Psychology Wiki
No edit summary
(Fixed a mistake)
Tag: rte-source
(14 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{SocPsy}}
+
{{BioPsy}}
  +
{{Expert}}
 
-----
 
{{wikify
 
-----
 
   
  +
{{Abortion}}
  +
{{Abortion by country sidebar}}
 
<!--Note to editors: This article has a long and intense history of terminology debates. Please review the talk page before making changes to lines to see if there is a previous established consensus or compromise. Thank you.-->
 
<!--Note to editors: This article has a long and intense history of terminology debates. Please review the talk page before making changes to lines to see if there is a previous established consensus or compromise. Thank you.-->
  +
An '''abortion''' is the termination of a [[pregnancy]] by the removal or expulsion of a [[fetus]]/[[embryo]] from the [[uterus]], resulting in or caused by its death. An abortion can occur spontaneously due to [[Complication (medicine)|complications]] during pregnancy or can be induced, in humans and other species. In the context of human pregnancies, an abortion induced to preserve the health of the pregnant female is termed a ''therapeutic abortion'', while an abortion induced for any other reason is termed an ''elective abortion''. The term ''abortion'' most commonly refers to the induced abortion of a [[pregnancy|human pregnancy]], while spontaneous abortions are usually termed [[miscarriage]]s. <!--Annotation: This paragraph serves to disambiguate abortion terminology and and types-->
An '''abortion''' is the termination of a [[pregnancy]] associated with the death of an [[embryo]] or a [[fetus]]. This can occur spontaneously, in the form of a [[miscarriage]], or be intentionally induced through chemical, surgical, or other means. Generally, abortions are performed by [[gynaecology|gynaecologists]] or [[obstetrics|obstetricians]]. All [[Pregnancy (mammals)|mammalian pregnancies]] can be aborted; however, this article focuses exclusively on the abortion of [[human]] pregnancy.
 
   
  +
Abortion has a long history and has been induced by various methods including herbal [[abortifacient]]s, the use of sharpened tools, [[physical trauma]] and other [[traditional medicine|traditional methods]]. Contemporary medicine utilizes [[medication]]s and [[surgery|surgical procedures]] to induce abortion. The [[abortion law|legality]], prevalence, and cultural views on abortion vary substantially around the world. In many parts of the world there is prominent and divisive [[Abortion debate|public controversy]] over the [[Ethical aspects of abortion|ethical]] and legal issues of abortion. Abortion and abortion-related issues feature prominently in the national politics in many nations often involving the opposing pro-life and pro-choice worldwide social movements. The approximate number of abortions performed worldwide in 2003 was 42 million, which declined from nearly 46 million in 1995. <!--Annotation: This paragraph covers related issues and current events.-->
There have been various methods of inducing an abortion [[History of abortion|throughout the centuries]]. In the 20th century, the [[ethics]] and [[morality]] of abortion became the subject of intense [[political]] [[debate]] in many areas of the world.
 
 
==Definitions==
 
[[Pregnancy]] is defined by the [[medicine|medical community]] as beginning at the [[implantation]] of the [[embryo]]. Others differ, however, placing this initiation at [[fertilisation|conception]]. The following medical terms are used to define an abortion:
 
 
* ''Spontaneous abortion ([[miscarriage]])'': An abortion due to accidental trauma or [[natural causes]].
 
*''Induced abortion'': An abortion deliberately caused. Induced abortions are further subcategorized into therapeutic abortions and elective abortions:
 
**''Therapeutic abortion''
 
*** To save the life of the pregnant woman.
 
*** To preserve the woman's physical or mental health.
 
*** To terminate a pregnancy that would result in the birth of a child with defects which would be [[fatal|incompatible with life]] or associated with significant [[morbidity]].
 
*** To [[selective reduction|selectively reduce]] the number of [[fetus]]es in a [[multiple birth|multiple pregnancy]] to lessen health risks involved.
 
**''Elective abortion'': An abortion performed for any other reason.
 
 
Methods of birth control that prevent implantation, such as [[emergency contraception]], are not considered to be abortion; however, emergency contraception is generally considered equivalent to abortion by those who reject the medical definition of pregnancy.
 
 
A pregnancy that ends earlier than 37 completed weeks of gestation, and where an [[infant]] is born and survives, is termed a [[premature birth]]. A pregnancy that ends with an infant dead upon birth at any gestational stage, due to causes including spontaneous abortion or complications during delivery, is termed a [[stillbirth]].
 
 
In common parlance, the term "abortion" is synonymous with induced abortion of a human fetus.
 
 
==Incidence==
 
The incidence of and reasons for induced abortion vary in regions in which abortion is generally permitted.
 
 
It has been estimated that the total number of induced abortions performed globally is approximately 46 million per year. 26 million of these are said to occur in [[abortion law|places in which abortion is legal]]; the other 20 million happen where it is illegal. Some countries, such as [[Belgium]] and the [[Netherlands]], experience a low rate of induced abortion, while others like [[Russia]] and [[Vietnam]] have a comparatively high rate. {{ref|incidence2}}
 
 
A 1998 study aggregated data from studies in 27 countries on the reasons women seek to terminate their pregnancies. It concluded that common factors cited to have influenced the abortion decision were the desire to delay or end childbearing, concern over the interruption of [[employment|work]] or [[education]], issues of financial or relationship stability, and perceived immaturity. {{ref|incidence3}} In [[Finland]] and the [[United States]], concern for the health risks posed by pregnancy in individual cases was not a factor commonly given, whereas in [[Bangladesh]], [[India]], and [[Kenya]] such a concern was found to be more prevalent. A 2004 study in which [[United States|American]] women at [[abortion clinic|clinic]]s answered a [[questionnaire]] yielded similar results. {{ref|incidence4}}
 
 
Some abortions are undergone as the result of societal pressures, such as [[eugenics]], the stigmatization of [[disabled]] persons, preference for children of a specific [[sex]], disapproval of [[single parent|single motherhood]], insufficient economic support for [[family|families]], lack of access to or rejection of [[birth control|contraceptive]] methods, or efforts toward [[population control]] (such as [[China]]'s [[one-child policy]]). A combination of these factors can sometimes result in forced abortion, [[forced sterilization]], [[infanticide]], [[child abandonment]], or [[sex-selective abortion and infanticide]] — which is illegal in most countries, but difficult to stop. In many areas, especially in [[developing country|developing nations]] or where abortion is illegal, women sometimes resort to "[[back-alley abortion|back-alley]]" or [[self-induced abortion|self-induced]] procedures. The [[World Health Organization]] suggests that there are 19 million terminations annually which fit its criteria for an [[Abortion#Unsafe abortion|unsafe abortion]]. {{ref|unsafe1}} See [[Abortion#Social issues|social issues]] for more information on these subjects.
 
 
==Forms of abortion==
 
   
  +
==Types of abortion==
 
===Spontaneous abortion===
 
===Spontaneous abortion===
 
{{main|Miscarriage}}
 
{{main|Miscarriage}}
  +
[[Image:Human Embryo - Approximately 6 weeks estimated gestational age.jpg|right|thumb|{{POVassertion|POV_tags_and_picture_wars}}A complete spontaneous abortion at about 6 weeks [[gestational age]]]]
   
  +
Spontaneous abortion (also known as miscarriage) is the expulsion of an embryo or fetus due to accidental trauma or [[Death by natural causes|natural causes]] before approximately the 22nd [[gestational age|week of gestation]]; the definition by gestational age varies by country.<ref name="WHOmiscarriage">{{cite web|url=http://www.who.int/reproductive-health/impac/Symptoms/Vaginal_bleeding_early_S7_S16.html|title=Managing Complications in Pregnancy and Childbirth - A guide for midwives and doctors|last=Department of Reproductive Health and Research , World Health Organization|date=2003|accessdate=2009-04-07}} NB: This definition is subject to regional differences, see [[Miscarriage#Terminology|miscarriage]].</ref> Most miscarriages are due to incorrect replication of chromosomes; they can also be caused by environmental factors. A pregnancy that ends before 37 weeks of gestation resulting in a [[Live birth|live-born]] infant is known as a "[[premature birth]]". When a fetus dies [[in utero]] after about 22 weeks, or during [[childbirth|delivery]], it is usually termed "[[stillbirth|stillborn]]". Premature births and stillbirths are generally not considered to be miscarriages although usage of these terms can sometimes overlap.
<!--improve me!-->
 
Spontaneous abortions, generally referred to as miscarriages, occur when an embryo or fetus is lost due to natural causes. A miscarriage is spontaneous loss of the embryo or fetus before the 20th week of development. Spontaneous abortions after the 20th week are generally considered to be preterm deliveries. Most miscarriages occur very early in a pregnancy. Approximately 10-50% of pregnancies end in miscarriage, depending upon the age and health of the pregnant woman. {{ref|miscarriage1}}
 
 
The risk for spontaneous abortion is greater in those with a history of more than three previous (known) spontaneous abortions, those who have had a previous induced abortion, those with systemic diseases, and in women over age 35.
 
   
  +
Between 10% and 50% of pregnancies end in clinically apparent miscarriage, depending upon the age and health of the pregnant woman.<ref name=BBCmiscarriage>{{cite news |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/2176898.stm |title=Q&A: Miscarriage |date=2002-08-06 |publisher=[[BBC]] |accessdate=2009-04-07}}</ref> Most miscarriages occur very early in pregnancy, in most cases, they occur so early in the pregnancy that the woman is not even aware that she was pregnant. One study testing hormones for ovulation and pregnancy found that 61.9% of conceptuses were lost prior to 12 weeks, and 91.7% of these losses occurred subclinically, without the knowledge of the once pregnant woman.<ref name="pmid7117572">{{cite journal |author=Edmonds DK, Lindsay KS, Miller JF, Williamson E, Wood PJ |title=Early embryonic mortality in women |journal=Fertil. Steril. |volume=38 |issue=4 |pages=447–53 |year=1982 |pmid=7117572 |doi=}}</ref>
Other causes can be infection (of either the woman or the fetus), immune responses, or serious systemic diseases of the woman.
 
   
  +
The risk of spontaneous abortion decreases sharply after the 10th week from the last menstrual period [[gestational age|(LMP)]].<ref name=BBCmiscarriage /><ref>{{cite book |first=Lennart |last=Nilsson |authorlink=Lennart Nilsson |coauthors=Lars Hamberger | page=91 |title=A child is born |publisher=[[Doubleday (publisher)|Doubleday]] |location=[[Garden City, New York]] |year=1990 |origdate=1965 |pages= |isbn=0-385-40085-3 |oclc=21412111}}</ref> One study of 232 pregnant women showed “virtually complete <nowiki>[pregancy loss]</nowiki> by the end of the embryonic period" (10 weeks [[LMP]]) with a pregnancy loss rate of only 2 percent after 8.5 weeks [[LMP]].<ref>{{cite book |first=E. |last=Jauniaux |coauthors=P. Kaminopetros and H. El-Rafaey |chapter=Early pregnancy loss |editor=Martin J. Whittle and C. H. Rodeck |title=Fetal medicine: basic science and clinical practice |publisher=Churchill Livingstone |location=Edinburgh |year=1999 |page=[http://books.google.com/books?id=0BY0hx2l5uoC&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_summary_r&cad=0#PPA836,M1 836]|isbn=0-443-05357-X |oclc=42792567}}</ref>
A spontaneous abortion can also be caused by accidental [[trauma]]; intentional trauma to cause miscarriage is considered an induced abortion. Some governments have laws increasing the criminal liability of a person who causes a miscarriage during an [[assault]] or other violent [[crime]].
 
  +
  +
The most common cause of spontaneous abortion during the first trimester is chromosomal abnormalities of the embryo/fetus,<ref name="mednet">{{cite web|url=http://www.medicinenet.com/miscarriage/page1.htm |title=Miscarriage (Spontaneous Abortion) |accessdate=2009-04-07|last=Stöppler |first=Melissa Conrad |coauthors=William C. Shiel, Jr., ed. |work=MedicineNet.com }}</ref> accounting for at least 50% of sampled early pregnancy losses.<ref name="fetal med 837">{{cite book |first=E. |last=Jauniaux |coauthors=P. Kaminopetros and H. El-Rafaey |chapter=Early pregnancy loss |editor=Martin J. Whittle and C. H. Rodeck |title=Fetal medicine: basic science and clinical practice |publisher=Churchill Livingstone |location=Edinburgh |year=1999 |page=[http://books.google.com/books?id=0BY0hx2l5uoC&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_summary_r&cad=0#PPA836,M1 837] |isbn=0-443-05357-X |oclc=42792567}}</ref> Other causes include [[vascular disease]] (such as [[Systemic lupus erythematosus|lupus]]), [[diabetes]], other hormonal problems, infection, and abnormalities of the uterus.<ref name="mednet" /> Advancing maternal age and a patient history of previous spontaneous abortions are the two leading factors associated with a greater risk of spontaneous abortion.<ref name="fetal med 837" /> A spontaneous abortion can also be caused by accidental [[Physical trauma|trauma]]; intentional trauma or stress to cause miscarriage is considered induced abortion or [[feticide]].<ref name="Fetal Homicide Laws">{{cite web |url=http://www.ncsl.org/programs/health/fethom.htm |title=Fetal Homicide Laws |accessdate=2009-04-07|publisher=[[National Conference of State Legislatures]]}}</ref>
   
 
===Induced abortion===
 
===Induced abortion===
  +
A pregnancy can be intentionally aborted in many ways. The manner selected depends chiefly upon the [[gestational age]] of the embryo or fetus, which increases in size as it ages.<ref>Menikoff, Jerry. [http://books.google.com/books?id=2jXOYv3X8zsC&pg=PA78&dq=size+fetus+abortion+technique&lr=&as_brr=3&ei=MymmSayEFJaQyATt6JiUDg Law and Bioethics], page 78 (Georgetown University Press 2001): "As the fetus grows in size, however, the vacuum aspiration method becomes increasingly difficult to use."</ref> Specific procedures may also be selected due to legality, regional availability, and doctor-patient preference. Reasons for procuring induced abortions are typically characterized as either therapeutic or elective. An abortion is medically referred to as therapeutic when it is performed to:
  +
*save the life of the pregnant woman;<ref name="roche1">Roche, Natalie E. (2004). [http://www.emedicine.com/med/topic3311.htm Therapeutic Abortion]. Retrieved 2006-03-08.</ref>
  +
*preserve the woman's physical or mental health;<ref name="roche1"/>
  +
*terminate pregnancy that would result in a child born with a [[congenital disorder]] that would be [[death|fatal]] or associated with significant [[morbidity]];<ref name="roche1"/> or
  +
*[[selective reduction|selectively reduce]] the number of fetuses to lessen health risks associated with [[multiple birth|multiple pregnancy]].<ref name="roche1"/>
  +
An abortion is referred to as elective when it is performed at the request of the woman "for reasons other than maternal health or fetal disease." <ref>''Encyclopedia Britannica'', (2007), Vol 26, page 674 </ref>
   
  +
==Abortion methods==
A pregnancy can be intentionally aborted in a number of ways. The manner selected depends chiefly upon the [[gestational age]] of the [[fetus]], in addition to the legality, regional availability, and/or doctor-patient preference for specific procedures.
 
  +
[[Image:Abortionmethods.png|thumb|350px|right|[[Gestational age]] may determine which abortion methods are practiced.]]
  +
===Medical===
  +
{{main|Medical abortion}}
   
  +
"Medical abortions" are non-surgical abortions that use [[pharmaceutical drug]]s, and are only effective in the first trimester of pregnancy. {{Fact|date=February 2009}} Medical abortions comprise 10% of all abortions in the United States<ref>{{cite journal |author=Strauss LT, Gamble SB, Parker WY, Cook DA, Zane SB, Hamdan S |title=Abortion surveillance--United States, 2004 |journal=MMWR Surveill Summ |volume=56 |issue=9 |pages=1–33 |year=2007 |month=November |pmid=18030283 |doi= |url=http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/ss5609a1.htm}}</ref> and Europe.{{Fact|date=February 2009}} Combined regimens include [[methotrexate]] or [[mifepristone]], followed by a [[prostaglandin]] (either [[misoprostol]] or [[gemeprost]]: misoprostol is used in the U.S.; gemeprost is used in the UK and Sweden.) When used within 49 days gestation, approximately 92% of women undergoing medical abortion with a combined regimen completed it without surgical intervention.<ref>{{cite journal|author=Spitz, I.M. et al|title=Early pregnancy termination with mifepristone and misoprostol in the United States|journal=New England Journal of Medicine|year=1998|volume=338|issue=18|pmid=9562577|doi=10.1056/NEJM199804303381801|page=1241|pages=1241}}</ref> Misoprostol can be used alone, but has a lower efficacy rate than combined regimens. In cases of failure of medical abortion, vacuum or manual aspiration is used to complete the abortion surgically.
====Surgical abortion====
 
[[Image:PBAsigning_wide.jpg|thumb|240px|right|U.S. President George W. Bush signs the ''Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003'']]
 
   
  +
===Surgical===
In the first fifteen weeks, [[suction-aspiration abortion|suction-aspiration]] or vacuum abortion is the most common method. ''[[Manual vacuum aspiration]]'', or MVA abortion, consists of removing the [[fetus]] or [[embryo]] by suction using a manual [[syringe]], while the ''[[Electric vacuum aspiration]]'' or EVA abortion method uses an electric [[pump]]. These techniques are equivalent, differing only in the mechanism use to apply suction. From the fifteenth week up until around the twenty-sixth week, a surgical [[dilation and evacuation]] (D &amp; E) is used. D &amp; E consists of opening the [[cervix]] of the [[uterus]] and emptying it using surgical instruments and suction.
 
   
  +
[[File:Vacuum-aspiration (single).svg|thumb|A vacuum aspiration abortion at 8 weeks gestational age (6 weeks after fertilization).<br />'''1:''' Amniotic sac<br />'''2:''' Embryo<br />'''3:''' Uterine lining<br />'''4:''' Speculum<br />'''5:''' Vacurette<br />'''6:''' Attached to a suction pump]]
''[[Dilation and curettage]]'' (D &amp; C) is a standard gynaecological procedure performed for a variety of reasons, including examination of the uterine lining for possible malignancy, investigation of abnormal bleeding, and abortion. ''[[Curettage]]'' refers to the cleaning of the walls of the [[uterus]] with a [[curette]]. The [[World Health Organization]] recommends this sort of procedure, also called Sharp Curettage, only when MVA is unavailable. {{ref|surgicalabortion1}} Sharp curettage only accounted for 2.4% of abortion procedures in the US in [[2002]]. {{ref|surgicalabortion2}} The term "D and C" can more generally be used to refer to the first trimester abortion procedure, irrespective of the method used to perform the procedure.
 
  +
In the first 12 weeks, [[suction-aspiration abortion|suction-aspiration]] or vacuum abortion is the most common method.<ref>{{cite web |author=Healthwise |url=http://www.webmd.com/hw/womens_conditions/tw1078.asp#tw1112 |title=Manual and vacuum aspiration for abortion |year=2004 |publisher=[[WebMD]] |accessdate=2008-12-05}}</ref> ''Manual [[Vacuum aspiration]]'' (MVA) abortion consists of removing the [[fetus]] or [[embryo]], [[placenta]] and membranes by suction using a manual [[syringe]], while ''electric [[vacuum aspiration]]'' (EVA) abortion uses an electric [[pump]]. These techniques are comparable, and differ in the mechanism used to apply suction, how early in pregnancy they can be used, and whether cervical dilation is necessary. MVA, also known as "mini-suction" and "[[menstrual extraction]]", can be used in very early pregnancy, and does not require cervical dilation. Surgical techniques are sometimes referred to as 'Suction (or surgical) Termination Of Pregnancy' (STOP). From the 15th week until approximately the 26th, [[dilation and evacuation]] (D&E) is used. D&E consists of opening the [[cervix]] of the [[uterus]] and emptying it using surgical instruments and suction.
   
  +
''[[Dilation and curettage]]'' (D&C), the second most common method of abortion, is a standard gynecological procedure performed for a variety of reasons, including examination of the uterine lining for possible malignancy, investigation of abnormal bleeding, and abortion. ''[[Curettage]]'' refers to cleaning the walls of the [[uterus]] with a [[curette]]. The [[World Health Organization]] recommends this procedure, also called ''sharp curettage,'' only when MVA is unavailable.<ref>{{cite book |author=[[World Health Organization]] |chapter=Dilatation and curettage |chapterurl=http://www.who.int/reproductive-health/impac/Procedures/Dilatetion_P61_P63.html |title=Managing Complications in Pregnancy and Childbirth: A Guide for Midwives and Doctors |publisher=[[World Health Organization]] |location=[[Geneva]] |year=2003 |pages= |isbn=92-4-154587-9 |oclc=181845530 |accessdate=2008-12-05}}</ref> The term ''D and C'', or sometimes ''suction curette'', is used as a [[euphemism]] for the first trimester abortion procedure, whichever the method used.
Other techniques must be used to induce abortion in the third [[trimester]]. Premature delivery can be induced with [[prostaglandin]]; this can be coupled with injecting the [[amniotic sac|amniotic fluid]] with caustic solutions containing [[saline (medicine)|saline]] or [[urea]]. Very late abortions can be brought about by [[intact dilation and extraction]] (intact D &amp; X), which requires the surgical decompression of the fetus's head before evacuation, and is sometimes termed "[[partial-birth abortion]]." A [[hysterotomy abortion]], similar to a [[caesarian section]] but resulting in a terminated fetus, can also be used at late stages of pregnancy. It can be performed vaginally, with an incision just above the [[cervix]], in the late mid-trimester.
 
   
  +
Other techniques must be used to induce abortion in the second [[trimester]]. Premature delivery can be induced with [[prostaglandin]]; this can be coupled with injecting the [[amniotic sac|amniotic fluid]] with caustic solutions containing [[saline (medicine)|saline]] or [[urea]]. After the 16th week of gestation, abortions can be induced by [[intact dilation and extraction]] (IDX) (also called intrauterine cranial decompression), which requires surgical decompression of the fetus' head before evacuation. IDX is sometimes called "[[partial-birth abortion]]," which has been [[Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act|federally banned]] in the United States. A [[hysterotomy abortion]] is a procedure similar to a [[caesarean section]], and is performed under [[general anesthesia]] because it is considered major abdominal surgery. It requires a smaller incision than a caesarean section and is used during later stages of pregnancy.<ref name="encarta">{{cite encyclopedia |last=McGee |first=Glenn |authorlink=Glenn McGee |coauthors=[[Jon F. Merz]] |encyclopedia=[[Encarta]] |title=Abortion |url=http://encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_761553899/Abortion.html |accessdate=2008-12-05 |publisher=[[Microsoft]]}}</ref>
====Chemical abortion====
 
[[Image:Mifepristone.gif|thumb|right|170px|The molecular structure of the abortifacient drug Mifepristone.]]
 
