Wikia

Psychology Wiki

Changes: Attitudes

Edit

Back to page

m (Reverted edits by 71.197.19.110 (talk | block) to last version by Dr Joe Kiff)
 
Line 3: Line 3:
 
{{Attitudes}}
 
{{Attitudes}}
 
{{TOCleft}}
 
{{TOCleft}}
'''Attitude''' is a hypothetical construct that represents an individual's like or dislike for an item. Attitudes are positive, negative or neutral views of an "attitude object": i.e. a [[person]], behavior, event, item, or entity. People can also be "ambivalent" towards a target, meaning that they simultaneously possess a positive and a negative bias toward the attitude object in question. Gordon Allport once stated that the attitude "is probably the most distinctive and indispensiable concept in contemporary American social psychology" (Allport, 1935).
+
'''Attitude''' is a hypothetical construct that represents an individual's like or dislike for an item. Attitudes are positive, negative or neutral views of an "attitude object": i.e. a [[person]], behaviour or event. People can also be "ambivalent" towards a target, meaning that they simultaneously possess a positive and a negative bias towards the attitude in question.
==Conceptualization of attitudes==
+
===As Evaluative Dispositions===
+
Attitudes comes from judgments. Attitudes develop on the '''ABC''' model (affect, behavioral change and [[cognition]]). The ''affective'' response is a [[Physiology|physiological]] response that expresses an individual's preference for an entity. The ''behavioral intention'' is a verbal indication of the intention of an individual. The ''cognitive'' response is a cognitive evaluation of the entity to form an attitude. Most attitudes in individuals are a result of ''[[observational learning]]'' from their environment.
In its inception, the attitude was conceptualized as a disposition (e.g. Ajzen, 1984; Chein, 1948; Davis & Ostrom, 1984), much like other acquired behavioral dispositions including concepts, habits, and schemas, to name a few (Campbell, 1963). This dispositional approach to attitudes has been criticized due to the growing body of research on attitude change, particularly the attitude construction approach.
+
The link between attitude and behavior exists but depends on human behavior, some of which is irrational. For example, a person who is in favor of blood transfusion may not donate blood. This makes sense if the person does not like the sight of blood, which explains this irrationality.
===As Evaluative Tendencies===
 
In one well-known approach, Eagly & Chaiken (1993; 2007) conceptualize attitudes as evaluative tendencies, which they state accomodates both they enduring and change nature of evaluations.
 
===As Temporary Constructions===
 
Alternatively, the attitude construction approach to attitudes (e.g. Schwarz, 2007) construes the attitude as an evaluative state, rather than a tendency or disposition. According to this approach, evaluations of attitude objects are formed when needed, such as encountering the attitude object or thinking of the attitude object, and do not exist within memory or outside of the time of evaluation. Several models within this approach argue that attitudes are constructed on the fly from accessible representations of the attitude object (Bassili & Brown, 2005; Conrey & Smith, 2007; Lord & Lepper, 1999). The attitude construction approach argues that when attitudes appear to persist across time (i.e., individuals are giving consistent evaluative responses), what is actually consistent are the inputs (e.g. mental representations, contexts) that are used in constructing the temporary attitude.
 
   
 
== Implicit and explicit attitudes ==
 
== Implicit and explicit attitudes ==
There is also considerable [[research]] on "implicit" attitudes, which are unconscious but have effects (identified through sophisticated methods using people's response times to stimuli). Implicit and "explicit" attitudes seem to affect people's behavior, though in different ways. They tend not to be strongly associated with each other, although in some cases they are. The relationship between them is not fully understood.
+
There is also considerable [[research]] on "implicit" attitudes, which are unconscious but have effects (identified through sophisticated methods using people's response times to stimuli). Implicit and "explicit" attitudes seem to affect people's behavior, though in different ways. They tend not to be strongly associated with each other, although in some cases they are. The relationship between them is poorly understood.
   
