Psychology Wiki
Don't have an account?
Register
Register
in: Articles lacking reliable references from September 2007, Pages with broken file links, Ethics,
and 3 more

Changes: Affection

Back to page
Sign in to edit
No edit summary
 
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{SocialPsy}}
  
{{SocialPsy}}
  +
{{Expert}}
 
[[Image:Smooches (baby and child kiss).jpg|thumb|A kiss can express affection.]]
  
[[Image:Smooches (baby and child kiss).jpg|thumb|A kiss can express affection.]]
−
'''Affection''' (from latin ''ad'', and ''facere'', meaning "to do something to") is an [[emotion]] that derives from the recognition of one's own values in the character of another.
  
   
  +
'''Affection''' or '''fondness''' is a "disposition or rare state of mind or body"<ref>[http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=affection affection - Definitions from Dictionary.com<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref> that is often associated with a feeling or type of [[love]]. It has given rise to a number of branches of [[philosophy]] and [[psychology]] concerning: emotion (popularly: love, devotion etc.); disease; influence; state of being (philosophy);<ref>[http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/emotions-17th18th/LD7Hutcheson.html 17th and 18th Century Theories of Emotions > Francis Hutcheson on the Emotions (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref> and [[Affect (psychology)|state of mind (psychology)]]. "Affection" is popularly used to denote a feeling or type of [[love]], amounting to more than goodwill or [[friendship]]. Writers on [[ethics]] generally use the word to refer to distinct states of feeling, both lasting and spasmodic. Some contrast it with ''[[passion (emotion)|passion]]'' as being free from the distinctively sensual element.
−
== Popular usage ==
  
⚫
It is popularly used to denote a feeling or type of [[personal relationship]] amounting to more than goodwill or [[friendship]]. By ethical writers the word has been used generally of distinct states of feeling, both lasting and spasmodic; some contrast it with ''[[passion (emotion)|passion]]'' as being free from the distinctively sensual element. More specifically the word has been restricted to [[emotion]]al states which are in relation to persons. In the former sense, it is the Greek pathos, and as such it appears in the writings of French philosopher René Descartes, Dutch philosopher Baruch Spinoza and most of the writings of early British ethicists. On various grounds, however---e.g. that it does not involve anxiety or excitement, that it is comparatively inert and compatible with the entire absence of the sensuous element--At is generally and usefully distinguished from passion. In this narrower sense the word has played a great part in ethical systems, which have spoken of the social or parental ''affections'' as in some sense a part of moral obligation. For a consideration of these and similar problems, which depend ultimately on the degree in which the affections are regarded as voluntary, see [[H]]. Sidgwick, ''Methods of [[Ethics]],'' pp. 345-349.
  
   
−
== Psychology ==
 +
== Restricted definition ==
  ⚫
More specifically, the word has been restricted to [[emotion]]al states, the object of which is a person. In the former sense, it is the Greek "[[pathos]]" and as such it appears in the writings of [[France|French]] philosopher [[René Descartes]], [[Netherlands|Dutch]] philosopher [[Baruch Spinoza]], and most of the writings of early British ethicists. However, on various grounds (e.g., that it does not involve anxiety or excitement and that it is comparatively inert and compatible with the entire absence of the sensuous element), it is generally and usefully distinguished from passion. In this narrower sense the word has played a great part in ethical systems, which have spoken of the social or parental ''affections'' as in some sense a part of moral obligation. For a consideration of these and similar problems, which depend ultimately on the degree in which the affections are regarded as voluntary, see [[Henry Sidgwick|H. Sidgwick]], ''Methods of Ethics'' pp.&nbsp;345–349.
⚫
In psychology the terms ''affection'' and ''affective'' are of great importance. As all intellectual phenomena have by experimentalists been reduced to sensation, so all emotion has been and is regarded as reducible to simple mental affection, the element of which all emotional manifestations are ultimately composed. The nature of this element is a problem which has been provisionally, but not conclusively, solved by many psychologists; the method is necessarily experimental, and all experiments on feeling are peculiarly difficult. The solutions proposed are two. In the first, all affection phenomena are primarily divisible into those which are pleasurable and those which are the reverse. The main objections to this are that it does not explain the infinite variety of phenomena, and that it disregards the distinction which most philosophers admit between higher and lower pleasures. The second solution is that every sensation has its specific affective quality, though by reason of the poverty of language many of these have no name. W. Wundt, ''Outlines of [[Psychology]]'' (trans. C. H. Judd, [[Leipzig]], [[1897]]), maintains that we may group under three main affective directions, each with its negative, all the infinite varieties in question; these are (a) [[pleasure]], or rather pleasantness, and the reverse, (b) tension and relaxation, (c) excitement and depression. These two views are antithetic and no solution has been discovered.
 