{{main|Chemical abortion}}
 
   
  +
From the 20th to 23rd week of gestation, an [[medical injection|injection]] to stop the fetal [[heart]] can be used as the first phase of the surgical abortion procedure<ref>{{cite journal |author=Vause S, Sands J, Johnston TA, Russell S, Rimmer S |title=Could some fetocides be avoided by more prompt referral after diagnosis of fetal abnormality? |journal=J Obstet Gynaecol |volume=22 |issue=3 |pages=243–5 |year=2002 |month=May |pmid=12521492 |doi=10.1080/01443610220130490 |url=http://www.informaworld.com/openurl?genre=article&doi=10.1080/01443610220130490&magic=pubmed&#124;&#124;1B69BA326FFE69C3F0A8F227DF8201D0 |accessdate=2008-12-03}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |author=Dommergues M, Cahen F, Garel M, Mahieu-Caputo D, Dumez Y |title=Feticide during second- and third-trimester termination of pregnancy: opinions of health care professionals |journal=Fetal. Diagn. Ther. |volume=18 |issue=2 |pages=91–7 |year=2003 |pmid=12576743 |doi=10.1159/000068068 |url=http://content.karger.com/produktedb/produkte.asp?typ=fulltext&file=fdt18091 |accessdate=2008-12-03}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |author=Bhide A, Sairam S, Hollis B, Thilaganathan B |title=Comparison of feticide carried out by cordocentesis versus cardiac puncture |journal=Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol |volume=20 |issue=3 |pages=230–2 |year=2002 |month=September |pmid=12230443 |doi=10.1046/j.1469-0705.2002.00797.x |accessdate=2008-12-03}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |author=Senat MV, Fischer C, Bernard JP, Ville Y |title=The use of lidocaine for fetocide in late termination of pregnancy |journal=BJOG |volume=110 |issue=3 |pages=296–300 |year=2003 |month=March |pmid=12628271 |doi= 10.1046/j.1471-0528.2003.02217.x|url=http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/openurl?genre=article&sid=nlm:pubmed&issn=1470-0328&date=2003&volume=110&issue=3&spage=296 |accessdate=2008-12-03}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |author=Senat MV, Fischer C, Ville Y |title=Funipuncture for fetocide in late termination of pregnancy |journal=Prenat. Diagn. |volume=22 |issue=5 |pages=354–6 |year=2002 |month=May |pmid=12001185 |doi=10.1002/pd.290 |accessdate=2008-12-03}}</ref> to ensure that the fetus is not born alive.<ref>{{cite book |author=Nuffield Council on Bioethics |chapter=Clinical perspectives (Continued) |chapterurl=http://www.nuffieldbioethics.org/go/browseablepublications/criticalCareDecisionFetalNeonatalMedicine/report_542.html |accessdate=2008-12-03 |title=Critical Case Decisions in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine: Ethical Issues |publisher=Nuffield Council on Bioethics |location= |year=2006 |isbn=1-904384-14-5 |oclc=85782378}}</ref>
Effective in the first trimester of pregnancy, chemical (also referred to as a medical abortion), or non-surgical abortions comprise 10% of all abortions in the [[United States]] and [[Europe]]. The process begins with the administration of either [[methotrexate]] or [[mifepristone]], followed by [[misoprostol]]. When appropriately used, 98% of women undergoing medical termination of pregnancy will experience completed abortion without surgical intervention. The [[Food and Drug Administration]] currently approves the use of mifepristone up to 49 days gestation (7 weeks), though evidence based regimens exist for its use up to 61 days gestation with similar success rates. Misoprostol alone can also be used, though it is not FDA approved for this purpose. Misoprostol (Cytotec) alone has the advantage of costing less than one dollar for an effective dose, as opposed to several hundred dollars for an effective dose of mifepristone. In cases of failure of medical abortion, vacuum or manual aspiration is used to complete the abortion surgically.
 
   
====Other means of abortion====
+
===Other methods===
Historically, a number of [[herb]]s reputed to possess [[abortifacient]] properties have been used in [[folk medicine]]: [[tansy]], [[pennyroyal]], [[black cohosh]], and the now-extinct [[silphium]] (see [[Abortion#History of abortion|history of abortion]]). The use of herbs in such a manner can cause serious — even lethal — side effects, such as [[multiple organ dysfunction syndrome|multiple organ failure]], and is not recommended by [[physician]]s. {{ref|othermethods1}}
+
[[Image:AngkorWatAbortionAD1150.JPG|thumb|left|{{POV-statement|date=April 2009}}[[Bas-relief]] at [[Angkor Wat]], [[Cambodia]], c. 1150, depicting a [[demon]] inducing an abortion by pounding the abdomen of a pregnant woman with a [[pestle]].<ref>Potts, M. et al. "Thousand-year-old depictions of massage abortion," ''Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care'', volume 33, page 234 (2007): “at Angkor, the operator is a demon.” Also see Mould, R. ''Mould's Medical Anecdotes'', page 406 (CRC Press 1996).</ref>]] Historically, a number of [[herb]]s reputed to possess [[abortifacient]] properties have been used in [[folk medicine]]: [[tansy]], [[pennyroyal]], [[black cohosh]], and the now-extinct [[silphium]] (see [[Abortion#History of abortion|history of abortion]]).<ref name="riddle2">{{cite book |first=John M. |last=Riddle |title=Eve's herbs: a history of contraception and abortion in the West |publisher=[[Harvard University Press]] |location=[[Cambridge, Massachusetts]] |year=1997 |pages= |isbn=0-674-27024-X |oclc=36126503}}{{pn}}</ref> The use of herbs in such a manner can cause serious — even lethal — side effects, such as [[multiple organ dysfunction syndrome|multiple organ failure]], and is not recommended by [[physician]]s.<ref>{{cite journal |author=Ciganda C, Laborde A |title=Herbal infusions used for induced abortion |journal=J. Toxicol. Clin. Toxicol. |volume=41 |issue=3 |pages=235–9 |year=2003 |pmid=12807304 |doi=10.1081/CLT-120021104 |url= |accessdate=2008-12-04}}</ref>
   
Abortion is sometimes attempted through means of trauma to the [[abdomen]]. The degree of force applied, if severe, can cause serious internal injuries without necessarily succeeding in inducing [[miscarriage]]. {{ref|othermethods2}} Both accidental and deliberate abortions of this kind can be subject to criminal liability in many countries. In [[Myanmar|Burma]], [[Indonesia]], [[Malaysia]], the [[Philippines]], and [[Thailand]], there is an ancient tradition of attempting abortion through forceful abdominal [[massage]]. {{ref|othermethods3}}
+
Abortion is sometimes attempted by causing trauma to the [[abdomen]]. The degree of force, if severe, can cause serious internal injuries without necessarily succeeding in inducing [[miscarriage]].<ref>Education for Choice. (2005-05-06). {{cite journal | url=http://web.archive.org-main.us/web/20100716102822/http://www.efc.org.uk/Foryoungpeople/Factsaboutabortion/Unsafeabortion |Archive link|date=December 2008}} Unsafe abortion. Retrieved 2006-01-11.</ref> Both accidental and deliberate abortions of this kind can be subject to criminal liability in many countries. In [[Southeast Asia]], there is an ancient tradition of attempting abortion through forceful abdominal [[massage]].<ref name="potts">{{cite journal |first=Malcolm |last=Potts |authorlink=Malcolm Potts |coauthors=Martha Campbell |year=2002 |title=History of Contraception |journal=Gynecology and Obstetrics |volume=6 |issue=8 |accessdate=2008-12-04}}</ref> One of the [[bas relief]]s decorating the temple of [[Angkor Wat]] in [[Cambodia]] depicts a [[demon]] performing such an abortion upon a woman who has been sent to the [[underworld]].<ref name="potts" />
   
Reported methods of unsafe, [[self-induced abortion]] include the misuse of the [[ulcer]] [[drug]] [[Misoprostol]] and the insertion of non-surgical implements such as [[knitting needle]]s and [[clothes hanger]]s into the [[uterus]].
+
Reported methods of unsafe, [[self-induced abortion]] include misuse of [[misoprostol]], and insertion of non-surgical implements such as [[knitting needle]]s and [[clothes hanger]]s into the [[uterus]]. These methods are rarely seen in developed countries where surgical abortion is legal and available.<ref>{{cite journal |author=Thapa SR, Rimal D, Preston J |title=Self induction of abortion with instrumentation |journal=Aust Fam Physician |volume=35 |issue=9 |pages=697–8 |year=2006 |month=September |pmid=16969439 |doi= |url=http://www.racgp.org.au/afp/200609/11015 |accessdate=2008-12-04}}</ref>
  +
{{clr}}<!-- The clr tag prevents the picture from running into the next section. Please keep it at the bottom of this section. -->
   
==Health effects==
+
==Health considerations==
  +
Early-term surgical abortion is a simple procedure which is safer than [[childbirth]] when performed before the 16th week.<ref>{{cite journal |last=Henshaw |first=Stanley K. |title=Induced Abortion: A World Review, 1990 |journal=International Family Planning Perspectives |volume=23 |issue=2 |pages=246–252 |year=1990 |month=June}}</ref><ref name="grimes">{{cite journal |author=Grimes DA |title=The morbidity and mortality of pregnancy: still risky business |journal=Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. |volume=170 |issue=5 Pt 2 |pages=1489–94 |year=1994 |pmid=8178896 |doi= |url=}}</ref> Abortion methods, like most [[minimally invasive procedure]]s, carry a small potential for serious complications.<ref>{{cite book |author=[[World Health Organization]] |title=Medical Methods for Termination of Pregnancy: Report of a Who Scientific Group |series=Who Technical Report Series No. 871 |publisher=[[World Health Organization]] |location=[[Geneva]] |year=1997 |pages= |isbn=92-4-120871-6 |oclc=38276325}}{{pn}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |first=Slava V. |last=Gaufberg |date=2006-08-29 |publisher=eMedicine |title=Abortion, Complications |url=http://www.emedicine.com/emerg/topic4.htm |accessdate=2007-06-30}}</ref> The risk of complications can increase depending on how far [[pregnancy]] has progressed.<ref name="pauli">{{cite journal |author=Pauli E, Haller U, Zimmermann R |title=[Morbidity of dilatation and evacuation in the second trimester: an analysis] |language=German |journal=Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch |volume=45 |issue=2 |pages=107–15 |year=2005 |pmid=15818053 |doi=10.1159/000083785 |url=}}</ref><ref name="bartley">{{cite journal |author=Bartley J, Tong S, Everington D, Baird DT |title=Parity is a major determinant of success rate in medical abortion: a retrospective analysis of 3161 consecutive cases of early medical abortion treated with reduced doses of mifepristone and vaginal gemeprost |journal=Contraception |volume=62 |issue=6 |pages=297–303 |year=2000 |pmid=11239616 |doi=10.1016/S0010-7824(00)00187-6}}</ref>
   
  +
Women typically experience minor pain during first-trimester abortion procedures. In a 1979 study of 2,299 patients, 97% reported experiencing some degree of pain. Patients rated the pain as being less than earache or toothache, but more than headache or backache.<ref name="pmid443287">{{cite journal |author=Smith GM, Stubblefield PG, Chirchirillo L, McCarthy MJ |title=Pain of first-trimester abortion: its quantification and relations with other variables |journal=Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. |volume=133 |issue=5 |pages=489–98 |year=1979 |pmid=443287 |doi= |url=}}</ref> Local and general anesthetics are used during surgical procedures<ref>[http://www.womensmedcenter.com/faqs/default.asp Women's Center Medical]{{Verify credibility|date=December 2008}}</ref>
<!--MAJOR REORG NEEDED. Entire section is argumentative, and biased: See Talk. -->
 
Early-term surgical abortion is a simple procedure, and when performed by competent doctors (and in some states, nurse practitioners, nurse midwives and physician assistants) in first-world nations (before the 16th week), is safer than carrying the pregnancy to term. {{ref|healtheffects1}} <!-- As I pointed out earlier, listing the negatives of this generally safe procedure first would be biased. -->
 
   
  +
===Mental health===
As with most surgical procedures, the most common surgical abortion methods carry the risk of potentially serious complications. These risks include: a perforated uterus, perforated [[bowel]] or [[Urinary bladder|bladder]], [[septic shock]], sterility, and death. The risk of complications occurring can increase depending on how far the pregnancy has progressed, but may be counterbalanced by [[Complications of pregnancy|complications]] that would occur from carrying the pregnancy to term.
 
  +
{{Main|Abortion and mental health}}
  +
The relationship between induced abortion and [[mental health]] is an area of controversy.<ref name="Bazelon"/><ref name="now">[http://www.pbs.org/now/shows/329/index.html "Post-Abortion Politics"] NOW with David Brancaccio on PBS</ref> No scientific research has demonstrated a direct [[causality|causal relationship]] between abortion and poor mental health,<ref name="Mooney"/><ref name=more-on-koop>{{cite journal |year=1990 |month=January/February |title=More on Koop's Study of Abortion
  +
|journal=Family Planning Perspectives |volume=22 |issue=1 |pages=36–39 |url=http://www.jstor.org/pss/2135437 |publisher=[[Guttmacher Institute]] |doi=10.2307/2135437}}</ref> though some studies have noted that there may be a [[statistical correlation]]. Pre-existing factors in a woman's life, such as emotional attachment to the pregnancy, lack of social support, pre-existing psychiatric illness, and conservative views on abortion increase the likelihood of experiencing negative feelings after an abortion.<ref name="APA89">{{cite journal |author=Adler NE, David HP, Major BN, Roth SH, Russo NF, Wyatt GE |title=Psychological responses after abortion |journal=Science |volume=248 |issue=4951 |pages=41–4 |year=1990 |pmid=2181664 |doi=10.1126/science.2181664}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |first=S. |last=Edwards |year=1997 |month=July/August |title=Abortion study finds no long-term ill effects on emotional well-being |journal=Family Planning Perspectives |url=http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3634/is_199707/ai_n8772240 |accessdate=2008-12-03 |doi=10.2307/2953388 |volume=29 |pages=193}}</ref>
   
  +
In a 1990 review, the [[American Psychological Association]] (APA) found that "severe negative reactions [after abortion] are rare and are in line with those following other normal life stresses."<ref name=more-on-koop/> The APA revised and updated its findings in August 2008 to account for the accumulation of new evidence, and again concluded that induced abortion did not lead to increased mental health problems.<ref>[http://www.apa.org/releases/abortion-report.pdf Report of the APA Task Force on Mental Health and Abortion] APA (August 13, 2008)</ref><ref>{{cite news |first=Benedict |last=Carey |date=2008-08-12 |title=Abortion Does Not Cause Mental Illness |work=[[New York Times]] |url=http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/13/health/research/13brfs-ABORTIONDOES_BRF.html |accessdate=2008-12-03}}</ref> A 2008 review by a group from the [[Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health]] concluded that the highest quality studies found few, if any, mental health differences between women who had abortions and their comparison groups, whereas studies with the most flaws reported negative mental health consequences of abortion.<ref>{{cite journal|last=Charles|first=VE|coauthors=Polis CB, Sridhara SK, Blum RW|date=December 2008|title= Abortion and long-term mental health outcomes: a systematic review of the evidence.|journal=Contraception|publisher=Elsevier|volume=78|issue=6|pages=436-50|issn=0010-7824|url=http://www.jhsph.edu/adolescenthealth/_includes/Charles_2008_Contraception.pdf}}</ref> As of August 2008, the United Kingdom [[Royal College of Psychiatrists]] is also performing a [[systematic review]] of the medical literature to update their position statement on the subject.
It is difficult to accurately assess the risks of induced abortion due to a number of factors. These factors include wide variation in the quality of abortion services in different [[Society|societies]] and among different [[socio-economic]] groups, a lack of uniform [[definition]]s of terms, and difficulties in patient follow-up and after-care. The degree of risk is also dependent upon the skill and experience of the practitioner; maternal age, health, and [[parity]]; [[gestational age]]; pre-existing conditions; methods and instruments used; [[medication]]s used; the skill and experience of those assisting the practitioner; and the quality of recovery and follow-up care. A highly-skilled practitioner, operating under ideal conditions, will tend to have a very low rate of complications; an inexperienced practitioner in an ill-equipped and ill-staffed facility, on the other hand, will often have a higher incidence of complications.
 
   
  +
Some proposed negative [[psychological]] effects of abortion have been referred to by [[pro-life]] advocates as a separate condition called "post-abortion syndrome." However, the existence of "post-abortion syndrome" is not recognized by any medical or psychological organization,<ref name="Grimes">{{cite journal |author=Grimes DA, Creinin MD |title=Induced abortion: an overview for internists |journal=Ann. Intern. Med. |volume=140 |issue=8 |pages=620–6 |year=2004 |pmid=15096333 |doi=10.1001/archinte.140.5.620 |quote=Abortion does not lead to an increased risk for breast cancer or other late psychiatric or medical sequelae. …The alleged 'postabortion trauma syndrome' does not exist.}}</ref> and some [[physician]]s and [[pro-choice]] advocates have argued that the effort to popularize the idea of a "post-abortion syndrome" is a tactic used by pro-life advocates for political purposes.<ref name="Bazelon">{{cite news |first=Emily |last=Bazelon |authorlink=Emily Bazelon |date=2007-01-21 |title=Is There a Post-Abortion Syndrome? |work=[[New York Times Magazine]] |url=http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/21/magazine/21abortion.t.html?pagewanted=1&ei=5088&en=5092fc3344065aec&ex=1327035600&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss&adxnnlx=1190370959-M3NVF8bZOGTDu468IEZo8g |accessdate=2008-12-03}}</ref><ref name="Mooney">{{cite journal |first=Chris |last=Mooney |authorlink=Chris Mooney |year=2004 |month=October |title=Research and Destroy: How the religious right promotes its own 'experts' to combat mainstream science |work=[[Washington Monthly]] |url=http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2004/0410.mooney.html |accessdate=2008-12-03}}</ref><ref name="stotlandreview">{{cite journal |author=Stotland NL |title=Abortion and psychiatric practice |journal=J Psychiatr Pract |volume=9 |issue=2 |pages=139–49 |year=2003 |pmid=15985924 |doi=10.1097/00131746-200303000-00005 |quote=Currently, there are active attempts to convince the public and women considering abortion that abortion frequently has negative psychiatric consequences. This assertion is not borne out by the literature: the vast majority of women tolerate abortion without psychiatric sequelae.}}</ref><ref name="stotland_1404747">{{cite journal |author=Stotland NL |title=The myth of the abortion trauma syndrome |journal=JAMA |volume=268 |issue=15 |pages=2078–9 |year=1992 |month=October |pmid=1404747 |doi=10.1001/jama.268.15.2078}}</ref>
In the [[United Kingdom]], the number of deaths due to legal abortion between the years of 1991 and 1993 was 5, as compared to the 9 deaths caused by [[ectopic pregnancy]] during the same time frame. {{ref|mortality1}} In the [[United States]], during the year 1999, there were a total of 4 deaths due to legal abortion. {{ref|mortality2}} <!--need to compare the number of abortions and the number of pregnancies for these numbers to relate -->
 
   
  +
==Incidence of induced abortion==
Some practitioners advocate using minimal [[anesthesia]] so that the patient can alert them to possible complications. Others recommend [[general anesthesia]], in order to prevent patient movement, which might cause a perforation. General anesthesia carries its own risks, including death, which is why public health officials recommend against its routine use.
 
  +
The incidence and reasons for induced abortion vary regionally. It has been estimated that approximately 46 million abortions are performed worldwide every year. Of these, 26 million are said to occur in [[abortion law|places where abortion is legal]]; the other 20 million happen where the procedure is illegal. Some countries, such as Belgium (11.2 per 100 known pregnancies) and the Netherlands (10.6 per 100), have a low rate of induced abortion, while others like Russia (62.6 per 100) and [[Vietnam]] (43.7 per 100) have a comparatively high rate. The world ratio is 26 induced abortions per 100 known pregnancies.<ref>Henshaw, Stanley K., Singh, Susheela, & Haas, Taylor. (1999). [http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/journals/25s3099.html The Incidence of Abortion Worldwide]. ''International Family Planning Perspectives, 25 (Supplement)'', 30 – 8. Retrieved 2006-01-18.</ref>
   
  +
===By gestational age and method===
[[Dilation]] of the [[cervix]] carries the risk of cervical tears or perforations, including small tears that might not be apparent and might cause [[cervical incompetence]] in future pregnancies. Most practitioners recommend using the smallest possible dilators, and using [[osmotic]] rather than [[mechanical]] dilators after the first [[trimester]] of pregnancy.
 
  +
[[Image:UK abortion by gestational age 2004 histogram.svg|thumb|[[Histogram]] of abortions by [[gestational age]] in [[England and Wales]] during 2004. Average is 9.5 weeks.]]
   
  +
Abortion rates also vary depending on the stage of [[pregnancy]] and the method practiced. In 2003, from data collected in those areas of the United States that sufficiently reported [[gestational age]], it was found that 88.2% of abortions were conducted at or prior to 12 weeks, 10.4% from 13 to 20 weeks, and 1.4% at or after 21 weeks. 90.9% of these were classified as having been done by "[[curettage]]" ([[Suction-aspiration abortion|suction-aspiration]], [[Dilation and curettage]], [[Dilation and evacuation]]), 7.7% by "[[medical abortion|medical]]" means ([[mifepristone]]), 0.4% by "[[instillation abortion|intrauterine instillation]]" ([[saline (medicine)|saline]] or [[prostaglandin]]), and 1.0% by "other" (including [[hysterotomy abortion|hysterotomy]] and [[hysterectomy]]).<ref name="cdc2003">Strauss, L.T., Gamble, S.B., Parker, W.Y, Cook, D.A., Zane, S.B., & Hamdan, S. (November 24, 2006). [http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/ss5511a1.htm Abortion Surveillance - United States, 2003]. ''Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 55 (11),'' 1-32. Retrieved May 10, 2007.</ref> The [[Guttmacher Institute]] estimated there were 2,200 [[intact dilation and extraction]] procedures in the U.S. during 2000; this accounts for 0.17% of the total number of abortions performed that year.<ref>Finer, Lawrence B. & Henshaw, Stanley K. (2003). [http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/journals/3500603.html Abortion Incidence and Services in the United States in 2000]. ''Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 35 (1).'' Retrieved 2006-05-10.</ref> Similarly, in England and Wales in 2006, 89% of terminations occurred at or under 12 weeks, 9% between 13 to 19 weeks, and 1.5% at or over 20 weeks. 64% of those reported were by vacuum aspiration, 6% by D&E, and 30% were medical.<ref>{{cite web |author=Department of Health |year=2007 |title=Abortion statistics, England and Wales: 2006 |url=http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsStatistics/DH_075697 |accessdate=2007-10-12}}</ref> Later abortions are more common in China, India, and other developing countries than in developed countries.<ref>Cheng L. [http://www.who.int/rhl/fertility/abortion/CD006714_chengl_com/en/index.html “Surgical versus medical methods for second-trimester induced abortion : RHL commentary”] (last revised: 1 November 2008). The WHO Reproductive Health Library; Geneva: World Health Organization.</ref>
Instruments are placed within the uterus to remove the fetus. These can, on rare occasions, cause [[perforation]] or [[laceration]] of the uterus, and damage to structures surrounding the uterus. Laceration or perforation of the uterus or cervix can, again on rare occasions, lead to even more serious complications.
 
   
  +
===By personal and social factors===
Incomplete emptying of the uterus can cause [[hemorrhage]] and infection. Use of [[ultrasound]] verification of the location and duration of the pregnancy prior to abortion, with immediate follow-up of patients reporting continuing pregnancy symptoms after the procedure, will virtually eliminate this risk. The sooner a complication is noted and properly treated, the lower the risk of permanent injury or death.
 
  +
[[Image:AGIAbortionReasonsBarChart.png|thumb|left|A [[bar chart]] depicting selected data from the 1998 [[Alan Guttmacher Institute|AGI]] [[meta-study]] on the reasons women stated for having an abortion.]]
   