 
== Philosophical aspect ==
 
== Philosophical aspect ==
Line 15: Line 15:
   
 
== Attitude formation ==
 
== Attitude formation ==
Unlike [[personality psychology|personality]], attitudes are expected to change as a function of [[experience]]. Tesser (1993) has argued that hereditary variables may affect attitudes - but believes that they may do so indirectly. For example, if one inherits the disposition to become an extrovert, this may affect one's attitude to certain styles of music. There are numerous theories of attitude formation and [[attitude change]].
+
Unlike [[personality psychology|personality]], attitudes are expected to change as a function of [[experience]]. Tesser (1993) has argued that hereditary variables may affect attitudes - but believes that they may do so indirectly. For example, if one inherits the disposition to become an extrovert, this may affect one's attitude to certain styles of music. There are numerous theories of attitude formation and [[attitude change]].
  +
 
{{Main|Attitude formation}}
 
{{Main|Attitude formation}}
   
Line 34: Line 34:
   
 
== Attitude in the workplace ==
 
== Attitude in the workplace ==
When it comes to Human Resource Management and recruiting, in recent years [http://www.jobeq.com/articles/why_jobEQ.htm hire for attitude] became a well known mantra. Several commercial tests such as the [http://www.labprofile.net LAB Profile],
+
When it comes to Human Resource Management and recruiting, in recent years [http://www.jobeq.com/articles/why_jobEQ.htm hire for attitude] became a well known mantra. Several commercial tests such as the [http://www.labprofile.net LAB Profile],
 
Nowhere is your [http://www.dirjournal.com/guides/attitude/ positive attitude] more required and appreciated by others than your workplace. There are sound reasons for this: about 30% of an employee’s waking hours are spent at the workplace. Without some positive people around, this time could become troublesome.
 
Nowhere is your [http://www.dirjournal.com/guides/attitude/ positive attitude] more required and appreciated by others than your workplace. There are sound reasons for this: about 30% of an employee’s waking hours are spent at the workplace. Without some positive people around, this time could become troublesome.
 
[http://www.jobEq.com/iwam.php iWAM] and PAPI were developed to measure work Attitude and motivation, e.g. for [http://www.jobeq.com/articles/pre-employment_testing.htm pre-employment testing]
 
[http://www.jobEq.com/iwam.php iWAM] and PAPI were developed to measure work Attitude and motivation, e.g. for [http://www.jobeq.com/articles/pre-employment_testing.htm pre-employment testing]
Line 115: Line 115:
 
* [[World view]]
 
* [[World view]]
   
==References & Bibliography==
+
==References & Bibliography==
==Key texts==
+
==Key texts==
 
===Books===
 
===Books===
   
 
===Papers===
 
===Papers===
  +
 
==Additional material==
 
==Additional material==
 
===Books===
 
===Books===
Line 131: Line 132:
 
*Ajzen, I. and Fishbein, M. (1980) Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behaviour, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
 
*Ajzen, I. and Fishbein, M. (1980) Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behaviour, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
 
*Ajzen, 1., Timko, C. and White, J.B. (1982) Self-monitoring and the attitude-behaviour relation, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 42: 426-35.
 
*Ajzen, 1., Timko, C. and White, J.B. (1982) Self-monitoring and the attitude-behaviour relation, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 42: 426-35.
*Allport, G. W. (1935). Attitudes. In C. Murchison (Ed.), A handbook of social psychology (pp. 798-844). Worcester, MA: Clark University Press.
 
   
{{enWP|Attitude (psychology)}}
 
 
[[Category:Cognition]]
 
[[Category:Cognition]]
 
[[Category:Psychological attitude| ]]
 
[[Category:Psychological attitude| ]]
 
[[Category:Social psychology]]
 
[[Category:Social psychology]]
  +
{{enWP|Attitude (psychology)}}

Latest revision as of 12:31, July 18, 2011

Assessment | Biopsychology | Comparative | Cognitive | Developmental | Language | Individual differences | Personality | Philosophy | Social |
Methods | Statistics | Clinical | Educational | Industrial | Professional items | World psychology |

Social psychology: Altruism · Attribution · Attitudes · Conformity · Discrimination · Groups · Interpersonal relations · Obedience · Prejudice · Norms · Perception · Index · Outline


This article is in need of attention from a psychologist/academic expert on the subject.
Please help recruit one, or improve this page yourself if you are qualified.
This banner appears on articles that are weak and whose contents should be approached with academic caution
.
Attitudes

Attitudes within groupsEdit

Attitudes towards groupsEdit

Attitudes towardsEdit


Attitude is a hypothetical construct that represents an individual's like or dislike for an item. Attitudes are positive, negative or neutral views of an "attitude object": i.e. a person, behaviour or event. People can also be "ambivalent" towards a target, meaning that they simultaneously possess a positive and a negative bias towards the attitude in question.

