmeche, E., Mathieu, J., & Weil-Barais, A. (1982). Experimental reasoning of preadolescents: Hypothesis testing strategies: Enfance No 1-2 Jan-May 1982, 23-37.
  • Chaiklin, S. (1984). On the nature of verbal rules and their role in problem solving: Cognitive Science: A Multidisciplinary Journal Vol 8(2) Apr-Jun 1984, 131-155.
  • Chambers, M., & Rehfeldt, R. A. (2003). Effects of rules on preference for reliable reinforcement in a 5-year old child: North American Journal of Psychology Vol 5(1) 2003, 67-74.
  • Chamrad, D. L. (1987). Confirmation biases in paranoid and nonparanoid schizophrenia: Dissertation Abstracts International.
  • Channon, S., Jones, M.-C., & Stephenson, S. (1993). Cognitive strategies and hypothesis testing during discrimination learning in Parkinson's disease: Neuropsychologia Vol 31(1) Jan 1993, 75-82.
  • Chase, V. M. (2000). Where to look to find out why: Rational information search in causal hypothesis testing. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering.
  • Chasseigne, G., Lafon, P., & Mullet, E. (2002). Aging and rule learning: The case of the multiplicative law: American Journal of Psychology Vol 115(3) Fal 2002, 315-330.
  • Chasseigne, G., & Mullet, E. (2001). Functional learning and cognitive aging: Psicologia Educacao Cultura Vol 5(2) Dec 2001, 165-193.
  • Chi, M. T. H. (2000). Self-explaining: The dual processes of generating inference and repairing mental models. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
  • Chinn, R. N. (1985). A comparison of two developmental models of concept learning: Dissertation Abstracts International.
  • Cho, Y., & Telch, M. J. (2005). Testing the Cognitive Content-Specificity Hypothesis of Social Anxiety and Depression: An Application of Structural Equation Modeling: Cognitive Therapy and Research Vol 29(4) Aug 2005, 399-416.
  • Choi, S., McDaniel, M. A., & Busemeyer, J. R. (1993). Incorporating prior biases in network models of conceptual rule learning: Memory & Cognition Vol 21(4) Jul 1993, 413-423.
  • Christiansen, M. H., & Curtin, S. (1999). Transfer of learning: Rule acquisition or statistical learning? : Trends in Cognitive Sciences Vol 3(8) Aug 1999, 289-290.
  • Cicerone, K. D. (1983). Discrimination learning and hypothesis sampling by subjects with unilateral frontal-lobe lesions: Dissertation Abstracts International.
  • Cicerone, K. D., Lazar, R. M., & Shapiro, W. R. (1983). Effects of frontal lobe lesions on hypothesis sampling during concept formation: Neuropsychologia Vol 21(5) 1983, 513-524.
  • Cock, J. J., Berry, D. C., & Gaffan, E. A. (1994). New strings for old: The role of similarity processing in an incidental learning task: The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology Vol 47A(4) Nov 1994, 1015-1034.
  • Colliver, J. A. (2001). Are qualitative studies of PBL tutorial process indicated? : Academic Medicine Vol 76(3) Mar 2001, 215.
  • Colman, A. M., & Stirk, J. A. (1998). Stackelberg reasoning in mixed-motive games: An experimental investigation: Journal of Economic Psychology Vol 19(2) Apr 1998, 279-293.
  • Connell, P. J., & Stone, C. A. (1994). The conceptual basis for morpheme learning problems in children with specific language impairment: Journal of Speech & Hearing Research Vol 37(2) Apr 1994, 389-398.
  • Corson, Y. (1984). Hypotheses research, test and chronology in open situations: Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive/Current Psychology of Cognition Vol 4(5) Oct 1984, 421-447.
  • Crocker, J. (1982). Biased questions in judgment of covariation studies: Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin Vol 8(2) Jun 1982, 214-220.
  • Crott, H. W., Giesel, M., & Hoffmann, C. (1998). The process of inductive inference in groups: The use of positive and negative hypothesis and target testing in sequential rule-discovery tasks: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Vol 75(4) Oct 1998, 938-952.
  • Cuqlock, V. G. (1983). A behavioral assessment of the weights applied to redundant cues: Dissertation Abstracts International.
  • Cutietta, R. (1984). The musical hypothesis-testing ability of the adolescent learner: Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education No 80 Fal 1984, 27-50.
  • Dabrowska, E. (2001). Learning a morphological system without a default: The Polish genitive: Journal of Child Language Vol 28(3) Oct 2001, 545-574.
  • Daly, B. L. (1991). The effects of computer-mediated communication on inductive learning by groups: Dissertation Abstracts International.
  • D'Amato, M. F., & Guber, S. (1982). Rules and paired-associate retention: Perceptual and Motor Skills Vol 54(1) Feb 1982, 110.
  • Dark, V. J., & Schmidt, P. A. (2000). Conceptual activation of distractors during selection is not sufficient to produce negative priming: Psychonomic Bulletin & Review Vol 7(1) Mar 2000, 126-132.
  • Dark, V. J., & Schmidt, P. A. (2000). "Conceptual activation of distractors during selection is not sufficient to produce negative priming": Errata: Psychonomic Bulletin & Review Vol 7(4) Dec 2000, 741.
  • Dashen, M. L. (1994). Context effects in the application of rules. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering.
  • D'Astous, A. (1986). The use of nonanalytic cognitive processes in evaluative judgment making: Dissertation Abstracts International.
  • Davidson, G. M. (1988). Evaluation of evidence for necessity and for sufficiency: Dissertation Abstracts International.
  • de Jonghe, L. S. (1982). Negative hypothesis testing and the child's development of the concept of balance: Dissertation Abstracts International.
  • de Swart, J. H., Kok, A., & Das-Smaal, E. A. (1981). P300 and uncertainty reduction in a concept-identification task: Psychophysiology Vol 18(6) Nov 1981, 619-629.
  • Deak, G. O., Ray, S. D., & Pick, A. D. (2004). Effects of age, reminders, and task difficulty on young children's rule-switching flexibility: Cognitive Development Vol 19(3) Jul-Sep 2004, 385-400.
  • Deakin, J. M., & Proteau, L. (2000). The role of scheduling in learning through observation: Journal of Motor Behavior Vol 32(3) Sep 2000, 268-276.
  • DeSantis, A., Markowsky, G., & Wegman, M. N. (1989). Learning probabilistic prediction functions. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
  • Destrebecqz, A., & Cleeremans, A. (2005). Implicit learning in a prediction task: Neither abstract nor based on exemplars: Current Psychology Letters: Behaviour, Brain & Cognition No 17(3) 2005, No Pagination Specified.
  • Devine, P. G., Hirt, E. R., & Gehrke, E. M. (1990). Diagnostic and confirmation strategies in trait hypothesis testing: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Vol 58(6) Jun 1990, 952-963.
  • Diakidoy, I.-A. N., & Ioannides, C. (2004). Elementary School Children's Ability to Distinguish Hypothetical Beliefs From Statements of Preference: Journal of Educational Psychology Vol 96(3) Sep 2004, 536-544.
  • Dickstein, L. S. (1981). Conversion and possibility in syllogistic reasoning: Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society Vol 18(5) Nov 1981, 229-232.
  • Diefenderfer, K. K., Holzman, T. G., & Thompson, D. N. (1985). Verbal self-monitoring and solution flexibility in rule induction: Journal of Genetic Psychology Vol 146(1) Mar 1985, 79-88.
  • Dieussaert, K., Schaeken, W., Schroyens, W., & d'Ydewalle, G. (1999). Strategies for dealing with complex deductive problems: Combining and dividing: Psychologica Belgica Vol 39(4) 1999, 215-234.
  • Dijkstra, S., & Dekker, P. H. (1982). Inference processes in learning well-defined concepts: Acta Psychologica Vol 51(3) Oct 1982, 181-205.
  • Doherty, M. E., Schiavo, M. B., Tweney, R. D., & Mynatt, C. R. (1981). The influence of feedback and diagnostic data on pseudodiagnosticity: Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society Vol 18(4) Oct 1981, 191-194.
  • Donnelly, M. B., Sisson, J. C., & Woolliscroft, J. O. (1990). The reliability of a hypothesis generation and testing task: Medical Education Vol 24(6) Nov 1990, 507-511.
  • Dunbar, K., & Klahr, D. (1989). Developmental differences in scientific discovery processes. Hillsdale, NJ, England: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  • Dupagne, M., Salwen, M. B., & Paul, B. (1999). Impact of question order on the third-person effect: International Journal of Public Opinion Research Vol 11(4) Win 1999, 334-345.
  • Durand, R. P., Fincher, R.-M. E., Reigart, J. R., Lancaster, C. J., & et al. (1991). Association between third-year medical students' abilities to organize hypotheses about patients' problems and to order appropriate diagnostic tests: Academic Medicine Vol 66(11) Nov 1991, 702-704.
  • Durnin, J. H. (1991). Rules, higher order rules and problem solving: Journal of Structural Learning Vol 11(1) Apr 1991, 13-25.
  • Dybdahl, C. S. (1983). A theoretical analysis of revision strategies employed by proficient and less proficient readers for underlying model construction in narrative text: Dissertation Abstracts International.
  • Echevarria, M. (2003). Anomalies as a catalyst for middle school students' knowledge construction and scientific reasoning during science inquiry: Journal of Educational Psychology Vol 95(2) Jun 2003, 357-374.
  • Edgell, S. E., Castellan, N. J., Jr., Roe, R. M., Barnes, J. M., Ng, P. C., Bright, R. D., et al. (1996). Irrelevant information in probabilistic categorization: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition Vol 22(6) Nov 1996, 1463-1481.
  • Eitel, P., Friend, R., Griffin, K. W., & Wadhwa, N. K. (1998). Cognitive control and consistency in compliance: Psychology & Health Vol 13(6) Nov 1998, 953-973.
  • Ellis, A. (1994). A corrective note on O'Donohue and Szymanski's study of logical analysis and REBT's use of empirical hypothesis testing as well as logical analysis: Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive Behavior Therapy Vol 12(1) Spr 1994, 73-76.
  • Endress, A. D., Scholl, B. J., & Mehler, J. (2005). The Role of Salience in the Extraction of Algebraic Rules: Journal of Experimental Psychology: General Vol 134(3) Aug 2005, 406-419.
  • Enns, J. T., & King, K. A. (1990). Components of line-drawing interpretation: A developmental study: Developmental Psychology Vol 26(3) May 1990, 469-479.
  • Eva, K. W., Brooks, L. R., & Norman, G. R. (2002). Forward reasoning as a hallmark of expertise in medicine: Logical, psychological, phenomenological inconsistencies. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.
  • Evans, J. S. B. T. (2002). The influence of prior belief on scientific thinking. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Evans, J. S. B. T., & Handley, S. J. (1999). The role of negation in conditional inference: The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology Vol 52A(3) Aug 1999, 739-769.
  • Evans, J. S. B. T., Venn, S., & Feeney, A. (2002). Implicit and explicit processes in a hypothesis testing task: British Journal of Psychology Vol 93(1) Feb 2002, 31-46.
  • Evett, S. R., Devine, P. G., Hirt, E. R., & Price, J. (1994). The role of the hypothesis and the evidence in the trait hypothesis testing process: Journal of Experimental Social Psychology Vol 30(5) Sep 1994, 456-481.
