Individual differences |
Methods | Statistics | Clinical | Educational | Industrial | Professional items | World psychology |
Bradford's law is a pattern first described by Samuel C. Bradford in 1934 that estimates the exponentially diminishing returns of extending a search for references in science journals. One formulation is that if journals in a field are sorted by number of articles into three groups, each with about one-third of all articles, then the number of journals in each group will be proportional to 1:n:n². There are a number of related formulations of the principle.
In economics this pattern is called a Pareto distribution. As a practical example, suppose that a researcher has 5 core scientific journals for their subject. Suppose that in a month there are 12 articles of interest in those journals. Suppose further that in order to find another dozen articles of interest, the researcher would have to go to 10 journals. Then that researcher's Bradford multiplier bm is 2 (ie 10/5). For each new dozen articles, that researcher will need to look in bm times as many journals. After looking in 5, 10, 20, 40, ... journals, most researchers quickly realize that there is little point in looking further.
Different researchers have different numbers of core journals, and different Bradford multipliers. But the pattern holds quite well across many subjects, and may well be a general pattern for human interactions in social systems. Like Zipf's law, to which it is related, we do not have a good explanation for why it works. But knowing that it does is very useful for librarians. What it means is that for each specialty it is sufficient to identify the "core publications" for that field and only stock those. Very rarely will researchers need to go outside that set.
However its impact has been far greater than that. Armed with this idea and inspired by Vannevar Bush's famous article As We May Think, Eugene Garfield at the Institute for Scientific Information in the 1960s undertook the development of a comprehensive index of how scientific thinking propagates. The creation of his Science Citation Index (SCI) had the effect of making it easy to identify exactly which scientists did science that had an impact, and which journals that science appeared in. It also caused the discovery, which some did not expect, that a few journals like Nature and Science were core for all of hard science. The same pattern does not happen with the humanities or the social science - possibly because objective truth is so much harder to establish there, or because literature use in these fields is more diffuse, with less emphasis on journals.
The result of this is pressure on scientists to publish in the best journals, and pressure on universities to ensure access to that core set of journals.
Hjørland and Nicolaisen (2005, p. 103) identified three kinds of scattering:
- Lexical scattering. The scattering of words in texts and in collections of texts.
- Semantic scattering. The scattering of concepts in texts and in collections of texts.
- Subject scattering. The scattering of items useful to a given task or problem.
They found that the literature of Bradford's law (including Bradford's own papers) are unclear in relation to which kind of scattering is actually being measured.
Related laws and distributionsEdit
- Zipf's law, originally used for word frequencies
- Zipf-Mandelbrot law
- Benford's law, originally used to explain apparently non-random sampling
- Pareto distribution, originally representing the distribution of wealth among individuals in a capitalist economic system.
- Zeta distribution
- Power law the most general mathematical distribution
Notes and references Edit
- Bradford, S.C. "Sources of Information on Specific Subjects". Engineering: An Illustrated Weekly Journal (London), 137, 1934 (26 January), pages 85-86.
- Reprinted as:
- Bradford, S.C. “Sources of information on specific subjects”. J. Information Science, 10:4, 1985 (October), pages 173 - 180.
- Hjørland, B. & Nicolaisen, J. (2005). Bradford's law of scattering: ambiguities in the concept of "subject". Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Conceptions of Library and Information Science: 96-106.
- Nicolaisen, J. & Hjørland, B. (2007). Practical potentials of Bradford's law: A critical examination of the received view. Journal of Documentation, 63(3): 359-377. Available at: http://dlist.sir.arizona.edu/2123/
- In Oldenburg's Long Shadow: Librarians, Research Scientists, Publishers, and the Control of Scientific Publishing
|This page uses Creative Commons Licensed content from Wikipedia (view authors).|