   
  +
==Affectionate behavior==
⚫
Two obvious methods of experiment have been tried:
  
  +
Numerous behaviors are used by people to express affection. Some theories<ref>according to [[Communication]] professor Kory Floyd of [[Arizona State University]]</ref> suggest that affectionate behavior evolved from parental nurturing behavior due to its associations with hormonal rewards with research verifying that expressions of affection, although commonly evaluated positively, can be considered negative if they pose implied threats to one's well being. Furthermore, affectionate behavior in positively [[Valence (psychology)|valence]]d relationships may be associated with numerous health benefits. Other, more loving type gestures of affectionate behavior include obvious signs of liking a person.
   
  +
==Psychology==
⚫
# The first, introduced by A. Mosso, the [[Italy|Italian]] psychologist, consists in recording the physical phenomena which are observed to accompany modifications of the affective consciousness. Thus it is found that the action of the [[heart]] is accelerated by pleasant, and retarded by unpleasant, stimuli; again, changes of weight and volume are found to accompany modifications of affection--and so on. Apart altogether from the facts that this investigation is still in its infancy and that the conditions of experiment are insufficiently understood, its ultimate success is rendered highly problematical by the essential fact that real scientific results can be achieved only by data recorded in connection with a perfectly normal subject; a conscious or interested subject introduces variable factors which are probably incalculable.
 
  +
{{Unreferenced section|date=September 2007}}
  +
[[Image:JohnnyCashJuneCarterCash1969.jpg|thumb|Affection shown between Johnny Cash and June Carter Cash.]]
  ⚫
In psychology the terms ''affection'' and ''affective'' are of great importance. As all intellectual phenomena have by experimentalists been reduced to sensation, so all emotion has been and is regarded as reducible to simple mental affection, the element of which all emotional manifestations are ultimately composed. The nature of this element is a problem that has been provisionally, but not conclusively, solved by many psychologists; the method is necessarily experimental, and all experiments on feeling are peculiarly difficult. The solutions proposed are two. In the first, all affection phenomena are primarily divisible into those that are pleasurable and those that are the reverse. The main objections to this are that it does not explain the infinite variety of phenomena, and that it disregards the distinction that most philosophers admit between higher and lower pleasures. The second solution is that every sensation has its specific affective quality, though by reason of the poverty of language many of these have no name. W. Wundt, ''Outlines of [[Psychology]]'' (trans. C. H. Judd, [[Leipzig]], 1897), maintains that we may group under three main affective directions, each with its negative, all the infinite varieties in question; these are (a) [[pleasure]], or rather pleasantness, and [[suffering|displeasure]], (b) tension and relaxation, (c) excitement and depression. These two views are antithetic and no solution has been discovered.
   
  +
American psychologist [[Henry Murray]] (1893–1988) developed a theory of [[Personality type|personality]] that was organized in terms of motives, presses, and needs. According to Murray, these psychogenic needs function mostly on the unconscious level, but play a major role in our personality. Murray classified five affection needs:
⚫
# The second is [[Fechner]]'s method; it consists of recording the changes in feeling-tone produced in a subject by bringing him in contact with a series of conditions, objects or stimuli graduated according to a scientific plan and presented singly in pairs or in groups. The result is a comparative table of likes and dislikes.
 
   
  +
{| class="wikitable"
⚫
Mention should also be made of a third method which has hardly yet been tried, namely, that of endeavouring to isolate one of the three ''directions'' by the method of suggestion or even hypnotic trance observations.
 