  • Farris, H. H., & Revlin, R. (1989). Sensible reasoning in two tasks: Rule discovery and hypothesis evaluation: Memory & Cognition Vol 17(2) Mar 1989, 221-232.
  • Feinberg, H. (1987). Generalization via multiple exemplar training and two methods of rule training: Do rules help? : Dissertation Abstracts International.
  • Feldman, M. P. (1963). A reconsideration of the extinction hypothesis of warm up in motor behavior: Psychological Bulletin Vol 60(5) Sep 1963, 452-459.
  • Fiedler, K. (1983). Are confirmation biases due to confirmation biases? A reply to Gadenne: Psychologische Beitrage Vol 25(1-2) 1983, 280-286.
  • Findler, N. V., & Dhulipalla, S. (1999). A decision support system for rule discovery in social networks: Social Networks Vol 21(2) Apr 1999, 167-185.
  • Fiorello, C. A., Hale, J. B., & Snyder, L. E. (2006). Cognitive hypothesis testing and response to intervention for children with reading problems: Psychology in the Schools Vol 43(8) Nov 2006, 835-853.
  • Fischer, B. (1983). The development of hypothesis behavior in retarded adults: Dissertation Abstracts International.
  • Fisher, D. H., Edgerton, M. E., Chen, Z., Tang, L., & Frey, L. (2006). Backward chaining rule induction: Intelligent Data Analysis Vol 10(5) 2006, 397-417.
  • Fisher, S. (1965). Body sensation and perception of projective stimuli: Journal of Consulting Psychology Vol 29(2) Apr 1965, 135-138.
  • Fisher, S. D. (1987). Cue selection in hypothesis generation: Reading habits, consistency checking, and diagnostic scanning: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes Vol 40(2) Oct 1987, 170-192.
  • Fisher, S. D., & et al. (1983). Consistency checking in hypothesis generation: Organizational Behavior & Human Performance Vol 31(2) Apr 1983, 233-254.
  • Fisk, A. D., & Lloyd, S. J. (1988). The role of stimulus-to-rule consistency in learning rapid application of spatial rules: Human Factors Vol 30(1) Feb 1988, 35-49.
  • Fitzgerald, L. F. (1988). On the importance of operational definitions: A comment on Hayden: Journal of Counseling Psychology Vol 35(3) Jul 1988, 351-352.
  • Flach, P. A., Lachiche, N., & Fisher, D. H. (2001). Confirmation-guided discovery of first-order rules with Tertius: Machine Learning Vol 42(1-2) Jan-Feb 2001, 61-95.
  • Foster, D. P., & Young, H. P. (1998). On the nonconvergence of fictitious play in coordination games: Games and Economic Behavior Vol 25(1) Oct 1998, 79-96.
  • Fountain, S. B. (1990). Rule abstraction, item memory, and chunking in rat serial-pattern tracking: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes Vol 16(1) Jan 1990, 96-105.
  • Fountain, S. B., Rowan, J. D., & Benson, D. M., Jr. (1999). Rule learning in rats: serial tracking in interleaved patterns: Animal Cognition Vol 2(1) 1999, 41-54.
  • Frydman, O., Light, P., & Alegria, J. (1999). Pragmatic determinants of children's responses to the Wason Selection Task: Psychologia: An International Journal of Psychology in the Orient Vol 42(1) Mar 1999, 59-68.
  • Fu, Q., & Fu, X. (2005). The Effects of Exemplar Quantity on Implicit Sequence Learning: Psychological Science (China) Vol 28(4) Jul 2005, 801-805.
  • Fuchs, K. D., & Turner, R. R. (1981). Classification skills and feedback sequence as determinants of hypothesis testing and problem solving: International Journal of Behavioral Development Vol 4(2) Jun 1981, 223-236.
  • Fugelsang, J. A., & Thompson, V. A. (2000). Strategy selection in causal reasoning: When beliefs and covariation collide: Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale Vol 54(1) Mar 2000, 15-32.
  • Fuhs, M. C., & Touretzky, D. S. (2000). Synaptic learning models of map separation in the hippocampus: Neurocomputing: An International Journal Vol 32-33 Jun 2000, 379-384.
  • Gachowetz, H., & Schiepek, G. (1982). The observer as an attribution source: The acceptance of causal attributions by the actor: Zeitschrift fur Sozialpsychologie Vol 13(3) 1982, 209-216.
  • Gadenne, V. (1982). Confirmation bias and rationality of cognitive processes: Psychologische Beitrage Vol 24(1) 1982, 11-25.
  • Gadenne, V., & Oswald, M. (1986). Origin of and changes in confirmatory tendencies in hypothesis testing: Zeitschrift fur Experimentelle und Angewandte Psychologie Vol 33(3) 1986, 360-374.
  • Gagnon, R., Charlin, B., Roy, L., St-Martin, M., Sauve, E., Boshuizen, H. P. A., et al. (2006). The Cognitive Validity of the Script Concordance Test: A Processing Time Study: Teaching and Learning in Medicine Vol 18(1) Win 2006, 22-27.
  • Gale, M., & Ball, L. J. (2006). Dual-goal facilitation in Wason's 2-4-6 task: What mediates successful rule discovery? : The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Vol 59(5) May 2006, 873-885.
  • Gangemi, A., Balbo, M., Bocchi, C., Carriero, L., Filippi, B., Lelli, F., et al. (2002). Responsibility, fear of guilt and hypothesis testing process: Psicoterapia Cognitiva e Comportamentale Vol 8(3) 2002, 211-231.
  • Garavan, H., Doherty, M. E., & Mynatt, C. R. (1997). When falsification fails: Irish Journal of Psychology Vol 18(3) 1997, 267-292.
  • Garcia-Marques, L., Sherman, S. J., & Palma-Oliveira, J. M. (2001). Hypothesis testing and the perception of diagnosticity: Journal of Experimental Social Psychology Vol 37(3) May 2001, 183-200.
  • Germano, F., & Lugosi, G. (2007). Global Nash convergence of Foster and Young's regret testing: Games and Economic Behavior Vol 60(1) Jul 2007, 135-154.
  • Gettys, C. F., Mehle, T., & Fisher, S. (1986). Plausibility assessments in hypothesis generation: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes Vol 37(1) Feb 1986, 14-33.
  • Gibbons, H., & Rammsayer, T. H. (2001). Latent inhibition depends on inhibitory attentional learning to the preexposed stimulus: Evidence from visual search and rule-learning tasks: Learning and Motivation Vol 32(4) Nov 2001, 457-476.
  • Gierl, M. J. (2007). Making diagnostic inferences about cognitive attributes using the rule-space model and attribute hierarchy method: Journal of Educational Measurement Vol 44(4) Win 2007, 325-340.
  • Girotto, V., & Legrenzi, P. (1989). Mental representation and hypothetico-deductive reasoning: The case of the THOG problem: Psychological Research Vol 51(3) Nov 1989, 129-135.
  • Giurfa, M., & Benard, J. (2006). Prospective and retrospective learning in honeybees: International Journal of Comparative Psychology Vol 19(3) 2006, 358-367.
  • Gleason, M. E., & Schauble, L. (1999). Parents' assistance of their children's scientific reasoning: Cognition and Instruction Vol 17(4) 1999, 343-378.
  • Goel, V., & Vartanian, O. (2005). Dissociating the Roles of Right Ventral Lateral and Dorsal Lateral Prefrontal Cortex in Generation and Maintenance of Hypotheses in Set-shift Problems: Cerebral Cortex Vol 15(8) Aug 2005, 1170-1177.
  • Goldsmith, A. H., Veum, J. R., & Darity, W., Jr. (2000). Working hard for the money? Efficiency wages and worker effort: Journal of Economic Psychology Vol 21(4) Aug 2000, 351-385.
  • Goldvarg, Y., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2000). Illusions in modal reasoning: Memory & Cognition Vol 28(2) Mar 2000, 282-294.
  • Gomez Becerra, I., & Luciano Soriano, M. C. (2000). Self control through altering function rules: Psicothema Vol 12(3) Aug 2000, 418-425.
  • Gopnik, A., Glymour, C., Sobel, D. M., Schulz, L. E., Kushnir, T., & Danks, D. (2004). A Theory of Causal Learning in Children: Causal Maps and Bayes Nets: Psychological Review Vol 111(1) Jan 2004, 3-32.
  • Gorman, H., & Bourne, L. E. (1983). Learning to think by learning LOGO: Rule learning in third-grade computer programmers: Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society Vol 21(3) May 1983, 165-167.
  • Gorman, M. E. (1995). Hypothesis testing. Hillsdale, NJ, England: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  • Gorsky, J. M. (1994). Vocational hypothesis testing: The relationship between stage of career development and hypothesis testing strategy. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences.
  • Gowan, M. A., Riordan, C. M., & Gatewood, R. D. (1999). Test of a model of coping with involuntary job loss following a company closing: Journal of Applied Psychology Vol 84(1) Feb 1999, 75-86.
  • Graham, L. M. (1997). A two-component theory of conditional reasoning: Content and process in the Wason four-card selection Task. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering.
  • Greco, A. (1991). Confirmation bias and the use of evidence in a 2-4-6 task: Giornale Italiano di Psicologia Vol 18(1) Feb 1991, 79-96.
  • Green, D. W. (1990). Confirmation bias, problem-solving and cognitive models. Oxford, England: North-Holland.
  • Grewal, A. (1985). An interactional study of cognitive and socio-economic correlates of school achievement: Journal of Psychological Researches Vol 29(1) Jan 1985, 41-45.
  • Griggs, R. A., Platt, R. D., Newstead, S. E., & Jackson, S. L. (1998). Attentional factors in a disjunctive reasoning task: Thinking & Reasoning Vol 4(1) 1998, 1-14.
  • Grigorenko, Y. L., & Smirnov, S. D. (1988). Study of the process of advancement and verification of hypotheses in solving problems with unspecified conditions: Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta - Seriya 14: Psikhologiya No 1 Jan-Mar 1988, 61-68.
  • Gruen, G. E., Offenbach, S. I., & Keane, T. (1986). Hypothesis testing on a proportional reasoning task by children at different Piagetian stage levels: International Journal of Behavioral Development Vol 9(1) Mar 1986, 91-104.
  • Guttman, R., & Shoham, I. (1983). Parent-offspring resemblance and parental education: Behavior Genetics Vol 13(1) Jan 1983, 99-105.
  • Hacker, W. (1989). On the utility of procedural rules: Conditions of the use of rules in the production of operation sequences: Ergonomics Vol 32(7) Jul 1989, 717-732.
  • Hagafors, R. (1983). Effects of information presentation mode on subjects' hypotheses in a probabilistic inference task: Acta Psychologica Vol 53(3) Oct 1983, 195-204.
  • Hak, T. (2001). "Are qualitative studies of PBL tutorial process indicated?": Reply: Academic Medicine Vol 76(3) Mar 2001, 216.
  • Hak, T., & Maguire, P. (2000). Group process: The black box of studies on problem-based learning: Academic Medicine Vol 75(7) Jul 2000, 769-772.
  • Halberstadt, N., & Kareev, Y. (1995). Transitions between modes of inquiry in a rule discovery task: The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology Vol 48A(2) May 1995, 280-295.