Attitudes comes from judgments. Attitudes develop on the ABC model (affect, behavioral change and cognition). The affective response is a physiological response that expresses an individual's preference for an entity. The behavioral intention is a verbal indication of the intention of an individual. The cognitive response is a cognitive evaluation of the entity to form an attitude. Most attitudes in individuals are a result of observational learning from their environment. The link between attitude and behavior exists but depends on human behavior, some of which is irrational. For example, a person who is in favor of blood transfusion may not donate blood. This makes sense if the person does not like the sight of blood, which explains this irrationality.

Implicit and explicit attitudes Edit

There is also considerable research on "implicit" attitudes, which are unconscious but have effects (identified through sophisticated methods using people's response times to stimuli). Implicit and "explicit" attitudes seem to affect people's behavior, though in different ways. They tend not to be strongly associated with each other, although in some cases they are. The relationship between them is poorly understood.

Philosophical aspect Edit

Attitude may also be seen as a form or appearance that an individual assumes to gain or achieve an egotistic preference, whether it is acceptance, manifestation of power or other self-centered needs. Attitude may be considered as a primitive attribute to the preservation of the self or of the ego.

Attitude formation Edit

Unlike personality, attitudes are expected to change as a function of experience. Tesser (1993) has argued that hereditary variables may affect attitudes - but believes that they may do so indirectly. For example, if one inherits the disposition to become an extrovert, this may affect one's attitude to certain styles of music. There are numerous theories of attitude formation and attitude change.

Main article: Attitude formation

Factors that affect attitude change Edit

Attitudes can be changed through persuasion. The celebrated work of Carl Hovland, at Yale University in the 1950s and 1960s, helped to advance knowledge of persuasion. In Hovland's view, we should understand attitude change as a response to communication. He and his colleagues did experimental research into the factors that can affect the persuasiveness of a message:

Main article: Attitude change

Emotion and Attitude ChangeEdit

Emotion is a common component in persuasion, social influence, and attitude change. Much of attitude research emphasized the importance of affective or emotion components (Breckler & Wiggins, 1992). Emotion works hand-in-hand with the cognitive process, or the way we think, about an issue or situation. Emotional appeals are commonly found in advertising, health campaigns and political messages. Recent examples include no-smoking health campaigns and political campaign advertising emphasizing the fear of terrorism.

Main article: Emotion and attitude change


Attitude measurementEdit

Main article: Attitude measure

Attitude in the workplace Edit

When it comes to Human Resource Management and recruiting, in recent years hire for attitude became a well known mantra. Several commercial tests such as the LAB Profile, Nowhere is your positive attitude more required and appreciated by others than your workplace. There are sound reasons for this: about 30% of an employee’s waking hours are spent at the workplace. Without some positive people around, this time could become troublesome. iWAM and PAPI were developed to measure work Attitude and motivation, e.g. for pre-employment testing

Main article: Employee attitudes
Main article: Employer attitudes
Main article: Job applicant attitudes
Main article: Occupational attitudes

Researchers into attitudes Edit

JournalsEdit

Attitudes amongst groupsEdit

Attitudes towards groupsEdit

Attitudes towards concepts or behaviorsEdit

See alsoEdit

References & BibliographyEdit

Key textsEdit

BooksEdit

PapersEdit

Additional materialEdit

BooksEdit

  • Ajzen, I. (1988) Attitudes, Personality and Behaviour, Milton Keynes: Open University Press.


PapersEdit

  • Google Scholar
  • Abelson, R.P. (1976) Script processing in attitude formation and decision making. In: J.S. Carroll and J.W. Payne (eds) Cognition and Social Behaviour, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Ajzen, I. and Fishbein, M. (1977) Attitude-behaviour relationships: a theoretical analysis and review of empirical research, Psychological Bulletin 84: 888-918.
  • Ajzen, I. and Fishbein, M. (1980) Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behaviour, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Ajzen, 1., Timko, C. and White, J.B. (1982) Self-monitoring and the attitude-behaviour relation, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 42: 426-35.
This page uses Creative Commons Licensed content from Wikipedia (view authors).

Around Wikia's network

Random Wiki