  +
A 1998 aggregated study, from 27 countries, on the reasons women seek to terminate their pregnancies concluded that common factors cited to have influenced the abortion decision were: desire to delay or end [[childbirth|childbearing]], concern over the interruption of [[employment|work]] or [[education]], issues of financial or relationship stability, and perceived immaturity.<ref name="bankole98">Bankole, Akinrinola, Singh, Susheela, & Haas, Taylor. (1998). [http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/journals/2411798.html Reasons Why Women Have Induced Abortions: Evidence from 27 Countries]. ''International Family Planning Perspectives, 24 (3)'', 117-127 & 152. Retrieved 2006-01-18.</ref> A 2004 study in which American women at [[abortion clinic|clinics]] answered a [[questionnaire]] yielded similar results.<ref name="finer2005">Finer, Lawrence B., Frohwirth, Lori F., Dauphinee, Lindsay A., Singh, Shusheela, & Moore, Ann M. (2005). [http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/journals/3711005.pdf Reasons U.S. women have abortions: quantative and qualitative perspectives]. ''Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 37 (3),'' 110-8. Retrieved 2006-01-18.</ref> In Finland and the United States, concern for the health risks posed by pregnancy in individual cases was not a factor commonly given; however, in [[Bangladesh]], India, and [[Kenya]] health concerns were cited by women more frequently as reasons for having an abortion.<ref name="bankole98"/> 1% of women in the 2004 survey-based U.S. study became pregnant as a result of [[rape]] and 0.5% as a result of [[incest]].<ref name="finer2005"/> Another American study in 2002 concluded that 54% of women who had an abortion were using a form of [[birth control|contraception]] at the time of becoming pregnant while 46% were not. Inconsistent use was reported by 49% of those using [[condom]]s and 76% of those using the [[combined oral contraceptive pill]]; 42% of those using condoms reported failure through slipping or breakage.<ref>Jones, Rachel K., Darroch, Jacqueline E., Henshaw, Stanley K. (2002). [http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/journals/3429402.pdf Contraceptive Use Among U.S. Women Having Abortions in 2000–2001]. ''Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 34 (6).'' Retrieved June 15, 2006.</ref> The Guttmacher Institute estimated that "most abortions in the United States are obtained by minority women" because minority women "have much higher rates of unintended pregnancy."<ref>Susan A. Cohen: [http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/gpr/11/3/gpr110302.html ''Abortion and Women of Color: The Bigger Picture''], Guttmacher Policy Review, Summer 2008, Volume 11, Number 3</ref>
In rare cases, the abortion will be unsuccessful and the pregnancy will continue. An unsuccessful abortion can also result in the delivery of a live [[neonate]], or infant. This, termed a failed abortion, is more likely to occur if the procedure is carried out later in the pregnancy. Some doctors faced with this situation have voiced concerns about the ethical and legal ramifications of then letting the neonate die. As a result, recent investigations have been launched in the [[United Kingdom]] by the Confidential Enquiry into Maternal and Child Health (CEMACH) and the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, in order to determine how widespread the problem is and what an ethical response in the treatment of the infant might be. {{ref|failed}}
 
   
  +
Some abortions are undergone as the result of societal pressures. These might include the stigmatization of [[disabled]] persons, preference for children of a specific [[sex]], disapproval of [[single parent|single motherhood]], insufficient economic support for [[family|families]], lack of access to or rejection of contraceptive methods, or efforts toward [[population control]] (such as [[People's Republic of China|China's]] [[one-child policy]]). These factors can sometimes result in compulsory abortion or [[sex-selective abortion]].
Use of other methods (e.g., overdose of various drugs, insertion of various objects into [[uterus]]) for abortion is potentially dangerous, carrying a significantly elevated risk for permanent injury or death compared to abortions done by [[physician]]s.
 
   
  +
==History of abortion==
===Suggested effects===
 
  +
[[Image:FrenchPeriodicalPills-January61845,BostonDailyTimes.jpg|thumb|right|"French Periodical Pills." An example of a clandestine advertisement published in an 1845 edition of the ''Boston Daily Times''.]]
There is controversy over a number of proposed risks and effects of abortion. Evidence, whether in support of or against such claims, might in part be influenced by the political and religious beliefs of the parties behind it.
 
  +
{{main|History of abortion}}
  +
Induced abortion can be traced to ancient times.<ref name="devereux">{{cite book |last=Devereux |first=G. |chapter=A typological study of abortion in 350 primitive, ancient, and pre-industrial societies |chapterurl=http://www.popline.org/docs/671051 |accessdate=2008-12-02 |editor=Harold Rosen |title=Abortion in America; medical, psychiatric, legal, anthropological, and religious considerations |year=1967 |location=[[Boston]] |publisher=[[Beacon Press]] |oclc=187445}}</ref> There is evidence to suggest that, historically, pregnancies were terminated through a number of methods, including the administration of [[abortifacient]] herbs, the use of sharpened implements, the application of abdominal pressure, and other techniques.
   
  +
The [[Hippocratic Oath]], the chief statement of [[medical ethics]] for Hippocratic physicians in [[Ancient Greece]], forbade doctors from helping to procure an abortion by [[pessary]]. [[Soranus (Greek Physician)|Soranus]], a second-century Greek [[physician]], suggested in his work ''[[Gynaecology]]'' that women wishing to abort their pregnancies should engage in energetic exercise, energetic jumping, carrying heavy objects, and riding animals. He also prescribed a number of recipes for herbal baths, pessaries, and [[bloodletting]], but advised against the use of sharp instruments to induce miscarriage due to the risk of organ [[perforation]].<ref>{{cite book |first=Mary R. |last=Lefkowitz |authorlink=Mary Lefkowitz |coauthors=Maureen B. Fant |title=Women's life in Greece & Rome: a source book in translation |publisher=[[Johns Hopkins University Press]] |location=[[Baltimore]] |year=1992 |pages= |isbn=0-8018-4474-6 |oclc=25373320 |url=http://www.stoa.org/diotima/anthology/wlgr/ |accessdate=2008-12-02}}</ref> It is also believed that, in addition to using it as a [[contraceptive]], the ancient Greeks relied upon [[silphium]] as an [[abortifacient]]. Such folk remedies, however, varied in effectiveness and were not without risk. [[Tansy]] and [[pennyroyal]], for example, are two [[poison]]ous [[herbs]] with serious [[Adverse effect (medicine)|side effects]] that have at times been used to terminate pregnancy.
====Breast cancer====
 
{{main|Abortion-breast cancer hypothesis}}
 
   
  +
During the [[Islamic Golden Age|medieval period]], [[Medicine in medieval Islam|physicians in the Islamic world]] documented detailed and extensive lists of [[birth control]] practices, including the use of [[abortifacient]]s, commenting on their effectiveness and prevalence.<ref>{{citation|last=Sheikh|first=Sa'diyya|contribution=Family Planning, Contraception, and Abortion in Islam|editor-first=Daniel C.|editor-last=Maguire|title=Sacred Rights: The Case for Contraception and Abortion in World Religions|publisher=[[Oxford University Press]] US|year=2003|isbn=0195160010|pages=105–128 [105–6]}}</ref> They listed many different birth control substances in their medical encyclopedias, such as [[Avicenna]] listing 20 in ''[[The Canon of Medicine]]'' (1025) and [[Muhammad ibn Zakariya ar-Razi]] listing 176 in his ''Hawi'' (10th century). This was unparalleled in European medicine until the 19th century.<ref>{{citation|last=Sheikh|first=Sa'diyya|contribution=Family Planning, Contraception, and Abortion in Islam|editor-first=Daniel C.|editor-last=Maguire|title=Sacred Rights: The Case for Contraception and Abortion in World Religions|publisher=[[Oxford University Press]] US|year=2003|isbn=0195160010|pages=105–128 [115]}}</ref>
The ''abortion-breast cancer (ABC) hypothesis'' posits a [[causality| causal relationship]] between having an induced abortion and a higher risk of developing [[breast cancer]] in the future. An increased level of [[estrogen]] in early [[pregnancy]] helps to initiate [[cellular differentiation]] (growth) in the [[breast]] in preparation for [[lactation]]. If this process is terminated, through abortion, before full differentiation in the third [[trimester]], then more "vulnerable" undifferentiated cells will be left than there were prior to the pregnancy. It is proposed that this might result in an elevated risk of [[breast cancer]]. The majority of interview-based studies have indicated a link, and some have been demonstrated to be [[statistically significant]], {{ref|abc1}} but there remains debate as to their reliability because of possible [[response bias]].
 
   
  +
Abortion in the 19th century continued, despite bans in both the United Kingdom and the United States, as the disguised, but nonetheless open, advertisement of services in the [[Victorian era]] suggests.<ref>{{cite web |first=James |last=DeHullu |url=http://mysite.verizon.net/jdehullu/abortion/abhist.htm |accessdate=2008-12-02 |title=Histories of Abortion}}</ref>
Larger and more recent record-based studies, such as one in 1997 which used data from two national [[registry|registries]] in [[Denmark]], found the correlation to be negligible to non-existent after statistical adjustment. {{ref|abc2}} The [[National Cancer Institute]] conducted an official workshop with dozens of experts on the issue, between [[February 24]]-[[February 26]], [[2003]], which concluded from its examination of various evidence that it is "well established" that "induced abortion is not associated with an increase in breast cancer risk." {{ref|abc3}} These findings and how the Denmark study statistically adjusted their overall results have been disputed by [[Joel Brind|Dr. Joel Brind]], {{ref|abc4}} an invitee to the workshop and the leading scientific advocate of the abortion-breast cancer hypothesis. Nevertheless, gaps and inconsistencies remain in the research, and the subject continues to be one of political and scientific contention.
 
   
  +
In the 20th century the [[Soviet Union]] (1919), [[Iceland]] (1935) and Sweden (1938) were among the first countries to legalize certain or all forms of abortion.<ref name="cbctrust">{{cite web |url=http://web.archive.org/web/20080208053146/http://www.cbctrust.com/history_law_religion.php |title=Abortion Law, History & Religion |accessdate=2008-03-23 |work=Childbirth By Choice Trust}}</ref> In 1935 Nazi Germany, a law was passed permitting abortions for those deemed "hereditarily ill," while women considered of German stock were specifically prohibited from having abortions.<ref>{{cite book |last=Friedlander |first=Henry |authorlink=Henry Friedlander |title=The origins of Nazi genocide: from euthanasia to the final solution |publisher=University of North Carolina Press |location=Chapel Hill |year=1995 |page=[http://books.google.com/books?id=gqLDEKVk2nMC&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_summary_r&cad=0#PPA30,M1 30] |isbn=0-8078-4675-9 |oclc=60191622}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |first=Robert |last=Proctor |authorlink=Robert N. Proctor |title=Racial Hygiene: Medicine Under the Nazis |publisher=[[Harvard University Press]] |location=[[Cambridge, Massachusetts]] |year=1988 |pages=122, 123 and 366 |isbn=0-674-74578-7 |oclc=20760638}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |first=Margaret L. |last=Arnot |authorlink=Margaret McLean |coauthors=Cornelie Usborne |title=Gender and Crime in Modern Europe |publisher=Routledge |location=New York |year=1999 |page=231 |isbn=1-85728-745-2 |oclc=186748539}}</ref><ref>{{cite encyclopedia |last=DiMeglio |first=Peter M. |editor=Helen Tierney |encyclopedia=Women's studies encyclopedia |title=Germany 1933-1945 (National Socialism) |year=1999 |publisher=Greenwood Press |location=[[Westport, Connecticut]] |isbn=0-313-31072-6 |oclc=38504469 |pages=[http://books.google.com/books?id=gQLqRd7hJq0C&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_summary_r&cad=0#PPA589,M1 589]}}</ref>
====Fetal pain====
 
{{main|Fetal pain}}
 
   
  +
==Social issues==
The experience of the fetus during abortion is a matter of medical, ethical and public policy concern. Evidence is conflicting, with some authorities holding that the fetus is capable of feeling pain from the first [[trimester]], and others maintaining that the neuro-anatomical requirements for such experience do not exist until the second or third trimester.
 
  +
===Sex-selective abortion and female infanticide===
  +
{{Main|Sex-selective abortion and female infanticide}}
   
  +
[[Medical ultrasonography|Sonography]] and [[amniocentesis]] allows parents to determine [[sex]] before [[childbirth|birth]]. The development of this technology has lead [[sex-selective abortion and female infanticide|sex-selective abortion]], or the targeted termination of female [[fetus]]es.
[[Pain|Pain receptors]] begin to appear in the seventh week of pregnancy. The [[thalamus]], the part of the brain which receives signals from the [[nervous system]] and then relays them to the [[cerebral cortex]], starts to form in the fifth week. However, other anatomical structures involved in the [[pain|nociceptic]] process are not present until much later in gestation. Links between the thalamus and cerebral cortex aren't forged until around the 23rd week. {{ref|pain1}}
 
   
  +
It is suggested that sex-selective abortion might be partially responsible for the noticeable disparities between the [[birth rate]]s of male and female children in some places. The preference for male children is reported in many areas of Asia, and abortion used to limit female births has been reported in [[Mainland China]], [[Republic of China|Taiwan]], South Korea, and India.<ref>Banister, Judith. (1999-03-16). [http://www.census.gov/ipc/www/ebspr96a.html Son Preference in Asia - Report of a Symposium]. Retrieved 2006-01-12.</ref>
Researchers have observed changes in the heart rates and [[hormones| hormonal levels]] of newborn [[infants]] after [[circumcision]], [[blood tests]], and surgery — effects which were alleviated with the administration of [[anesthesia]]. {{ref|pain2}} Others suggest that the human experience of pain, being more than just physiological, cannot be measured in such [[reflexive]] responses.
 
   
  +
In India, the [[economic]] role of men, the costs associated with [[dowry|dowries]], and a [[Hindu]] tradition which dictates that [[funeral|funeral rites]] must be performed by a male relative have led to a [[culture|cultural]] preference for [[son]]s.<ref>Mutharayappa, Rangamuthia, Kim Choe, Minja, Arnold, Fred, & Roy, T.K. (1997). [http://www2.eastwestcenter.org/pop/misc/subj-3.pdf Son Preferences and Its Effect on Fertility in India]. ''National Family Health Survey Subject Reports, Number 3.'' Retrieved 2006-01-12.</ref> The widespread availability of diagnostic testing, during the 1970s and '80s, led to advertisements for services which read, "Invest 500 [[rupee]]s &#91;for a sex test&#93; now, save 50,000 rupees &#91;for a dowry&#93; later."<ref>{{cite journal |first=Rita |last=Patel |year=1996 |month=Fall |title=The practice of sex selective abortion in India: May you be the mother of a hundred sons |journal=Carolina Papers in International Health and Development |volume=7 |url=http://cgi.unc.edu/research/pdf/abortion.pdf |format=PDF|accessdate=2008-12-03}}</ref> In 1991, the male-to-female [[human sex ratio|sex ratio]] in India was skewed from its biological norm of 105 to 100, to an average of 108 to 100.<ref>{{cite journal |last=Sudha |first=S. |coauthors=S. Irudaya Rajan |year=1999 |month=July |title=Female Demographic Disadvantage in India 1981-1991: Sex Selective Abortions and Female Infanticide |journal=Development and Change |volume=30 |issue=3 |pages=585–618 |doi=10.1111/1467-7660.00130 |url=http://web.archive.org/web/20030101210623/http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/organizations/healthnet/gender/docs/sudha.html |accessdate=2008-12-03}}</ref> Researchers have asserted that between 1985 and 2005 as many as 10 million female fetuses may have been selectively aborted.<ref>{{cite news |first=Patricia |last=Reaney |publisher=[[Reuters]] |url=http://web.archive.org/web/20060220072756/http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/L06779563.htm |title=Selective abortion blamed for India's missing girls |accessdate=2008-12-03}}</ref> The Indian government passed an official ban of pre-natal sex screening in 1994 and moved to pass a complete ban of sex-selective abortion in 2002.<ref>{{cite journal |last=Mudur |first=Ganapati |year=2002 |title=India plans new legislation to prevent sex selection |journal=[[BMJ]] |volume=324 |issue=7334 |pages=385b |doi=10.1136/bmj.324.7334.385/b}}</ref>
====Mental health====
 
Some women will experience negative feelings as a result of elective abortion. However, whether this phenomenon is significant enough to warrant a general diagnosis, or even classification as an independent syndrome (see [[post-abortion syndrome]]), is a subject that is debated among members of the medical community.
 
   
  +
In the People's Republic of China, there is also a historic son preference. The implementation of the [[one-child policy]] in 1979, in response to population concerns, led to an increased disparity in the sex ratio as parents attempted to circumvent the law through sex-selective abortion or the abandonment of unwanted daughters.<ref>{{cite journal |first=Maureen J. |last=Graham |coauthors=Ulla Larsen and Xiping Xu |year=1998 |month=June |title=Son Preference in Anhui Province, China |journal=International Family Planning Perspectives |volume=24 |issue=2 |url=http://www.agi-usa.org/pubs/journals/2407298.html |accessdate=2008-12-03 |doi=10.2307/2991929 |pages=72}}</ref> Sex-selective abortion might be an influence on the shift from the baseline male-to-female birth rate to an elevated national rate of 117:100 reported in 2002. The trend was more pronounced in rural regions: as high as 130:100 in [[Guangdong]] and 135:100 in [[Hainan]].<ref>{{cite journal |last=Plafker |first=Ted |year=2002 |month=May |title=Sex selection in China sees 117 boys born for every 100 girls |journal=[[BMJ]] |volume=324 |issue=7348 |pages=1233a |doi=10.1136/bmj.324.7348.1233/a |pmid=12028966}}</ref> A ban upon the practice of sex-selective abortion was enacted in 2003.<ref>"[http://www.china.org.cn/english/2003/Mar/59194.htm China Bans Sex-selection Abortion]." (2002-03-22). ''Xinhua News Agency.'' Retrieved 2006-01-12.</ref>
Data on the incidence of [[clinical depression]], [[mental illness]], [[post-traumatic stress disorder]], and suicide in association with abortion remain inconclusive. {{ref|mental1}} A comparative analysis of the suicide rates among [[postnatal| postpartum]] and post-abortive women in [[Finland]] found a [[statistics| statistical]] correlation between abortion and suicide. {{ref|mental2}}
 
   
  +
===Unsafe abortion===
Other studies have suggested a link between the elective termination of an unwanted [[pregnancy]] and an improvement in reported mental well-being. {{ref|mental3}} Elective abortion may reduce the occurrence of depression in cases of unwanted pregnancy, as compared to cases in which the pregnancy has been carried to completion, but it is also sometimes reported as an additional [[stressor]] ([[ibid.]]). The majority of evidence would seem to indicate that adverse emotional reactions to the procedure are most strongly influenced by pre-existing [[psychology| psychological]] conditions and other negative factors ([[ibid.]]).
 
  +
[[Image:RussianAbortionPoster.jpg|thumb|left|[[Soviet Union|Soviet]] [[Propaganda|poster]] circa 1925, promoting hospital abortions. Title translation: "Abortions performed by either trained or self-taught midwives not only maim the woman, they also often lead to death."]]
  +
{{main|Unsafe abortion}}
  +
Women seeking to terminate their pregnancies sometimes resort to unsafe methods, particularly where and when access to legal abortion is being barred.
   
  +
The [[World Health Organization]] (WHO) defines an unsafe abortion as being "a procedure...carried out by persons lacking the necessary skills or in an environment that does not conform to minimal medical standards, or both."<ref name="whounsafe"/> Unsafe abortions are sometimes known colloquially as "back-alley" abortions. This can include a person without medical training, a professional health provider operating in sub-standard conditions, or [[self-induced abortion|the woman herself]].
Spontaneous abortion, or [[miscarriage]], is known to present an increased risk of [[depression]] in women. {{ref|mental4}}
 
   
  +
Unsafe abortion remains a [[public health]] concern today due to the higher incidence and severity of its associated complications, such as incomplete abortion, [[sepsis]], [[hemorrhage]], and damage to internal organs. WHO estimates that 19 million unsafe abortions occur around the world annually and that 68,000 of these result in the woman's death.<ref name="whounsafe">World Health Organization. (2004). [http://www.who.int/reproductive-health/publications/unsafeabortion_2000/estimates.pdf "Unsafe abortion: global and regional estimates of unsafe abortion and associated mortality in 2000"]. Retrieved 2009-03-22.</ref> Complications of unsafe abortion are said to account, globally, for approximately 13% of all [[maternal death|maternal mortalities]], with regional estimates including 12% in Asia, 25% in [[Latin America]], and 13% in [[sub-Saharan Africa]].<ref>Salter, C., Johnson, H.B., and Hengen, N. (1997). [http://www.infoforhealth.org/pr/l10edsum.shtml Care for post abortion complications: saving women's lives]. ''Population Reports, 25 (1).'' Retrieved 2006-02-22.</ref> A 2007 study published in the ''[[The Lancet]]'' found that, although the global rate of abortion declined from 45.6 million in 1995 to 41.6 million in 2003, unsafe procedures still accounted for 48% of all abortions performed in 2003..<ref name="Worldwide">{{cite journal |first=Gilda |last=Sedgh |coauthors=Stanley Henshaw, Susheela Singh, Elisabeth Åhman and Iqbal H. Shah |year=2007 |month=October |title=Induced abortion: estimated rates and trends worldwide |journal=[[The Lancet]] |volume=370 |issue=9595 |pages=1338–1345 |doi=10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61575-X |pmid=17933648 |url=http://media.mcclatchydc.com/smedia/2007/10/17/13/Chang-Guttmacher_Institute_abortion_report.source.prod_affiliate.91.pdf |format=PDF|accessdate=2008-12-02}}</ref>
==History of abortion==
 
  +
[[Health education]], access to [[family planning]], and improvements in [[health care]] during and after abortion have been proposed to address this phenomenon.<ref>World Health Organization. (1998). [http://www.who.int/docstore/world-health-day/en/pages1998/whd98_10.html Address Unsafe Abortion]. Retrieved 2006-03-01.</ref>
{{main|History of abortion}}
 
   
  +
==Abortion debate==
[[Image:TansyPills.jpg|thumb|right|90px|Bottom-most: "Dr. Caton's Tansy Pills!" An example of a clandestine advertisement.]]
 
  +
{{Refimprovesect|date=November 2008}}
  +
[[Image:March for Women's Lives detail.jpg|thumb|right|Pro-choice activists near the [[Washington Monument]] at the [[March for Women's Lives]].]]
  +
[[Image:March for life 2007.JPG|thumb|right|Pro-life activists at the [[March for Life]] in 2007. The rally is held annually in [[Washington, DC]].]]
  +
<!-- Deleted image removed: [[Image:P1020321.JPG|thumb|right|Pro-life activists at the [[March for Life]] in 2008. The rally is held annually in [[Washington, DC]].]] -->
  +
{{main|Abortion debate|Pro-choice|Pro-life}}
  +
In the [[history of abortion]], induced abortion has been the source of considerable [[debate]], [[controversy]], and [[activism]]. An [[opinion|individual's position]] on the complex [[ethical]], [[moral]], [[philosophical]], [[Biology|biological]], and [[legal]] issues is often related to his or her [[value system]]. The main positions are the [[pro-choice]] position, which argues in favor of access to abortion, and the [[pro-life]] position, which argues against access to abortion. Opinions of abortion may be best described as being a combination of beliefs on its morality, and beliefs on the responsibility, ethical scope, and proper extent of [[government]]al [[authority|authorities]] in [[Policy|public policy]]. [[religion|Religious ethics]] also has an influence upon both personal opinion and the greater debate over abortion (see [[religion and abortion]]).
   
  +
Abortion debates, especially pertaining to [[abortion law]]s, are often spearheaded by [[advocacy|advocacy groups]] belonging to one of two camps. In the United States, most often those in favor of greater legal restrictions on, or even complete prohibition of abortion, describe themselves as [[pro-life]] while those against legal restrictions on abortion describe themselves as [[pro-choice]]. Generally, the pro-life position argues that a human fetus is a [[human being]] with the [[right to life|right to live]] making abortion tantamount to [[murder]]. The pro-choice position argues that a woman has certain [[reproductive rights]], especially the choice whether or not to carry a pregnancy to term.
The practice of induced abortion, according to some [[anthropologists]], can be traced to ancient times. There is evidence to suggest that, historically, pregnancies were terminated through a number of methods, including the administration of [[abortifacient]] herbs, the use of sharpened implements, the application of abdominal pressure, and other techniques.
 
   
  +
In both public and private debate, arguments presented in favor of or against abortion focus on either the moral permissibility of an induced abortion, or justification of [[laws]] permitting or restricting abortion.
[[Soranus]], a 2nd century [[Ancient Greece|Greek]] [[physician]], suggested in his work ''[[Gynecology]]'' that women wishing to abort their pregnancies should engage in violent exercise, energetic jumping, carrying heavy objects, and riding animals. He also prescribed a number of recipes for herbal bathes, [[pessary| pessaries]], and [[bloodletting]], but advised against the use of sharp instruments to induce miscarriage due to the risk of organ [[perforation]]. {{ref|history1}} It is also known that the ancient Greeks relied upon the herb [[silphium]] as both a [[contraceptive]] and an [[abortifacient]]. The plant, as the chief export of [[Cyrene]], was driven to [[extinction]], but it is suggested that it might have possessed the same abortive properties as some of its closest extant relatives in the [[Apiaceae|Apiaceae family]].
 