  • Hamm, R. M. (1993). Explanations for common responses to the Blue/Green Cab probabilistic inference word problem: Psychological Reports Vol 72(1) Feb 1993, 219-242.
  • Hamzei, G. H. S., Mulvaney, D. J., & Sillitoe, I. P. (1999). Multi-layer hierarchical rule learning in reactive robot control using incremental decision trees: Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems Vol 24(2) Feb 1999, 99-124.
  • Happaney, K., & Zelazo, P. D. (2003). Inhibition as a problem in the psychology of behavior: Developmental Science Vol 6(5) Nov 2003, 468-470.
  • Hardiman, P. T., Pollatsek, A., & Well, A. D. (1986). Learning to understand the balance beam: Cognition and Instruction Vol 3(1) 1986, 63-86.
  • Hare, B., & Wrangham, R. (2002). Integrating two evolutionary models for the study of social cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Harre, R. (1988). Ethogenic methods: An empirical psychology of action. New York, NY ; Oxford, England: Cambridge University Press; British Psychological Society.
  • Harris, J. A., & Livesey, E. J. (2008). Comparing patterning and biconditional discriminations in humans: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes Vol 34(1) Jan 2008, 144-154.
  • Hauber, R. P. (1988). Diagnostic problem solving: The effects of knowledge/experience and problem complexity on early hypothesis generation in the nursing knowledge domain: Dissertation Abstracts International.
  • Haverkamp, B. E. (1990). An investigation of the hypothesis testing behavior of counseling trainees: Dissertation Abstracts International.
  • Hayden, D. C. (1986). Counselor and client responses to hypothesis testing strategies: Dissertation Abstracts International.
  • Hayden, D. C. (1987). Counselor and client responses to hypothesis-testing strategies: Journal of Counseling Psychology Vol 34(2) Apr 1987, 149-156.
  • Hayden, D. C. (1988). Should we lock the door for fear of spooks, pixies, or elves? Reply to Fitzgerald: Journal of Counseling Psychology Vol 35(3) Jul 1988, 353-354.
  • Hayes, S. C. (1989). Rule-governed behavior: Cognition, contingencies, and instructional control. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
  • Hayes, S. C. (1992). The Two-Way Street of Narrowness: PsycCRITIQUES Vol 37 (5), May, 1992.
  • Hayes, S. C., & Hayes, L. J. (1989). The verbal action of the listener as a basis for rule-governance. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
  • Hayes, S. C., Zettle, R. D., & Rosenfarb, I. (1989). Rule-following. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
  • Haygood, R. C., & Bourne, L. E., Jr. (1965). Attribute- and rule-learning aspects of conceptual behavior: Psychological Review Vol 72(3) May 1965, 175-195.
  • Heibeck, T. H., & Markman, E. M. (1987). Word learning in children: An examination of fast mapping: Child Development Vol 58(4) Aug 1987, 1021-1034.
  • Heil, D. W. (1981). "What are you like?" An examination of interpersonal hypothesis testing strategies: Dissertation Abstracts International.
  • Hertel, P. T. (1989). The generation effect: A reflection of cognitive effort? : Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society Vol 27(6) Nov 1989, 541-544.
  • Hineline, P. N., & Wanchisen, B. A. (1989). Correlated hypothesizing and the distinction between contingency-shaped and rule-governed behavior. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
  • Hirshman, E., & Hostetter, M. (2000). Using ROC curves to test models of recognition memory: The relationship between presentation duration and slope: Memory & Cognition Vol 28(2) Mar 2000, 161-166.
  • Ho, C. P., Savenye, W., & Haas, N. (1986). The effects of orienting objectives and review learning from interactive video: Journal of Computer-Based Instruction Vol 13(4) Fal 1986, 126-129.
  • Hodgins, H. S., & Zuckerman, M. (1993). Beyond selecting information: Biases in spontaneous questions and resultant conclusions: Journal of Experimental Social Psychology Vol 29(5) Sep 1993, 387-407.
  • Hoffmann, C., & Crott, H. W. (2004). Effects of amount of evidence and range of rule on the use of hypothesis and target tests by groups in rule-discovery tasks: Thinking & Reasoning Vol 10(4) Nov 2004, 321-354.
  • Hofmann, S. G. (1999). Introducing the grandmother test into psychological science: Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology Vol 19(2) Fal 1999, 167-176.
  • Holmstrom-Hintikka, G. (1992). On argumentation in legal contexts: Communication & Cognition Vol 25(2-3) 1992, 259-268.
  • Hong, L., Chijun, Z., Xuemei, G., Shan, G., & Chongde, L. (2005). The influence of complexity and reasoning direction on children's causal reasoning: Cognitive Development Vol 20(1) Jan-Mar 2005, 87-101.
  • Hoover, S. M. (1994). Scientific problem finding in gifted fifth-grade students: Roeper Review Vol 16(3) Feb 1994, 156-159.
  • Howard, G. S., & Englehardt, J. L. (1990). Teaching rival hypotheses in experimental psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Howe, C., Tolmie, A., Greer, K., & Mackenzie, M. (1995). Peer collaboration and conceptual growth in physics: Task influences on children's understanding of heating and cooling: Cognition and Instruction Vol 13(4) 1995, 483-503.
  • Hughes, L. A. (1984). Beyond the rules of the game: Girls gaming at a friends' school: Dissertation Abstracts International.
  • Hullermeier, E., & Beringer, J. (2006). Learning from ambiguously labeled examples: Intelligent Data Analysis Vol 10(5) 2006, 419-439.
  • Ishii, T. (1999). The change of the basic rules in a CG maze: Japanese Journal of Social Psychology Vol 14(2) Feb 1999, 57-68.
  • Izawa, C. (1993). Power behind the scenes: Hidden effects of test trials unveiled. Hillsdale, NJ, England: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  • Jacques, S., Zelazo, P. D., Kirkham, N. Z., & Semcesen, T. K. (1999). Rule selection versus rule execution in preschoolers: An error-detection approach: Developmental Psychology Vol 35(3) May 1999, 770-780.
  • Jansen, B. R. J., & van der Maas, H. L. J. (1997). Statistical test of the rule assessment methodology by latent class analysis: Developmental Review Vol 17(3) Sep 1997, 321-357.
  • Jin, S.-H., Kwon, Y.-J., Jeong, J.-S., Kwon, S. W., & Shin, D.-H. (2006). Increased information transmission during scientific hypothesis generation: Mutual information analysis of multichannel EEG: International Journal of Psychophysiology Vol 62(2) Nov 2006, 337-344.
  • Johnson, R., & Donchin, E. (1982). Sequential expectancies and decision making in a changing environment: An electrophysiological approach: Psychophysiology Vol 19(2) Mar 1982, 183-200.
  • Johnson, T. R., & Krems, J. F. (2001). Use of current explanations in multicausal abductive reasoning: Cognitive Science: A Multidisciplinary Journal Vol 25(6) Nov-Dec 2001, 903-939.
  • Johnston, J. R. (1985). Cognitive prerequisites: The evidence from children learning English. Hillsdale, NJ, England: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  • Josephson, J. R., Chandrasekaran, B., Smith, J. W., & Tanner, M. C. (1987). A mechanism for forming composite explanatory hypotheses: IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, & Cybernetics Vol 17(3) May-Jun 1987, 445-454.
  • Joyce, B. G., Joyce, J. H., & Chase, P. N. (1989). Considerations for the use of rules in academic settings: Education & Treatment of Children Vol 12(1) Feb 1989, 82-92.
  • Kalina, M. L. (1991). Group verbal mediation effects on rule generation which govern subsequent transfer tasks for community college remedial reading students: Dissertation Abstracts International.
  • Kalohn, J. C., & Spray, J. A. (1999). The effect of model misspecification on classification decisions made using a computerized test: Journal of Educational Measurement Vol 36(1) Spr 1999, 47-59.
  • Kamhi, A. G., Nelson, L. K., Lee, R. F., & Gholson, B. (1985). The ability of language-disordered children to use and modify hypotheses in discrimination learning: Applied Psycholinguistics Vol 6(4) Dec 1985, 435-451.
  • Kareev, Y., & Avrahami, J. (1995). Teaching by examples: The case of number series: British Journal of Psychology Vol 86(1) Feb 1995, 41-54.
  • Kareev, Y., & Halberstadt, N. (1993). Evaluating negative tests and refutations in a rule discovery task: The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology Vol 46A(4) Nov 1993, 715-727.
  • Kareev, Y., Halberstadt, N., & Shafir, D. (1993). Improving performance and increasing the use of non-positive testing in a rule-discovery task: The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology Vol 46A(4) Nov 1993, 729-742.
  • Kashyap, R. L., & Chang, L. (1993). Study of interval belief combination: Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems Vol 7(1) Feb 1993, 1-13.
  • Kassin, S. M. (1981). Distortions in estimating consensus from sequential events: Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin Vol 7(4) Dec 1981, 542-546.
  • Kavsek, B., & Lavrac, N. (2006). APRIORI-SD: Adapting association rule learning to subgroup discovery: Applied Artificial Intelligence Vol 20(7) Aug 2006, 543-583.
  • Kellogg, R. T. (1982). Hypothesis recognition failure in conjunctive and disconjunctive concept-identification tasks: Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society Vol 19(6) Jun 1982, 327-330.
  • Kellogg, R. T. (1982). When can we introspect accurately about mental processes? : Memory & Cognition Vol 10(2) Mar 1982, 141-144.
  • Kellogg, R. T. (1983). Age differences in hypothesis testing and frequency processing in concept learning: Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society Vol 21(2) Mar 1983, 101-104.
  • Kendler, T. S. (1981). Development of discrimination learning and problem solving: A critical review of The Cognitive-Developmental Basis of Human Learning: Studies in hypothesis testing: Developmental Review Vol 1(2) Jun 1981, 146-162.
  • Kern, L. H. (1983). The effect of data error in inducing confirmatory inference strategies in scientific hypothesis testing: Dissertation Abstracts International.
  • Kiernan, B. J., & Snow, D. P. (1999). Bound-morpheme generalization by children with SLI: Is there a functional relationship with accuracy of response to training targets: Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research Vol 42(3) Jun 1999, 649-662.
  • Kimmel, S., & MacGinitie, W. H. (1985). Helping students revise hypotheses while reading: Reading Teacher Vol 38(8) Apr 1985, 768-771.
  • Kirkham, N. Z., Cruess, L., & Diamond, A. (2003). Helping children apply their knowledge to their behavior on a dimension-switching task: Developmental Science Vol 6(5) Nov 2003, 449-476.
  • Kirkham, N. Z., & Diamond, A. (2003). Sorting between theories of perseveration: performance in conflict tasks requires memory, attention and inhibition: Developmental Science Vol 6(5) Nov 2003, 474-476.
  • Klaczynski, P. A. (2000). Motivated scientific reasoning biases, epistemological beliefs, and theory polarization: A two-process approach to adolescent cognition: Child Development Vol 71(5) Sep-Oct 2000, 1347-1366.
  • Klaczynski, P. A., & Laipple, J. S. (1993). Role of content domain, logic training, and IQ in rule acquisition and transfer: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition Vol 19(3) May 1993, 653-672.
  • Klayman, J., & Ha, Y.-w. (1989). Hypothesis testing in rule discovery: Strategy, structure, and content: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition Vol 15(4) Jul 1989, 596-604.