  +
|+Five Affection Needs
  +
!Need
  +
!Definition
  +
|-
  +
|[[Need for affiliation|Affiliation]]
  +
|Spending time with other people
  +
|-
  +
|[[Nurture|Nurturance]]
  +
|Taking care of another person
  +
|-
  +
|[[Play (activity)|Play]]
  +
|Having fun with others
  +
|-
  +
|[[Social rejection|Rejection]]
  +
|Rejecting other people
  +
|-
  +
|[[Helpfulness|Succorance]]
  +
|Being helped or protected by others
  +
|}
  +
  ⚫
Two methods of experiment on affection have been tried:
  +
  ⚫
#The first, introduced by A. Mosso, the [[Italy|Italian]] psychologist, consists in recording the physical phenomena that accompany modifications of the affective consciousness. Thus it is found that the action of the [[Human heart|heart]] is accelerated by pleasant, and retarded by unpleasant, stimuli; again, changes of weight and volume are found to accompany modifications of affection—and so on. Apart altogether from the facts that this investigation is still in its infancy and that the conditions of experiment are insufficiently understood, its ultimate success is rendered highly problematical by the essential fact that real scientific results can be achieved only by data recorded in connection with a perfectly normal subject; a conscious or interested subject introduces variable factors that are probably incalculable.
  ⚫
#The second is [[Fechner]]'s method; it consists of recording the changes in feeling-tone produced in a subject by bringing him in contact with a series of conditions, objects or stimuli graduated according to a scientific plan and presented singly in pairs or in groups. The result is a comparative table of likes and dislikes.
  +
  ⚫
Mention should also be made of a third method that has hardly yet been tried, namely, that of endeavouring to isolate one of the three ''directions'' by the method of suggestion or even hypnotic trance observations.
  +
  +
  +
  ⚫
==See also==
  ⚫
* [[Affectional bond]]
  +
* [[Affectional action]]
  +
* [[Affectional orientation]]
  +
* [[Affectionism]]
  ⚫
* [[Affective filter]]
  ⚫
* [[Intimacy]]
  +
* [[Love]]
  +
* [[Physical contact]]
  +
* [[Psychosexual behavior]]
  +
* [[Public display of affection]]
  +
* [[Reciprocal liking]]
  +
* [[Romance]]
  +
* [[Sexuality]]
   
 
== Books ==
  
== Books ==
Line 25: Line 71:
 
*E. B. Titchener, ''Experimental Psychology'' ([[1905]]); art. "[[Psychology]]" and works there quoted.
  
*E. B. Titchener, ''Experimental Psychology'' ([[1905]]); art. "[[Psychology]]" and works there quoted.
   
⚫
==See also==
  
⚫
* [[Affectional orientation]]
  
⚫
* [[Affective filter]]
  
⚫
* [[Love]]
  
   
 
==References==
  
==References==
Line 35: Line 77:
 
[[Category:Ethics]]
  
[[Category:Ethics]]
 
[[Category:Phrenology]]
  
[[Category:Phrenology]]
  +
[[Category:Emotional states]]
  +
[[Categoy:Interpersonal interaction]]
  +
[[Category:Interpersonal relationships]]
  +
<!--
 
[[de:Zuneigung]]
  
[[de:Zuneigung]]
 
[[fr:Affection]]
  
[[fr:Affection]]
 
[[id:Afeksi]]
  
[[id:Afeksi]]
 
[[it:Affetto]]
  
[[it:Affetto]]
  +
-->
 
{{enWP|Affection}}
  
{{enWP|Affection}}

Latest revision as of 23:26, 28 December 2011

Assessment | Biopsychology | Comparative | Cognitive | Developmental | Language | Individual differences | Personality | Philosophy | Social |
Methods | Statistics | Clinical | Educational | Industrial | Professional items | World psychology |

Social psychology: Altruism · Attribution · Attitudes · Conformity · Discrimination · Groups · Interpersonal relations · Obedience · Prejudice · Norms · Perception · Index · Outline

This article is in need of attention from a psychologist/academic expert on the subject.
Please help recruit one, or improve this page yourself if you are qualified.
This banner appears on articles that are weak and whose contents should be approached with academic caution.
Smooches (baby and child kiss)

A kiss can express affection.

Affection or fondness is a "disposition or rare state of mind or body"[1] that is often associated with a feeling or type of love. It has given rise to a number of branches of philosophy and psychology concerning: emotion (popularly: love, devotion etc.); disease; influence; state of being (philosophy);[2] and state of mind (psychology). "Affection" is popularly used to denote a feeling or type of love, amounting to more than goodwill or friendship. Writers on ethics generally use the word to refer to distinct states of feeling, both lasting and spasmodic. Some contrast it with passion as being free from the distinctively sensual element.

Restricted definition

More specifically, the word has been restricted to emotional states, the object of which is a person. In the former sense, it is the Greek "pathos" and as such it appears in the writings of French philosopher René Descartes, Dutch philosopher Baruch Spinoza, and most of the writings of early British ethicists. However, on various grounds (e.g., that it does not involve anxiety or excitement and that it is comparatively inert and compatible with the entire absence of the sensuous element), it is generally and usefully distinguished from passion. In this narrower sense the word has played a great part in ethical systems, which have spoken of the social or parental affections as in some sense a part of moral obligation. For a consideration of these and similar problems, which depend ultimately on the degree in which the affections are regarded as voluntary, see H. Sidgwick, Methods of Ethics pp. 345–349.