   
  +
Debate also focuses on whether the [[pregnancy|pregnant]] woman should have to notify and/or have the [[consent]] of others in distinct cases: a [[minor (law)|minor]], her parents; a [[marriage|legally married]] or [[common-law marriage|common-law]] wife, her husband; or a pregnant woman, the biological father. In a 2003 Gallup poll in the United States, 79% of male and 67% of female respondents were in favor of spousal notification; overall support was 72% with 26% opposed.<ref>The Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. (2005-11-02). "[http://people-press.org/commentary/display.php3?AnalysisID=122 Public Opinion Supports Alito on Spousal Notification Even as It Favors Roe v. Wade]." ''Pew Research Center Pollwatch.'' Retrieved 2006-03-01.</ref>
Such folk remedies, however, varied in effectiveness and were not without risk. [[Tansy]] and [[pennyroyal]], for example, are two [[poison|poisonous]] [[herbs]] with serious [[Adverse effect (medicine)|side effects]] that have at times been used to terminate pregnancy.
 
   
  +
===Public opinion===
[[19th-century]] [[medicine]] saw advances in the fields of [[surgery]], [[anaesthesia]], and [[sanitation]], in the same era that doctors with the [[American Medical Association]] lobbied for bans on abortion in [[The United States]] and the [[British Parliament]] passed the Offences Against the Person Act. Demand for the procedure continued, however, as the disguised, but nonetheless open, advertisement of abortion services in Victorian times would seem to suggest. {{ref|history2}}
 
  +
{{Main|Societal attitudes towards abortion}}
   
  +
A number of [[opinion poll]]s around the world have explored [[public opinion]] regarding the issue of abortion. Results have varied from poll to poll, country to country, and region to region, while varying with regard to different aspects of the issue.
==Social issues==
 
A number of of complex issues exist in the debate over abortion. These, like the suggested effects upon health listed above, are a focus of research and a fixture of discussion among members on all sides the controversy.
 
   
  +
A May 2005 survey examined attitudes toward abortion in 10 European countries, asking polltakers whether they agreed with the statement, "If a woman doesn't want children, she should be allowed to have an abortion". The highest level of approval was 81% (in the Czech Republic); the lowest was 47% (in Poland).<ref>TNS Sofres. (May 2005). [http://www.thebrusselsconnection.be/tbc/upload/attachments/European%20Values%20Overall%20EN.pdf European Values]. Retrieved January 11, 2007.</ref>
===Effect upon crime rate===
 
{{Main|legalized abortion and crime effect}}
 
   
  +
In North America, a December 2001 poll surveyed [[Abortion in Canada#Opinion polls|Canadian opinion on abortion]], asking [[Canada|Canadians]] in what circumstances they believe abortion should be permitted; 32% responded that they believe abortion should be legal in all circumstances, 52% that it should be legal in certain circumstances, and 14% that it should be legal in no circumstances. A similar poll in January 2006 surveyed people in the United States about [[Abortion in the United States#Public Opinion|U.S. opinion on abortion]]; 33% said that abortion should be "permitted only in cases such as rape, incest or to save the woman's life", 27% said that abortion should be "permitted in all cases", 15% that it should be "permitted, but subject to greater restrictions than it is now", 17% said that it should "only be permitted to save the woman's life", and 5% said that it should "never" be permitted.<ref>''[http://www.pollingreport.com/abortion.htm The Polling Report].'' (2006). Retrieved 2006-01-11.</ref> A November 2005 poll in Mexico found that 73.4% think abortion should not be legalized while 11.2% think it should.<ref>{{cite web |title=Mexicans Support Status Quo on Social Issues |publisher=[[Angus Reid Global Monitor]] |date=2005-12-01 |url=http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/view/10042 |accessdate=2008-12-09}}</ref>
A controversial theory attempts to draw a [[correlation]] between the unprecedented nationwide decline of the overall [[crime rate]] witnessed in the [[United States]] during the 1990s and the decriminalization of abortion 20 years prior.
 
   
  +
Of attitudes in [[South America]], a December 2003 survey found that 30% of [[Argentina|Argentines]] thought that [[abortion in Argentina]] should be allowed "regardless of situation", 47% that it should be allowed "under some circumstances", and 23% that it should not be allowed "regardless of situation".<ref>{{cite web |title=Argentines Assess Abortion Changes |publisher=[[Angus Reid Global Monitor]] |date=2004-03-04 |url=http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/view/2029 |accessdate=2008-12-09}}</ref> A March 2007 poll regarding the [[Abortion in Brazil|abortion law in Brazil]] found that 65% of [[Brazil]]ians believe that it "should not be modified", 16% that it should be expanded "to allow abortion in other cases", 10% that abortion should be "decriminalized", and 5% were "not sure".<ref>{{cite web |title=Brazilians Want to Keep Abortion as Crime |publisher=[[Angus Reid Global Monitor]] |date=2007-04-12 |url=http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/view/15370 |accessdate=2008-12-09}}</ref> A July 2005 poll in [[Colombia]] found that 65.6% said they thought that abortion should remain illegal, 26.9% that it should be made legal, and 7.5% that they were unsure.<ref>{{cite web |title=Colombians Reject Legalizing Abortion |publisher=[[Angus Reid Global Monitor]] |date=2005-08-02 |url=http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/view/8333 |accessdate=2008-12-09}}</ref>
The suggestion was brought to widespread attention by a 1999 [[academic paper]], ''[[The Impact of Legalized Abortion on Crime]]'', authored by the [[economist]]s [[Steven Levitt| Steven D. Levitt]] and [[John Donohue]]. They attributed the drop in crime to a reduction in individuals said to have a higher statistical probability of committing crimes: unwanted children, especially those born to mothers who are [[African-American]], [[poverty| impoverished]], [[teenage pregnancy|adolescent]], [[education|uneducated]], and [[single parent|single]]. The change coincided with what would've been the adolescence, or peak years of potential criminality, of those who had not been born as a result of ''[[Roe v. Wade]]'' and similar cases. Donohue and Levitt's study also noted that states which legalized abortion before the rest of the nation experienced the lowering crime rate pattern earlier and that those with higher abortion rates had more pronounced reductions. {{ref|crimerate1}}
 
   
  +
===Selected issues of the abortion debate===
Fellow economists [[Christopher Foote]] and [[Christopher Goetz]] criticized the [[methodology]] in the Donahue-Levitt study, noting a lack of accommodation for statewide yearly variations such as [[cocaine]] use, and recalculating based on incidence of crime [[per capita]]; they found no [[statistically significant|statistically significant]] results. {{ref|crimerate2}} Levitt and Donohue responded to this by presenting an adjusted [[data set]] which took into account these concerns but, they claim, maintained the statistical significance of their initial paper. {{ref|crimerate3}}
 
  +
====Breast cancer hypothesis====
  +
{{main|Abortion-breast cancer hypothesis}}
  +
The abortion-breast cancer hypothesis (supporters call it the abortion-breast cancer link) posits that induced abortion increases the risk of developing [[breast cancer]];<ref name="RUSSO_505">{{cite journal |author=Russo J, Russo I |title=Susceptibility of the mammary gland to carcinogenesis. II. Pregnancy interruption as a risk factor in tumor incidence |journal=Am J Pathol |volume=100 |issue=2 |pages=505–506 |year=1980 |pmid=6773421 |quote=In contrast, abortion is associated with increased risk of carcinomas of the breast. The explanation for these epidemiologic findings is not known, but the parallelism between the DMBA-induced rat mammary carcinoma model and the human situation is striking. …Abortion would interrupt this process, leaving in the gland undifferentiated structures like those observed in the rat mammary gland, which could render the gland again susceptible to carcinogenesis.}}</ref> it has been a controversial subject but the current [[scientific consensus]] has concluded that there is no significant association between first-trimester abortion and breast cancer risk.<ref name="WHO">{{cite web |url=http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs240/en/index.html |title=Induced abortion does not increase breast cancer risk |year=2000 |month=June |accessdate=2007-12-24 |format= |publisher=[[World Health Organization]]}}</ref><ref name="rcog_2000">{{cite book |title=The Care of Women Requesting Induced Abortion |origyear=2000 |url=http://www.rcog.org.uk/resources/Public/pdf/induced_abortionfull.pdf |format=PDF|accessdate=2008-12-05 |series=Evidence-based Clinical Guideline Number 7 |year=2004 |month=September |publisher=[[Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists]] |isbn=1-904752-06-3 |oclc=263585758 |page=43 |author=[[Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists]]}}</ref><ref name="oversight">{{cite web |url=http://oversight.house.gov/features/politics_and_science/example_breast_cancer.htm |title=Breast Cancer Risks |accessdate=2008-04-14 |publisher=[[United States House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform]]}}</ref><ref name="JASEN">{{cite journal |author=Koba S, Nowak S |title=[A case of acute bacterial dysentery with cerebrospinal meningitis] |language=Polish |journal=Wiadomości lekarskie |volume=29 |issue=3 |pages=221–3 |year=1976 |month=February |pmid=1251638 |doi= |url= |accessdate=2008-12-05 |issn=0043-5147}}</ref>
   
  +
In early [[pregnancy]], levels of [[estrogen]] increase, leading to [[breast]] growth in preparation for [[lactation]]. The hypothesis proposes that if this process is interrupted by an abortion{{ndash}} before full maturity in the third [[trimester]]{{ndash}} then more relatively vulnerable immature cells could be left than there were prior to the pregnancy, resulting in a greater potential risk of breast cancer. The hypothesis mechanism was first proposed and explored in [[rat]] studies conducted in the 1980s.<ref name="RUSSO">{{cite journal |author=Russo J, Russo IH |title=Susceptibility of the mammary gland to carcinogenesis. II. Pregnancy interruption as a risk factor in tumor incidence |journal=Am. J. Pathol. |volume=100 |issue=2 |pages=497–512 |year=1980 |month=August |pmid=6773421 |pmc=1903536 |doi= |url= |accessdate=2008-12-05}}</ref><ref name="RUSSO2">{{cite journal |author=Russo J, Tay L, Russo I |title=Differentiation of the mammary gland and susceptibility to carcinogenesis |journal=Breast Cancer Research and Treatment |volume=2 |issue=1 |pages=5–73 |year=1982 |pmid=6216933 |doi=10.1007/BF01805718}}</ref><ref name="RUSSO3">{{cite journal |author=Russo J, Russo I |title=Biological and molecular bases of mammary carcinogenesis |journal=Laboratory Investigation |volume=57 |issue=2 |pages=112–37 |year=1987 |pmid=3302534 |issn=0023-6837}}</ref>
Such research has been criticized by some as being [[utilitarian]], [[discrimination|discriminatory]] as to [[race]] and [[social class|socioeconomic class]], and as promoting [[eugenic]]s as a solution to [[crime]]. {{ref|crimerate4}} {{ref|crimerate5}} Levitt states in his book, ''[[Freakonomics]]'', that they are neither promoting nor negating any course of action &ndash; merely reporting data as economists.
 
   
===Sex-selective abortion===
+
====Fetal pain debate====
{{Main|sex-selective abortion and infanticide}}
+
{{Main | Fetal pain}}
  +
Fetal pain, its existence, and its implications are part of a larger debate about abortion. Many researchers in the area of fetal development believe that a fetus is unlikely to feel pain until after the seventh month of pregnancy. Others disagree.<ref name="MSNBC pain">[http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9053416/ "Study: Fetus feels no pain until third trimester"], Associated Press via MSNBC (2005-08-24). Retrieved 2008-04-13.</ref><ref Developmental [[neurobiology|neurobiologists]] suspect that the establishment of [[Human thalamus|thalamocortical]] connections (at about 26 weeks) may be critical to fetal perception of pain.<ref name="Johnson">Johnson, Martin and Everitt, Barry. ''[http://books.google.com/books?vid=ISBN0632042877&id=MzZRuSQ5UeEC&pg=PA215&lpg=PA215&ots=cx0KcmuOYk&dq=%22emerging+consensus+among+developmental+neurobiologists+that+the+establishment+%22&num=100&sig=8I9DY9KPpuSPNYvGI3sEV2bmKsA Essential reproduction]'' Retrieved 2007-02-21.</ref> However, legislation has been proposed by [[pro-life]] advocates requiring abortion providers to tell a woman that the fetus may feel pain during an abortion procedure.<ref>Weisman, Jonathan. "[http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/12/04/AR2006120401089.html House to Consider Abortion Anesthesia Bill]", ''Washington Post'' 2006-12-05. Retrieved 2007-02-06.</ref>
   
  +
A review by researchers from the [[University of California, San Francisco]] in ''[[Journal of the American Medical Association|JAMA]]'' concluded that data from dozens of medical reports and studies indicate that fetuses are unlikely to feel pain until the [[third trimester]] of pregnancy.<ref>{{cite journal |author=Lee SJ, Ralston HJ, Drey EA, Partridge JC, Rosen MA |title=Fetal pain: a systematic multidisciplinary review of the evidence |journal=JAMA |volume=294 |issue=8 |pages=947–54 |year=2005 |pmid=16118385 |doi=10.1001/jama.294.8.947 |doi_brokendate=2009-04-04}}</ref> However a number of medical critics have since disputed these conclusions.<ref name="MSNBC pain" /> <ref>{{cite journal |author=Lowery CL, Hardman MP, Manning N, Hall RW, Anand KJS |title=Neurodevelopmental Changes of Fetal Pain|journal=Seminars in Perinatology |volume=31 |issue=5 |pages=275–82 |year=2007 |url=http://www.seminperinat.com/article/PIIS0146000507000687/fulltext |doi=10.1053/j.semperi.2007.07.004}}</ref> At the end of the 20th century there was an emerging consensus among developmental [[neurobiology|neurobiologists]] that the establishment of [[Human thalamus|thalamocortical]] connections (at about 26 weeks) is a critical event with regard to fetal perception of pain.<ref>Johnson, Martin and Everitt, Barry. ''[http://books.google.com/books?vid=ISBN0632042877&id=MzZRuSQ5UeEC&pg=PA215&lpg=PA215&ots=cx0KcmuOYk&dq=%22emerging+consensus+among+developmental+neurobiologists+that+the+establishment+%22&num=100&sig=8I9DY9KPpuSPNYvGI3sEV2bmKsA Essential reproduction]'' (Blackwell 2000), p. 215. Retrieved 2007-02-21.</ref> Other researchers such as Anand and Fisk have challenged this late date, positing that pain can be felt around 20 weeks.<ref name="NYT pain">Paul, Annie. "[http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/10/magazine/10Fetal-t.html The First Ache]", ''New York Times'' 2008-02-10. Retrieved 2009-03-21.</ref> Because pain can involve sensory, emotional and cognitive factors, it may be "impossible to know" when painful experiences are perceived, even if it is known when thalamocortical connections are established.<ref>Johnson, Martin and Everitt, Barry. ''[http://books.google.com/books?vid=ISBN0632042877&id=MzZRuSQ5UeEC&pg=PA215&lpg=PA215&ots=cx0KcmuOYk&dq=%22emerging+consensus+among+developmental+neurobiologists+that+the+establishment+%22&num=100&sig=8I9DY9KPpuSPNYvGI3sEV2bmKsA Essential reproduction]'' (Blackwell 2000): ''"The multidimensionality of pain perception, involving sensory, emotional, and cognitive factors may in itself be the basis of conscious, painful experience, but it will remain difficult to attribute this to a fetus at any particular developmental age."'' Retrieved 2007-02-21.</ref>
The advent of both [[ultrasound]] and [[amniocentesis]] has allowed [[parent]]s to determine [[sex]] before [[childbirth|birth]]. This has lead to the occurrence of [[sex-selective abortion and infanticide|sex-selective abortion]] or the targeted termination of a [[fetus]] based upon its gender.
 
   
  +
====Effect upon crime rate====
It is suggested that sex-selective abortion might be partially responsible for the noticeable disparities between the [[birth rate]]s of [[male]] and [[female]] children in some places. The preference for male children is reported in many areas of [[Asia]], and the use of abortion to limit female births has been reported in [[Mainland China]], [[Taiwan]], [[South Korea]], and [[India]]. {{ref|sexselective1}}
 
  +
{{Main|Legalized abortion and crime effect}}
   
  +
A theory attempts to draw a [[correlation]] between the United States' unprecedented nationwide decline of the overall [[crime rate]] during the 1990s and the decriminalization of abortion 20 years prior.
In [[India]], the [[economic]] role of [[men]], the costs associated with [[dowry| dowries]], and a [[Hindu]] tradition which dictates that [[funeral|funeral rites]] must be performed by a male relative have lead to a [[culture| cultural]] preference for [[son]]s. {{ref|sexselective2}} The widespread availability of diagnostic testing, during the 1970s and '80s, lead to advertisements for services which read, "Invest 500 [[rupee]]s [for a sex test] now, save 50,000 rupees [for a dowry] later." {{ref|sexselective3}} In 1991, the male-to-female [[sex ratio]] in India was skewed from its biological norm of 105 to 100, to an average of 108 to 100. {{ref|sexselective4}} Researchers have asserted that between 1985 and 2005 as many as 10 million female fetuses may have been selectively aborted. {{ref|india1}} The Indian government passed an official ban of pre-natal sex screening in 1994 and moved to pass a complete ban of sex-selective abortion in 2002. {{ref|sexselective5}}
 
   
  +
The suggestion was brought to widespread attention by a 1999 [[academic paper]], ''[[The Impact of Legalized Abortion on Crime]]'', authored by the [[economist]]s [[Steven Levitt|Steven D. Levitt]] and John Donohue. They attributed the drop in crime to a reduction in individuals said to have a higher statistical probability of committing crimes: unwanted children, especially those born to mothers who are [[African-American]], [[poverty|impoverished]], [[teenage pregnancy|adolescent]], [[education|uneducated]], and [[single parent|single]]. The change coincided with what would have been the adolescence, or peak years of potential criminality, of those who had not been born as a result of ''[[Roe v. Wade]]'' and similar cases. Donohue and Levitt's study also noted that states which legalized abortion before the rest of the nation experienced the lowering crime rate pattern earlier, and those with higher abortion rates had more pronounced reductions.<ref>{{cite journal |first=John J. |last=Donohue |coauthors=[[Steven Levitt]] |year=2001 |month=May |title=[[The Impact of Legalized Abortion on Crime]] |journal=[[Quarterly Journal of Economics]] |volume=116 |issue=2 |pages=379–420 |doi=10.1162/00335530151144050 |accessdate=2008-12-06}}</ref>
In the [[People's Republic of China]], there is also a historic son preference. The implementation of the [[one-child policy]] in 1979, in response to population concerns, lead to an increased disparities in the sex ratio as parents attempted to circumvent the law through sex-selective abortion or the abandonment of unwanted [[daughter]]s. {{ref|sexselective6}} Sex-selective abortion might be a part of what is behind the shift from the baseline male-to-female birth rate to an elevated national rate of 117:100 reported in 2002. The trend was more pronounced in rural regions: as high as 130:100 in [[Guangdong]] and 135:100 in [[Hainan]]. {{ref|sexselective7}} A ban upon the practice of sex-selective abortion was enacted in 2003. {{ref|sexselective8}}
 
   
  +
Fellow economists Christopher Foote and Christopher Goetz criticized the [[methodology]] in the Donohue-Levitt study, noting a lack of accommodation for statewide yearly variations such as [[cocaine]] use, and recalculating based on incidence of crime [[per capita]]; they found no [[statistically significant]] results.<ref>{{cite journal |last=Foote |first=Christopher L. |year=2008 |month=February |title=The Impact of Legalized Abortion on Crime: Comment |journal=[[Quarterly Journal of Economics]] |volume=123 |issue=1 |pages=407–423 |doi=10.1162/qjec.2008.123.1.407 |accessdate=2008-12-06}}</ref> Levitt and Donohue responded to this by presenting an adjusted [[data set]] which took into account these concerns and reported that the data maintained the statistical significance of their initial paper.<ref>{{cite journal |last=Donohue |first=John J. |year=2008 |month=February |title=Measurement Error, Legalized Abortion, and the Decline in Crime: A Response to Foote and Goetz |journal=[[Quarterly Journal of Economics]] |volume=123 |issue=1 |pages=425–440 |doi=10.1162/qjec.2008.123.1.425 |accessdate=2008-12-06}}</ref>
===Unsafe abortion===
 
{{main|Unsafe abortions}}
 
   
  +
Such research has been criticized by some as being [[Utilitarianism|utilitarian]], [[discrimination|discriminatory]] as to [[Race (classification of human beings)|race]] and [[social class|socioeconomic class]], and as promoting [[eugenic]]s as a solution to [[crime]].<ref>{{cite web |title=Crime-Abortion Study Continues to Draw Pro-life Backlash |date=1999-08-11 |publisher=The Pro-Life Infonet |url=http://ohioroundtable.org/library/articles/life/crimeabortion.html |work=Ohio Roundtable Online Library |accessdate=2008-12-06}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |author=J.B.F. |url=http://www.americancatholic.org/Messenger/Jan2000/Editorial.asp |title=Abortion and the Lower Crime Rate |year=2000 |month=January |work=St. Anthony Messenger |accessdate=2008-12-06}}</ref> Levitt states in his book ''[[Freakonomics]]'' that they are neither promoting nor negating any course of action&mdash;merely reporting data as economists.
Where and when access to safe abortion has been barred, due to explicit sanctions or general unavailability, women seeking to terminate their pregnancies have sometimes resorted to unsafe methods.
 
   
  +
===Mexico City Policy===
"[[Back-alley abortion]]" is a [[slang]] term for any abortion not practiced under ideal conditions of [[sanitation]] and [[professional| professionalism]]. The [[World Health Organization]] defines an unsafe abortion as being, "a procedure...carried out by persons lacking the necessary skills or in an environment that does not conform to minimal medical standards, or both." {{ref|unsafe1}} This can include a person without medical training, a professional health provider operating in sub-standard conditions, or the woman herself.
 
  +
{{Main|Mexico City Policy}}
  +
The Mexico City policy, also known as the "Global Gag Rule" required any [[non-governmental organization]] receiving US Government funding to refrain from performing or promoting abortion services in other countries. This had a significant effect on the health policies of many nations across the globe. The Mexico City Policy was instituted under [[Ronald Reagan|President Reagan]], suspended under [[Bill Clinton|President Clinton]], reinstated by [[George W. Bush|President George W. Bush]],<ref>{{cite book |title=Reproductive Rights in a Global Context |last= Knudsen |first=Lara |authorlink= |coauthors= |year=2006 |publisher= Vanderbilt University Press |location= |isbn=0826515282, 9780826515285 |page=7 |url=http://books.google.com/books?id=b3thCcdyScsC&dq=reproductive+rights&source=gbs_summary_s&cad=0 }}</ref> and suspended again by [[Barack Obama|President Barack Obama]] on January 24, 2009. <ref>{{cite web |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7847651.stm |title=Obama lifts ban on abortion funds |accessdate=2009-01-24 |work= |publisher=BBC News |date=2009-01-24 }}</ref>
   
  +
===Religious Views===
Unsafe abortion remains a [[public health]] concern today due to the higher incidence and severity of its associated complications, such as incomplete abortion, [[sepsis]], [[hemorrhage]], and damage to internal organs. WHO estimates that 19 million unsafe abortions occur around the world annually and that 68,000 of these result in the death of a woman. {{ref|unsafe1}} Complications of unsafe abortion are said to account, globally, for approximately 13% of all [[maternal death|maternal mortalities]], with regional estimates including 12% in [[Asia]], 25% in [[Latin America]], and 13% in [[sub-Saharan Africa]]. {{ref|unsafe2}} [[Health education]], access to [[family planning]], and improvements in [[healthcare]] during and after abortion have been proposed to address this phenomenon. {{ref|unsafe3}}
 
  +
{{main|Religion and abortion}}
   
==Abortion debate==
+
==Abortion law==
  +
{{main|Abortion law|History of abortion law}}
[[Image:Prolife-DC.JPG|thumb|right|240px||Pro-life activists in Washington, DC stage a silent demonstration before the Supreme Court.]]
 