  • Kleinschmidt, H., & Lachnit, H. (1993). Pavlovian conditioning and rule learning: Integrative Physiological & Behavioral Science Vol 28(2) Apr-Jun 1993, 158-162.
  • Klinger, L. G., & Dawson, G. (2001). Prototype formation in autism: Development and Psychopathology Vol 13(1) Mar 2001, 111-124.
  • Knowles, M. E., & Delaney, P. F. (2005). Lasting Reductions in Illegal Moves Following an Increase in Their Cost: Evidence From River-Crossing Problems: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition Vol 31(4) Jul 2005, 670-682.
  • Kobayashi, H. (2007). Hypothesis evaluation schema and collaborative discovery: Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology Vol 55(1) Mar 2007, 48-59.
  • Koedijker, J. M., Oudejans, R. R. D., & Beek, P. J. (2007). Explicit rules and direction of attention in learning and performing the table tennis forehand: International Journal of Sport Psychology Vol 38(2) Apr-Jun 2007, 227-244.
  • Koehler, D. J. (1994). Hypothesis generation and confidence in judgment: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition Vol 20(2) Mar 1994, 461-469.
  • Kramer, K. M. (2003). Testing the nonextensionality of support theory: A generalization to dual disjunctions. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering.
  • Kreiner, D. S., & Gough, P. B. (1990). Two ideas about spelling: Rules and word-specific memory: Journal of Memory and Language Vol 29(1) Feb 1990, 103-118.
  • Kroner, S., Plass, J. L., & Leutner, D. (2005). Intelligence assessment with computer simulations: Intelligence Vol 33(4) Jul-Aug 2005, 347-368.
  • Kruglanski, A. W., & Mayseless, O. (1988). Contextual effects in hypothesis testing: The role of competing alternatives and epistemic motivations: Social Cognition Vol 6(1) 1988, 1-20.
  • Kurpius, D. J., Benjamin, D., & Morran, D. K. (1985). Effects of teaching a cognitive strategy on counselor trainee internal dialogue and clinical hypothesis formulation: Journal of Counseling Psychology Vol 32(2) Apr 1985, 263-271.
  • Kurtz, S. T. (1983). The development of rules in two different interpersonal situations: Dissertation Abstracts International.
  • Lachnit, H. (1992). Pavlovian conditioning and cognitive psychology: The case of inductive reasoning: German Journal of Psychology Vol 16(4) Dec 1992, 273-282.
  • Lafond, D., Lacouture, Y., & Mineau, G. (2007). Complexity minimization in rule-based category learning: Revising the catalog of Boolean concepts and evidence for non-minimal rules: Journal of Mathematical Psychology Vol 51(2) Apr 2007, 57-74.
  • Lagnado, D. A., & Sloman, S. (2004). The Advantage of Timely Intervention: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition Vol 30(4) Jul 2004, 856-876.
  • Lalljee, M., Lamb, R., Furnham, A. F., & Jaspars, J. (1984). Explanations and information search: Inductive and hypothesis-testing approaches to arriving at an explanation: British Journal of Social Psychology Vol 23(3) Sep 1984, 201-212.
  • Langford, P. E. (1993). Evaluation of conditional and biconditional hypotheses in information-use tasks during adolescence: Journal of Genetic Psychology Vol 154(1) Mar 1993, 111-126.
  • Langford, P. E. (1998). A neglected window on hypothesis testing in adolescence: Explicit standard order conditional selection tasks: Psychological Reports Vol 83(3, Pt 2) Dec 1998, 1363-1386.
  • Langford, P. E., & Hunting, R. (1992). A test of a two-stage model of the evaluation of hypotheses from quantified first-order predicate logic in information use tasks: Psychological Reports Vol 71(3, Pt 2) Dec 1992, 1091-1104.
  • Laughlin, P. R., Bonner, B. L., & Altermatt, T. W. (1998). Collective versus individual induction with single versus multiple hypotheses: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Vol 75(6) Dec 1998, 1481-1489.
  • Laughlin, P. R., Bonner, B. L., & Altermatt, T. W. (1999). Effectiveness of positive hypothesis testing in inductive and deductive rule learning: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes Vol 77(2) Feb 1999, 130-146.
  • Laughlin, P. R., & Futoran, G. C. (1985). Collective induction: Social combination and sequential transition: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Vol 48(3) Mar 1985, 608-613.
  • Laughlin, P. R., Magley, V. J., & Shupe, E. I. (1997). Positive and negative hypothesis testing by cooperative groups: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes Vol 69(3) Mar 1997, 265-275.
  • Laughlin, P. R., Shupe, E. I., & Magley, V. J. (1998). Effectiveness of positive hypothesis testing for cooperative groups: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes Vol 73(1) Jan 1998, 27-38.
  • Laughlin, P. R., Zander, M. L., Knievel, E. M., & Tan, T. K. (2003). Groups perform better than the best individuals on letters-to-numbers problems: Informative equations and effective strategies: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Vol 85(4) Oct 2003, 684-694.
  • Laupa, M. (2000). Children's understanding of logical and conventional rules in arithmetic algorithms: The Journal of Mathematical Behavior Vol 19(3) 3rdQtr 2000, 291-305.
  • Lawson, A. E., Lawson, D. I., & Lawson, C. A. (1984). Proportional reasoning and the linguistic abilities required for hypothetico-deductive reasoning: Journal of Research in Science Teaching Vol 21(2) Feb 1984, 119-131.
  • Lecas, J.-F., & Barrouillet, P. (1999). Understanding conditional rules in childhood and adolescence: A mental models approach: Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive/Current Psychology of Cognition Vol 18(3) Jun 1999, 363-396.
  • Lecoutre, M.-P. (1982). A direct investigation of two hypotheses in a concept identification situation: Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive/Current Psychology of Cognition Vol 2(3) Sep 1982, 313-326.
  • Lee, G., & Oakhill, J. (1984). The effects of externalization on syllogistic reasoning: The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology Vol 36A(3) Aug 1984, 519-530.
  • Lee, O. M. (1985). The effect of type of feedback on rule learning in computer based instruction: Dissertation Abstracts International.
  • Lee, S.-s. (1984). Separability of coded attributes in logical rule acquisition: A two-process analysis: Canadian Journal of Psychology/Revue Canadienne de Psychologie Vol 38(3) Sep 1984, 386-401.
  • Legrenzi, P., Butera, F., Mugny, G., & Perez, J. (1991). Majority and minority influence in inductive reasoning: A preliminary study: European Journal of Social Psychology Vol 21(4) Jul-Aug 1991, 359-363.
  • Lehman, D. R., Krosnick, J. A., West, R. L., & Li, F. (1992). The focus of judgment effect: A question wording effect due to hypothesis confirmation bias: Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin Vol 18(6) Dec 1992, 690-699.
  • Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2000). Modeling in mathematics and science. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
  • Leland, J. W. (1986). Individual choice under uncertainty: Finite discriminatory ability and systematic deviations from "strict" rationality: Dissertation Abstracts International.
  • Lewicka, M. (1998). Confirmation bias: Cognitive error or adaptive strategy of action control? New York, NY: Plenum Press.
  • Liberman, N., & Klar, Y. (1996). Hypothesis testing in Wason's selection task: Social exchange cheating detection or task understanding: Cognition Vol 58(1) Jan 1996, 127-156.
  • Liberman, N., Molden, D. C., Idson, L. C., & Higgins, E. T. (2001). Promotion and prevention focus on alternative hypotheses: Implications for attributional functions: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Vol 80(1) Jan 2001, 5-18.
  • Like, R., & Reeb, K. G. (1984). Clinical hypothesis testing in family practice: A biopsychosocial perspective: The Journal of Family Practice Vol 19(4) Oct 1984, 517-523.
  • Lin, D.-Y. M., & Su, Y.-L. (1998). The effect of time pressure on expert system based training for emergency management: Behaviour & Information Technology Vol 17(4) Jul-Aug 1998, 195-202.
  • Ling, C. X., & Marinov, M. (1994). A symbolic model of the nonconscious acquisition of information: Cognitive Science: A Multidisciplinary Journal Vol 18(4) Oct-Dec 1994, 595-621.
  • Lippman, L. G. (1994). Rule-governed performance and sensitivity to contingencies: What's new? : Journal of General Psychology Vol 121(4) Oct 1994, 353-360.
  • Litchfield, B. C., Driscoll, M. P., & Dempsey, J. V. (1990). Presentation sequence and example difficulty: Their effect on concept and rule learning in computer-based instruction: Journal of Computer-Based Instruction Vol 17(1) Win 1990, 35-40.
  • Litowitz, B. E. (1981). Hypothetical speech: A developmental perspective: Journal of Psycholinguistic Research Vol 10(3) May 1981, 289-312.
  • Lochy, A., Seron, X., Delazer, M., & Butterworth, B. (2000). The odd-even effect in multiplication: Parity rule or familiarity with even numbers? : Memory & Cognition Vol 28(3) Apr 2000, 358-365.
  • Lockard, R. B. (1964). Preadaptation: Panacea for past puzzles: Reply to Kiernan: Psychological Bulletin Vol 62(5) Nov 1964, 358-360.
  • Loddo, S. (2002). Rulebound and nonrulebound tasks: Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders Vol 32(1) Feb 2002, 61-62.
  • Logan, C. R. (2001). Need for closure and mediation: Effects of epistemic motivation on strategy perseverance and hypothesis testing. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering.
  • Lohaus, A., Thomas, H., Kessler, T., & Gediga, G. (1996). Decomposing water-level responses: Field effects as separate influences: Journal of Experimental Child Psychology Vol 63(1) Oct 1996, 79-102.
  • Lopez-Rousseau, A. (1993). Argument testing: Hypothesis testing in categorical arguments: Dissertation Abstracts International.
  • Ludlow, B. L., & Woodrum, D. T. (1985). Hypothesis testing and problem solving by learning disabled and nondisabled boys: Perceptual and Motor Skills Vol 60(1) Feb 1985, 160.
  • Lundy, D. H., Carlson, R. A., & Paquiot, J. (1995). Acquisition of rule-application skills: Practice schedules, rule types, and working memory: American Journal of Psychology 108(4) Win 1995, 471-497.
  • MacDonald, G. (1996). Inferences in therapy: Processes and hazards: Professional Psychology: Research and Practice Vol 27(6) Dec 1996, 600-603.
  • MacDonald, G. L. (1991). Counselor cognitive processing during hypothesis formation: Dissertation Abstracts International.
  • MacLeod, C. M., & Daniels, K. A. (2000). Direct versus indirect tests of memory: Directed forgetting meets the generation effect: Psychonomic Bulletin & Review Vol 7(2) Jun 2000, 354-359.
  • Maddox, W. T., Ashby, F. G., & Bohil, C. J. (2003). Delayed feedback effects on rule-based and information-integration category learning: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition Vol 29(4) Jul 2003, 650-662.
  • Maddox, W. T., Baldwin, G. C., & Markman, A. B. (2006). A test of the regulatory fit hypothesis in perceptual classification learning: Memory & Cognition Vol 34(7) Oct 2006, 1377-1397.
  • Maddox, W. T., Bohil, C. J., & Ing, A. D. (2004). Evidence for a procedural-learning-based system in perceptual category learning: Psychonomic Bulletin & Review Vol 11(5) Oct 2004, 945-952.