Affectionate behavior

Numerous behaviors are used by people to express affection. Some theories[3] suggest that affectionate behavior evolved from parental nurturing behavior due to its associations with hormonal rewards with research verifying that expressions of affection, although commonly evaluated positively, can be considered negative if they pose implied threats to one's well being. Furthermore, affectionate behavior in positively valenced relationships may be associated with numerous health benefits. Other, more loving type gestures of affectionate behavior include obvious signs of liking a person.

Psychology

Info icon This section does not cite any references or sources.
Please help improve this section by adding citations to reliable sources. (help, get involved!)
Unverifiable material may be challenged and removed.

This article has been tagged since September 2007.

File:JohnnyCashJuneCarterCash1969.jpg

Affection shown between Johnny Cash and June Carter Cash.

In psychology the terms affection and affective are of great importance. As all intellectual phenomena have by experimentalists been reduced to sensation, so all emotion has been and is regarded as reducible to simple mental affection, the element of which all emotional manifestations are ultimately composed. The nature of this element is a problem that has been provisionally, but not conclusively, solved by many psychologists; the method is necessarily experimental, and all experiments on feeling are peculiarly difficult. The solutions proposed are two. In the first, all affection phenomena are primarily divisible into those that are pleasurable and those that are the reverse. The main objections to this are that it does not explain the infinite variety of phenomena, and that it disregards the distinction that most philosophers admit between higher and lower pleasures. The second solution is that every sensation has its specific affective quality, though by reason of the poverty of language many of these have no name. W. Wundt, Outlines of Psychology (trans. C. H. Judd, Leipzig, 1897), maintains that we may group under three main affective directions, each with its negative, all the infinite varieties in question; these are (a) pleasure, or rather pleasantness, and displeasure, (b) tension and relaxation, (c) excitement and depression. These two views are antithetic and no solution has been discovered.

American psychologist Henry Murray (1893–1988) developed a theory of personality that was organized in terms of motives, presses, and needs. According to Murray, these psychogenic needs function mostly on the unconscious level, but play a major role in our personality. Murray classified five affection needs:

Five Affection Needs
Need Definition
Affiliation Spending time with other people
Nurturance Taking care of another person
Play Having fun with others
Rejection Rejecting other people
Succorance Being helped or protected by others

Two methods of experiment on affection have been tried:

  1. The first, introduced by A. Mosso, the Italian psychologist, consists in recording the physical phenomena that accompany modifications of the affective consciousness. Thus it is found that the action of the heart is accelerated by pleasant, and retarded by unpleasant, stimuli; again, changes of weight and volume are found to accompany modifications of affection—and so on. Apart altogether from the facts that this investigation is still in its infancy and that the conditions of experiment are insufficiently understood, its ultimate success is rendered highly problematical by the essential fact that real scientific results can be achieved only by data recorded in connection with a perfectly normal subject; a conscious or interested subject introduces variable factors that are probably incalculable.
  2. The second is Fechner's method; it consists of recording the changes in feeling-tone produced in a subject by bringing him in contact with a series of conditions, objects or stimuli graduated according to a scientific plan and presented singly in pairs or in groups. The result is a comparative table of likes and dislikes.

Mention should also be made of a third method that has hardly yet been tried, namely, that of endeavouring to isolate one of the three directions by the method of suggestion or even hypnotic trance observations.


See also

Books

For the subject of emotion in general see modern text-books of psychology, e.g. those of

  • J. Sully
  • W. James
  • G. T. Fechner
  • O. Kulpe; Angelo Mosso, La Paura (Milan, 1884, 1900 Eng. trans. E. Lough and F. Kiesow, Lond. 1896)
  • E. B. Titchener, Experimental Psychology (1905); art. "Psychology" and works there quoted.


References

  • This article incorporates text from the Encyclopædia Britannica, Eleventh Edition, a publication now in the public domain.

Categoy:Interpersonal interaction

This page uses Creative Commons Licensed content from Wikipedia (view authors).
  1. ↑ affection - Definitions from Dictionary.com
  2. ↑ 17th and 18th Century Theories of Emotions > Francis Hutcheson on the Emotions (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)
  3. ↑ according to Communication professor Kory Floyd of Arizona State University
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.