  +
{{see also|Reproductive rights}}
{{main|abortion debate}}
 
  +
[[File:AbortionLawsMap-NoLegend.png|thumb|right|250px|International status of abortion law: {{legend|#3f9bbb|Legal on request}} {{legend|#d4df5a|Legal for rape, maternal life, health, mental health, socioeconomic factors, and/or fetal defects}} {{legend|#64513B|Legal for or illegal with exception for rape, maternal life, health, fetal defects, and/or mental health}} {{legend|#FA7014|Illegal with exception for rape, maternal life, health, and/or mental health}} {{legend|#cc7662|Illegal with exception for maternal life, health, and/or mental health}} {{legend|#3236D3|Illegal with no exceptions}}
  +
{{legend|#2F2F2F|Varies by region}}
  +
{{legend|#B3B3B3|No information}}
  +
Vertical stripes (various colours): Illegal but unenforced]]
   
  +
Before the scientific discovery in the nineteenth century that human development begins at [[human fertilization|fertilization]],<ref>Garrison, Fielding. [http://books.google.com/books?id=JvoIAAAAIAAJ&pg=PA567&dq=fetilization+was+discovered+hertwig&num=100&ei=nQiGSYDYGouiyATyvuSnDQ#PPA567,M1 An Introduction to the History of Medicine,] pages 566-567 (Saunders 1921).</ref> [[English common law]] forbade abortions after "[[quickening]]”, that is, after “an infant is able to stir in the mother's womb.”<ref>{{cite book |first=William |last=Blackstone |authorlink=William Blackstone |chapter=Amendment IX, Document 1 |chapterurl=http://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/documents/amendIXs1.html |title=[[Commentaries on the Laws of England]] |origyear=1765 |year=1979 |publisher=University of Chicago Press |location=Chicago |volume=5 |page=388}}</ref> There was also an earlier period in England when abortion was prohibited "if the foetus is already formed" but not yet quickened.<ref>{{cite book |author=[[Henry de Bracton]] |chapter=The crime of homicide and the divisions into which it falls |editor=George E. Woodbine ed.; Samuel Edmund Thorne trans. |title=On the Laws and Customs of England |origyear={{circa|1250}} |year=1968 |accessdate=2008-12-11 |volume=2 |page=[http://hlsl5.law.harvard.edu/bracton/Unframed/English/v2/341.htm 341] |oclc=1872}}</ref> Both pre- and post-quickening abortions were criminalized by ''[[Lord Ellenborough's Act]]'' in 1803.<ref>[http://web.archive.org/web/20070918233015/http://members.aol.com/abtrbng/lea.htm Lord Ellenborough’s Act] (1998). ''The Abortion Law Homepage.'' Retrieved February 20, 2007.</ref> In 1861, the [[British Parliament]] passed the ''[[Offences Against The Person Act 1861|Offences Against the Person Act]]'', which continued to outlaw abortion and served as a model for similar prohibitions in some other nations.<ref>United Nations Population Division. (2002). [http://www.un.org/esa/population/publications/abortion Abortion Policies: A Global Review]. Retrieved February 22, 2007.</ref>
Over the course of the [[history of abortion]], induced abortions have been a source of considerable [[debate]] and [[controversy]] regarding the morality and legality of this practice. An individual's position on the complex [[ethical]], [[moral]], [[philosophical]], [[biological]], and [[legal]] issues have a strong relationship with that individual's [[value system]]. A person's position on abortion may be best described as a combination of their personal beliefs on the morality of abortion, and that person's beliefs on the ethical scope and responsibility of legitimate [[government|governmental]] and legal [[authority]]. Another factor for many individuals is [[religion|religious]] doctrine (see [[religion and abortion]]).
 
   
  +
The [[Soviet Union]], with legislation in 1920, and [[Iceland]], with legislation in 1935, were two of the first countries to generally allow abortion. The second half of the 20th century saw the liberalization of abortion laws in other countries. The ''[[Abortion Act 1967]]'' allowed abortion for limited reasons in the United Kingdom. In the 1973 case, ''[[Roe v. Wade]]'', the [[Supreme Court of the United States|United States Supreme Court]] struck down state laws banning abortion, ruling that such laws violated an implied [[right to privacy]] in the [[United States Constitution]]. The [[Supreme Court of Canada]], similarly, in the case of ''[[R. v. Morgentaler]]'', discarded its criminal code regarding abortion in 1988, after ruling that such restrictions violated the security of person guaranteed to women under the ''[[Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms]]''. Canada later struck down provincial regulations of abortion in the case of ''[[R. v. Morgentaler (1993)]].'' By contrast, [[abortion in Ireland]] was affected by the addition of an [[Eighth Amendment of the Constitution of Ireland|amendment]] to the [[Republic of Ireland|Irish]] [[Constitution of Ireland|Constitution]] in 1983 by popular [[referendum]], recognizing "the right to life of the unborn".
Abortion debates, especially pertaining to [[abortion law]]s, are often spearheaded by [[advocacy|advocacy groups]] belonging to one of two camps. Most often those in favor of legal prohibition of abortion describe themselves as [[pro-life]] while those against legal restrictions on abortion describe themselves as [[pro-choice]]. Both are used to indicate the central principles in arguments for and against abortion: "Is the fetus a human being with a fundamental right to ''life''?" for pro-life advocates, and, for those who are pro-choice, "Does a woman have the right to ''choose'' whether or not to have an abortion?"
 
   
  +
Current laws pertaining to abortion are diverse. Religious, moral, and cultural sensibilities continue to influence abortion laws throughout the world. The [[right to life]], the right to [[liberty]], the right to [[security of person]], and the right to [[Reproductive rights|reproductive health]] are major issues of [[human rights]] that are sometimes used as justification for the existence or absence of laws controlling abortion. Many countries in which abortion is legal require that certain criteria be met in order for an abortion to be obtained, often, but not always, using a [[trimester]]-based system to regulate the window of legality:
In both public and private debate, arguments presented in favor of or against abortion focus on either the moral permissibility of an induced abortion, or justification of [[laws]] permitting or restricting abortion. Arguments on morality and legality tend to collide and combine, complicating the issue at hand.
 
  +
*In the United States, some states impose a 24-hour waiting period before the procedure, prescribe the distribution of information on [[prenatal development|fetal development]], or require that [[minors and abortion|parents be contacted]] if their [[Minor (law)|minor]] daughter requests an abortion.<ref>[http://www.lawserver.com/abortion Interactive maps comparing U.S. abortion restrictions by state] LawServer</ref>
  +
*In the United Kingdom, as in some other countries, two doctors must first certify that an abortion is medically or socially necessary before it can be performed.
   
  +
Other countries, in which abortion is normally illegal, will allow one to be performed in the case of [[rape]], [[incest]], or danger to the pregnant woman's life or health. A few nations ban abortion entirely: [[Abortion in Chile|Chile]], [[El Salvador]], [[Malta]], Ireland and [[Abortion in Nicaragua|Nicaragua]], although in 2006 the [[Politics of Chile|Chilean government]] began the free distribution of [[emergency contraception]].<ref>Ross, Jen. (September 12, 2006). "[http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/0912/p01s04-woam.html In Chile, free morning-after pills to teens]." ''The Christian Science Monitor.'' Retrieved 2006-12-07.</ref><ref>Gallardoi, Eduardo. (September 26, 2006). "[http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/26/AR2006092600770.html Morning-After Pill Causes Furor in Chile]." ''The Washington Post.'' Retrieved 2006-12-07. </ref> In [[Bangladesh]], abortion is illegal, but the government has long supported a network of "menstrual regulation clinics", where [[menstrual extraction]] ([[manual vacuum aspiration]]) can be performed as menstrual hygiene.<ref>{{cite web|title=Surgical Abortion: History and Overview|publisher=National Abortion Federation|accessdate=2006-09-04|url=http://www.prochoice.org/education/resources/surg_history_overview.html}}</ref>
Debate also focuses on whether the [[pregnancy|pregnant]] woman should have to notify and/or have the [[consent]] of others in distinct cases: a [[minor (law)|minor]] her parents; a [[marriage|legally-married]] or [[common-law marriage|common-law]] wife her husband; or a pregnant woman the biological father. In a 2003 [[Gallup]] poll in the [[United States]], 72% of respondents were in favor of spousal notification, with 26% opposed; of those polled, 79% of males and 67% of females responded in favor. {{ref|abortiondebate1}}
 
   
  +
In places where abortion is illegal or carries heavy social stigma, pregnant women may engage in [[medical tourism]] and travel to countries where they can terminate their pregnancy. In the USA, it is not unusual for women to travel from one state to another for reasons of termination of pregnancy.
===Public opinion===
 
Political sides have largely been divided into [[moral absolutism|absolutes]]. The abortion debate, as such, tends to center around individuals who hold strong positions. However, public opinion varies from poll to poll, country to country, and region to region:
 
   
  +
==In other animals==
*'''Australia''': In a February 2005 [[AC Nielsen]] poll, as reported in [[The Age]], 56% thought the [[Abortion in Australia|current abortion laws]], which generally allow abortion for the sake of life or health, were "about right," 16% want changes in law to make abortion "more accessible," and 17% want changes to make it "less accessible." {{ref|publicopinion1}} A 1998 poll, conducted by Roy Morgan Research, asked, "Do you approve of the termination of unwanted pregnancies through surgical abortion?" 65% of the [[Australia| Australians]] polled stated that they approved of surgical abortion and 25% stated that they disapproved of it. {{ref|publicopinion2}}
 
  +
{{See|Miscarriage#In other animals}}
  +
Spontaneous abortion occurs in various animals. For example, in sheep, it may be caused by crowding through doors, or being chased by dogs.<ref>Spencer, James. ''[http://books.google.com/books?id=RXMuAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA124&lpg=PA124&dq=abortion+and+husbandry&source=bl&ots=WjmvGj-fB2&sig=8qH_WrPR08YEwPKr_c6PHDUOMmQ&hl=en&ei=erDbSeSVBoz4MY-F7M4I&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=2#PPA124,M1 Sheep Husbandry in Canada]'', page 124 (1911).</ref> In cows, abortion may be caused by contagious disease, such as [[Brucellosis]] or [[Campylobacter]], but can often be controlled by vaccination.<ref>[http://www.teara.govt.nz/1966/B/BeefCattleAndBeefProduction/ManagementAndHusbandryOfBeefCattle/en "Beef cattle and Beef production: Management and Husbandry of Beef Cattle”], ''Encyclopaedia of New Zealand'' (1966).</ref> Additionally, many other diseases are known to increase the risk of miscarriage in non-human animals.{{Fact|date=April 2009}}
   
  +
Abortion may also be induced in animals, in the context of [[animal husbandry]]. For example, abortion may be induced in [[mares]] that have been mated improperly, or that have been purchased by owners who did not realize the mares were pregnant, or that are pregnant with twin [[foal]]s.<ref>McKinnon, Angus et al. ''[http://books.google.com/books?id=jlZAT-9VwUIC&pg=PA563&lpg=PA563&dq=%22induce+abortion%22+and+husbandry&source=bl&ots=6T9w3LtpsI&sig=aEYDFpnMIbLaKlstxK1MGK2rxwQ&hl=en&ei=eLTbSY7EO5muMrXUkMkI&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=7 Equine Reproduction]'', page 563 (Wiley-Blackwell 1993).</ref>
* '''Canada''': A recent poll of [[Canadians]], conducted in April 2005 by [[Gallup]], found that 52% of those polled want abortion laws to "remain the same," 20% want the laws to be "less strict," and 24% would prefer that the laws become "more strict." An earlier Gallup poll, from December 2001, asked, "Do you think abortions should be legal under any circumstances, legal only under certain circumstances or illegal in all circumstances and in what circumstances?" 32% of Canadians responded that they believe abortion should be legal in all circumstance, 52% that it should be legal in certain circumstances, and 14% that it should be legal in no circumstances. See [[Abortion in Canada]].
 
   
  +
[[Feticide]] can occur in [[horses]] and [[zebras]] due to male harassment of pregnant mares or [[forced copulation]],<ref>{{cite journal|last=Berger|first=Joel W|date=5 May 1983|title=Induced abortion and social factors in wild horses|journal=Nature|location=London|volume=303|pages=59-61|url=http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v303/n5912/abs/303059a0.html}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|last=Pluháček|first=Jan|coauthors=Luděk Bartoš|date=2000|title=Male infanticide in captive plains zebra, Equus burchelli|journal=Animal Behaviour|volume=59|pages=689–694|url=http://af.czu.cz/~bartos/publications/pdf/Pluhacek_Bartos_2000_AB.pdf}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|last=Pluháček|first=Jan|coauthors=Luděk Bartoš|date=2005|title=Further evidence for male infanticide and feticide in captive plains zebra, Equus burchelli|journal=Folia Zool.|volume=54|issue=3|pages= 258–262|url=http://www.ivb.cz/folia/54/3/258-262.pdf}}</ref> although the frequency in the wild has been questioned.<ref>{{cite journal|last=JW|first=Fitzpatrick|coauthors=JF Turner Jr.|date=October 1991|title=Changes in herd stallions among feral horse bands and the absence of forced copulation and induced abortion |journal=Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology|publisher=Springer|location=Berlin/Heidelberg|volume=29|issue=3|pages=217-219|issn=0340-5443 (Print) 1432-0762 (Online)|url=http://www.springerlink.com/content/k1543n1548987255/}}</ref> Male [[Gray langur]] monkeys may attack females following male takeover, causing miscarriage.<ref>{{cite journal|last=Agoramoorthy |first=G.|coauthors=S. M. Mohnot, V. Sommer and A. Srivastava|date=August 1988|title=Abortions in free ranging Hanuman langurs (Presbytis entellus) — a male induced strategy?|journal=Human Evolution|publisher=Springer|location=Netherlands|volume=3|issue=4|pages=297-308|issn=0393-9375 (Print) 1824-310X (Online)|url=http://www.springerlink.com/content/324g107410293474/}}</ref>
*'''Ireland''': A 1997 [[Irish Times]]/MRBI poll of the [[Republic of Ireland|Republic of Ireland's]] electorate found that 18% believe that abortion should never be permitted, 35% that one should be allowed in the event that the woman's life is threatened, 18% if her health is at risk, 28% that "an abortion should be provided to those who need it," and 5% were undecided. {{ref|publicopinion3}}
 
   
  +
==See also==
* '''The United Kingdom''': An online [[YouGov]]/[[Daily Telegraph]] poll in August 2005 found that 30% of [[The United Kingdom| Britons]] would back a measure to reduce the legal limit for abortion to 20 weeks, 19% support a limit of 12 weeks, 9% support a limit of less than 12 weeks, and 25% support maintaining the current limit of 24 weeks. 6% responded that abortion should never be allowed while 2% said it should be permitted throughout the entirety of pregnancy. {{ref|publicopinion4}}
 
  +
* [[Abortion debate]]
  +
* [[Abortion and mental health]]
  +
* [[Abortion laws]]
  +
* [[Anti-abortion violence]]
  +
* [[Fetal rights]]
  +
* [[Late-term abortion]]
  +
* [[Minors and abortion]]
  +
* [[Paternal rights and abortion]]
  +
* [[Population control]]
  +
* [[Reproductive rights]]
  +
* [[Self-induced abortion]]
  +
* [[Stem cell controversy]]
   
  +
==References==
* '''The United States''': In a January 2006 [[CBS News]] poll, which asked, "What is your personal feeling about abortion?", 27% said that abortion should be "permitted in all cases," 15% that it should be "permitted, but subject to greater restrictions than it is now," 33% that it should be "permitted only in cases such as rape, incest or to save the woman's life," 17% that it should "only be permitted to save the woman's life," and 5% that it should "never" be permitted. {{ref|publicopinion5}} A November 2005 [[Pew Research Center]] poll asked "In 1973 the Roe versus Wade decision established a woman's constitutional right to an abortion, at least in the first three months of pregnancy. Would you like to see the Supreme Court completely overturn its Roe versus Wade decision, or not?", with 29% indicating they want it overturned, and 65% that they do not. {{ref|publicopinion6}}
 
  +
<!-- ----------------------------------------------------------
  +
See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Footnotes for a
  +
discussion of different citation methods and how to generate
  +
footnotes using the<ref>, </ref> and <reference /> tags
  +
----------------------------------------------------------- -->
  +
{{Reflist|colwidth=30em}}
   
==Abortion law==
+
==External links==
{{Main articles|[[Abortion law]], [[History of abortion law]]}}
+
{{sisterlinks|abortion}}
  +
*{{dmoz|Health/Reproductive_Health/Abortion}}
  +
*[http://www.un.org/esa/population/publications/abortion Abortion Policies: A Global Review]
  +
*[http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/article/002912.htm#Definition MedlinePlus Medical Encyclopedia: Abortion]
  +
<!-- HELP KEEP THIS ARTICLE SHORT AND SIMPLE: ADD LINKS TO WHICHEVER SUB-ARTICLE WOULD BE APPROPRIATE INSTEAD OF HERE. ALSO, PLEASE UNDERSTAND THAT SITES CONTAINING SHOCK MATERIAL SHALL IN NO CASE BE ACCEPTED. THANKS!!-->
   
  +
'''The following information resources may be created by those with a non-neutral position in the abortion debate:'''
[[Image:AbortionLawsMap.png|thumb|250px|right|International status of abortion law]]
 
  +
*[http://www.guttmacher.org/ The Guttmacher Institute]
The [[Soviet Union]] (1920) and [[Iceland]] (1935) were some of the first countries to generally allow abortion. The second half of the twentieth century saw the liberalization of abortion laws in many other countries. In 1973, the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] struck down state laws banning abortion, ruling that such laws violated an inferred [[right to privacy]] in the [[U.S. Constitution]]. The [[Supreme Court of Canada]], similarly, discarded its criminal code regarding abortion in 1988, after ruling that such restrictions violated the security of person guaranteed to women under in the [[Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms]] in the case of [[R. v. Morgentaler]]. Canada later struck down provincial regulations of abortion in the case of [[R. v. Morgentaler (1993)]]. [[Ireland]], on the other hand, added an [[Eighth Amendment of the Constitution of Ireland| amendment]] to its [[Constitution of Ireland|Constitution]] in 1983 by popular referendum, recognizing "the right to life of the unborn" (see [[Abortion in Ireland]]).
 
  +
*[http://www.johnstonsarchive.net/policy/abortion Johnston's Archive: Abortion Statistics and Other Data]
   
  +
{{Birth control methods}}
Current laws pertaining to abortion are diverse. Religious, moral, and cultural sensibilities continue to influence abortion laws throughout the world. The [[right to life]], the right to [[liberty]], and the right to [[security of person]] are major issues of [[human rights]] that are sometimes used as justification for the existence or the absence of laws controlling abortion. Many countries in which abortion is legal require that certain criteria be met in order for an abortion to be obtained, often, but not always, using a [[trimester]]-based system to regulate the window in which abortion is still legal to perform:
 
  +
{{Particular human rights}}
  +
{{Reproductive health}}
   
* In the [[United States]], some states impose a 24-hour waiting period before the procedure, prescribe the distribution of information on [[fetal development]], or require that parents be contacted if their [[Minor (law)|minor]] daughter requests an abortion.
 
* In the [[United Kingdom]], as in some other countries, two doctors must first certify that an abortion is medically or socially necessary before it can be performed.
 
Other countries, in which abortion is illegal, will allow one to be performed in the case of [[rape]], [[incest]], or danger to the pregnant woman's life or health. A handful of nations ban abortion entirely, such as [[Chile]], [[El Salvador]], and [[Malta]].
 
   
  +
<!--
==See also==
 
  +
[[ar:إجهاض]]
*[[Abortion in Australia]]
 
  +
[[ast:Albuertu]]
*[[Abortion in Canada]]
 
  +
[[az:Abort]]
*[[Abortion in Ireland]]
 
  +
[[bn:গর্ভপাত]]
*[[Abortion in the United Kingdom]]
 
  +
[[bs:Pobačaj]]
*[[Abortion in the United States]]
 
*[[Adoption]]
+
[[bg:Аборт]]
  +
[[ca:Avortament]]
*[[Partial-birth abortion]]
 
*[[Pregnancy]]
+
[[cs:Interrupce]]
  +
[[da:Abort]]
*[[Religion and abortion]]
 
  +
[[de:Schwangerschaftsabbruch]]
*[[Selective reduction]]
 
  +
[[et:Abort]]
*[[Self-induced abortion]]
 
  +
[[el:Έκτρωση]]
*[[Wrongful abortion]]
 
  +
[[es:Aborto inducido]]
  +
[[eo:Aborto]]
  +
[[eu:Haurgaltze]]
  +
[[fa:سقط جنین]]
  +
[[fo:Fosturtøka]]
  +
[[fr:Avortement]]
  +
[[gl:Aborto]]
  +
[[ko:낙태]]
  +
[[hr:Pobačaj]]
  +
[[id:Gugur kandungan]]
  +
[[ia:Aborto]]
  +
[[is:Fóstureyðing]]
  +
[[it:Aborto]]
  +
[[he:הפלה מלאכותית]]
  +
[[jv:Abortus]]
  +
[[pam:Abortion]]
  +
[[ka:აბორტი]]
  +
[[sw:Utoaji mimba]]
  +
[[ku:Zarokjiberbirin]]
  +
[[la:Abortus]]
  +
[[lt:Abortas]]
  +
[[hu:Terhességmegszakítás]]
  +
[[mk:Абортус]]
  +
[[ms:Pengguguran]]
  +
[[nl:Abortus]]
  +
[[ja:人工妊娠中絶]]
  +
[[no:Abort]]
  +
[[nn:Abort]]
  +
[[pl:Aborcja]]
  +
[[pt:Aborto]]
  +
[[ro:Avort]]
  +
[[qu:Sulluchiy]]
  +
[[ru:Искусственный аборт]]
  +
[[sq:Dështimi i zhvillimit të fetusit]]
  +
[[simple:Abortion]]
  +
[[sk:Interrupcia]]
  +
[[sl:Splav]]
  +
[[sr:Побачај]]
  +
[[sh:Abortus]]
  +
[[fi:Abortti]]
  +
[[sv:Abort]]
  +
[[tl:Pagpapalaglag]]
  +
[[ta:கருக்கலைப்பு]]
  +
[[te:గర్భస్రావం]]
  +
[[th:การแท้ง]]
  +
[[tr:Kürtaj]]
  +
[[tk:Abort]]
  +
[[uk:Аборт]]
  +
[[ur:اسقاط (حمل)]]
  +
[[yi:אבארטאציע]]
  +
[[zh-yue:落仔]]
  +
[[zh:堕胎]]
  +
-->
  +
{{EnWP|Abortion}}
   
==Sources==
 
#{{note|miscarriage1}} "[http://wuphysicians.wustl.edu/dept.asp?pageID=8&ID=35 Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility: Recurrent Pregnancy Loss (Recurrent Miscarriage)]." (n.d.) Retrieved [[2006-01-18]] from Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology web site.
 
#{{note|incidence2}} Henshaw, Stanley K., Singh, Susheela, & Haas, Taylor. (1999). [http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/journals/25s3099.html The Incidence of Abortion Worldwide]. ''International Family Planning Perspectives, 25 (Supplement)'', 30–8. Retrieved [[2006-01-18]].
 
#{{note|incidence3}} Bankole, Akinrinola, Singh, Susheela, & Haas, Taylor. (1998). [http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/journals/2411798.html Reasons Why Women Have Induced Abortions: Evidence from 27 Countries]. ''International Family Planning Perspectives, 24 (3)'', 117-127 & 152. Retrieved [[2006-01-18]].
 
#{{note|incidence4}} Finer, Lawrence B., Frohwirth, Lori F., Dauphinee, Lindsay A., Singh, Shusheela, & Moore, Ann M. (2005). [http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/journals/3711005.pdf Reasons U.S. women have abortions: quantative and qualitative perspectives]. ''Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 37 (3),'' 110-8. Retrieved [[2006-01-18]].
 
# {{note|unsafe1}} World Health Organization. (2004). [http://www.who.int/reproductive-health/publications/unsafe_abortion_estimates_04/estimates.pdf Unsafe abortion: global and regional estimates of unsafe abortion and associated mortality in 2000]. Retrieved [[2006-01-12]].
 
#{{note|incidenceaustralia}} Chan, Annabelle & Sage, Leonie C. (2005). Estimating Australia’s abortion rates 1985–2003 [http://www.mja.com.au/public/issues/182_09_020505/cha10829_fm.html Electronic version]. ''Medical Journal of Australia, 182 (9),''447-52. Retrieved [[2006-01-17]].
 
#{{note|populationaustralia}} Australian Bureau of Statistics. ([[2003-02-18]]). [http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/ProductsbyReleaseDate/C947E831266D3234CA256CD000827941?OpenDocument Population, Australian States and Territories - Electronic delivery, Sep 2002]. Retrieved [[2006-01-28]].
 