  • Magara, K. (1986). Effects of teaching a rule with exceptions on arousing interest in learners: Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology Vol 34(2) Jun 1986, 139-147.
  • Magara, K. (1991). Effects of examples occurring in daily life upon rule learning: Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology Vol 39(3) Sep 1991, 261-269.
  • Magara, K. (1994). Effects of "corroboration" in rule learning--Criticism on inductive and deductive method: Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology Vol 42(3) Sep 1994, 244-252.
  • Magara, K. (2006). Influence Upon Rule Learning of Learners' Notion that Rules have Exceptions: How to Encourage Learners to Apply Rules: Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology Vol 54(2) Jun 2006, 151-161.
  • Magliaro, S. G. (1989). Expertise in problem identification: A descriptive analysis of the cue selection and hypothesis generation of reading diagnosticians: Dissertation Abstracts International.
  • Magnan, A. (1989). Acquisition of a rule during the solving of a representation task for rotated figures: Archives de Psychologie Vol 57(223) Dec 1989, 303-322.
  • Malkova, L., Bachevalier, J., Webster, M., & Mishkin, M. (2001). Effects of neonatal inferior prefrontal and medial temporal lesions on learning the rule for delayed nonmatching-to-sample: Developmental Neuropsychology Vol 18(3) 2001, 399-421.
  • Maloney, T. J. (1981). The relation between field-independence and rule-transfer: Dissertation Abstracts International.
  • Malott, R. W. (1989). The achievement of evasive goals: Control by rules describing contingencies that are not direct acting. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
  • Mancini, F., & Gangemi, A. (2004). The influence of responsibility and guilt on naive hypothesis-testing: Thinking & Reasoning Vol 10(3) Aug 2004, 289-320.
  • Mancini, F., & Gangemi, A. (2006). The role of responsibility and fear of guilt in hypothesis-testing: Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry Vol 37(4) Dec 2006, 333-346.
  • Manktelow, K. I., Fairley, N., Kilpatrick, S. G., & Over, D. E. (2000). Pragmatics and strategies for practical reasoning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
  • Manly, C. F., & Spoehr, K. T. (1999). Mental multiplication: Nothing but the facts? : Memory & Cognition Vol 27(6) Nov 1999, 1087-1096.
  • Mann, T. S. (1983). Delayed reaction behavior of preschool children as a function of verbal pretraining and conservation ability: Dissertation Abstracts International.
  • Marcus, G. F. (1999). Connectionism: With or without rules? Response to J.L. McClelland and D.C. Plaut (1999): Trends in Cognitive Sciences Vol 3(5) May 1999, 168-170.
  • Marcus, G. F. (1999). Reply to Christiansen and Curtin: Trends in Cognitive Sciences Vol 3(8) Aug 1999, 290-291.
  • Marcus, G. F. (1999). "Reply to Christiansen and Curtin": Corrigendum: Trends in Cognitive Sciences Vol 3(9) Sep 1999, 322.
  • Marcus, G. F. (1999). Reply to Seidenberg and Elman: Trends in Cognitive Sciences Vol 3(8) Aug 1999, 289.
  • Marcus, G. F., Fernandes, K. J., & Johnson, S. P. (2007). Infant rule learning facilitated by speech: Psychological Science Vol 18(5) May 2007, 387-391.
  • Marcus, G. F., Vijayan, S., Rao, S. B., & Vishton, P. M. (1999). Rule learning by seven-month-old infants: Science Vol 283(5398) Jan 1999, 77-80.
  • Marcus, G. F., Vijayan, S., Rao, S. B., & Vishton, P. M. (2004). Rule Learning by 7-Month-Old Infants. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
  • Marek-Lovejoy, J. P. (1999). The effect of reducing cognitive complexity on a hypothetico-deductive reasoning task. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering.
  • Martin, M., & Jones, G. V. (1995). Integral bias in the cognitive processing of emotionally linked pictures: British Journal of Psychology Vol 86(3) Aug 1995, 419-435.
  • Maruszewski, T. (1983). An analysis of the cognitive processes of an individual in the light of the idealizational theory of science: Uniwersytet Im Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu: Seria Psychologia i Pedagogika No 57 1983, 238.
  • Masson, M. E. J., & Hicks, C. L. (1999). The influence of selection for response on repetition priming of word identification: Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale Vol 53(4) Dec 1999, 381-393.
  • Mathews, R. C., Stanley, W. B., Buss, R. R., & Chinn, R. (1984). Concept learning: What happens when hypothesis testing fails? : Journal of Experimental Education Vol 53(2) Win 1984-1985, 91-96.
  • Mawer, R. F., & Sweller, J. (1982). Effects of subgoal density and location on learning during problem solving: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition Vol 8(3) May 1982, 252-259.
  • Mayor, J. S. (1979). The verification of premises as a base of syllogistic reasoning: Revista de Psicologia General y Aplicada Vol 34(158) May-Jun 1979, 415-472.
  • McClelland, J. L., & Plaut, D. C. (1999). Does generalization in infant learning implicate abstract algebra-like rules? : Trends in Cognitive Sciences Vol 3(5) May 1999, 166-168.
  • McDonald, J. (1990). Some situational determinants of hypothesis-testing strategies: Journal of Experimental Social Psychology Vol 26(3) May 1990, 255-274.
  • McDonald, J. (1995). The relative effectiveness of diagnostic and positive test strategies is logically indeterminable: Psychological Record Vol 45(3) Sum 1995, 373-388.
  • McDonald, J., Frank, D. M., Samuels, M., & Castillo, J. (2003). Categorical induction as hypothesis assessment: Psychological Record Vol 53(1) Win 2003, 121-142.
  • McDonald, J., & Stenger, J. (1993). Effects of hypothesis saliency on the use of positive and diagnostic test strategies: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes Vol 56(2) Nov 1993, 213-232.
  • McDonald, J. P. (1991). A situation-centered model of inductive inference: Dissertation Abstracts International.
  • McFadden, G. T., Dufresne, A., & Kobasigawa, A. (1987). Young children's knowledge of balance scale problems: Journal of Genetic Psychology Vol 148(1) Mar 1987, 79-94.
  • McGee, W. E. (1983). The relationship between learning methods and academic achievement in 10-year-old boys: Dissertation Abstracts International.
  • McKenzie, C. R. M. (1997). Underweighting alternatives and overconfidence: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes Vol 71(2) Aug 1997, 141-160.
  • McKenzie, C. R. M. (2004). Hypothesis testing and evaluation. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
  • McKenzie, C. R. M. (2006). Increased sensitivity to differentially diagnostic answers using familiar materials: Implications for confirmation bias: Memory & Cognition Vol 34(3) Apr 2006, 577-588.
  • McKenzie, C. R. M., & Mikkelsen, L. A. (2000). The psychological side of Hempel's paradox of confirmation: Psychonomic Bulletin & Review Vol 7(2) Jun 2000, 360-366.
  • McNemar, Q. (1958). More on the Wilson Test: Psychological Bulletin Vol 55(5) Sep 1958, 334-335.
  • Meertens, R. W., Koomen, W., Delpeut, A. P., & Hager, G. A. (1984). Effects of hypothesis and assigned task on question selection strategies: European Journal of Social Psychology Vol 14(4) Oct-Dec 1984, 369-378.
  • Meeter, M., Radics, G., Myers, C. E., Gluck, M. A., & Hopkins, R. O. (2008). Probabilistic categorization: How do normal participants and amnesic patients do it? : Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews Vol 32(2) 2008, 237-248.
  • Mehle, T. (1982). Hypothesis generation in an automobile malfunction inference task: Acta Psychologica Vol 52(1-2) Nov 1982, 87-106.
  • Mehle, T., & et al. (1981). The availability explanation of excessive plausibility assessments: Acta Psychologica Vol 49(2) Nov 1981, 127-140.
  • Mendak, P. A. (1983). Reading and the art of guessing: Reading World Vol 22(4) May 1983, 346-351.
  • Michas, I. C., & Berry, D. C. (1994). Implicit and explicit processes in a second-language learning task: European Journal of Cognitive Psychology Vol 6(4) Dec 1994, 357-381.
  • Miller, D. T., & Prentice, D. A. (1999). Some consequences of a belief in group essence: The category divide hypothesis. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
  • Molenaar, P. C. (1986). Issues with a rule-sampling theory of conservation learning from a structuralist point of view: Human Development Vol 29(3) May-Jun 1986, 137-144.
  • Moraes, I. (1996). Use of rule based elaboration of worked examples to promote the acquisition of programming plans. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences.
  • Mori, H. (1993). Discovery versus expository instruction in rule learning: Reexamination using a revised anagram task: Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology Vol 41(4) Dec 1993, 435-443.
  • Morrison, F. J. (1984). Word decoding and rule-learning in normal and disabled readers: RASE: Remedial & Special Education Vol 5(3) May-Jun 1984, 20-27.
  • Moxley, R. A. (2001). Abduction in postmodern research. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.
  • Munakata, Y., Morton, J. B., & Yerys, B. E. (2003). Children's perseveration: attentional inertia and alternative accounts: Developmental Science Vol 6(5) Nov 2003, 471-473.
  • Murdock, B. B. (1965). Test of the "limited capacity" hypothesis: Journal of Experimental Psychology Vol 69(3) Mar 1965, 237-240.
  • Mynatt, C. R., Doherty, M. E., & Dragan, W. (1993). Information relevance, working memory, and the consideration of alternatives: The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology Vol 46A(4) Nov 1993, 759-778.
  • Mynatt, C. R., Doherty, M. E., & Sullivan, J. A. (1991). Data selection in a minimal hypothesis testing task: Acta Psychologica Vol 76(3) Jun 1991, 293-305.
  • Nakagawa, E. (1994). Transfer of a matching and non-matching concept between recurring and non-recurring tasks in kindergarten children: Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology Vol 42(4) Dec 1994, 383-394.
  • Nakajima, S. (2001). Failure of hierarchical conditional rule learning in the pigeon (Columba livia): Animal Cognition Vol 3(4) 2001, 221-226.
  • Nakashima, N. (1997). The role of counterevidence in rule revision: The effects of instructing metaknowledge concerning non adhocness of theory: Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology Vol 45(3) Sep 1997, 263-273.
  • Nelson, L. K., Kamhi, A. G., & Apel, K. (1987). Cognitive strengths and weaknesses in language-impaired children: One more look: Journal of Speech & Hearing Disorders Vol 52(1) Feb 1987, 36-43.
  • Newell, B. R., & Bright, J. E. H. (2002). Well past midnight: Calling time on implicit invariant learning? : European Journal of Cognitive Psychology Vol 14(2) Apr 2002, 185-205.
  • Newstead, S. E., & Griggs, R. A. (1992). Thinking about THOG: Sources of error in a deductive reasoning problem: Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung Vol 54(4) Dec 1992, 299-305.
  • Nomura, E. M., & Reber, P. J. (2008). A review of medial temporal lobe and caudate contributions to visual category learning: Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews Vol 32(2) 2008, 279-291.
  • Norman, G. R., Brooks, L. R., Colle, C. L., & Hatala, R. M. (1999). The benefit of diagnostic hypotheses in clinical reasoning: Experimental study of an instructional intervention for forward and backward reasoning: Cognition and Instruction Vol 17(4) 1999, 433-448.