#{{note|incidencecanada}} Statistics Canada. ([[2005-02-11]]). [http://www.statcan.ca/Daily/English/050211/d050211a.htm Induced abortions]. ''The Daily.'' Retrieved [[2006-01-17]].
 
#{{note|populationcanada}} Statistics Canada. ([[2003-12-18]]). [http://www.statcan.ca/Daily/English/031218/d031218c.htm Demographic statistics]. ''The Daily.'' Retrieved [[2006-01-28]].
 
#{{note|incidencedenmark}} Dansmark Statistik. ([[2004-11-25]]). [http://www.statistikbanken.dk/statbank5a/SelectVarVal/Define.asp?MainTable=FOD6&PLanguage=1&PXSId=0 Legal abortions by region (counties) and age]. Retrieved [[2006-01-17]].
 
#{{note|populationdenmark}} Statistics Denmark. ([[2005-02-01]]). [http://www.dst.dk/HomeUK/Statistics/Key_indicators/Population/pop.aspx Population 1st January]. Retrieved [[2006-01-28]].
 
#{{note|incidencefrance}} Vilain, Annick. Ministry for Employment, Social Cohesion and Housing. (2005, October). [http://www.sante.gouv.fr/drees/etude-resultat/er431/er431.pdf Les interruptions volontaires de grossesse en 2003]. ''Études et Résultats, 431.'' Retrieved [[2006-01-17]].
 
#{{note|populationfrance}} National Institute for Demographic Studies. (n.d.) [http://www.ined.fr/englishversion/figures/france/population/tabpyr2004A.html Total population of France 1st January 2004]. Retrieved [[2006-01-28]].
 
#{{note|incidencegermany}} Federal Statistical Office Germany. ([[2005-03-09]]). [http://www.destatis.de/basis/e/gesu/gesutab18.htm Abortions in Germany, 1999 to 2004, by the Land of the place of residence and ratio per 1 000 births]. Retrieved [[2006-01-17]].
 
#{{note|populationgermany}} Federal Statistical Office Germany. ([[2006-01-24]]). [http://www.destatis.de/basis/e/bevoe/bevoetab4.htm Population, by sex and citizenship]. Retrieved [[2006-01-28]].
 
#{{note|incidencejapan}} "[http://web-japan.org/stat/stats/18WME21.html Abortions (1984-2004)]." (2005). Retrieved [[2006-01-17]] from Web Japan.
 
#{{note|populationjapan}} Statistics Bureau. (2004). [http://www.stat.go.jp/english/data/jinsui/2004np/index.htm Current Population Estimates as of October 1, 2004]. Retrieved [[2006-01-28]].
 
#{{note|incidencenewzealand}} Ewing, Ian. Statistics New Zealand. ([[2005-06-15]]). [http://www2.stats.govt.nz/domino/external/pasfull/pasfull.nsf/web/Hot+Off+The+Press+Abortions+Year+ended+December+2004?open Abortions (Year ended December 2004)]. Retrieved [[2006-01-17]].
 
#{{note|populationnewzealand}} Statistics New Zealand. ([[2005-05-15]]). [http://www.stats.govt.nz/analytical-reports/dem-trends-04/tables.htm Demographic Trends 2004]. Retrieved [[2006-01-28]].
 
#{{note|incidencenorway}} Statistics Norway. ([[2005-06-08]]). [http://www.ssb.no/abort_en/tab-2005-06-08-02-en.html Induced abortions, by woman's county of residence, 1980-2004]. Retrieved [[2006-01-17]].
 
#{{note|populationnorway}} Statistics Norway. (2005). [http://www.ssb.no/folkemengde_en/tab-2005-03-11-01-en.html Population by age, sex, marital status and foreign citizenship]. Retrieved [[2006-01-28]].
 
#{{note|incidencesouthafrica}} Health Systems Trust. (n.d.) [http://hst.org.za/healthstats/47/data TOPs (Terminations of Pregnancy)]. Retrieved [[2006-01-17]].
 
#{{note|populationsouthafrica}} Statistics South Africa. ([[2001-07-02]]). [http://www.statssa.gov.za/publications/P0302/P03022001.pdf Mid-year estimates 2001]. Retrieved [[2006-01-28]].
 
#{{note|incidencesweden}} Nilsson, Emma & Ollars, Birgitta. The National Board of Health and Welfare. (2005, May). [http://www.socialstyrelsen.se/NR/rdonlyres/8013473F-C14A-467E-A2F7-F3BB1A082E0C/3573/2005423.pdf Aborter 2004]. Retrieved [[2006-01-17]].
 
#{{note|populationsweden}} Statistics Sweden. ([[2006-01-13]]). [http://www.scb.se/templates/tableOrChart____25897.asp Preliminary population statistics per month, 2003-2005]. Retrieved [[2006-01-28]].
 
#{{note|incidenceenglandwales}} Government Statistical Service for the Department of Health. ([[2005-07-27]]). [http://www.dh.gov.uk/PublicationsAndStatistics/Publications/PublicationsStatistics/PublicationsStatisticsArticle/fs/en?CONTENT_ID=4116461&chk=6T9UTA Abortion statistics, England and Wales: 2004]. Retrieved [[2006-01-17]].
 
#{{note|incidencescotland}} ISD Scotland. ([[2005-05-24]]). [http://www.isdscotland.org/isd/info3.jsp?pContentID=1919&p_applic=CCC&p_service=Content.show& Number of abortions performed in Scotland]. Retrieved [[2006-01-17]].
 
#{{note|populationunitedkingdom}} National Statistics. ([[2005-08-25]]). [http://www.statistics.gov.uk/CCI/nugget.asp?ID=6 Population Estimates: UK population approaches 60 million]. Retrieved [[2006-01-28]].
 
#{{note|incidenceunitedstates}} Finer, Lawrence B. & Henshaw, Stanley K. The Alan Guttmacher Institute. ([[2005-05-18]]). [http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/2005/05/18/ab_incidence.pdf Estimates of U.S. Abortion Incidence in 2001 and 2002]. Retrieved January 17, 2006.
 
#{{note|populationunitedstates}} U.S. Census Bureau. ([[2006-01-04]]). [http://www.census.gov/prod/www/statistical-abstract.html Statistical Abstract of the United States]. Retrieved [[2006-01-28]].
 
#{{note|surgicalabortion1}} World Health Organization. (2003). [http://www.who.int/reproductive-health/impac/Procedures/Dilatetion_P61_P63.html Managing complications in pregnancy and childbirth: a guide for midwives and doctors]. Retrieved [[2006-02-24]].
 
#{{note|surgicalabortion2}} Strauss, Lilo T., Herndon, Joy, Chang, Jeani, Parker, Wilda Y., Bowens, Sonya V., Berg, Cynthia J. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. ([[2005-11-15]]). [http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/ss5407a1.htm Abortion Surveillance - United States, 2002]. ''Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report''. Retrieved [[2006-02-20]].
 
# {{note|othermethods1}} Ciganda, C., & Laborde, A. (2003). [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=12807304&query_hl=9 Herbal infusions used for induced abortion]. ''J Toxicol Clin Toxicol, 41(3),'' 235-9. Retrieved [[2006-01-25]].
 
# {{note|othermethods2}} Education for Choice. ([[2005-05-06]]). [http://www.efc.org.uk/Foryoungpeople/Factsaboutabortion/Unsafeabortion Unsafe abortion]. Retrieved [[2006-01-11]].
 
# {{note|othermethods3}} Potts, Malcolm, & Campbell, Martha. (2002). [http://big.berkeley.edu/ifplp.history.pdf History of contraception]. ''Gynecology and Obstetrics'', vol. 6, chp. 8. Retrieved [[2005-01-25]].
 
# {{note|healtheffects1}} Cates W., Jr, & Tietze C. (1978). Standardized mortality rates associated with legal abortion: United States, 1972-1975 [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=639966&dopt=Abstract Electronic version]. ''Family Planning Perspectives, 10 (2)'', 109-12. Retrieved [[2006-01-28]].
 
# {{note|mortality1}} Department of Health. (1998). ''[http://www.archive.official-documents.co.uk/document/doh/wmd/wmd-hm.htm Why Mothers Die: Report on Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in the United Kingdom 1994–1996].'' London: The Stationery Office. Retrieved [[2006-01-11]].
 
# {{note|mortality2}} Elam-Evans, Laurie. D., Strauss, Lilo T., Herndon, Joy, Parker, Wilda Y., Bowens, Sonya V., Zane, Suzanne, ''et al.'' Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. ([[2003-11-23]]). ''[http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/ss5212a1.htm Abortion Surveillance - United States, 2000].'' Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. Retrieved [[2006-01-11]].
 
#{{note|failed}}Rogers, Lois. ([[2005-11-27]]). "[http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2087-1892696,00.html Fifty babies a year are alive after abortion]." ''The Sunday Times.'' Retrieved [[2006-01-11]].
 
# {{note|abc1}} [http://www.etters.net/cancerTP.htm#3 American abortion-breast cancer studies]
 
# {{note|abc2}} Melbye M., Wohlfahrt, J., Olsen, J.H., Frisch, M., Westergaard, T., Helweg-Larsen, K., ''et al.'' (1997). Induced abortion and the risk of breast cancer [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=8988884 Electronic version]. ''New England Journal of Medicine, 336,'' 81-5. Retrieved [[2006-01-11]] from PubMed.
 
# {{note|abc3}} National Cancer Institute. ([[2003-03-04]]). [http://www.cancer.gov/cancerinfo/ere-workshop-report Summary Report: Early Reproductive Events and Breast Cancer Workshop]. Retrieved [[2006-01-11]].
 
# {{note|abc4}} National Cancer Institute. (2003). [http://www.cancer.gov/cancer_information/doc.aspx?viewid=15e3f2d5-5cdd-4697-a2ba-f3388d732642 Minority Dissenting Comment Regarding Early Reproductive Events and Breast Cancer Workshop]. Retrieved [[2006-01-11]].
 
# {{note|pain1}} Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology. (1997). ''[http://www.parliament.uk/post/pn094.pdf Fetal Awareness].'' Retrieved [[2006-01-11]].
 
# {{note|Emory}} Mulligan LaRossa, Maureen, & Carter, Sheena L. ([[2005-02-07]]). ''Understanding How the Brain Develops.'' Retrieved [[2006-01-11]], from Emory University, Department of Pediatrics web site: [http://www.pediatrics.emory.edu/neonatology/dpc/brain.htm].
 
# {{note|pain2}} Anand, K., Phil, D., & Hickey, P.R. (1987). Pain and its effects on the human neonate and fetus. ''New England Journal of Medicine, 316 (21),'' 1321-9. Retrieved [[2006-01-11]] from [http://www.cirp.org/library/pain/anand/ The Circumcision Reference Library].
 
# {{note|mental1}} Schmiege, S. & Russo, N.F. (2005). Depression and unwanted first pregnancy: longitudinal cohort study [http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/331/7528/1303 Electronic version] . ''British Medical Journal, 331 (7528),'' 1303. Retrieved [[2006-01-11]].
 
# {{note|mental2}} Gissler, M., Hemminki, E., & Lonnqvist, J. (1996). Suicides after pregnancy in Finland, 1987-94: register linkage study [http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/313/7070/1431 Electronic version]. ''British Medical Journal, 313,'' 1431-4. Retrieved [[2006-01-11]].
 
# {{note|mental3}} American Psychological Association. (2005). [http://web.archive.org/web/20050304001316/http://www.apa.org/ppo/issues/womenabortfacts.html APA Briefing Paper on The Impact of Abortion on Women]. Retrieved [[2006-01-15]] from [http://www.archive.org The Internet Archive].
 
# {{note|mental4}} ''[http://www.medicinenet.com/script/main/art.asp?articlekey=619 Depression Risk Increased After Miscarriage].'' ([[2002-04-01]]). Retrieved [[2006-01-11]].
 
# {{note|history1}} Lefkowitz, Mary R. & Fant, Maureen R. (1992). ''[http://www.stoa.org/diotima/anthology/wlgr/ Women's life in Greece & Rome: a source book in translation].'' Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press. Retrieved [[2006-01-11]].
 
# {{note|history2}} ''[http://users.telerama.com/~jdehullu/abortion/abhist.htm Histories of Abortion].'' (n.d.) Retrieved [[2006-01-11]].
 
# {{note|crimerate1}} Donohue, John J. and Levitt, Steven D. (2001). [http://ssrn.com/abstract=174508 The impact of legalized abortion on crime].''Quarterly Journal of Economics.'' Retrieved [[2006-02-11]].
 
# {{note|crimerate2}} Foote, Christopher L. and Goetz, Christopher F. (2005). [http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/wp/wp2005/wp0515.pdf Testing economic hypotheses with state-level data: a comment on Donohue and Levitt (2001)]. ''Working Papers, 05-15''. Retrieved [[2006-02-11]].
 
# {{note|crimerate3}} Donohue, John J. and Levitt, Steven D. (2006). Measurement error, legalized abortion, and the decline in crime: a response to Foote and Goetz (2005). Retrieved [[2006-02-17]], from University of Chicago, Initiative on Chicago Price Theory web site: [http://pricetheory.uchicago.edu/levitt/Papers/ResponseToFooteGoetz2006.pdf http://pricetheory.uchicago.edu/levitt/Papers/ResponseToFooteGoetz2006.pdf].
 
# {{note|crimerate4}} "Crime-Abortion Study Continues to Draw Pro-life Backlash." ([[1999-08-11]]). ''The Pro-Life Infonet.'' Retrieved [[2006-02-17]] from [http://ohioroundtable.org/library/articles/life/crimeabortion.html Ohio Roundtable Online Library].
 
# {{note|crimerate5}} "[http://www.americancatholic.org/Messenger/Jan2000/Editorial.asp Abortion and the Lower Crime Rate]." (2000, January). ''St. Anthony Messenger.'' Retrieved [[2006-02-17]].
 
# {{note|sexselective1}} Banister, Judith. ([[1999-03-16]]). [http://www.census.gov/ipc/www/ebspr96a.html Son Preference in Asia - Report of a Symposium]. Retrieved [[2006-01-12]].
 
# {{note|sexselective2}} Mutharayappa, Rangamuthia, Kim Choe, Minja, Arnold, Fred, & Roy, T.K. (1997). [http://www2.eastwestcenter.org/pop/misc/subj-3.pdf Son Preferences and Its Effect on Fertility in India]. ''National Family Health Survey Subject Reports, Number 3.'' Retrieved [[2006-01-12]].
 
# {{note|sexselective3}} Patel, Rita. (1996). The practice of sex selective abortion in India: may you be the mother of a hundred sons. Retrieved [[2006-01-11]], from University of North Carolina, University Center for International Studies web site: [http://www.ucis.unc.edu/resources/pubs/carolina/abortion.pdf http://www.ucis.unc.edu/resources/pubs/carolina/abortion.pdf].
 
# {{note|sexselective4}} Sudha, S., & Irudaya Rajan, S. (1999). [http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/organizations/healthnet/gender/docs/sudha.html Female Demographic Disadvantage in India 1981-1991: Sex Selective Abortion, Female Infanticide and Excess Female Child Mortality]. Retrieved [[2006-01-12]]
 
# {{note|india1}} Reaney, Patricia. ([[2006-01-09]]). "[http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/L06779563.htm Selective abortion blamed for India's missing girls]." ''Reuters AlertNet.'' Retrieved [[2006-01-09]].
 
# {{note|sexselective5}} Mudur, Ganapati. (2002). "[http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/abridged/324/7334/385/b India plans new legislation to prevent sex selection]." ''British Medical Journal: News Roundup.'' Retrieved [[2006-01-12]].
 
# {{note|sexselective6}} Graham, Maureen J., Larsen, Ulla, & Xu, Xiping. (1998). [http://www.agi-usa.org/pubs/journals/2407298.html Son Preference in Anhui Province, China]. ''International Family Planning Perspectives, 24 (2).'' Retrieved [[2006-01-12]].
 
# {{note|sexselective7}} Plafker, Ted. ([[2002-05-25]]). [http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/324/7348/1233/a?maxtoshow=&HITS=10&hits=10&RESULTFORMAT=&fulltext Sex selection in China sees 117 boys born for every 100 girls]. ''British Medical Journal: News Roundup.'' Retrieved [[2006-01-12]].
 
# {{note|sexselective8}} "[http://www.china.org.cn/english/2003/Mar/59194.htm China Bans Sex-selection Abortion]." ([[2002-03-22]]). ''Xinhua News Agency.'' Retrieved [[2006-01-12]].
 
# {{note|unsafe2}} Salter, C., Johnson, H.B., and Hengen, N. (1997). [http://www.infoforhealth.org/pr/l10edsum.shtml Care for postabortion complications: saving women's lives]. ''Population Reports, 25 (1).'' Retrieved [[2006-02-22]].
 
# {{note|unsafe3}} World Health Organization. (1998). [http://www.who.int/docstore/world-health-day/en/pages1998/whd98_10.html Address Unsafe Abortion]. Retrieved [[2006-03-01]].
 
# {{note|abortiondebate1}} The Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. ([[2005-11-02]]). "[http://people-press.org/commentary/display.php3?AnalysisID=122 Public Opinion Supports Alito on Spousal Notification Even as It Favors Roe v. Wade]." ''Pew Research Center Pollwatch.'' Retrieved [[2006-03-01]].
 
# {{note|publicopinion1}} Grattan, Michelle. ([[2005-02-16]]). "[http://www.theage.com.au/news/National/Poll-backs-abortion-laws/2005/02/15/1108230007300.html Poll backs abortion laws]." ''The Age.'' Retrieved [[2006-01-11]].
 
# {{note|publicopinion2}} Roy Morgan International. ([[1998-03-03]]). [http://www.roymorgan.com/news/polls/1998/3058 Almost Two-Thirds Of Australians Approve Of Abortion]. Retrieved [[2006-01-11]].
 
# {{note|publicopinion3}} Kennedy, Geraldine. ([[1997-12-11]]). "[http://www.ireland.com/newspaper/front/1997/1211/archive.97121100003.html 77% say limited abortion right should be provided]." ''The Irish Times.'' Retrieved [[2006-01-11]].
 
# {{note|publicopinion4}} YouGov. ([[2005-07-30]]). [http://www.yougov.com/archives/pdf/TEL050101042_1.pdf YouGov/Daily Telegraph Survey Results]. Retrieved [[2006-01-11]].
 
# {{note|publicopinion5}} ''[http://www.pollingreport.com/abortion.htm The Polling Report].'' (2006). Retrieved [[2006-01-11]].
 
# {{note|publicopinion6}} The Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life. ([[2005-11-29]]). [http://pewforum.org/docs/index.php?DocID=127 Abortion Seen as Most Important Issue for Supreme Court]. Retrieved [[2006-01-12]].
 
 
==Further reading==
 
 
* Tullberg, B.S. & Lummaa, V. (2001). Induced abortion rate in modern Sweden falls with age, but rises again before menopause. ''[[Evolution and Human Behavior]]'', 22, 1-10. [http://www.shef.ac.uk/aps/hlhp/tullberg-lummaa-ehb-2001.pdf Full text]
 
 
==External links==
 
{{wikiquote}}
 
* [http://www.johnstonsarchive.net/policy/abortion Abortion Statistics and Other Data]
 
*[http://annualreview.law.harvard.edu/population/abortion/abortionlaws.htm Abortion Laws of the World]
 
* [http://www.un.org/esa/population/publications/abortion Abortion Policies: A Global Review]
 
   
<!-- HELP KEEP THIS ARTICLE SHORT AND SIMPLE: DO NOT ADD MORE LINKS TO "BIASED" SECTION. ADD THEM TO WHICHEVER SUB-ARTICLE WOULD BE APPROPRIATE INSTEAD. ALSO, PLEASE UNDERSTAND THAT SITES CONTAINING SHOCK MATERIAL SHALL, IN NO CASE, BE ACCEPTED. THANKS! !-->
 
'''The following links may be biased:'''
 
   
* [http://www.abortion.com/ Abortion.com]
 
* [http://agi-usa.org/ The Alan Guttmacher Institute]
 
* [http://www.all.org/ American Life League]
 
* [http://www.care-net.org/ CareNet]
 
* [http://justfacts.com/abortion.htm Just Facts: Abortion]
 
* [http://www.plannedparenthood.com Planned Parenthood]
 
   
[[Category:Abortion|*]]
 
   
{{enWP|Abortion}}
+
{{Disambig}}
  +
[[Category:Abortion]]
  +
[[Category:Reproduction]]
  +
[[Category:Core issues in ethics]]
  +
[[Category:Gynecology]]
  +
[[Category:Pregnancy]]
  +
[[Category:Obstetrics]]
  +
[[Category:Gender studies]]
  +
[[Category:Fertility]]

Revision as of 00:38, 27 March 2015

Assessment | Biopsychology | Comparative | Cognitive | Developmental | Language | Individual differences | Personality | Philosophy | Social |
Methods | Statistics | Clinical | Educational | Industrial | Professional items | World psychology |

Biological: Behavioural genetics · Evolutionary psychology · Neuroanatomy · Neurochemistry · Neuroendocrinology · Neuroscience · Psychoneuroimmunology · Physiological Psychology · Psychopharmacology (Index, Outline)


This article is in need of attention from a psychologist/academic expert on the subject.
Please help recruit one, or improve this page yourself if you are qualified.
This banner appears on articles that are weak and whose contents should be approached with academic caution.


A series of articles on
WPAbortion-logo
Main topics


Template:Abortion by country sidebar An abortion is the termination of a pregnancy by the removal or expulsion of a fetus/embryo from the uterus, resulting in or caused by its death. An abortion can occur spontaneously due to complications during pregnancy or can be induced, in humans and other species. In the context of human pregnancies, an abortion induced to preserve the health of the pregnant female is termed a therapeutic abortion, while an abortion induced for any other reason is termed an elective abortion. The term abortion most commonly refers to the induced abortion of a human pregnancy, while spontaneous abortions are usually termed miscarriages.

Abortion has a long history and has been induced by various methods including herbal abortifacients, the use of sharpened tools, physical trauma and other traditional methods. Contemporary medicine utilizes medications and surgical procedures to induce abortion. The legality, prevalence, and cultural views on abortion vary substantially around the world. In many parts of the world there is prominent and divisive public controversy over the ethical and legal issues of abortion. Abortion and abortion-related issues feature prominently in the national politics in many nations often involving the opposing pro-life and pro-choice worldwide social movements. The approximate number of abortions performed worldwide in 2003 was 42 million, which declined from nearly 46 million in 1995.

Types of abortion

Spontaneous abortion

Main article: Miscarriage
File:Human Embryo - Approximately 6 weeks estimated gestational age.jpg

Template:POVassertionA complete spontaneous abortion at about 6 weeks gestational age

Spontaneous abortion (also known as miscarriage) is the expulsion of an embryo or fetus due to accidental trauma or natural causes before approximately the 22nd week of gestation; the definition by gestational age varies by country.[1] Most miscarriages are due to incorrect replication of chromosomes; they can also be caused by environmental factors. A pregnancy that ends before 37 weeks of gestation resulting in a live-born infant is known as a "premature birth". When a fetus dies in utero after about 22 weeks, or during delivery, it is usually termed "stillborn". Premature births and stillbirths are generally not considered to be miscarriages although usage of these terms can sometimes overlap.

Between 10% and 50% of pregnancies end in clinically apparent miscarriage, depending upon the age and health of the pregnant woman.[2] Most miscarriages occur very early in pregnancy, in most cases, they occur so early in the pregnancy that the woman is not even aware that she was pregnant. One study testing hormones for ovulation and pregnancy found that 61.9% of conceptuses were lost prior to 12 weeks, and 91.7% of these losses occurred subclinically, without the knowledge of the once pregnant woman.[3]

The risk of spontaneous abortion decreases sharply after the 10th week from the last menstrual period (LMP).[2][4] One study of 232 pregnant women showed “virtually complete [pregancy loss] by the end of the embryonic period" (10 weeks LMP) with a pregnancy loss rate of only 2 percent after 8.5 weeks LMP.[5]

The most common cause of spontaneous abortion during the first trimester is chromosomal abnormalities of the embryo/fetus,[6] accounting for at least 50% of sampled early pregnancy losses.[7] Other causes include vascular disease (such as lupus), diabetes, other hormonal problems, infection, and abnormalities of the uterus.[6] Advancing maternal age and a patient history of previous spontaneous abortions are the two leading factors associated with a greater risk of spontaneous abortion.[7] A spontaneous abortion can also be caused by accidental trauma; intentional trauma or stress to cause miscarriage is considered induced abortion or feticide.[8]

Induced abortion

A pregnancy can be intentionally aborted in many ways. The manner selected depends chiefly upon the gestational age of the embryo or fetus, which increases in size as it ages.[9] Specific procedures may also be selected due to legality, regional availability, and doctor-patient preference. Reasons for procuring induced abortions are typically characterized as either therapeutic or elective. An abortion is medically referred to as therapeutic when it is performed to:

  • save the life of the pregnant woman;[10]
  • preserve the woman's physical or mental health;[10]
  • terminate pregnancy that would result in a child born with a congenital disorder that would be fatal or associated with significant morbidity;[10] or
  • selectively reduce the number of fetuses to lessen health risks associated with multiple pregnancy.[10]

An abortion is referred to as elective when it is performed at the request of the woman "for reasons other than maternal health or fetal disease." [11]

Abortion methods

Abortionmethods

Gestational age may determine which abortion methods are practiced.

Medical

Main article: Medical abortion

"Medical abortions" are non-surgical abortions that use pharmaceutical drugs, and are only effective in the first trimester of pregnancy. [How to reference and link to summary or text] Medical abortions comprise 10% of all abortions in the United States[12] and Europe.[How to reference and link to summary or text] Combined regimens include methotrexate or mifepristone, followed by a prostaglandin (either misoprostol or gemeprost: misoprostol is used in the U.S.; gemeprost is used in the UK and Sweden.) When used within 49 days gestation, approximately 92% of women undergoing medical abortion with a combined regimen completed it without surgical intervention.[13] Misoprostol can be used alone, but has a lower efficacy rate than combined regimens. In cases of failure of medical abortion, vacuum or manual aspiration is used to complete the abortion surgically.

Surgical

File:Vacuum-aspiration (single).svg

A vacuum aspiration abortion at 8 weeks gestational age (6 weeks after fertilization).
1: Amniotic sac
2: Embryo
3: Uterine lining
4: Speculum
5: Vacurette
6: Attached to a suction pump

In the first 12 weeks, suction-aspiration or vacuum abortion is the most common method.[14] Manual Vacuum aspiration (MVA) abortion consists of removing the fetus or embryo, placenta and membranes by suction using a manual syringe, while electric vacuum aspiration (EVA) abortion uses an electric pump. These techniques are comparable, and differ in the mechanism used to apply suction, how early in pregnancy they can be used, and whether cervical dilation is necessary. MVA, also known as "mini-suction" and "menstrual extraction", can be used in very early pregnancy, and does not require cervical dilation. Surgical techniques are sometimes referred to as 'Suction (or surgical) Termination Of Pregnancy' (STOP). From the 15th week until approximately the 26th, dilation and evacuation (D&E) is used. D&E consists of opening the cervix of the uterus and emptying it using surgical instruments and suction.

Dilation and curettage (D&C), the second most common method of abortion, is a standard gynecological procedure performed for a variety of reasons, including examination of the uterine lining for possible malignancy, investigation of abnormal bleeding, and abortion. Curettage refers to cleaning the walls of the uterus with a curette. The World Health Organization recommends this procedure, also called sharp curettage, only when MVA is unavailable.[15] The term D and C, or sometimes suction curette, is used as a euphemism for the first trimester abortion procedure, whichever the method used.

Other techniques must be used to induce abortion in the second trimester. Premature delivery can be induced with prostaglandin; this can be coupled with injecting the amniotic fluid with caustic solutions containing saline or urea. After the 16th week of gestation, abortions can be induced by intact dilation and extraction (IDX) (also called intrauterine cranial decompression), which requires surgical decompression of the fetus' head before evacuation. IDX is sometimes called "partial-birth abortion," which has been federally banned in the United States. A hysterotomy abortion is a procedure similar to a caesarean section, and is performed under general anesthesia because it is considered major abdominal surgery. It requires a smaller incision than a caesarean section and is used during later stages of pregnancy.[16]

From the 20th to 23rd week of gestation, an injection to stop the fetal heart can be used as the first phase of the surgical abortion procedure[17][18][19][20][21] to ensure that the fetus is not born alive.[22]

Other methods

File:AngkorWatAbortionAD1150.JPG

Template:POV-statementBas-relief at Angkor Wat, Cambodia, c. 1150, depicting a demon inducing an abortion by pounding the abdomen of a pregnant woman with a pestle.[23]

Historically, a number of herbs reputed to possess abortifacient properties have been used in folk medicine: tansy, pennyroyal, black cohosh, and the now-extinct silphium (see history of abortion).[24] The use of herbs in such a manner can cause serious — even lethal — side effects, such as multiple organ failure, and is not recommended by physicians.[25]

Abortion is sometimes attempted by causing trauma to the abdomen. The degree of force, if severe, can cause serious internal injuries without necessarily succeeding in inducing miscarriage.[26] Both accidental and deliberate abortions of this kind can be subject to criminal liability in many countries. In Southeast Asia, there is an ancient tradition of attempting abortion through forceful abdominal massage.[27] One of the bas reliefs decorating the temple of Angkor Wat in Cambodia depicts a demon performing such an abortion upon a woman who has been sent to the underworld.[27]

Reported methods of unsafe, self-induced abortion include misuse of misoprostol, and insertion of non-surgical implements such as knitting needles and clothes hangers into the uterus. These methods are rarely seen in developed countries where surgical abortion is legal and available.[28]

Health considerations

Early-term surgical abortion is a simple procedure which is safer than childbirth when performed before the 16th week.[29][30] Abortion methods, like most minimally invasive procedures, carry a small potential for serious complications.[31][32] The risk of complications can increase depending on how far pregnancy has progressed.[33][34]

Women typically experience minor pain during first-trimester abortion procedures. In a 1979 study of 2,299 patients, 97% reported experiencing some degree of pain. Patients rated the pain as being less than earache or toothache, but more than headache or backache.[35] Local and general anesthetics are used during surgical procedures[36]

Mental health

Main article: Abortion and mental health

The relationship between induced abortion and mental health is an area of controversy.[37][38] No scientific research has demonstrated a direct causal relationship between abortion and poor mental health,[39][40] though some studies have noted that there may be a statistical correlation. Pre-existing factors in a woman's life, such as emotional attachment to the pregnancy, lack of social support, pre-existing psychiatric illness, and conservative views on abortion increase the likelihood of experiencing negative feelings after an abortion.[41][42]

In a 1990 review, the American Psychological Association (APA) found that "severe negative reactions [after abortion] are rare and are in line with those following other normal life stresses."[40] The APA revised and updated its findings in August 2008 to account for the accumulation of new evidence, and again concluded that induced abortion did not lead to increased mental health problems.[43][44] A 2008 review by a group from the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health concluded that the highest quality studies found few, if any, mental health differences between women who had abortions and their comparison groups, whereas studies with the most flaws reported negative mental health consequences of abortion.[45] As of August 2008, the United Kingdom Royal College of Psychiatrists is also performing a systematic review of the medical literature to update their position statement on the subject.

Some proposed negative psychological effects of abortion have been referred to by pro-life advocates as a separate condition called "post-abortion syndrome." However, the existence of "post-abortion syndrome" is not recognized by any medical or psychological organization,[46] and some physicians and pro-choice advocates have argued that the effort to popularize the idea of a "post-abortion syndrome" is a tactic used by pro-life advocates for political purposes.[37][39][47][48]

Incidence of induced abortion

The incidence and reasons for induced abortion vary regionally. It has been estimated that approximately 46 million abortions are performed worldwide every year. Of these, 26 million are said to occur in places where abortion is legal; the other 20 million happen where the procedure is illegal. Some countries, such as Belgium (11.2 per 100 known pregnancies) and the Netherlands (10.6 per 100), have a low rate of induced abortion, while others like Russia (62.6 per 100) and Vietnam (43.7 per 100) have a comparatively high rate. The world ratio is 26 induced abortions per 100 known pregnancies.[49]

By gestational age and method

File:UK abortion by gestational age 2004 histogram.svg

Histogram of abortions by gestational age in England and Wales during 2004. Average is 9.5 weeks.

Abortion rates also vary depending on the stage of pregnancy and the method practiced. In 2003, from data collected in those areas of the United States that sufficiently reported gestational age, it was found that 88.2% of abortions were conducted at or prior to 12 weeks, 10.4% from 13 to 20 weeks, and 1.4% at or after 21 weeks. 90.9% of these were classified as having been done by "curettage" (suction-aspiration, Dilation and curettage, Dilation and evacuation), 7.7% by "medical" means (mifepristone), 0.4% by "intrauterine instillation" (saline or prostaglandin), and 1.0% by "other" (including hysterotomy and hysterectomy).[50] The Guttmacher Institute estimated there were 2,200 intact dilation and extraction procedures in the U.S. during 2000; this accounts for 0.17% of the total number of abortions performed that year.[51] Similarly, in England and Wales in 2006, 89% of terminations occurred at or under 12 weeks, 9% between 13 to 19 weeks, and 1.5% at or over 20 weeks. 64% of those reported were by vacuum aspiration, 6% by D&E, and 30% were medical.[52] Later abortions are more common in China, India, and other developing countries than in developed countries.[53]

By personal and social factors

AGIAbortionReasonsBarChart

A bar chart depicting selected data from the 1998 AGI meta-study on the reasons women stated for having an abortion.

A 1998 aggregated study, from 27 countries, on the reasons women seek to terminate their pregnancies concluded that common factors cited to have influenced the abortion decision were: desire to delay or end childbearing, concern over the interruption of work or education, issues of financial or relationship stability, and perceived immaturity.[54] A 2004 study in which American women at clinics answered a questionnaire yielded similar results.[55] In Finland and the United States, concern for the health risks posed by pregnancy in individual cases was not a factor commonly given; however, in Bangladesh, India, and Kenya health concerns were cited by women more frequently as reasons for having an abortion.[54] 1% of women in the 2004 survey-based U.S. study became pregnant as a result of rape and 0.5% as a result of incest.[55] Another American study in 2002 concluded that 54% of women who had an abortion were using a form of contraception at the time of becoming pregnant while 46% were not. Inconsistent use was reported by 49% of those using condoms and 76% of those using the combined oral contraceptive pill; 42% of those using condoms reported failure through slipping or breakage.[56] The Guttmacher Institute estimated that "most abortions in the United States are obtained by minority women" because minority women "have much higher rates of unintended pregnancy."[57]

Some abortions are undergone as the result of societal pressures. These might include the stigmatization of disabled persons, preference for children of a specific sex, disapproval of single motherhood, insufficient economic support for families, lack of access to or rejection of contraceptive methods, or efforts toward population control (such as China's one-child policy). These factors can sometimes result in compulsory abortion or sex-selective abortion.

History of abortion

FrenchPeriodicalPills-January61845,BostonDailyTimes

"French Periodical Pills." An example of a clandestine advertisement published in an 1845 edition of the Boston Daily Times.

Main article: History of abortion

Induced abortion can be traced to ancient times.[58] There is evidence to suggest that, historically, pregnancies were terminated through a number of methods, including the administration of abortifacient herbs, the use of sharpened implements, the application of abdominal pressure, and other techniques.

The Hippocratic Oath, the chief statement of medical ethics for Hippocratic physicians in Ancient Greece, forbade doctors from helping to procure an abortion by pessary. Soranus, a second-century Greek physician, suggested in his work Gynaecology that women wishing to abort their pregnancies should engage in energetic exercise, energetic jumping, carrying heavy objects, and riding animals. He also prescribed a number of recipes for herbal baths, pessaries, and bloodletting, but advised against the use of sharp instruments to induce miscarriage due to the risk of organ perforation.[59] It is also believed that, in addition to using it as a contraceptive, the ancient Greeks relied upon silphium as an abortifacient. Such folk remedies, however, varied in effectiveness and were not without risk. Tansy and pennyroyal, for example, are two poisonous herbs with serious side effects that have at times been used to terminate pregnancy.

During the medieval period, physicians in the Islamic world documented detailed and extensive lists of birth control practices, including the use of abortifacients, commenting on their effectiveness and prevalence.[60] They listed many different birth control substances in their medical encyclopedias, such as Avicenna listing 20 in The Canon of Medicine (1025) and Muhammad ibn Zakariya ar-Razi listing 176 in his Hawi (10th century). This was unparalleled in European medicine until the 19th century.[61]

Abortion in the 19th century continued, despite bans in both the United Kingdom and the United States, as the disguised, but nonetheless open, advertisement of services in the Victorian era suggests.[62]

In the 20th century the Soviet Union (1919), Iceland (1935) and Sweden (1938) were among the first countries to legalize certain or all forms of abortion.[63] In 1935 Nazi Germany, a law was passed permitting abortions for those deemed "hereditarily ill," while women considered of German stock were specifically prohibited from having abortions.[64][65][66][67]

Social issues

Sex-selective abortion and female infanticide

Main article: Sex-selective abortion and female infanticide

Sonography and amniocentesis allows parents to determine sex before birth. The development of this technology has lead sex-selective abortion, or the targeted termination of female fetuses.

It is suggested that sex-selective abortion might be partially responsible for the noticeable disparities between the birth rates of male and female children in some places. The preference for male children is reported in many areas of Asia, and abortion used to limit female births has been reported in Mainland China, Taiwan, South Korea, and India.[68]

In India, the economic role of men, the costs associated with dowries, and a Hindu tradition which dictates that funeral rites must be performed by a male relative have led to a cultural preference for sons.[69] The widespread availability of diagnostic testing, during the 1970s and '80s, led to advertisements for services which read, "Invest 500 rupees [for a sex test] now, save 50,000 rupees [for a dowry] later."[70] In 1991, the male-to-female sex ratio in India was skewed from its biological norm of 105 to 100, to an average of 108 to 100.[71] Researchers have asserted that between 1985 and 2005 as many as 10 million female fetuses may have been selectively aborted.[72] The Indian government passed an official ban of pre-natal sex screening in 1994 and moved to pass a complete ban of sex-selective abortion in 2002.[73]

In the People's Republic of China, there is also a historic son preference. The implementation of the one-child policy in 1979, in response to population concerns, led to an increased disparity in the sex ratio as parents attempted to circumvent the law through sex-selective abortion or the abandonment of unwanted daughters.[74] Sex-selective abortion might be an influence on the shift from the baseline male-to-female birth rate to an elevated national rate of 117:100 reported in 2002. The trend was more pronounced in rural regions: as high as 130:100 in Guangdong and 135:100 in Hainan.[75] A ban upon the practice of sex-selective abortion was enacted in 2003.[76]

Unsafe abortion

RussianAbortionPoster

Soviet poster circa 1925, promoting hospital abortions. Title translation: "Abortions performed by either trained or self-taught midwives not only maim the woman, they also often lead to death."

Main article: Unsafe abortion

Women seeking to terminate their pregnancies sometimes resort to unsafe methods, particularly where and when access to legal abortion is being barred.

The World Health Organization (WHO) defines an unsafe abortion as being "a procedure...carried out by persons lacking the necessary skills or in an environment that does not conform to minimal medical standards, or both."[77] Unsafe abortions are sometimes known colloquially as "back-alley" abortions. This can include a person without medical training, a professional health provider operating in sub-standard conditions, or the woman herself.

Unsafe abortion remains a public health concern today due to the higher incidence and severity of its associated complications, such as incomplete abortion, sepsis, hemorrhage, and damage to internal organs. WHO estimates that 19 million unsafe abortions occur around the world annually and that 68,000 of these result in the woman's death.[77] Complications of unsafe abortion are said to account, globally, for approximately 13% of all maternal mortalities, with regional estimates including 12% in Asia, 25% in Latin America, and 13% in sub-Saharan Africa.[78] A 2007 study published in the The Lancet found that, although the global rate of abortion declined from 45.6 million in 1995 to 41.6 million in 2003, unsafe procedures still accounted for 48% of all abortions performed in 2003..[79] Health education, access to family planning, and improvements in health care during and after abortion have been proposed to address this phenomenon.[80]

Abortion debate

File:March for Women's Lives detail.jpg

Pro-choice activists near the Washington Monument at the March for Women's Lives.

File:March for life 2007.JPG

Pro-life activists at the March for Life in 2007. The rally is held annually in Washington, DC.

Main article: Abortion debate

In the history of abortion, induced abortion has been the source of considerable debate, controversy, and activism. An individual's position on the complex ethical, moral, philosophical, biological, and legal issues is often related to his or her value system. The main positions are the pro-choice position, which argues in favor of access to abortion, and the pro-life position, which argues against access to abortion. Opinions of abortion may be best described as being a combination of beliefs on its morality, and beliefs on the responsibility, ethical scope, and proper extent of governmental authorities in public policy. Religious ethics also has an influence upon both personal opinion and the greater debate over abortion (see religion and abortion).

Abortion debates, especially pertaining to abortion laws, are often spearheaded by advocacy groups belonging to one of two camps. In the United States, most often those in favor of greater legal restrictions on, or even complete prohibition of abortion, describe themselves as pro-life while those against legal restrictions on abortion describe themselves as pro-choice. Generally, the pro-life position argues that a human fetus is a human being with the right to live making abortion tantamount to murder. The pro-choice position argues that a woman has certain reproductive rights, especially the choice whether or not to carry a pregnancy to term.

In both public and private debate, arguments presented in favor of or against abortion focus on either the moral permissibility of an induced abortion, or justification of laws permitting or restricting abortion.

Debate also focuses on whether the pregnant woman should have to notify and/or have the consent of others in distinct cases: a minor, her parents; a legally married or common-law wife, her husband; or a pregnant woman, the biological father. In a 2003 Gallup poll in the United States, 79% of male and 67% of female respondents were in favor of spousal notification; overall support was 72% with 26% opposed.[81]

Public opinion

Main article: Societal attitudes towards abortion

A number of opinion polls around the world have explored public opinion regarding the issue of abortion. Results have varied from poll to poll, country to country, and region to region, while varying with regard to different aspects of the issue.

A May 2005 survey examined attitudes toward abortion in 10 European countries, asking polltakers whether they agreed with the statement, "If a woman doesn't want children, she should be allowed to have an abortion". The highest level of approval was 81% (in the Czech Republic); the lowest was 47% (in Poland).[82]

In North America, a December 2001 poll surveyed Canadian opinion on abortion, asking Canadians in what circumstances they believe abortion should be permitted; 32% responded that they believe abortion should be legal in all circumstances, 52% that it should be legal in certain circumstances, and 14% that it should be legal in no circumstances. A similar poll in January 2006 surveyed people in the United States about U.S. opinion on abortion; 33% said that abortion should be "permitted only in cases such as rape, incest or to save the woman's life", 27% said that abortion should be "permitted in all cases", 15% that it should be "permitted, but subject to greater restrictions than it is now", 17% said that it should "only be permitted to save the woman's life", and 5% said that it should "never" be permitted.[83] A November 2005 poll in Mexico found that 73.4% think abortion should not be legalized while 11.2% think it should.[84]

Of attitudes in South America, a December 2003 survey found that 30% of Argentines thought that abortion in Argentina should be allowed "regardless of situation", 47% that it should be allowed "under some circumstances", and 23% that it should not be allowed "regardless of situation".[85] A March 2007 poll regarding the abortion law in Brazil found that 65% of Brazilians believe that it "should not be modified", 16% that it should be expanded "to allow abortion in other cases", 10% that abortion should be "decriminalized", and 5% were "not sure".[86] A July 2005 poll in Colombia found that 65.6% said they thought that abortion should remain illegal, 26.9% that it should be made legal, and 7.5% that they were unsure.[87]

Selected issues of the abortion debate

Breast cancer hypothesis

Main article: Abortion-breast cancer hypothesis

The abortion-breast cancer hypothesis (supporters call it the abortion-breast cancer link) posits that induced abortion increases the risk of developing breast cancer;[88] it has been a controversial subject but the current scientific consensus has concluded that there is no significant association between first-trimester abortion and breast cancer risk.[89][90][91][92]

In early pregnancy, levels of estrogen increase, leading to breast growth in preparation for lactation. The hypothesis proposes that if this process is interrupted by an abortion – before full maturity in the third trimester – then more relatively vulnerable immature cells could be left than there were prior to the pregnancy, resulting in a greater potential risk of breast cancer. The hypothesis mechanism was first proposed and explored in rat studies conducted in the 1980s.[93][94][95]

Fetal pain debate

Main article: Fetal pain

Fetal pain, its existence, and its implications are part of a larger debate about abortion. Many researchers in the area of fetal development believe that a fetus is unlikely to feel pain until after the seventh month of pregnancy. Others disagree.[96]Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; invalid names, e.g. too many However, legislation has been proposed by pro-life advocates requiring abortion providers to tell a woman that the fetus may feel pain during an abortion procedure.[97]

A review by researchers from the University of California, San Francisco in JAMA concluded that data from dozens of medical reports and studies indicate that fetuses are unlikely to feel pain until the third trimester of pregnancy.[98] However a number of medical critics have since disputed these conclusions.[96] [99] At the end of the 20th century there was an emerging consensus among developmental neurobiologists that the establishment of thalamocortical connections (at about 26 weeks) is a critical event with regard to fetal perception of pain.[100] Other researchers such as Anand and Fisk have challenged this late date, positing that pain can be felt around 20 weeks.[101] Because pain can involve sensory, emotional and cognitive factors, it may be "impossible to know" when painful experiences are perceived, even if it is known when thalamocortical connections are established.[102]

Effect upon crime rate

Main article: Legalized abortion and crime effect

A theory attempts to draw a correlation between the United States' unprecedented nationwide decline of the overall crime rate during the 1990s and the decriminalization of abortion 20 years prior.

The suggestion was brought to widespread attention by a 1999 academic paper, The Impact of Legalized Abortion on Crime, authored by the economists Steven D. Levitt and John Donohue. They attributed the drop in crime to a reduction in individuals said to have a higher statistical probability of committing crimes: unwanted children, especially those born to mothers who are African-American, impoverished, adolescent, uneducated, and single. The change coincided with what would have been the adolescence, or peak years of potential criminality, of those who had not been born as a result of Roe v. Wade and similar cases. Donohue and Levitt's study also noted that states which legalized abortion before the rest of the nation experienced the lowering crime rate pattern earlier, and those with higher abortion rates had more pronounced reductions.[103]

Fellow economists Christopher Foote and Christopher Goetz criticized the methodology in the Donohue-Levitt study, noting a lack of accommodation for statewide yearly variations such as cocaine use, and recalculating based on incidence of crime per capita; they found no statistically significant results.[104] Levitt and Donohue responded to this by presenting an adjusted data set which took into account these concerns and reported that the data maintained the statistical significance of their initial paper.[105]

Such research has been criticized by some as being utilitarian, discriminatory as to race and socioeconomic class, and as promoting eugenics as a solution to crime.[106][107] Levitt states in his book Freakonomics that they are neither promoting nor negating any course of action—merely reporting data as economists.