  • Nosofsky, R. M., Palmeri, T. J., & McKinley, S. C. (1994). Rule-plus-exception model of classification learning: Psychological Review Vol 101(1) Jan 1994, 53-79.
  • Novak, M., & Offenbach, S. I. (1985). Response training in young children's discrimination shift learning: Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society Vol 23(1) Jan 1985, 35-38.
  • Oaksford, M., & Chater, N. (1994). Another look at eliminative and enumerative behavior in a conceptual task: European Journal of Cognitive Psychology Vol 6(2) Jun 1994, 149-169.
  • Oberauer, K., & Wilhelm, O. (2000). Effects of directionality in deductive reasoning: I. The comprehension of single relational premises: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition Vol 26(6) Nov 2000, 1702-1712.
  • O'Brien, D. P. (1999). If is neither and nor material implication. (Commentary on "Understanding conditional rules in childhood and adolescence: A mental models approach": Comment.): Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive/Current Psychology of Cognition Vol 18(3) Jun 1999, 397-406.
  • O'Brien, D. P., & Davidson, G. M. (1989). Evaluation of evidence for sufficiency, for necessity, and for necessity-and-sufficiency: The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology Vol 41(3-A) Aug 1989, 531-551.
  • O'Donohue, W., & Szymanski, J. (1993). Change mechanisms in cognitive therapy of a simple phobia: Logical analysis and empirical hypothesis testing: Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive Behavior Therapy Vol 11(4) Win 1993, 207-222.
  • Offenbach, S. I., Gruen, G. E., & Caskey, B. J. (1984). Development of proportional response strategies: Child Development Vol 55(3) Jun 1984, 963-972.
  • Ofir, C. (1988). Pseudodiagnosticity in judgment under uncertainty: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes Vol 42(3) Dec 1988, 343-363.
  • Ormerod, T. C., Manktelow, K. I., & Jones, G. V. (1993). Reasoning with three types of conditional: Biases and mental models: The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology Vol 46A(4) Nov 1993, 653-677.
  • Osman, M., & Laming, D. (2001). Misinterpretation of conditional statements in Wason's selection task: Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung Vol 65(2) May 2001, 128-144.
  • Otterbach, R. (2001). Hypothetico-deductive thinking as a metacognitive knowledge acquisition strategy in inquiry-based learning environments. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences.
  • Paap, K. R., Chun, E., & Vonnahme, P. (1999). Discrete threshold versus continuous strength models of perceptual recognition: Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale Vol 53(4) Dec 1999, 277-293.
  • Palmeri, T. J., & Nosofsky, R. M. (1995). Recognition memory for exceptions to the category rule: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition Vol 21(3) May 1995, 548-568.
  • Pandelaere, M., Hoorens, V., & Peeters, G. (2003). Why Ask About Peter? Do You Think He Caused It? How the Description of Causal Events Guides the Selection of Questions About Them: Basic and Applied Social Psychology Vol 25(4) Dec 2003, 291-297.
  • Papo, D., Baudonniere, P.-M., Hugueville, L., & Caverni, J.-P. (2003). Feedback in hypothesis testing: An ERP study: Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience Vol 15(4) May 2003, 508-522.
  • Parks, J. M., Conlon, D. E., Ang, S., & Bontempo, R. (1999). The manager giveth, the manager taketh away: Variation in distribution/recovery rules due to resource type and cultural orientation: Journal of Management Vol 25(5) 1999, 723-757.
  • Patterson, D. R. (1983). Social-cognitive biases in clinical judgment: Dissertation Abstracts International.
  • Pemberton, E. (1987). The drawing rules of children: Sequence and direction: Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society Vol 25(5) Sep 1987, 383-386.
  • Penner, D. E., & Klahr, D. (1996). When to trust the data: Further investigations of system error in a scientific reasoning task: Memory & Cognition Vol 24(5) Sep 1996, 655-668.
  • Perales, J. C., & Shanks, D. R. (2003). Normative and descriptive accounts of the influence of power and contingency on causal judgement: The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology Vol 56A(6) Aug 2003, 977-1007.
  • Perry, C., & Zhuang, J. (2005). Prosody and lemma selection: Memory & Cognition Vol 33(5) Jul 2005, 862-870.
  • Pesenti, M., Depoorter, N., & Seron, X. (2000). Noncommutability of the N+0 arithmetical rule: A case study of dissociated impairment: Cortex Vol 36(3) Jun 2000, 445-454.
  • Peterson, D. K. (1982). Hypothesis testing in a multiple-cue probability task: Dissertation Abstracts International.
  • Peterson, M. E. (1981). The repeated acquisition procedure as a means of analyzing rule-governed behavior: Dissertation Abstracts International.
  • Pfeiffer, A. M., Whelan, J. P., & Martin, J. M. (2000). Decision-making bias in psychotherapy: Effects of hypothesis source and accountability: Journal of Counseling Psychology Vol 47(4) Oct 2000, 429-436.
  • Pinker, S. (1999). Out of the minds of babes: Science Vol 283(5398) Jan 1999, 40-41.
  • Pitas, I., Milios, E. E., & Venetsanopoulos, A. N. (1992). A minimum entropy approach to rule learning from examples: IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, & Cybernetics Vol 22(4) Jul-Aug 1992, 621-635.
  • Plunkett, E. J. (1992). A descriptive study of the development of cognitive diagnostic reasoning skills in undergraduate nursing students across a four semester time period: Dissertation Abstracts International.
  • Poletiek, F. H. (1995). Testing in a rule discovery task: Strategies of test choice and test result interpretation. Amsterdam, Netherlands: North-Holland/Elsevier Science Publishers.
  • Poletiek, F. H. (2002). Implicit learning of a recursive rule in an artificial grammar: Acta Psychologica Vol 111(3) Nov 2002, 323-335.
  • Polonyi, T. E. (2000). A transfer appropriate approach to multilingual memory: Magyar Pszichologiai Szemle Vol 55(1) 2000, 19-44.
  • Powel, J. E. (1981). Factors facilitating hypothesis testing in young children: Dissertation Abstracts International.
  • Pryor, J. B., Reeder, G. D., Yeadon, C., & Hesson-Mclnnis, M. (2004). A Dual-Process Model of Reactions to Perceived Stigma: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Vol 87(4) Oct 2004, 436-452.
  • Qu, L., & Zelazo, P. D. (2007). The facilitative effect of positive stimuli on 3-year-olds' flexible rule use: Cognitive Development Vol 22(4) Oct 2007, 456-473.
  • Quereshi, M. Y., & Seitz, R. (1993). Identical rules do not make letter and number series equivalent: Intelligence Vol 17(3) Jul-Sep 1993, 399-405.
  • Quesada, S. (1983). The effects of two alternate sets of conditions of learning of state-anxiety and rule-learning: Dissertation Abstracts International.
  • Quinn, P. C. (1989). Effects of self generated instructions and rules on the acquisition of sequential ordering behavior: Dissertation Abstracts International.
  • Raaijmakers, J. G. (1981). A general framework for the analysis of concept identification tasks: Acta Psychologica Vol 49(3) Dec 1981, 233-261.
  • Rabinowitz, F. M., Dunlap, W. P., Grant, M. J., & Campione, J. C. (1989). The rules used by children and adults in attempting to generate random numbers: Journal of Mathematical Psychology Vol 33(3) Sep 1989, 227-287.
  • Racine, C. A., Barch, D. M., Braver, T. S., & Noelle, D. C. (2006). The Effect of Age on Rule-Based Category Learning: Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition Vol 13(3-4) Sep-Dec 2006, 411-434.
  • Rakowitz, L. W. (1981). Rule utilization and rule shift: A developmental study: Dissertation Abstracts International.
  • Rao, S. M., & Hammeke, T. A. (1984). Hypothesis testing in patients with chronic progressive multiple sclerosis: Brain and Cognition Vol 3(1) Jan 1984, 94-104.
  • Reese, H. W. (1989). Rules and rule-governance: Cognitive and behavioristic views. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
  • Reid, D. A. (2002). Conjectures and refutations in Grade 5 mathematics: Journal for Research in Mathematics Education Vol 33(1) Jan 2002, 5-29.
  • Reimann, P. (1991). Detecting functional relations in a computerized discovery environment: Learning and Instruction Vol 1(1) 1991, 45-65.
  • Reiser, B., Tabak, I., Sandoval, W. A., Smith, B. K., Steinmuller, F., & Leone, A. J. (2001). BGuILE: Strategic and conceptual scaffolds for scientific inquiry in biology classrooms. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
  • Roberts, P. L., & MacLeod, C. (1995). Representational consequences of two modes of learning: The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology Vol 48A(2) May 1995, 296-319.
  • Robinson, D. M. (1981). The impact on clinicians of parents' reports of their children's problems: Dissertation Abstracts International.
  • Robinson, L. B., & Hastie, R. (1985). Revision of beliefs when a hypothesis is eliminated from consideration: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance Vol 11(4) Aug 1985, 443-456.
  • Roch, S. G., Lane, J. A. S., Samuelson, C. D., Allison, S. T., & Dent, J. L. (2000). Cognitive load and the equality heuristic: A two-stage model of resource overconsumption in small groups: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes Vol 83(2) Nov 2000, 185-212.
  • Rohlman, D. S. (1993). The role of problem representation and expertise in hypothesis testing: A software testing analogue: Dissertation Abstracts International.
  • Rosario, M., Mahler, K., Hunter, J., & Gwadz, M. (1999). Understanding the unprotected sexual behaviors of gay, lesbian, and bisexual youths: An empirical test of the cognitive-environmental model: Health Psychology Vol 18(3) May 1999, 272-280.
  • Rose, W. J. (1994). Computational adaptation, real-time organization and language learning. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences.
  • Roth, W.-M. (1991). The development of reasoning on the balance beam: Journal of Research in Science Teaching Vol 28(7) Sep 1991, 631-645.
  • Rothkopf, E. Z., & Dashen, M. L. (1995). Particularization: Inductive speeding of rule-governed decisions by narrow application experience: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition Vol 21(2) Mar 1995, 469-482.
  • Rottenstreich, Y., Brenner, L., & Sood, S. (1999). Similarity between hypotheses and evidence: Cognitive Psychology Vol 38(1) Feb 1999, 110-128.
  • Rubenstein, M. S. (1986). The effect of commitment to a point of view on social hypothesis testing: Dissertation Abstracts International.
  • Ruffman, T., Perner, J., Olson, D. R., & Doherty, M. (1993). Reflecting on scientific thinking: Children's understanding of the hypothesisEuro vidence relation: Child Development Vol 64(6) Dec 1993, 1617-1636.
  • Russell, J., Jarrold, C., & Hood, B. (1999). Two intact executive capacities in children with autism: Implications for the core executive dysfunctions in the disorder: Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders Vol 29(2) Apr 1999, 103-112.
  • Saffran, J. R., Pollak, S. D., Seibel, R. L., & Shkolnik, A. (2007). Dog is a dog is a dog: Infant rule learning is not specific to language: Cognition Vol 105(3) Dec 2007, 669-680.
  • Saint-Aubin, J., & Poirier, M. (2000). Immediate serial recall of words and nonwords: Tests of the retrieval-based hypothesis: Psychonomic Bulletin & Review Vol 7(2) Jun 2000, 332-340.