Mexico City Policy

Main article: Mexico City Policy

The Mexico City policy, also known as the "Global Gag Rule" required any non-governmental organization receiving US Government funding to refrain from performing or promoting abortion services in other countries. This had a significant effect on the health policies of many nations across the globe. The Mexico City Policy was instituted under President Reagan, suspended under President Clinton, reinstated by President George W. Bush,[108] and suspended again by President Barack Obama on January 24, 2009. [109]

Religious Views

Main article: Religion and abortion

Abortion law

Main article: Abortion law
File:AbortionLawsMap-NoLegend.png

International status of abortion law: ██ Legal on request ██ Legal for rape, maternal life, health, mental health, socioeconomic factors, and/or fetal defects ██ Legal for or illegal with exception for rape, maternal life, health, fetal defects, and/or mental health ██ Illegal with exception for rape, maternal life, health, and/or mental health ██ Illegal with exception for maternal life, health, and/or mental health ██ Illegal with no exceptions ██ Varies by region ██ No information Vertical stripes (various colours): Illegal but unenforced

Before the scientific discovery in the nineteenth century that human development begins at fertilization,[110] English common law forbade abortions after "quickening”, that is, after “an infant is able to stir in the mother's womb.”[111] There was also an earlier period in England when abortion was prohibited "if the foetus is already formed" but not yet quickened.[112] Both pre- and post-quickening abortions were criminalized by Lord Ellenborough's Act in 1803.[113] In 1861, the British Parliament passed the Offences Against the Person Act, which continued to outlaw abortion and served as a model for similar prohibitions in some other nations.[114]

The Soviet Union, with legislation in 1920, and Iceland, with legislation in 1935, were two of the first countries to generally allow abortion. The second half of the 20th century saw the liberalization of abortion laws in other countries. The Abortion Act 1967 allowed abortion for limited reasons in the United Kingdom. In the 1973 case, Roe v. Wade, the United States Supreme Court struck down state laws banning abortion, ruling that such laws violated an implied right to privacy in the United States Constitution. The Supreme Court of Canada, similarly, in the case of R. v. Morgentaler, discarded its criminal code regarding abortion in 1988, after ruling that such restrictions violated the security of person guaranteed to women under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Canada later struck down provincial regulations of abortion in the case of R. v. Morgentaler (1993). By contrast, abortion in Ireland was affected by the addition of an amendment to the Irish Constitution in 1983 by popular referendum, recognizing "the right to life of the unborn".

Current laws pertaining to abortion are diverse. Religious, moral, and cultural sensibilities continue to influence abortion laws throughout the world. The right to life, the right to liberty, the right to security of person, and the right to reproductive health are major issues of human rights that are sometimes used as justification for the existence or absence of laws controlling abortion. Many countries in which abortion is legal require that certain criteria be met in order for an abortion to be obtained, often, but not always, using a trimester-based system to regulate the window of legality:

  • In the United States, some states impose a 24-hour waiting period before the procedure, prescribe the distribution of information on fetal development, or require that parents be contacted if their minor daughter requests an abortion.[115]
  • In the United Kingdom, as in some other countries, two doctors must first certify that an abortion is medically or socially necessary before it can be performed.

Other countries, in which abortion is normally illegal, will allow one to be performed in the case of rape, incest, or danger to the pregnant woman's life or health. A few nations ban abortion entirely: Chile, El Salvador, Malta, Ireland and Nicaragua, although in 2006 the Chilean government began the free distribution of emergency contraception.[116][117] In Bangladesh, abortion is illegal, but the government has long supported a network of "menstrual regulation clinics", where menstrual extraction (manual vacuum aspiration) can be performed as menstrual hygiene.[118]

In places where abortion is illegal or carries heavy social stigma, pregnant women may engage in medical tourism and travel to countries where they can terminate their pregnancy. In the USA, it is not unusual for women to travel from one state to another for reasons of termination of pregnancy.

In other animals

Further information: Miscarriage#In other animals

Spontaneous abortion occurs in various animals. For example, in sheep, it may be caused by crowding through doors, or being chased by dogs.[119] In cows, abortion may be caused by contagious disease, such as Brucellosis or Campylobacter, but can often be controlled by vaccination.[120] Additionally, many other diseases are known to increase the risk of miscarriage in non-human animals.[How to reference and link to summary or text]

Abortion may also be induced in animals, in the context of animal husbandry. For example, abortion may be induced in mares that have been mated improperly, or that have been purchased by owners who did not realize the mares were pregnant, or that are pregnant with twin foals.[121]

Feticide can occur in horses and zebras due to male harassment of pregnant mares or forced copulation,[122][123][124] although the frequency in the wild has been questioned.[125] Male Gray langur monkeys may attack females following male takeover, causing miscarriage.[126]

See also

References

  1. Department of Reproductive Health and Research , World Health Organization Managing Complications in Pregnancy and Childbirth - A guide for midwives and doctors. URL accessed on 2009-04-07. NB: This definition is subject to regional differences, see miscarriage.
  2. 2.0 2.1 includeonly>"Q&A: Miscarriage", BBC, 2002-08-06. Retrieved on 2009-04-07.
  3. Edmonds DK, Lindsay KS, Miller JF, Williamson E, Wood PJ (1982). Early embryonic mortality in women. Fertil. Steril. 38 (4): 447–53.
  4. Nilsson, Lennart; Lars Hamberger [1965] (1990). A child is born, Garden City, New York: Doubleday.
  5. Jauniaux, E.; P. Kaminopetros and H. El-Rafaey (1999). "Early pregnancy loss" Martin J. Whittle and C. H. Rodeck Fetal medicine: basic science and clinical practice, Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.
  6. 6.0 6.1 Stöppler, Melissa Conrad, William C. Shiel, Jr., ed. Miscarriage (Spontaneous Abortion). MedicineNet.com. URL accessed on 2009-04-07.
  7. 7.0 7.1 Jauniaux, E.; P. Kaminopetros and H. El-Rafaey (1999). "Early pregnancy loss" Martin J. Whittle and C. H. Rodeck Fetal medicine: basic science and clinical practice, Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.
  8. Fetal Homicide Laws. National Conference of State Legislatures. URL accessed on 2009-04-07.
  9. Menikoff, Jerry. Law and Bioethics, page 78 (Georgetown University Press 2001): "As the fetus grows in size, however, the vacuum aspiration method becomes increasingly difficult to use."
  10. 10.0 10.1 10.2 10.3 Roche, Natalie E. (2004). Therapeutic Abortion. Retrieved 2006-03-08.
  11. Encyclopedia Britannica, (2007), Vol 26, page 674
  12. Strauss LT, Gamble SB, Parker WY, Cook DA, Zane SB, Hamdan S (November 2007). Abortion surveillance--United States, 2004. MMWR Surveill Summ 56 (9): 1–33.
  13. Spitz, I.M. et al (1998). Early pregnancy termination with mifepristone and misoprostol in the United States. New England Journal of Medicine 338 (18): 1241.
  14. Healthwise (2004). Manual and vacuum aspiration for abortion. WebMD. URL accessed on 2008-12-05.
  15. World Health Organization (2003). "Dilatation and curettage" Managing Complications in Pregnancy and Childbirth: A Guide for Midwives and Doctors, Geneva: World Health Organization. URL accessed 2008-12-05.
  16. McGee, Glenn; Jon F. Merz "Abortion". Encarta. Microsoft. Retrieved on 2008-12-05. 
  17. Vause S, Sands J, Johnston TA, Russell S, Rimmer S (May 2002). Could some fetocides be avoided by more prompt referral after diagnosis of fetal abnormality?. J Obstet Gynaecol 22 (3): 243–5.
  18. Dommergues M, Cahen F, Garel M, Mahieu-Caputo D, Dumez Y (2003). Feticide during second- and third-trimester termination of pregnancy: opinions of health care professionals. Fetal. Diagn. Ther. 18 (2): 91–7.
  19. Bhide A, Sairam S, Hollis B, Thilaganathan B (September 2002). Comparison of feticide carried out by cordocentesis versus cardiac puncture. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 20 (3): 230–2.
  20. Senat MV, Fischer C, Bernard JP, Ville Y (March 2003). The use of lidocaine for fetocide in late termination of pregnancy. BJOG 110 (3): 296–300.
  21. Senat MV, Fischer C, Ville Y (May 2002). Funipuncture for fetocide in late termination of pregnancy. Prenat. Diagn. 22 (5): 354–6.
  22. Nuffield Council on Bioethics (2006). "Clinical perspectives (Continued)" Critical Case Decisions in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine: Ethical Issues, Nuffield Council on Bioethics. URL accessed 2008-12-03.
  23. Potts, M. et al. "Thousand-year-old depictions of massage abortion," Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care, volume 33, page 234 (2007): “at Angkor, the operator is a demon.” Also see Mould, R. Mould's Medical Anecdotes, page 406 (CRC Press 1996).
  24. Riddle, John M. (1997). Eve's herbs: a history of contraception and abortion in the West, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Template:Pn
  25. Ciganda C, Laborde A (2003). Herbal infusions used for induced abortion. J. Toxicol. Clin. Toxicol. 41 (3): 235–9.
  26. Education for Choice. (2005-05-06). (December 2008){{{title}}}. Unsafe abortion. Retrieved 2006-01-11.
  27. 27.0 27.1 Potts, Malcolm, Martha Campbell (2002). History of Contraception. Gynecology and Obstetrics 6 (8).
  28. Thapa SR, Rimal D, Preston J (September 2006). Self induction of abortion with instrumentation. Aust Fam Physician 35 (9): 697–8.
  29. Henshaw, Stanley K. (June 1990). Induced Abortion: A World Review, 1990. International Family Planning Perspectives 23 (2): 246–252.
  30. Grimes DA (1994). The morbidity and mortality of pregnancy: still risky business. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 170 (5 Pt 2): 1489–94.
  31. World Health Organization (1997). Medical Methods for Termination of Pregnancy: Report of a Who Scientific Group, Geneva: World Health Organization.Template:Pn
  32. Gaufberg, Slava V. Abortion, Complications. eMedicine. URL accessed on 2007-06-30.
  33. Pauli E, Haller U, Zimmermann R (2005). [Morbidity of dilatation and evacuation in the second trimester: an analysis]. Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch 45 (2): 107–15.
  34. Bartley J, Tong S, Everington D, Baird DT (2000). Parity is a major determinant of success rate in medical abortion: a retrospective analysis of 3161 consecutive cases of early medical abortion treated with reduced doses of mifepristone and vaginal gemeprost. Contraception 62 (6): 297–303.
  35. Smith GM, Stubblefield PG, Chirchirillo L, McCarthy MJ (1979). Pain of first-trimester abortion: its quantification and relations with other variables. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 133 (5): 489–98.
  36. Women's Center Medical[unreliable source?]
  37. 37.0 37.1 includeonly>Bazelon, Emily. "Is There a Post-Abortion Syndrome?", New York Times Magazine, 2007-01-21. Retrieved on 2008-12-03.
  38. "Post-Abortion Politics" NOW with David Brancaccio on PBS
  39. 39.0 39.1 Mooney, Chris (October 2004). Research and Destroy: How the religious right promotes its own 'experts' to combat mainstream science.
  40. 40.0 40.1 (January/February 1990). More on Koop's Study of Abortion. Family Planning Perspectives 22 (1): 36–39.
  41. Adler NE, David HP, Major BN, Roth SH, Russo NF, Wyatt GE (1990). Psychological responses after abortion. Science 248 (4951): 41–4.
  42. Edwards, S. (July/August 1997). Abortion study finds no long-term ill effects on emotional well-being. Family Planning Perspectives 29: 193.
  43. Report of the APA Task Force on Mental Health and Abortion APA (August 13, 2008)
  44. includeonly>Carey, Benedict. "Abortion Does Not Cause Mental Illness", New York Times, 2008-08-12. Retrieved on 2008-12-03.
  45. Charles, VE, Polis CB, Sridhara SK, Blum RW (December 2008). Abortion and long-term mental health outcomes: a systematic review of the evidence.. Contraception 78 (6): 436-50.
  46. Grimes DA, Creinin MD (2004). Induced abortion: an overview for internists. Ann. Intern. Med. 140 (8): 620–6.
  47. Stotland NL (2003). Abortion and psychiatric practice. J Psychiatr Pract 9 (2): 139–49.
  48. Stotland NL (October 1992). The myth of the abortion trauma syndrome. JAMA 268 (15): 2078–9.
  49. Henshaw, Stanley K., Singh, Susheela, & Haas, Taylor. (1999). The Incidence of Abortion Worldwide. International Family Planning Perspectives, 25 (Supplement), 30 – 8. Retrieved 2006-01-18.
  50. Strauss, L.T., Gamble, S.B., Parker, W.Y, Cook, D.A., Zane, S.B., & Hamdan, S. (November 24, 2006). Abortion Surveillance - United States, 2003. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 55 (11), 1-32. Retrieved May 10, 2007.
  51. Finer, Lawrence B. & Henshaw, Stanley K. (2003). Abortion Incidence and Services in the United States in 2000. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 35 (1). Retrieved 2006-05-10.
  52. Department of Health (2007). Abortion statistics, England and Wales: 2006. URL accessed on 2007-10-12.
  53. Cheng L. “Surgical versus medical methods for second-trimester induced abortion : RHL commentary” (last revised: 1 November 2008). The WHO Reproductive Health Library; Geneva: World Health Organization.
  54. 54.0 54.1 Bankole, Akinrinola, Singh, Susheela, & Haas, Taylor. (1998). Reasons Why Women Have Induced Abortions: Evidence from 27 Countries. International Family Planning Perspectives, 24 (3), 117-127 & 152. Retrieved 2006-01-18.
  55. 55.0 55.1 Finer, Lawrence B., Frohwirth, Lori F., Dauphinee, Lindsay A., Singh, Shusheela, & Moore, Ann M. (2005). Reasons U.S. women have abortions: quantative and qualitative perspectives. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 37 (3), 110-8. Retrieved 2006-01-18.
  56. Jones, Rachel K., Darroch, Jacqueline E., Henshaw, Stanley K. (2002). Contraceptive Use Among U.S. Women Having Abortions in 2000–2001. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 34 (6). Retrieved June 15, 2006.
  57. Susan A. Cohen: Abortion and Women of Color: The Bigger Picture, Guttmacher Policy Review, Summer 2008, Volume 11, Number 3
  58. Devereux, G. (1967). "A typological study of abortion in 350 primitive, ancient, and pre-industrial societies" Harold Rosen Abortion in America; medical, psychiatric, legal, anthropological, and religious considerations, Boston: Beacon Press. URL accessed 2008-12-02.
  59. Lefkowitz, Mary R.; Maureen B. Fant (1992). Women's life in Greece & Rome: a source book in translation, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. URL accessed 2008-12-02.
  60. Sheikh, Sa'diyya (2003), "Family Planning, Contraception, and Abortion in Islam", in Maguire, Daniel C., Sacred Rights: The Case for Contraception and Abortion in World Religions, Oxford University Press US, pp. 105–128 [105–6], ISBN 0195160010 
  61. Sheikh, Sa'diyya (2003), "Family Planning, Contraception, and Abortion in Islam", in Maguire, Daniel C., Sacred Rights: The Case for Contraception and Abortion in World Religions, Oxford University Press US, pp. 105–128 [115], ISBN 0195160010 
  62. DeHullu, James Histories of Abortion. URL accessed on 2008-12-02.
  63. Abortion Law, History & Religion. Childbirth By Choice Trust. URL accessed on 2008-03-23.
  64. Friedlander, Henry (1995). The origins of Nazi genocide: from euthanasia to the final solution, Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
  65. Proctor, Robert (1988). Racial Hygiene: Medicine Under the Nazis, 122, 123 and 366, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
  66. Arnot, Margaret L.; Cornelie Usborne (1999). Gender and Crime in Modern Europe, New York: Routledge.
  67. DiMeglio, Peter M. (1999). "Germany 1933-1945 (National Socialism)". Women's studies encyclopedia. Ed. Helen Tierney. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press. 589. ISBN 0-313-31072-6. OCLC 38504469. 
  68. Banister, Judith. (1999-03-16). Son Preference in Asia - Report of a Symposium. Retrieved 2006-01-12.
  69. Mutharayappa, Rangamuthia, Kim Choe, Minja, Arnold, Fred, & Roy, T.K. (1997). Son Preferences and Its Effect on Fertility in India. National Family Health Survey Subject Reports, Number 3. Retrieved 2006-01-12.
  70. Patel, Rita (Fall 1996). The practice of sex selective abortion in India: May you be the mother of a hundred sons. Carolina Papers in International Health and Development 7.
  71. Sudha, S., S. Irudaya Rajan (July 1999). Female Demographic Disadvantage in India 1981-1991: Sex Selective Abortions and Female Infanticide. Development and Change 30 (3): 585–618.
  72. includeonly>Reaney, Patricia. "Selective abortion blamed for India's missing girls", Reuters. Retrieved on 2008-12-03.
  73. Mudur, Ganapati (2002). India plans new legislation to prevent sex selection. BMJ 324 (7334): 385b.
  74. Graham, Maureen J., Ulla Larsen and Xiping Xu (June 1998). Son Preference in Anhui Province, China. International Family Planning Perspectives 24 (2): 72.
  75. Plafker, Ted (May 2002). Sex selection in China sees 117 boys born for every 100 girls. BMJ 324 (7348): 1233a.
  76. "China Bans Sex-selection Abortion." (2002-03-22). Xinhua News Agency. Retrieved 2006-01-12.
  77. 77.0 77.1 World Health Organization. (2004). "Unsafe abortion: global and regional estimates of unsafe abortion and associated mortality in 2000". Retrieved 2009-03-22.
  78. Salter, C., Johnson, H.B., and Hengen, N. (1997). Care for post abortion complications: saving women's lives. Population Reports, 25 (1). Retrieved 2006-02-22.
  79. Sedgh, Gilda, Stanley Henshaw, Susheela Singh, Elisabeth Åhman and Iqbal H. Shah (October 2007). Induced abortion: estimated rates and trends worldwide. The Lancet 370 (9595): 1338–1345.
  80. World Health Organization. (1998). Address Unsafe Abortion. Retrieved 2006-03-01.
  81. The Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. (2005-11-02). "Public Opinion Supports Alito on Spousal Notification Even as It Favors Roe v. Wade." Pew Research Center Pollwatch. Retrieved 2006-03-01.
  82. TNS Sofres. (May 2005). European Values. Retrieved January 11, 2007.
  83. The Polling Report. (2006). Retrieved 2006-01-11.
  84. Mexicans Support Status Quo on Social Issues. Angus Reid Global Monitor. URL accessed on 2008-12-09.
  85. Argentines Assess Abortion Changes. Angus Reid Global Monitor. URL accessed on 2008-12-09.
  86. Brazilians Want to Keep Abortion as Crime. Angus Reid Global Monitor. URL accessed on 2008-12-09.
  87. Colombians Reject Legalizing Abortion. Angus Reid Global Monitor. URL accessed on 2008-12-09.
  88. Russo J, Russo I (1980). Susceptibility of the mammary gland to carcinogenesis. II. Pregnancy interruption as a risk factor in tumor incidence. Am J Pathol 100 (2): 505–506.
  89. (2000). Induced abortion does not increase breast cancer risk. World Health Organization. URL accessed on 2007-12-24.
  90. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists [2000] (September 2004). The Care of Women Requesting Induced Abortion (PDF), Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. URL accessed 2008-12-05.
  91. Breast Cancer Risks. United States House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. URL accessed on 2008-04-14.
  92. Koba S, Nowak S (February 1976). [A case of acute bacterial dysentery with cerebrospinal meningitis]. Wiadomości lekarskie 29 (3): 221–3.
  93. Russo J, Russo IH (August 1980). Susceptibility of the mammary gland to carcinogenesis. II. Pregnancy interruption as a risk factor in tumor incidence. Am. J. Pathol. 100 (2): 497–512.
  94. Russo J, Tay L, Russo I (1982). Differentiation of the mammary gland and susceptibility to carcinogenesis. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 2 (1): 5–73.
  95. Russo J, Russo I (1987). Biological and molecular bases of mammary carcinogenesis. Laboratory Investigation 57 (2): 112–37.
  96. 96.0 96.1 "Study: Fetus feels no pain until third trimester", Associated Press via MSNBC (2005-08-24). Retrieved 2008-04-13.
  97. Weisman, Jonathan. "House to Consider Abortion Anesthesia Bill", Washington Post 2006-12-05. Retrieved 2007-02-06.
  98. Lee SJ, Ralston HJ, Drey EA, Partridge JC, Rosen MA (2005). Fetal pain: a systematic multidisciplinary review of the evidence. JAMA 294 (8): 947–54.
  99. Lowery CL, Hardman MP, Manning N, Hall RW, Anand KJS (2007). Neurodevelopmental Changes of Fetal Pain. Seminars in Perinatology 31 (5): 275–82.
  100. Johnson, Martin and Everitt, Barry. Essential reproduction (Blackwell 2000), p. 215. Retrieved 2007-02-21.
  101. Paul, Annie. "The First Ache", New York Times 2008-02-10. Retrieved 2009-03-21.
  102. Johnson, Martin and Everitt, Barry. Essential reproduction (Blackwell 2000): "The multidimensionality of pain perception, involving sensory, emotional, and cognitive factors may in itself be the basis of conscious, painful experience, but it will remain difficult to attribute this to a fetus at any particular developmental age." Retrieved 2007-02-21.
  103. Donohue, John J., Steven Levitt (May 2001). The Impact of Legalized Abortion on Crime. Quarterly Journal of Economics 116 (2): 379–420.
  104. Foote, Christopher L. (February 2008). The Impact of Legalized Abortion on Crime: Comment. Quarterly Journal of Economics 123 (1): 407–423.
  105. Donohue, John J. (February 2008). Measurement Error, Legalized Abortion, and the Decline in Crime: A Response to Foote and Goetz. Quarterly Journal of Economics 123 (1): 425–440.
  106. Crime-Abortion Study Continues to Draw Pro-life Backlash. Ohio Roundtable Online Library. The Pro-Life Infonet. URL accessed on 2008-12-06.
  107. J.B.F. (2000). Abortion and the Lower Crime Rate. St. Anthony Messenger. URL accessed on 2008-12-06.
  108. Knudsen, Lara (2006). Reproductive Rights in a Global Context, Vanderbilt University Press.
  109. Obama lifts ban on abortion funds. BBC News. URL accessed on 2009-01-24.
  110. Garrison, Fielding. An Introduction to the History of Medicine, pages 566-567 (Saunders 1921).
  111. Blackstone, William [1765] (1979). "Amendment IX, Document 1" Commentaries on the Laws of England, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  112. Henry de Bracton [Template:Circa] (1968). "The crime of homicide and the divisions into which it falls" George E. Woodbine ed.; Samuel Edmund Thorne trans. On the Laws and Customs of England. URL accessed 2008-12-11.
  113. Lord Ellenborough’s Act (1998). The Abortion Law Homepage. Retrieved February 20, 2007.
  114. United Nations Population Division. (2002). Abortion Policies: A Global Review. Retrieved February 22, 2007.
  115. Interactive maps comparing U.S. abortion restrictions by state LawServer
  116. Ross, Jen. (September 12, 2006). "In Chile, free morning-after pills to teens." The Christian Science Monitor. Retrieved 2006-12-07.
  117. Gallardoi, Eduardo. (September 26, 2006). "Morning-After Pill Causes Furor in Chile." The Washington Post. Retrieved 2006-12-07.
  118. Surgical Abortion: History and Overview. National Abortion Federation. URL accessed on 2006-09-04.
  119. Spencer, James. Sheep Husbandry in Canada, page 124 (1911).
  120. "Beef cattle and Beef production: Management and Husbandry of Beef Cattle”, Encyclopaedia of New Zealand (1966).
  121. McKinnon, Angus et al. Equine Reproduction, page 563 (Wiley-Blackwell 1993).
  122. Berger, Joel W (5 May 1983). Induced abortion and social factors in wild horses. Nature 303: 59-61.
  123. Pluháček, Jan, Luděk Bartoš (2000). Male infanticide in captive plains zebra, Equus burchelli. Animal Behaviour 59: 689–694.
  124. Pluháček, Jan, Luděk Bartoš (2005). Further evidence for male infanticide and feticide in captive plains zebra, Equus burchelli. Folia Zool. 54 (3): 258–262.
  125. JW, Fitzpatrick, JF Turner Jr. (October 1991). Changes in herd stallions among feral horse bands and the absence of forced copulation and induced abortion. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 29 (3): 217-219.
  126. Agoramoorthy, G., S. M. Mohnot, V. Sommer and A. Srivastava (August 1988). Abortions in free ranging Hanuman langurs (Presbytis entellus) — a male induced strategy?. Human Evolution 3 (4): 297-308.

External links

Find more information on abortion by searching Wikipedia's sister projects:

Wiktionary-logo-en Dictionary definitions from Wiktionary
Wikibooks-logo Textbooks from Wikibooks
Wikiquote-logo Quotations from Wikiquote
Wikisource-logo Source texts from Wikisource
Commons-logo Images and media from Commons
Wikinews-logo News stories from Wikinews

The following information resources may be created by those with a non-neutral position in the abortion debate:

Template:Birth control methods


This page uses Creative Commons Licensed content from Wikipedia (view authors).