  • Santamaria, C., & Espino, O. (2006). Thinking the truth and selecting the false: Psicologica Vol 27(2) 2006, 195-206.
  • Schmitt, D. R. (1998). Effects of consequences of advice on patterns of rule control and rule choice: Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior Vol 70(1) Jul 1998, 1-21.
  • Schneider, V. I. (1992). The effects of contextual interference on the acquisition and retention of logic rules: Dissertation Abstracts International.
  • Schrempp, I., & Sodian, B. (1999). Scientific reasoning in elementary school age. The ability to test hypotheses and evaluate evidence about the cause of achievement outcomes: Zeitschrift fur Entwicklungspsychologie und Padagogische Psychologie Vol 31(2) 1999, 67-77.
  • Schroth, M. L. (1984). Disjunctive concept formation: S-R hypothesis versus cognitive theory: Journal of General Psychology Vol 110(1) Jan 1984, 87-92.
  • Schroth, M. L. (1984). Memory for intratrial events in concept formation: Perceptual and Motor Skills Vol 59(1) Aug 1984, 23-29.
  • Schroth, M. L. (1990). A comparison of concept formation strategies in pattern recognition tasks: Journal of General Psychology Vol 117(3) Jul 1990, 303-309.
  • Schroyens, W., Schaeken, W., & d'Ydewalle, G. (1996). Meta-propositional reasoning with knight-knave problems: The importance of being hypothesized: Psychologica Belgica Vol 36(3) 1996, 145-169.
  • Schroyens, W., Schaeken, W., Fias, W., & d'Ydewalle, G. (2000). Heuristic and analytic processes in propositional reasoning with negatives: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition Vol 26(6) Nov 2000, 1713-1734.
  • Schuepfer, T., & Gholson, B. (1983). From response-set to prediction hypotheses: Rule acquisition among preschoolers and second graders: Journal of Experimental Child Psychology Vol 36(1) Aug 1983, 18-31.
  • Schuepfer, T. A. (1981). The acquisition and consolidation of prediction hypotheses among preschool children and second graders: Dissertation Abstracts International.
  • Schwartz, B. (1982). Reinforcement-induced behavioral stereotypy: How not to teach people to discover rules: Journal of Experimental Psychology: General Vol 111(1) Mar 1982, 23-59.
  • Schwartz, D. L., & Black, J. B. (1996). Shuttling between depictive models and abstract rules: Induction and fallback: Cognitive Science: A Multidisciplinary Journal Vol 20(4) Oct-Dec 1996, 457-497.
  • Sebby, R. A. (1987). Use of verbal and imaginal mediators in an hypothesis-testing task: Journal of Human Behavior & Learning Vol 4(2) 1987, 54-59.
  • Sedlmeier, P., & Gigerenzer, G. (2001). Teaching Bayesian reasoning in less than two hours: Journal of Experimental Psychology: General Vol 130(3) Sep 2001, 380-400.
  • Seidenberg, M. S., & Elman, J. L. (1999). Networks are not 'hidden rules.' Trends in Cognitive Sciences Vol 3(8) Aug 1999, 288-289.
  • Selart, M. (1996). Structure compatibility and restructuring in judgement and choice: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes Vol 65(2) Feb 1996, 106-116.
  • Seroussi, D.-E. (1995). Heuristic hypotheses in problem solving: An example of conceptual issues about scientific procedures: Science Education Vol 79(6) Nov 1995, 595-609.
  • Sfard, A. (2007). When the rules of discourse change, but nobody tells you: Making sense of mathematics learning from a commognitive standpoint: Journal of the Learning Sciences Vol 16(4) 2007, 565-613.
  • Shaffer, H. J. (1986). Assessment of addictive disorders: The use of clinical reflection and hypotheses testing: Psychiatric Clinics of North America Vol 9(3) Sep 1986, 385-398.
  • Shaklee, H., & Fischhoff, B. (1982). Strategies of information search in causal analysis: Memory & Cognition Vol 10(6) Nov 1982, 520-530.
  • Shaklee, H., & Mims, M. (1986). Development of rule use in judgments of covariation between events. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Shastri, L. (1999). Infants learning algebraic rules: Science Vol 285(5434) Sep 1999, 1673-1674.
  • Siegler, R. S., & Chen, Z. (1998). Developmental differences in rule learning: A microgenetic analysis: Cognitive Psychology Vol 36(3) Aug 1998, 273-310.
  • Sirois, S., Buckingham, D., & Shultz, T. R. (2000). Artificial grammar learning by infants: An auto-associator perspective: Developmental Science Vol 3(4) Nov 2000, 442-456.
  • Skov, R. B., & Sherman, S. J. (1986). Information-gathering processes: Diagnosticity, hypothesis-confirmatory strategies, and perceived hypothesis confirmation: Journal of Experimental Social Psychology Vol 22(2) Mar 1986, 93-121.
  • Slotnick, S. D., Klein, S. A., Dodson, C. S., & Shimamura, A. P. (2000). An analysis of signal detection and threshold models of source memory: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition Vol 26(6) Nov 2000, 1499-1517.
  • Slowiaczek, L. M., Klayman, J., Sherman, S. J., & Skov, R. B. (1992). Information selection and use in hypothesis testing: What is a good question, and what is a good answer? : Memory & Cognition Vol 20(4) Jul 1992, 392-405.
  • Smith, C. A. (1989). Reasoning about hypotheses: Dissertation Abstracts International.
  • Smith, E. E., Langston, C., & Nisbett, R. E. (1992). The case for rules in reasoning: Cognitive Science: A Multidisciplinary Journal Vol 16(1) Jan-Mar 1992, 1-40.
  • Smith, E. E., & Sloman, S. A. (1994). Similarity- versus rule-based categorization: Memory & Cognition Vol 22(4) Jul 1994, 377-386.
  • Snyder, M., & White, P. (1981). Testing hypotheses about other people: Strategies of verification and falsification: Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin Vol 7(1) Mar 1981, 39-43.
  • Sodian, B., Zaitchik, D., & Carey, S. (1991). Young children's differentiation of hypothetical beliefs from evidence: Child Development Vol 62(4) Aug 1991, 753-766.
  • Sofroniou, N. (1993). The development of rule-governed behaviour: Dissertation Abstracts International.
  • Spellman, B. A. (1994). The construction of causal explanations for temporally related events. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering.
  • Spellman, B. A., Lopez, A., & Smith, E. E. (1999). Hypothesis testing: Strategy selection for generalising versus limiting hypotheses: Thinking & Reasoning Vol 5(1) Feb 1999, 67-91.
  • Spetch, M. L., Rust, T. B., Kamil, A. C., & Jones, J. E. (2003). Searching by rules: Pigeons' (Columba livia) landmark-based search according to constant bearing or constant distance: Journal of Comparative Psychology Vol 117(2) Jun 2003, 123-132.
  • Springer, K. (1990). In defense of theories: Cognition Vol 35(3) Jun 1990, 293-298.
  • Stanley, L. (1995). A comparison of three methods of training four-year-old children in number and length conservation: Possible sex effects: Irish Journal of Psychology Vol 16(4) 1995, 426-435.
  • Stasson, M. F., Ono, K., Zimmerman, S. K., & Davis, J. H. (1988). Group consensus processes on cognitive bias tasks: A social decision scheme approach: Japanese Psychological Research Vol 30(2) 1988, 68-77.
  • Steele, D. L., Hayes, S. C., & Brownstein, A. J. (1990). Reinforcement, stereotypy, and rule discovery: Analysis of Verbal Behavior Vol 8 1990, 57-66.
  • Stefani, M. R., & Moghaddam, B. (2005). Systemic and Prefrontal Cortical NMDA Receptor Blockade Differentially Affect Discrimination Learning and Set-Shift Ability in Rats: Behavioral Neuroscience Vol 119(2) Apr 2005, 420-428.
  • Stevens, G. (2004). Using Census Data to Test the Critical-Period Hypothesis for Second-Language Acquisition: Psychological Science Vol 15(3) May 2004, 215-216.
  • Stewart, J., Passmore, C., Cartier, J., Rudolph, J., & Donovan, S. (2005). Modeling for Understanding in Science Education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
  • Strange, B. A., Henson, R. N. A., Friston, K. J., & Dolan, R. J. (2001). Anterior prefontal cortex mediates rule learning in humans: Cerebral Cortex Vol 11(11) Nov 2001, 1040-1046.
  • Strohmer, D. C., Biggs, D. A., Haase, R. F., & Keller, K. E. (1983). Hypothesis formation and testing in clinical judgment: Journal of Counseling Psychology Vol 30(4) Oct 1983, 607-610.
  • Strohmer, D. C., Moilanen, D. L., & Barry, L. J. (1988). Personal hypothesis testing: The role of consistency and self-schema: Journal of Counseling Psychology Vol 35(1) Jan 1988, 56-65.
  • Strohmer, D. C., & Newman, L. J. (1983). Counselor hypothesis-testing strategies: Journal of Counseling Psychology Vol 30(4) Oct 1983, 557-565.
  • Strohmer, D. C., & Newman, L. J. (1984). Correction to Strohmer and Newman: Journal of Counseling Psychology Vol 31(2) Apr 1984, 138.
  • Sun, R., Zhang, X., Slusarz, P., & Mathews, R. (2007). The interaction of implicit learning, explicit hypothesis testing learning and implicit-to-explicit knowledge extraction: Neural Networks Vol 20(1) Jan 2007, 34-47.
  • Sweller, J., Mawer, R. F., & Howe, W. (1982). Consequences of history-cued and means-end strategies in problem solving: American Journal of Psychology Vol 95(3) Fal 1982, 455-483.
  • Tanaka, T. (1984). A comparison of information-searching activities before and after hypothesis formation: Japanese Psychological Research Vol 26(1) 1984, 50-55.
  • Tolman, E. C., & Krechevsky, I. (1933). Means-end-readiness and hypothesis--A contribution to comparative psychology: Psychological Review Vol 40(1) Jan 1933, 60-70.
  • Towell, G. G., & Shavlik, J. W. (1993). Extracting refined rules from knowledge-based neural networks: Machine Learning Vol 13(1-3) Oct-Dec 1993, 71-101.
  • Tracy, J. I., Mohamed, F., Faro, S., Pinus, A., Tiver, R., Harvan, J., et al. (2003). Differential brain responses when applying criterion attribute versus family resemblance rule learning: Brain and Cognition Vol 51(3) Apr 2003, 276-286.
  • Trope, Y., & Bassok, M. (1982). Confirmatory and diagnosing strategies in social information gathering: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Vol 43(1) Jul 1982, 22-34.
  • Trope, Y., & Bassok, M. (1983). Information-gathering strategies in hypothesis-testing: Journal of Experimental Social Psychology Vol 19(6) Nov 1983, 560-576.
  • Trope, Y., Bassok, M., & Alon, E. (1984). The questions lay interviewers ask: Journal of Personality Vol 52(1) Mar 1984, 90-106.
  • Trowbridge, C. R. (1929). Spelling by rule: Journal of Educational Psychology Vol 20(3) Mar 1929, 205-211.
  • Tudge, J. R. (1992). Processes and consequences of peer collaboration: A Vygotskian analysis: Child Development Vol 63(6) Dec 1992, 1364-1379.
  • Tudge, J. R. H. (1999). Processes and consequences of peer collaboration: A Vygotskian analysis. Florence, KY: Taylor & Frances/Routledge.
  • Tukey, D. D. (1984). Inquiry through experimentation: A psychological study of subjects' methods of conducting experiments in a rule-learning task: Dissertation Abstracts International.
  • Tukey, D. D. (1986). A philosophical and empirical analysis of subjects' modes of inquiry in Wason's 2-4-6 task: The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology Vol 38(1-A) Feb 1986, 5-33.
  • Turnbull, W. (1986). Everyday explanation: The pragmatics of puzzle resolution: Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour Vol 16(2) Jul 1986, 141-160.
  • Umilta, C. (1986). The use of rules in automatic and controlled cognitive processes: Rassegna Italiana di Sociologia Vol 27(3) Jul-Sep 1986, 425-433.
  • Valina Garcia, M. D., Seoane Pesqueira, G., Ferraces Otero, M. J., & Rajo, M. M. (1995). Wason's selection task: A study of individual differences: Psicothema Vol 7(3) Nov 1995, 641-653.
  • Vallee-Tourangeau, F., Beynon, D. M., & James, S. A. (2000). The role of alternative hypotheses in the integration of evidence that disconfirms an acquired belief: European Journal of Cognitive Psychology Vol 12(1) Mar 2000, 107-129.
  • Vallee-Tourangeau, F., & Penney, A. K. (2005). The impact of external representation in a rule discovery task: European Journal of Cognitive Psychology Vol 17(6) Nov 2005, 820-834.
  • Van Avermaet, E. (1988). Testing hypothesis about other people: Confirmatory and diagnostic strategies: Communication & Cognition Vol 21(2) 1988, 179-189.
  • Van Houten, R. (1993). Rote vs. rules: A comparison of two teaching and correction strategies for teaching basic subtraction facts: Education & Treatment of Children Vol 16(2) May 1993, 147-159.
  • Van Joolingen, W. R., & de Jong, T. (1991). Supporting hypothesis generation by learners exploring an interactive computer simulation: Instructional Science Vol 20(5-6) 1991-1992, 389-404.
  • Van Wallendael, L. R. (1989). The quest for limits on noncomplementarity in opinion revision: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes Vol 43(3) Jun 1989, 385-405.
  • Van Wallendael, L. R., & Hastie, R. (1990). Tracing the footsteps of Sherlock Holmes: Cognitive representations of hypothesis testing: Memory & Cognition Vol 18(3) May 1990, 240-250.
  • Varley, R. (2002). Science without grammar: Scientific reasoning in severe agrammatic aphasia. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Varouxaki, A., Freeman, N. H., Peters, D., & Lewis, C. (1999). Inference neglect and ignorance denial: British Journal of Developmental Psychology Vol 17(4) Nov 1999, 483-499.
  • Vartanian, O., Martindale, C., & Kwiatkowski, J. (2003). Creativity and inductive reasoning: The relationship betweem divergent thinking and performance on Wason's 2-4-6 task: The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology Vol 56A(4) May 2003, 641-655.
  • Vaughan, M. (1989). Rule-governed behavior in behavior analysis: A theoretical and experimental history. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
  • Verguts, T., & de Boeck, P. (2002). The induction of solution rules in Raven's Progressive Matrices Test: European Journal of Cognitive Psychology Vol 14(4) Oct 2002, 521-547.
  • Vickrey, C., & Neuringer, A. (2000). Pigeon reaction time, Hick's law, and intelligence: Psychonomic Bulletin & Review Vol 7(2) Jun 2000, 284-291.
  • Vollmeyer, R., Burns, B. D., & Holyoak, K. J. (1996). The impact of goal specificity on strategy use and the acquisition of problem structure: Cognitive Science: A Multidisciplinary Journal Vol 20(1) Jan-Mar 1996, 75-100.
  • Vyse, S. A. (1991). Behavioral variability and rule generation: General, restricted, and superstitious contingency statements: Psychological Record Vol 41(4) Fal 1991, 487-506.
  • Waldron, E. M., & Ashby, F. G. (2001). The effects of concurrent task interference on category learning: Evidence for multiple category learning systems: Psychonomic Bulletin & Review Vol 8(1) Mar 2001, 168-176.
  • Walker, B. J. (1988). A comparison of the psychological effects of the possibility of error and actual error on hypothesis testing: Dissertation Abstracts International.
  • Walsh, K. W. (1995). A hypothesis-testing approach to assessment. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
  • Wantz, D. W., & Morran, D. K. (1994). Teaching counselor trainees a divergent versus a convergent hypothesis-formation strategy: Journal of Counseling & Development Vol 73(1) Sep-Oct 1994, 69-73.
  • Ward, G., & Churchill, E. F. (1998). Two tests of instance-based and abstract rule-based accounts of invariant learning: Acta Psychologica Vol 99(3) Sep 1998, 235-253.
  • Wayman, D. V. (1999). Comparing hypothesis formulation among trained peer helpers, inexpereinced counselors, and experienced counselors. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences.
  • Weinert, S. (1992). Deficits in acquiring language structure: The importance of using prosodic cues: Applied Cognitive Psychology Vol 6(6) Nov 1992, 545-571.
  • Weismer, S. E. (1991). Hypothesis-testing abilities of language-impaired children: Journal of Speech & Hearing Research Vol 34(6) Dec 1991, 1329-1338.
  • Welsh, J. C. (1987). Interactive effect of content structure, practice item sequence, and process learning using computer-based instruction: Dissertation Abstracts International.
  • Welsh, M. C. (1991). Rule-guided behavior and self-monitoring on the Tower of Hanoi disk-transfer task: Cognitive Development Vol 6(1) Jan-Mar 1991, 59-76.
  • Wennekers, T., & Ay, N. (2005). Finite State Automata Resulting from Temporal Information Maximization and a Temporal Learning Rule: Neural Computation Vol 17(10) Oct 2005, 2258-2290.
  • Wharton, C. M., Cheng, P. W., & Wickens, T. D. (1993). Hypothesis-testing strategies: Why two goals are better than one: The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology Vol 46A(4) Nov 1993, 743-758.
  • White, P. A. (1999). The dissipation effect: A naive model of causal interactions in complex physical systems: American Journal of Psychology Vol 112(3) Fal 1999, 331-364.
  • Whitehouse, A. J. O., Maybery, M. T., & Durkin, K. (2006). Inner speech impairments in autism: Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry Vol 47(8) Aug 2006, 857-865.
  • Whiteley, J. H. (1985). Control of children's observing responses by information feedback during visual discrimination learning: Journal of Experimental Child Psychology Vol 39(2) Apr 1985, 265-283.
  • Whyte, J., & Nunan, L. (1991). Hypothesis-testing in dyslexics: Irish Journal of Psychology Vol 12(4) 1991, 418-430.
  • Wilson, D. S. (2004). Review of Nature's Magic: Synergy in Evolution and the Fate of Humankind: Evolutionary Psychology Vol 2 2004, 1-2.
  • Wilson, D. W. (1985). Control-appraising: The problem solving behavior of mathematically gifted children: Dissertation Abstracts International.
  • Wirth, J., & Klieme, E. (2003). Computer-based Assessment of Problem Solving Competence: Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice Vol 10(3) Nov 2003, 329-345.
  • Wood, D., & Beck, R. (1990). Do's and don'ts: Family rules, rooms, and their relationships: Children's Environments Quarterly Vol 7(1) 1990, 2-14.
  • Woodward, A. L. (1992). The role of the whole object assumption in early word learning: Dissertation Abstracts International.
  • Wright, E. L. (1981). The long-term effect of intensive instruction on the open exploration behavior of ninth grade students: Journal of Research in Science Teaching Vol 18(6) Nov 1981, 557-561.
  • Wright, R. L., & Burton, A. M. (1995). Implicit learning of an invariant: Just say no: The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology Vol 48A(3) Aug 1995, 783-796.
  • Yasunaga, S. (1987). Response uncertainty on rule learning by observation: Effects of pre-experience on observational learning: Japanese Journal of Psychology Vol 58(3) Aug 1987, 137-143.
  • Yetim, S. (1996). How to use information without being Bayesian: Facilitating effects of an alternative hypothesis. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering.
  • Yinqing, G., Hong, L., & Meiling, F. (2005). Effects of Rule Orders and Types on Children's Rule-based Reasoning: Psychological Science (China) Vol 28(6) Nov 2005, 1318-1323.
  • Young, H. F., & Bentall, R. P. (1995). Hypothesis testing in patients with persecutory delusions: Comparison with depressed and normal subjects: British Journal of Clinical Psychology Vol 34(3) Sep 1995, 353-369.
  • Young, J. S. (1997). The impact of a supervisor-generated metaphor on the clinical hypothesis formation skills of counselors-in-training. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering.
  • Yu, J., & Bellezza, F. S. (2000). Process dissociation as source monitoring: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition Vol 26(6) Nov 2000, 1518-1533.
  • Zabielski, S. (1984). Attributes and rules in concept identification: A developmental study: Polish Psychological Bulletin Vol 15(1) 1984, 23-29.
  • Zachos, P. (1991). Scientific discovery on formal operational tasks: A study of the relationship between scientific thinking and the discovery of scientific concepts by high school students: Dissertation Abstracts International.
  • Zanga, A., Tijus, C., & Richard, J.-F. (2001). Implicit learning in a situation of rule discovery and problem solving: Bulletin de Psychologie Vol 54(4)(454) Jul-Aug 2001, 389-399.
  • Zaparniuk, J., Yuille, J. C., & Taylor, S. (1995). Assessing the credibility of true and false statements: International Journal of Law and Psychiatry Vol 18(3) Sum 1995, 343-352.
  • Zelazo, P. D. (1993). Age-related changes in the execution of explicit rules: The roles of logical complexity and executive function: Dissertation Abstracts International.
  • Zhang, J., & Michalski, R. S. (1995). An integration of rule induction and exemplar-based learning for graded concepts: Machine Learning Vol 21(1-3) Dec 1995, 235-267.
  • Zhang, Q., & Si, J. (1999). A study of hypothesis-testing strategies of disjunctive concepts of university students: Acta Psychologica Sinica Vol 31(4) 1999, 397-404.
  • Zhang, Q., Wang, Y., & Zhang, Z. (1997). Heuristics in hypothesis-testing process: Acta Psychologica Sinica Vol 29(1) 1997, 29-36.
  • Zhang, Q., & Yang, C. (1998). The development of the thinking strategy of hypothesis testing: Psychological Science (China) Vol 21(1) 1998, 13-16.
  • Zhang, S. (2006). Learning of abstract concepts and rules by the honeybee: International Journal of Comparative Psychology Vol 19(3) 2006, 318-341.
  • Zheng, Y., Myerson, J., & Hale, S. (2000). Age and individual differences in visuospatial processing speed: Testing the magnification hypothesis: Psychonomic Bulletin & Review Vol 7(1) Mar 2000, 113-120.

Ad blocker interference detected!


Wikia is a free-to-use site that makes money from advertising. We have a modified experience for viewers using ad blockers

Wikia is not accessible if you’ve made further modifications. Remove the custom ad blocker rule(s) and the page will load as expected.

Also on Fandom

Random Wiki